A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Doppler Effect Disproves Einstein



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 5th 17, 12:46 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Doppler Effect Disproves Einstein

When the initially stationary observer starts moving towards the light source with speed v, the frequency he measures becomes

f' = (c+v)/λ

http://www.hep.man.ac.uk/u/roger/PHY.../lecture18.pdf
"Moving Observer. Now suppose the source is fixed but the observer is moving towards the source, with speed v. In time t, ct/λ waves pass a fixed point. A moving point adds another vt/λ. So f'=(c+v)/λ."

On the other hand, the speed of the light relative to the moving observer is

c' = λf'

Combining the two formulas gives

c' = c+v

in violation of Einstein's relativity.

Barlow's lecture quoted above introduces relativistic corrections (time dilation) and the frequency measured by the moving observer becomes

f' = γ(c+v)/λ

The speed of the light relative to the moving observer is, accordingly,

c' = λf' = γ(c+v)

Clearly, Einstein's relativity is violated even if the relativistic corrections are taken into account.

In order to prevent Divine Albert's Divine Theory from collapsing, Einsteinians avoid the dangerous formula

f' = γ(c+v)/λ

and teach the equivalent relation

f'/f = sqrt((1+v/c)/(1-v/c))

where the variation of the speed of light is somewhat hidden.

Pentcho Valev
  #2  
Old February 5th 17, 09:04 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Doppler Effect Disproves Einstein

Einstein's 1905 postulate that the speed of light is independent of the speed of the light source was false but easy to believe in 1905, insofar as that was a tenet of the ether theory. Combined with the principle of relativity, however, this postulate entails the idiotic conclusion that the speed of light is independent of the speed of the observer as well - an absurdity no sane scientist would ever accept. Einstein knew the conclusion was nonsense and for a long time wrestled with it in despair, but in the end he found it profitable to introduce the nonsense:

https://perimeterinstitute.ca/videos...le-principle-2
Richard Epp: "For an observer at rest, the speed of light is c, independent of the motion of the source" is natural and easy to believe. (...) "For a source at rest, the speed of light is c, independent of the motion of the observer," which Einstein did not assume, because it is very hard to understand how it could be true."

http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/...relativity.htm
John Stachel: "But this seems to be nonsense. How can it happen that the speed of light relative to an observer cannot be increased or decreased if that observer moves towards or away from a light beam? Einstein states that he wrestled with this problem over a lengthy period of time, to the point of despair."

That the speed of light varies with the speed of the observer is obvious - so obvious that Einsteinians often teach it, forgetting that the variation is fatal for Divine Albert's Divine Theory:

http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/doppler
Albert Einstein Institute: "The frequency of a wave-like signal - such as sound or light - depends on the movement of the sender and of the receiver. This is known as the Doppler effect. [...] Here is an animation of the receiver moving towards the source:

http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ler_static.gif (stationary receiver)

http://www.einstein-online.info/imag...ector_blue.gif (moving receiver)

By observing the two indicator lights, you can see for yourself that, once more, there is a blue-shift - the pulse frequency measured at the receiver is somewhat higher than the frequency with which the pulses are sent out. This time, the distances between subsequent pulses are not affected, but still there is a frequency shift: As the receiver moves towards each pulse, the time until pulse and receiver meet up is shortened. In this particular animation, which has the receiver moving towards the source at one third the speed of the pulses themselves, four pulses are received in the time it takes the source to emit three pulses." [end of quotation]

Since "four pulses are received in the time it takes the source to emit three pulses", the speed of the pulses relative to the receiver (observer) is greater than their speed relative to the source, in violation of Einstein's relativity.

Pentcho Valev
  #3  
Old February 7th 17, 09:42 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Doppler Effect Disproves Einstein

When the observer starts moving towards the light source, the wavecrests start hitting him more frequently, which means that their speed relative to him has increased, in violation of Einstein's relativity:

http://physics.bu.edu/~redner/211-sp...9_doppler.html
"Let's say you, the observer, now move toward the source with velocity vO. You encounter more waves per unit time than you did before. Relative to you, the waves travel at a higher speed: v'=v+vO. The frequency of the waves you detect is higher, and is given by: f'=v'/λ=(v+vO)/λ."

http://a-levelphysicstutor.com/wav-doppler.php
"vO is the velocity of an observer moving towards the source. This velocity is independent of the motion of the source. Hence, the velocity of waves relative to the observer is c + vO. (...) The motion of an observer does not alter the wavelength. The increase in frequency is a result of the observer encountering more wavelengths in a given time."

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE
"Doppler effect - when an observer moves toward a stationary source. When an observer moves toward a stationary source, the period of the wave emitted by a source is shorter and the observed frequency is higher. Because the velocity of the wave relative to the observer is faster than that when it is still."

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Even Relativistic Doppler Effect Topples Einstein's Relativity Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 March 11th 16 03:32 PM
DOPPLER EFFECT WIPES OUT EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 September 15th 14 07:16 AM
EINSTEIN'S RELATIVITY INCOMPATIBLE WITH DOPPLER EFFECT Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 August 15th 14 04:01 PM
DOPPLER DISPROVES EINSTEIN Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 January 31st 14 04:42 PM
DOPPLER EFFECT IN EINSTEIN ZOMBIE WORLD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 October 27th 08 08:47 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.