Einstein was an atheist. ACTUALLY EINSTEIN WAS AN IDIOT

nightbat wrote

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
(Bill Sheppard) wrote:

snipped by ducky

Puddleduck
Please tell me your physics
qualifications.

Officer William Sheppard
#1, I managed to escape the 'space-as-void' indoctrination.


Puddleduck
Ah, none - you are a space cadet.


nightbat

Wrong bird brain, ah is a well known auk distinguished coffee
boy while Officer oc is a most distinguished fellow Earth Science Team
Officer of first magnitude. While you are the Captain's stowfiled PhD
(Please help Ducky) failed space cadet, Officer oc has Net Captain
General granted and awarded honorary degrees from Indy Base One Science
Net Space Academy. Bachelor of Science Summa cum Laude, Master of
Physics, Astronomy and Cosmology cum Laude, Ph.D. of Net AstroPhysics
and Deep Field co Peer Investigative Formulation Dynamics, Captain's
Staff Officer List, Deans list, and Presidential highest honors Citation
Award. While you are a self admitted net duck, so get back to the end of
the line with the rest of the clueless wonders and wait for 2012. Maybe
Officer Warhol will take your junior cadet reapplication at that time,
maybe not.

at ease imagined baby duck,
the nightbat

In article ,
nightbat wrote:


Wrong bird brain, ah is a well known auk distinguished coffee
boy while Officer oc is a most distinguished fellow Earth Science Team
Officer of first magnitude. While you are the Captain's stowfiled PhD
(Please help Ducky) failed space cadet,

Oh what a shame, you hate people pointing out your idiotic childish
nonsense!

Officer oc has Net Captain
General granted and awarded honorary degrees from Indy Base One Science
Net Space Academy. Bachelor of Science Summa cum Laude, Master of
Physics, Astronomy and Cosmology cum Laude, Ph.D. of Net AstroPhysics
and Deep Field co Peer Investigative Formulation Dynamics,

Ah, free from a packet of cereal then?

Captain's
Staff Officer List, Deans list, and Presidential highest honors Citation
Award. While you are a self admitted net duck, so get back to the end of
the line with the rest of the clueless wonders and wait for 2012. Maybe
Officer Warhol will take your junior cadet reapplication at that time,
maybe not.

Oh god, and they say tv doesn't affect people... This is just so sad and
pathetic I can't stop laughing. You ever kissed a girl Nightbat? I guess
not.

--

Just \int_0^\infty du it!

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

From Pudsterino:
Oh god, and they say tv doesn't affect
people... This is just so sad and pathetic
I can't stop laughing. You ever kissed a
girl Nightbat? I guess not.

Wowie gee Pudster, you sound all of maybe 14. But you're doin' a lot
better than db who hasn't graduated Romper Room yet. Now why don't you
just take a hike er, waddle?

Seriously though, while Pud is relatively benign, it's amazing that the
thread has progressed this far unmolested by the usual contingent of
mutts, maggots and morphodytes. But they're probably gonna descend en
masse any minute now. (-:

oc

In article ,
(Bill Sheppard) wrote:

Wowie gee Pudster, you sound all of maybe 14. But you're doin' a lot
better than db who hasn't graduated Romper Room yet. Now why don't you
just take a hike er, waddle?

Um no.


Seriously though, while Pud is relatively benign, it's amazing that the
thread has progressed this far unmolested by the usual contingent of
mutts, maggots and morphodytes. But they're probably gonna descend en
masse any minute now. (-:


Ah, did they disturb you imaging you're superheroes on your spaceship?

--
You know you've arrived when you've annoyed the cranks! Crank Hater proves his
stupidity here!

http://groups.google.gr/group/sci.ph...76a3a4b?&hl=en

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article .com,
"Double-A" wrote:

If that were true, we would still be centuries ahead of you!

Double-A

But as you said it isnt true. You're a bunch of no hoper social misfits
without a physics qualification between you, producing a mishmash of
poor scifi and even poorer science (though I taint the word by even
mentioning it in the same sentence as your moronic ramblings) which has
no congruence with reality at all.

But you keep on washing nightbats ass with your tounge AA- I guess
double-A stands for Asshole Astronomer? Even if it did, the second part
is still incorrect.


This sounds strange coming from a guy who has been working so hard at
kissing Art Deco's ass lately! Always good for seconds, Puddles?

You know, it won't get you anywhere in the long run. Just ask Michael
Baldwin, Bruce.

Double-A

In article om,
"Double-A" wrote:


This sounds strange coming from a guy who has been working so hard at
kissing Art Deco's ass lately! Always good for seconds, Puddles?


Always one step behind aren't you AA, so you reply with an almost
canonical IKYABWAI...

You know, it won't get you anywhere in the long run. Just ask Michael
Baldwin, Bruce.

Listen, I can hear nightbat squeezing out another nugget. Run AA Run!

--
You know you've arrived when you've annoyed the cranks! Crank Hater proves his
stupidity here!

http://groups.google.gr/group/sci.ph...76a3a4b?&hl=en

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

In article , Phineas T Puddleduck wrote:
In article ,
nightbat wrote:

nightbat

Profound Science Team Officers please escort this self admitted
quack duck out to the vacuum low IQ mental stowfile for he is so far off
deep theoretical field reality base he wouldn't understand real
alt.astronomy versus if Hollywood Captain Kirk smacked him on his
feathered behind

BWAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA

Free clue for you kooky boy. My PhD application went in last week. I was
born knowing more astronomy then you sad ******s.

Just curious, but where was this "PhD application" sent, who is the PhD
superviser and what project are you intending to carry out? Or are you
saying you've already done the research, written a thesis, defended it,
and you've sent in an application for a PhD?

"Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote...
in message news
In article ,
"Painius" wrote:

The center of our galaxy is roughly 30,000 light
years away. How long does it take the influence
from this tremendous gravity well to be felt by our
Solar System? At the speed of gravity set forth by
Van Flandern...

47.5 seconds!

It may very well be this delay that explains why
the galaxy arms revolve around the center of the
galaxy the way they do!

Utter, utter rubbish.

And you're certain of this because . . . (?)

--
Give the Devil an inch, and he'll take your Smile!

Indelibly yours,
Paine
http://www.savethechildren.org/
http://www.painellsworth.net

"Phineas T Puddleduck" wrote...
in message news
In article ,
(Bill Sheppard) wrote:

Apparently you have a very superficial knowledge base. You seem unaware
that Einstein fully endorsed the reality of the spatial medium until
well into the 1920s before inexplicably flip-flopping to the 'no medium'
idea which then grew legs and became the bedrock axiom of science.. all
in the space of scarcely 80 years. Can you explain the flip-flop?

His work with GR...

The 'ether', as it was known to Einstein, was depicted
as fixed and immobile, like a rigid lattice. Yet the existance of such a
medium was disproven by Michelson-Morley in 1887. He FINALLY rejected
it, and rightly so. But why did he continue endorsing it for 35+ years
before doing so?
Why, instead of further investigating a medium that's
FLUID, compressible/expansible and amenalble to density gradients, did
Einstein suddenly "throw out the baby with the bathwater" and go with
'no medium'? Why did he instead adopt the "curvature of space" metaphor?

Scientists often try various ideas before settling on the one that
works. The whole early 20th century science was already in flux thanks
to Maxwell....

LOL on that last pun!

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
The best things in life are here and now!

Indelibly yours,
Paine
http://www.savethechildren.org/
http://www.painellsworth.net

"John Zinni" wrote in message
ups.com...

The problem with making crap up out of thin air is that it is usually
inconsistent with crap someone else makes up out of thin air.

The problem with saying things like this is that
you leave an explanation up in the air like a fart.

You've done this before, John, and yet every time
i challenge you to explain why you think flowing
space is crap, you run away.

The process of dicking around new ideas is not
so difficult to understand, John. oc posts a new
idea based upon those of Gordon Wolter. Some
of us come along and get him to give us more
detail so we can better understand these new
and attractive ideas. In so doing, we come up
with our own ideas, some of which may be very
different from those of Wolter and Sheppard.

In tossing these ideas around in a harmonious
manner, more light may be shed upon the basic
ideas. You're perfectly allowed to be skeptical,
as these ideas go counter to presently accepted
theory.

However, if all you can do is talk out your asshole
and call it "crap", without one iota of reason why,
then how is your stand any better? You've never
been able to adequately explain just what it is
about space that's "expanding", "curving" and
"accelerating". So why not start there, John. If
it's truly all "crap", then why can't you tell people
*why* you think it's crap???

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
The best things in life are here and now!

Indelibly yours,
Paine
http://www.savethechildren.org/
http://www.painellsworth.net