|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
New theory about cause of earthquakes
Gravity (space, energy, matter, charge, magnetism) is converting in
time. Hence gravitational force of any matter is decreasing. That is reason behind.. 1. decreasing acceleration of pioneer spacecrafts(KE - Time). 2. Expansion of universe, speeding away of galaxies. 3. Increase of distance between moon and earth. 4. Decrease in speed of revolution of earth around sun. 5. Cause of earthquakes. As gravity of nucleus-electrons of atom is decreasing, electrons are spiralling towards nucleus leading decrease of distance. Let us take simple ring made of matter. Circumference of ring is decreasing because of decrease of distance between electrons and nucleus. The result will be decrease in circumference and radius. In this process continuity of circumference i.e ring will be broken, pieces of ring will collapse toward centre of ring. We can expand this analogy to sphere and planets. Overall circumference of planets is decreasing which result in friction and stress of tactonic plates over each other which ultimately leads to rupture and earthquakes. And this is not limited just to earth. So troll theory prediction: earthquakes happens on all planets with solid crust. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
New theory about cause of earthquakes
Dear neo:
neo wrote: Gravity (space, energy, matter, charge, magnetism) is converting in time. Matter and charge appear to be constant over time. Hence gravitational force of any matter is decreasing. Gravity is not a force. What is less than zero? That is reason behind.. 1. decreasing acceleration of pioneer spacecrafts (KE - Time). Acceleration of pioneer spacecraft was constant within the error bars. Neither increasing nor decreasing. 2. Expansion of universe, speeding away of galaxies. 3. Increase of distance between moon and earth. 4. Decrease in speed of revolution of earth around sun. Some planets are not receding from the Sun. Why are they different? 5. Cause of earthquakes. Other trolls have patent on this. You should try for some untried territory. As gravity of nucleus-electrons of atom is decreasing, The nucleus is not bound by anything as weak as gravity. electrons are spiralling towards nucleus leading decrease of distance. If you imagine that gravity (as an attractive force) is weakening, why is it you believe the electrons will move inward? It should move outward, like all expansion. Let us take simple ring made of matter. Circumference of ring is decreasing because of decrease of distance between electrons and nucleus. The result will be decrease in circumference and radius. In this process continuity of circumference i.e ring will be broken, pieces of ring will collapse toward centre of ring. You've got your signs reversed. Expansion is expansion, not contraction. We can expand this analogy to sphere and planets. Overall circumference of planets is decreasing So far this is untrue. Planets and moons are still accumulating matter. which result in friction and stress of tactonic plates over each other which ultimately leads to rupture and earthquakes. Could still occur with expansion as well, if you think about it. "Bound stresses" could easily be released, to be jammed into some other place by "momentum". And this is not limited just to earth. So troll theory prediction: earthquakes happens on all planets with solid crust. Already patented by others. Try again. David A. Smith |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
New theory about cause of earthquakes
"dlzc" wrote in message oups.com... Dear neo: Hi David, neo wrote: Gravity (space, energy, matter, charge, magnetism) is converting in time. Matter and charge appear to be constant over time. Hence gravitational force of any matter is decreasing. Gravity is not a force. What is less than zero? I think English is not the poster's first language and reading between the lines I think it was meant that G was decreasing with time. That is reason behind.. 1. decreasing acceleration of pioneer spacecrafts (KE - Time). Acceleration of pioneer spacecraft was constant within the error bars. Neither increasing nor decreasing. Probably intended to be decreasing speed but that is the wrong way round, it should be increasing to be consistent with: 2. Expansion of universe, speeding away of galaxies. 3. Increase of distance between moon and earth. 4. Decrease in speed of revolution of earth around sun. .... As gravity of nucleus-electrons of atom is decreasing, .... electrons are spiralling towards nucleus leading decrease of distance. If you imagine that gravity (as an attractive force) is weakening, why is it you believe the electrons will move inward? It should move outward, like all expansion. Exactly, however, ... So troll theory prediction: earthquakes happens on ^^^^^ that was a bit of a giveaway, don't you think ;-) George |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
New theory about cause of earthquakes
Dear George Dishman:
George Dishman wrote: "dlzc" wrote in message oups.com... .... So troll theory prediction: earthquakes happens on ^^^^^ that was a bit of a giveaway, don't you think ;-) I acknowledged that he was trolling in my response to #5. But I didn't want him to get *no* response at all. Not too many chances for me to "help". Some are far over my head, and some are simply too silly for words. David A. Smith |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
New theory about cause of earthquakes
"dlzc" wrote in message ups.com... Dear George Dishman: George Dishman wrote: "dlzc" wrote in message oups.com... ... So troll theory prediction: earthquakes happens on ^^^^^ that was a bit of a giveaway, don't you think ;-) I acknowledged that he was trolling in my response to #5. But I didn't want him to get *no* response at all. It's always useful to make sure nobody gets fooled by such nonsense as it comes up in response to serious questions. Not too many chances for me to "help". Some are far over my head, and some are simply too silly for words. I don't think he wanted help, the whole lot is too silly to be anything but a joke. Still, I've seen much worse! George |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
New theory about cause of earthquakes
In article .com,
neo wrote: So troll theory prediction: earthquakes happens on all planets with solid crust. No, that's impossible. Earthquakes only occur on Earth...by definition. -- http://yosemitephotos.net/ |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
New theory about cause of earthquakes
In article .com,
dlzc wrote: Acceleration of pioneer spacecraft was constant within the error bars. Neither increasing nor decreasing. The acceleration never changed? Wow! That's some new physics. -- http://yosemitephotos.net/ |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
New theory about cause of earthquakes
Dear ellis:
wrote in message ... In article .com, dlzc wrote: Acceleration of pioneer spacecraft was constant within the error bars. Neither increasing nor decreasing. The acceleration never changed? Wow! That's some new physics. Which is why everyone is "excited" about this constant sunward anomalous acceleration. David A. Smith |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
New theory about cause of earthquakes
I'll stick with the giant catfish swimming beneath the earth.
(Asian traditional theory.) |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
New theory about cause of earthquakes
In article .com,
rick++ wrote: I'll stick with the giant catfish swimming beneath the earth. Chasing giant mousefish? |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
554 California Earthquakes Since August 28 | Raving Loonie | Misc | 3 | September 7th 05 07:59 AM |
the recent near miss and earthquakes | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 13 | December 31st 04 12:01 AM |
Earthquakes and the Moon | Jonathan Silverlight | Astronomy Misc | 12 | December 27th 04 11:46 PM |
Sunspots = Earthquakes | Starlord | Amateur Astronomy | 16 | November 21st 03 01:47 AM |