|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
On Dec 12, 5:31*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
...my thinking has always been that gravity created the other forces we thus must thank gravity for making the universe just right for us. But what created (creates) gravity, Bert? Mayhaps Darla can fill us in (benn down this road before with her in years past). (: oc |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
Fergot to ask- has Darla now officially rescinded her claim of alien-
hood? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
On Dec 13, 11:51*am, jughead wrote:
Fergot to ask- has Darla now officially rescinded her claim of alien- hood? Darla is just another Rothschild kosher fart in the wind. ~ BG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
On Dec 13, 11:51*am, jughead wrote:
Fergot to ask- has Darla now officially rescinded her claim of alien- hood? Au contraire, reaffirmed it! But Darla has acknowledged and never said anything negative about the flowing space theory. Double-A |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
"jughead" wrote in message
... "jughead" wrote in message ... On Dec 12, 5:31 am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote: ...my thinking has always been that gravity created the other forces we thus must thank gravity for making the universe just right for us. But what created (creates) gravity, Bert? Mayhaps Darla can fill us in (benn down this road before with her in years past). (: oc Fergot to ask- has Darla now officially rescinded her claim of alien- hood? I am not from here, as you know, "jughead". Since I've lived here for a very long time, then in a sense I can claim citizenship by having been "grandfathered in". Earth science has postulated that electron-positron (antielectron) pairs are manufactured constantly in space. This is not entirely true. Where such pairs are made depends upon the amount of photon energy that's available. What is actually manufactured constantly are quark-antiquark pairs. If enough energy is involved, these might then become as electron-antielectron pairs. It takes far less energy to produce q-aq pairs than it does to produce e-ae pairs. So there are q-aq pairs constantly appearing and then disappearing that construct and comprise the energy field called gravitational energy. It is the very fast spin speed of these quarks combined with their varying periods of existence and their quantity that determine the speeds at which they move through the gravitational field, and thereby determine the strength of that field. The closer they get to existing matter (ultimately comprised of quarks), the faster is their speed and the stronger is the intensity of their energy field. So, the energy does not itself "flow" as previously surmised. It has the appearance of flowing due to the effect of the q-aq pairs in motion. Unfortunately, Earth physics has no way of confirming this, since there are presently no ways of sensing those elusive quarks and antiquarks. They appear and disappear far too quickly to be physically sensed by your instruments. Yet their effect can certainly be sensed. This is very basic and largely oversimplified, however you hopefully get the gist. If my description above raises questions, then "shoot". -- **** Darla Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
"jughead" wrote in message ... Fergot to ask- has Darla now officially rescinded her claim of alien- hood? "His" claim. 'Darla' is a man. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
Darla First question that jumps to mind is. Does the strong force
only act upon only this quark particle? Bert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
"G=EMC^2 Glazier" wrote in message ... Darla First question that jumps to mind is. Does the strong force only act upon only this quark particle? Bert The quarks that make up the particles of an atom, think of them as "tame" quarks, rely upon the weak nuclear force. This might give you some idea of the minimal strength needed for the forming and interaction of quark-antiquark pairs throughout the universe. You might think of those q-aq pairs as "wild" quarks. The strong nuclear force on the other hand interacts with the whole proton(s), similar to interacting with the whole Earth instead of with just a lump of clay, and as you know, is needed to overcome the repellent forces between two or more like-charged particles in an atom's nucleus. -- **** Darla Be well and come... be welcome You are the fifth star! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
On Dec 14, 5:46*am, (G=EMC^2 Glazier) wrote:
Darla *First question that jumps to mind is. * Does the strong force only act upon only this quark particle? * Bert Conditional or selective forces do not exist. But then your Darla can fix most anything to suit their mindset. Seans don't seem to have laws of physics other than those which are conditional. ~ BG |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
What if (on Cosmic Chance)
"Darla" wrote in message g.com... The quarks that make up the particles of an atom, think of them as "tame" quarks, rely upon the weak nuclear force. How do you catch a unique quark? Unique up on it! How do you catch a unique gluon? The tame way! |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
What if (on Cosmic Chance) | Darla[_3_] | Misc | 11 | December 26th 09 06:01 AM |
What if (on Cosmic Chance) | Mark Earnest | Misc | 4 | December 14th 09 06:35 AM |
What if (on Cosmic Chance) | Double-A[_3_] | Misc | 2 | December 13th 09 01:23 AM |