|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
When the sun becomes a white dwarf why will it take SO long to cool off?
-- "Ed" wrote in message oups.com... So are they diamonds yet? No, not yet And if so, what would they radiate or reflect being diamonds? They would reflect, although they'd also go through a very long period of radiating in the infra-red as the cooling process was finishing. One imagines a flat-looking crystalline landscape in glittering white diamond, dimly illuminated by starlight, though maybe carbon dioxide would be present there in some form too ? If we were to land there, in an attempt 'to walk on a star', we would be squashed flat and resemble badly cooked omelettes. Obviously I speak from ignorance, though in this I appear not to be alone. Very little work seems to have been done on what these 'dead stars' would actually be like. Bluebeard |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
When the sun becomes a white dwarf why will it take SO long to cool off?
Brian Tung wrote: Radium wrote: I've read about the sun's life cycle. Apparently, when the sun becomes a white dwarf, it will take at least a trillion years to completely cool off. Why such a long time? Because at that point, the Sun will still have a lot of heat left, but it will be radiating it much slower than it does now. A white dwarf is the hot exposed core of the progenitor star. As such, it contains most of the heat that was in the star at the time that it died. But the white dwarf radiates heat much slower than it did when the star was alive, simply because its surface area is so much smaller. The Sun as a white dwarf will be, let's say, 100 times smaller (by diameter) than it is now, meaning it will be 10,000 times smaller by area. To be sure, it will initially be quite hot, perhaps four times hotter (in kelvins) than it is now, so it'll radiate tens of times more energy per unit area than it does now. Still, that means that its overall rate of radiation (and therefore rate of cooling) will be several hundreds of times slower than it is now. That factor will only increase as the Sun cools down, and the rate at which it radiates off into space slows down. It will approach the cold of interstellar space only very slowly at the end. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html When the sun become a black dwarf, will it ever get a chance to cool to around 70 Fahrenheit? Or will it likely form another star before? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
When the sun becomes a white dwarf why will it take SO long to cool off?
I just wondered if there is a particular wavelength that just diamonds would re radiate? |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
When the sun becomes a white dwarf why will it take SO long to cool off?
"Radium" wrote in news:1156103700.335569.172140
@i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com: Brian Tung wrote: Radium wrote: I've read about the sun's life cycle. Apparently, when the sun becomes a white dwarf, it will take at least a trillion years to completely cool off. Why such a long time? Because at that point, the Sun will still have a lot of heat left, but it will be radiating it much slower than it does now. A white dwarf is the hot exposed core of the progenitor star. As such, it contains most of the heat that was in the star at the time that it died. But the white dwarf radiates heat much slower than it did when the star was alive, simply because its surface area is so much smaller. The Sun as a white dwarf will be, let's say, 100 times smaller (by diameter) than it is now, meaning it will be 10,000 times smaller by area. To be sure, it will initially be quite hot, perhaps four times hotter (in kelvins) than it is now, so it'll radiate tens of times more energy per unit area than it does now. Still, that means that its overall rate of radiation (and therefore rate of cooling) will be several hundreds of times slower than it is now. That factor will only increase as the Sun cools down, and the rate at which it radiates off into space slows down. It will approach the cold of interstellar space only very slowly at the end. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html When the sun become a black dwarf, will it ever get a chance to cool to around 70 Fahrenheit? Or will it likely form another star before? You can do the calculation yourself. Knowing the surface area of the dwarf, the specific heat of degenerate matter made of carbon and oxygen combined with the Stefan-Boltzmann law. i.e radiated power goes as the fourth power of temperature. That is good enough as a first approximation anyway. BTW, if a black dwarf manages to accumulate additional mass through accretion then it runs into a small problem once it reaches about 1.4 Solar masses. At that point, the pressure caused by the object's own gravity, can no longer be resisted by electron degeneracy pressure. This means that the dwarf starts to collapse but now all that Carbon and Oxygen is then available as fuel. Kablooooie. Type 1a supernova. Klazmon. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
When the sun becomes a white dwarf why will it take SO long to cool off?
Nope Klaz, I can't....if I could I'd be on top of Mauna Kea right now |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
When the sun becomes a white dwarf why will it take SO long to cool off?
Llanzlan Klazmon wrote: "Radium" wrote in news:1156103700.335569.172140 @i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com: Brian Tung wrote: Radium wrote: I've read about the sun's life cycle. Apparently, when the sun becomes a white dwarf, it will take at least a trillion years to completely cool off. Why such a long time? Because at that point, the Sun will still have a lot of heat left, but it will be radiating it much slower than it does now. A white dwarf is the hot exposed core of the progenitor star. As such, it contains most of the heat that was in the star at the time that it died. But the white dwarf radiates heat much slower than it did when the star was alive, simply because its surface area is so much smaller. The Sun as a white dwarf will be, let's say, 100 times smaller (by diameter) than it is now, meaning it will be 10,000 times smaller by area. To be sure, it will initially be quite hot, perhaps four times hotter (in kelvins) than it is now, so it'll radiate tens of times more energy per unit area than it does now. Still, that means that its overall rate of radiation (and therefore rate of cooling) will be several hundreds of times slower than it is now. That factor will only increase as the Sun cools down, and the rate at which it radiates off into space slows down. It will approach the cold of interstellar space only very slowly at the end. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html When the sun become a black dwarf, will it ever get a chance to cool to around 70 Fahrenheit? Or will it likely form another star before? You can do the calculation yourself. Knowing the surface area of the dwarf, the specific heat of degenerate matter made of carbon and oxygen combined with the Stefan-Boltzmann law. i.e radiated power goes as the fourth power of temperature. That is good enough as a first approximation anyway. BTW, if a black dwarf manages to accumulate additional mass through accretion then it runs into a small problem once it reaches about 1.4 Solar masses. At that point, the pressure caused by the object's own gravity, can no longer be resisted by electron degeneracy pressure. This means that the dwarf starts to collapse but now all that Carbon and Oxygen is then available as fuel. Kablooooie. Type 1a supernova. Correct me if I am wrong, but don't scientists beleive that the sun is not massive enough to become a supernova? Klazmon. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
When the sun becomes a white dwarf why will it take SO long to cool off?
Radium wrote:
Correct me if I am wrong, but don't scientists beleive that the sun is not massive enough to become a supernova? That latter part was after the "BTW" where Klazmon qualified it by requiring the white dwarf to have accumulated more than 1.4 solar masses of material. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
When the sun becomes a white dwarf why will it take SO long to cool off?
"Radium" wrote in
oups.com: Llanzlan Klazmon wrote: "Radium" wrote in news:1156103700.335569.172140 @i3g2000cwc.googlegroups.com: Brian Tung wrote: Radium wrote: I've read about the sun's life cycle. Apparently, when the sun becomes a white dwarf, it will take at least a trillion years to completely cool off. Why such a long time? Because at that point, the Sun will still have a lot of heat left, but it will be radiating it much slower than it does now. A white dwarf is the hot exposed core of the progenitor star. As such, it contains most of the heat that was in the star at the time that it died. But the white dwarf radiates heat much slower than it did when the star was alive, simply because its surface area is so much smaller. The Sun as a white dwarf will be, let's say, 100 times smaller (by diameter) than it is now, meaning it will be 10,000 times smaller by area. To be sure, it will initially be quite hot, perhaps four times hotter (in kelvins) than it is now, so it'll radiate tens of times more energy per unit area than it does now. Still, that means that its overall rate of radiation (and therefore rate of cooling) will be several hundreds of times slower than it is now. That factor will only increase as the Sun cools down, and the rate at which it radiates off into space slows down. It will approach the cold of interstellar space only very slowly at the end. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html When the sun become a black dwarf, will it ever get a chance to cool to around 70 Fahrenheit? Or will it likely form another star before? You can do the calculation yourself. Knowing the surface area of the dwarf, the specific heat of degenerate matter made of carbon and oxygen combined with the Stefan-Boltzmann law. i.e radiated power goes as the fourth power of temperature. That is good enough as a first approximation anyway. BTW, if a black dwarf manages to accumulate additional mass through accretion then it runs into a small problem once it reaches about 1.4 Solar masses. At that point, the pressure caused by the object's own gravity, can no longer be resisted by electron degeneracy pressure. This means that the dwarf starts to collapse but now all that Carbon and Oxygen is then available as fuel. Kablooooie. Type 1a supernova. Correct me if I am wrong, but don't scientists beleive that the sun is not massive enough to become a supernova? You are correct but I specifically said the dwarf accumulated additional matter till the point it reached 1.4 solar masses. Reread what I wrote. Klazmon. Klazmon. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
When the sun becomes a white dwarf why will it take SO long to cool off?
In article , Brian Tung wrote:
A white dwarf is the hot exposed core of the progenitor star. As such, it contains most of the heat that was in the star at the time that it died. But the white dwarf radiates heat much slower than it did when the star was alive, simply because its surface area is so much smaller. Why does smaller surface area mean less radiation? If each particle is radiating as much, what difference does it make how small a volume they are contained in? -- Richard |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
When the sun becomes a white dwarf why will it take SO long to cool off?
Richard Tobin wrote:
Why does smaller surface area mean less radiation? If each particle is radiating as much, what difference does it make how small a volume they are contained in? I think you're thinking of the white dwarf as an essentially transparent object, so that you can "see" the radiation of central particles just as easily as you can see that of the particles on the surface. If it were, then you'd be right, and the white dwarf would cool off much faster than it does in fact. But white dwarfs are opaque, so only the radiation from the surface gets out unimpeded. That from particles further in gets absorbed, keeping the white dwarf hot. -- Brian Tung The Astronomy Corner at http://astro.isi.edu/ Unofficial C5+ Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/c5plus/ The PleiadAtlas Home Page at http://astro.isi.edu/pleiadatlas/ My Own Personal FAQ (SAA) at http://astro.isi.edu/reference/faq.html |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
When the sun becomes a white dwarf why will it take SO long to cool off? | Radium | Astronomy Misc | 36 | September 6th 06 11:08 PM |
When the sun becomes a white dwarf why will it take SO long to cool off? | Radium | Misc | 36 | September 6th 06 11:08 PM |
BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Hubble weighs closest white dwarf | Nick | UK Astronomy | 19 | December 28th 05 10:11 AM |
Hubble and Einstein 'Weigh' Nearest White Dwarf Star | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 13th 05 04:22 PM |
Mystery Object Neither Star Nor Brown Dwarf (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 4 | October 10th 04 12:44 AM |