|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
practicum on light
they are very simple, quadratic theories,
only obfuscated by historical impediments: a) doctor Teimennspacenn's bogus slogans about phase-spaces; b) belief in Pascal's absolute vacuum and c) thereby-necessitated "newtonian rocks o'light . *_____ *SR & GR is Physics by "Hear-say"______. http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.co...odynamics.html |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Abuse of Scientific Methods
On Jun 5, 5:25*pm, "hanson" wrote:
"Koobee Wublee" wrote: On Jun 5, 1:43 pm, Fatso Absolutely Testicle wrote: On 6/5/2013 11:25 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote: Does anyone object to Richard Feynman’s definition of scientific method? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPapE-3FRw Applying scientific methods to special relativity (SR), one finds all experiments have not falsified this hypothesis, and the feat is exactly why self-styled physicists worship SR. *shrug Self-styled physicists then proceed to preach the value of SR and urge everyone to study. *However, studying is what they have not done. *If so, they would have realized the Voigt transform, Larmor’s transform, and infinite others do also satisfy in every single experimental result that validates SR including satisfying the null results of the Michelson-Morley experiment. *If the self-styled physicists have studied beyond the textbooks, they would have realized these transformations other than SR say the absolute frame of reference must exist which make them the antitheses to SR. shrug https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...ransformations IN SCIENCE, ANY HYPOTHESIS CANNOT COEXIST WITH ITS ANTITHESES. Thus, bringing up any experiments that satisfy both SR and its antitheses is just a waste of time and ludicrous. *EFFECTIVELY, SR HAS NEVER BEEN VALIDATED BY ANY EXPERIMENT. *shrug Mathematically, SR and its antitheses are mutually drastically different. *At some boundary within the domain of applicability, predictions will start to diverge, and these domains have not yet explored by science. *Self-styled physicists seem to be very afraid of going there. *shrug Does Koobee Wublee see Tom sweating lead? *shrug not likely. you haven't demonstrated anything yet. KW wrote: Koobee Wublee does not have to demonstrate the experimental results produced by the self-styled physicists. *Tom has already acknowledged that SR and its antitheses are indistinguishable given today’s technology. *shrug http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/6e6f9bf6fff... hanson wrote: KW, one of the highlights in your link above are the comments when "Fatso" rolled around & called himself "Big Dog" as seen in example:... Big Dog"'s Dawg**** also omits to mention that Roberts already said "uncle" to KW, and then [TR:] puts it rather eloquently, that: [TR:] _ *"SR/GR happen to be "META-Theories"_, iow: . * ____ *Relativity *is a theory about a theory.____, iow: . *_____ *SR & GR is Physics by "Hear-say"______. Thank you for pointing this out. Please keep up with the great works. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/spring01/Electrodynamics.html
it's just quadratic eqautions,
completely verified insofar as not pertinent to a) == plasma physics, and b) stringtheory. . *_____ *SR & GR is Physics by "Hear-say"______. http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.co...odynamics.html |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Abuse of Scientific Methods
On 6/5/2013 6:42 PM, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Jun 5, 1:43 pm, Absolutely Testicle wrote: On 6/5/2013 11:25 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote: Does anyone object to Richard Feynman’s definition of scientific method? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPapE-3FRw Applying scientific methods to special relativity (SR), one finds all experiments have not falsified this hypothesis, and the feat is exactly why self-styled physicists worship SR. shrug Self-styled physicists then proceed to preach the value of SR and urge everyone to study. However, studying is what they have not done. If so, they would have realized the Voigt transform, Larmor’s transform, and infinite others do also satisfy in every single experimental result that validates SR including satisfying the null results of the Michelson-Morley experiment. If the self-styled physicists have studied beyond the textbooks, they would have realized these transformations other than SR say the absolute frame of reference must exist which make them the antitheses to SR. shrug https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...ransformations IN SCIENCE, ANY HYPOTHESIS CANNOT COEXIST WITH ITS ANTITHESES. Thus, bringing up any experiments that satisfy both SR and its antitheses is just a waste of time and ludicrous. EFFECTIVELY, SR HAS NEVER BEEN VALIDATED BY ANY EXPERIMENT. shrug Mathematically, SR and its antitheses are mutually drastically different. At some boundary within the domain of applicability, predictions will start to diverge, and these domains have not yet explored by science. Self-styled physicists seem to be very afraid of going there. shrug Does Koobee Wublee see Tom sweating lead? shrug not likely. you haven't demonstrated anything yet. Koobee Wublee does not have to demonstrate the experimental results produced by the self-styled physicists. Tom has already acknowledged that SR and its antitheses are indistinguishable given today’s technology. shrug http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6f9bf6fff69aae don't flatter yourself. tom was not referring to the different transforms you are referring to. you have not backed up what you said, and you cannot. you are sniveling that someone else backs what you say, because you cannot, but you did not understand what he said either. If you want to deny the fact that so far any experiments have not uniquely verified SR, that is entirely your problem and yours only. [rest of repeating rants snipped] |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Abuse of Scientific Methods
Fatso, are you an "Absolutely Vertical"
fool and deaf, not to have understood what was said below? Fatso, get a hold of yourself, stop lamenting and avoid to become a total & complete laughingstock. Here, read it again: KW wrote: Koobee Wublee does not have to demonstrate the experimental results roduced by the self-styled physicists. Tom has already acknowledged that SR and its antitheses are indistinguishable given today’s technology. shrug http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6f9bf6fff69aae hanson wrote: KW, one of the highlights in your link above are the comments when "Fatso" rolled around & called himself "Big Dog" as seen in example:... Big Dog"'s Dawg**** also omits to mention that Roberts already said "uncle" to KW, and then [TR:] puts it rather eloquently, that: [TR:] _ "SR/GR happen to be "META-Theories"_, iow: .. ____ Relativity is a theory about a theory.____, iow: .. _____ SR & GR is Physics by "Hear-say"______. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
relativity is s simple, a fifth-grader can do it -- without freakin spacetime
koobydoobydoo has no theory, at all;
he hides behind quadratic equationary, but is unable to express "what they mean, the same as hahahanson, the Biggest Dingleberry, ever to be seen in local Universe. they are stuck in Minkowski's butttime -- poor Minkowski! http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/ |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Abuse of Scientific Methods
On Jun 5, 6:21 pm, Absolutely Testicle wrote:
On 6/5/2013 11:25 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote: Does anyone object to Richard Feynman’s definition of scientific method? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPapE-3FRw Applying scientific methods to special relativity (SR), one finds all experiments have not falsified this hypothesis, and the feat is exactly why self-styled physicists worship SR. shrug Self-styled physicists then proceed to preach the value of SR and urge everyone to study. However, studying is what they have not done. If so, they would have realized the Voigt transform, Larmor’s transform, and infinite others do also satisfy in every single experimental result that validates SR including satisfying the null results of the Michelson-Morley experiment. If the self-styled physicists have studied beyond the textbooks, they would have realized these transformations other than SR say the absolute frame of reference must exist which make them the antitheses to SR. shrug https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...ransformations IN SCIENCE, ANY HYPOTHESIS CANNOT COEXIST WITH ITS ANTITHESES. Thus, bringing up any experiments that satisfy both SR and its antitheses is just a waste of time and ludicrous. EFFECTIVELY, SR HAS NEVER BEEN VALIDATED BY ANY EXPERIMENT. shrug Mathematically, SR and its antitheses are mutually drastically different. At some boundary within the domain of applicability, predictions will start to diverge, and these domains have not yet explored by science. Self-styled physicists seem to be very afraid of going there. shrug Koobee Wublee does not have to demonstrate the experimental results produced by the self-styled physicists. Tom has already acknowledged that SR and its antitheses are indistinguishable given today’s technology. shrug http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6f9bf6fff69aae If PD aka absolutely imbecile wants to deny the fact that so far any experiments have not uniquely verified SR, that is entirely its problem and its only. don't flatter yourself. tom was not referring to the different transforms you are referring to. Is PD aka absolutely imbecile aka the little bitch Tom’s bitch now? Why doesn’t PD aka absolutely imbecile let Tom speak for himself? shrug you have not backed up what you said, and you cannot. PD aka absolutely imbecile just does not get it, Koobee Wublee is sure that is one of the reasons why it was fired as a professor of physics at University of Texas. shrug The self-styled physicists do not study. They stopped at the Lorentz transform without understanding how it was derived in the first place. In doing so, they mystically attributed this divine act of miracle to their god aka Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar, and the works prior to their god’s presence was conveniently forgotten. On the other hand, Koobee Wublee has gone beyond the Lorentz transform and has studied on the previous manifestations of this transform like a true scientist should have done in the first place. Not knowing about the existence of the antitheses to SR, they have bet their lives on the Lorentz transform. shrug The so-called co-moderator of sci.physics.research realized immediately that if the post were to be published over there, his “great works” on particle physics would be greatly compromised. As predicted, he is behaving like a priest from Ancient Nile delta attempting to desperately maintain to his elite status quo. shrug Eventually, SR will be trashcanned due to its stupidity, and the self- styled physicists’ names will be dragged in mud. If that will happen anyway, the self-styled physicists might as well milk the system as much as they can until they are booted out. shrug A few, like Tom, would cling on to a thread of hope believing that someday experiments will validate only SR and not its antitheses. If they actually do their own diligence and study like what Tom has suggested all to do, they will realize SR is just full of mathematical inconsistencies which Koobee Wublee has addressed each one many times over in these newsgroups. The chance of salvation by a future experiment is indeed a pipe dream. shrug How does Koobee Wublee know and understand how the self-styled physicists think? :-) [rest of repeating rants snipped] |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Abuse of Scientific Methods
On 6/6/2013 1:01 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Jun 5, 6:21 pm, Absolutely Testicle wrote: On 6/5/2013 11:25 AM, Koobee Wublee wrote: Does anyone object to Richard Feynman’s definition of scientific method? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPapE-3FRw Applying scientific methods to special relativity (SR), one finds all experiments have not falsified this hypothesis, and the feat is exactly why self-styled physicists worship SR. shrug Self-styled physicists then proceed to preach the value of SR and urge everyone to study. However, studying is what they have not done. If so, they would have realized the Voigt transform, Larmor’s transform, and infinite others do also satisfy in every single experimental result that validates SR including satisfying the null results of the Michelson-Morley experiment. If the self-styled physicists have studied beyond the textbooks, they would have realized these transformations other than SR say the absolute frame of reference must exist which make them the antitheses to SR. shrug https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...ransformations IN SCIENCE, ANY HYPOTHESIS CANNOT COEXIST WITH ITS ANTITHESES. Thus, bringing up any experiments that satisfy both SR and its antitheses is just a waste of time and ludicrous. EFFECTIVELY, SR HAS NEVER BEEN VALIDATED BY ANY EXPERIMENT. shrug Mathematically, SR and its antitheses are mutually drastically different. At some boundary within the domain of applicability, predictions will start to diverge, and these domains have not yet explored by science. Self-styled physicists seem to be very afraid of going there. shrug Koobee Wublee does not have to demonstrate the experimental results produced by the self-styled physicists. Tom has already acknowledged that SR and its antitheses are indistinguishable given today’s technology. shrug http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6f9bf6fff69aae If PD aka absolutely imbecile wants to deny the fact that so far any experiments have not uniquely verified SR, that is entirely its problem and its only. don't flatter yourself. tom was not referring to the different transforms you are referring to. Is PD aka absolutely imbecile aka the little bitch Tom’s bitch now? Why doesn’t PD aka absolutely imbecile let Tom speak for himself? shrug you may have noticed that tom doesn't always respond to your foppishly tossed gauntlet. perhaps because you have nothing really to say other than ridiculous statements you cannot back up. you have not backed up what you said, and you cannot. PD aka absolutely imbecile just does not get it, Koobee Wublee is sure that is one of the reasons why it was fired as a professor of physics at University of Texas. shrug oh dear. sorry to have aggravated you to the point of guessing, and doing it badly. recall that the issue is that you made a ridiculous statement that you cannot back up. hence you will be forever known as the guy who makes ridiculous statements without backup. as you do throughout this response. nice verification. The self-styled physicists do not study. They stopped at the Lorentz transform without understanding how it was derived in the first place. In doing so, they mystically attributed this divine act of miracle to their god aka Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar, and the works prior to their god’s presence was conveniently forgotten. On the other hand, Koobee Wublee has gone beyond the Lorentz transform and has studied on the previous manifestations of this transform like a true scientist should have done in the first place. Not knowing about the existence of the antitheses to SR, they have bet their lives on the Lorentz transform. shrug The so-called co-moderator of sci.physics.research realized immediately that if the post were to be published over there, his “great works” on particle physics would be greatly compromised. As predicted, he is behaving like a priest from Ancient Nile delta attempting to desperately maintain to his elite status quo. shrug Eventually, SR will be trashcanned due to its stupidity, and the self- styled physicists’ names will be dragged in mud. If that will happen anyway, the self-styled physicists might as well milk the system as much as they can until they are booted out. shrug A few, like Tom, would cling on to a thread of hope believing that someday experiments will validate only SR and not its antitheses. If they actually do their own diligence and study like what Tom has suggested all to do, they will realize SR is just full of mathematical inconsistencies which Koobee Wublee has addressed each one many times over in these newsgroups. The chance of salvation by a future experiment is indeed a pipe dream. shrug How does Koobee Wublee know and understand how the self-styled physicists think? :-) [rest of repeating rants snipped] |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Abuse of Scientific Methods
Am 05.06.2013 18:25, schrieb Koobee Wublee:
Does anyone object to Richard Feynman’s definition of scientific method? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPapE-3FRw Well, Feynman was very sure of himself in every single speech and discussion, but please don’t let that intimidate you. If you think Feynman is wrong on the process leading to scientific methods, please do explain how. If not, please continue.shrug Applying scientific methods to special relativity (SR), one finds all experiments have not falsified this hypothesis, and the feat is exactly why self-styled physicists worship SR.shrug Self-styled physicists then proceed to preach the value of SR and urge everyone to study. However, studying is what they have not done. If so, they would have realized the Voigt transform, Larmor’s transform, and infinite others do also satisfy in every single experimental result that validates SR including satisfying the null results of the Michelson-Morley experiment. If the self-styled physicists have studied beyond the textbooks, they would have realized these transformations other than SR say the absolute frame of reference must exist which make them the antitheses to SR.shrug https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:M...ztransform.svg This a Minkowski diagramm of a light cone. If c is constant, than the term 'space' must refer to the light-cone and not to what is called x. We see things in our own past light cone and cannot see into the direction called x. Since with a Lorentz transform the 'real' direction of x changes, that direction is not 'real' neither. So 'space' is just an observation and that is relative. Movement does not make trains shorter or seconds longer, but enable a view into a different world. The flaw of SRT is, that it depends on a preferred 'inertial' FoR. This does not exist and we have acceleration as mayor influence on time, not movement. This is proven by experiments like that at the Harvard towers. Or the so called Pioneer anomaly could be understood that way. The 'twin paradox' could be solved that way, too, since the effect of 'time-dilation' is compensated by 'time-contraction' then (because of deceleration). Next flaw is the speedlimit of c, since the angle 45° (in the diagram) refers to c and the direction x to infinite velocity. We cannot see infinite velocity (because light moves with c). But this does not mean, such relation do not exist. We have in fact a spectrum of velocity, from zero to infinity. Zero is the feature of a mass and infinity the feature of a static field. Both combined make an atom. Since the direction x is relative, this would mean, that matter is 'relative', too. TH |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Abuse of Scientific Methods
On Jun 6, 5:31 am, Absolutely Testicle wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote: Does anyone object to Richard Feynman’s definition of scientific method? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYPapE-3FRw Applying scientific methods to special relativity (SR), one finds all experiments have not falsified this hypothesis, and the feat is exactly why self-styled physicists worship SR. shrug Self-styled physicists then proceed to preach the value of SR and urge everyone to study. However, studying is what they have not done. If so, they would have realized the Voigt transform, Larmor’s transform, and infinite others do also satisfy in every single experimental result that validates SR including satisfying the null results of the Michelson-Morley experiment. If the self-styled physicists have studied beyond the textbooks, they would have realized these transformations other than SR say the absolute frame of reference must exist which make them the antitheses to SR. shrug https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histor...ransformations IN SCIENCE, ANY HYPOTHESIS CANNOT COEXIST WITH ITS ANTITHESES. Thus, bringing up any experiments that satisfy both SR and its antitheses is just a waste of time and ludicrous. EFFECTIVELY, SR HAS NEVER BEEN VALIDATED BY ANY EXPERIMENT. shrug Mathematically, SR and its antitheses are mutually drastically different. At some boundary within the domain of applicability, predictions will start to diverge, and these domains have not yet explored by science. Self-styled physicists seem to be very afraid of going there. shrug Koobee Wublee does not have to demonstrate the experimental results produced by the self-styled physicists. Tom has already acknowledged that SR and its antitheses are indistinguishable given today’s technology. shrug http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6f9bf6fff69aae If PD aka absolutely imbecile wants to deny the fact that so far any experiments have not uniquely verified SR, that is entirely its problem and its only. you may have noticed that tom doesn't always respond to your foppishly tossed gauntlet. perhaps because you have nothing really to say other than ridiculous statements you cannot back up. Why does Tom not reply? Because he knows he has failed as a professional experimental physicist, and Koobee Wublee won’t let him get away with bull****. shrug The self-styled physicists do not study. They stopped at the Lorentz transform without understanding how it was derived in the first place. In doing so, they mystically attributed this divine act of miracle to their god aka Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar, and the works prior to their god’s presence was conveniently forgotten. On the other hand, Koobee Wublee has gone beyond the Lorentz transform and has studied on the previous manifestations of this transform like a true scientist should have done in the first place. Not knowing about the existence of the antitheses to SR, they have bet their lives on the Lorentz transform. shrug The so-called co-moderator of sci.physics.research realized immediately that if the post were to be published over there, his “great works” on particle physics would be greatly compromised. As predicted, he is behaving like a priest from Ancient Nile delta attempting to desperately maintain to his elite status quo. shrug Eventually, SR will be trashcanned due to its stupidity, and the self- styled physicists’ names will be dragged in mud. If that will happen anyway, the self-styled physicists might as well milk the system as much as they can until they are booted out. shrug A few, like Tom, would cling on to a thread of hope believing that someday experiments will validate only SR and not its antitheses. If they actually do their own diligence and study like what Tom has suggested all to do, they will realize SR is just full of mathematical inconsistencies which Koobee Wublee has addressed each one many times over in these newsgroups. The chance of salvation by a future experiment is indeed a pipe dream. shrug recall that [rest of word diarrhea snipped] Recall that Koobee Wublee has told you that it is entirely your problem and yours alone if you do not study. shrug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Construction methods | Brian Gaff | Space Station | 1 | April 5th 13 12:30 AM |
multiscale methods | Statistica Sinica | UK Astronomy | 0 | February 11th 08 01:09 PM |
More Scientific Predictions From Profound Science Officers Becoming Scientific Based Real World Applied Extensions | Double-A[_1_] | Misc | 0 | May 23rd 07 06:49 PM |
More Scientific Predictions From Profound Science Officers Becoming Scientific Based Real World Applied Extensions | Double-A[_1_] | Misc | 0 | May 23rd 07 06:48 PM |
What is scientific reality? What is scientific understanding? | G=EMC^2 Glazier | Misc | 11 | February 5th 07 09:13 PM |