#32 Luminet team made an error just as Johns Hopkins made an error on

I was looking for the matter distribution of the Observable Cosmos as
to how much more dense
the galaxies are in the Great Wall Zones compared to our Local Group
of galaxies and I
happened to stumble on this website.

---quoting http://members.aol.com/newssciencepa..._univshape.htm
In the September 2004 issue of the research journal Astronomy &
Astrophysics, a group of researchers write that they has found “hints”
of the structure Luminet described. If space is structured this way,
researchers believe that the cosmic microwave background should
exhibit a specific pattern called “matched circles.” This means that
as we peer into space, certain areas of the radiation should look the
same as other areas.

(snipped)
One outcome of the hypersphere framework is that objects leaving one
face of the dodecahedron come back in the opposite face, but rotated
partially. To be exact, the amount of the rotation is 36 degrees,
which also happens to be the angle by which your direction would
change if you turned a corner while walking along the edge of a
pentagon.
--- end quoting ---

For years now, since Luminet team has reported their dodecahedron
result, I have given them
the benefit of the doubt that the Cosmos is 12 faced dodecahedron and
I have doubled or 2X
the 6 lobes of 5f6. So I adjusted the plutonium atom to accomodate the
Luminet findings.
Six lobes of a 5f6 would give a cube not a dodecahedron, so I altered
my theory of 5f6 by saying
it is easy to 2X the 6 lobes to get 12 faces. That somehow the lobes
of 6 turn into a 12 faced
dodecahedron.

But, after reading that website and noticing that the Luminet team
offers a Experimental Testing
as to whether the Observable Cosmos obeys a Dodecahredon or whether it
obeys a Cube.
And fortunately that website speaks of a experimental test. It talks
of the "Matching Circles Test"

Now, if Luminet team is correct of a dodecahedron then the angle of 36
degrees should be
prominent somewhere of Equality or Duality in physics. I know of not
one single case where
there is duality of a 36 degree angle.

What I do know for sure is that in EM theory that electricity equals
magnetism or is the dual
of one another. And the angle that separates Electricity from
Magnetism such as the transverse
light wave or the Oersted Experiment is a 90 degree angle. In other
words, Quantum Mechanics
duality of Electricity and Magnetism is a "Matching Circle" and that
matching circle is not a
36 degree angle expected in a Dodecahredon but rather a 90 degree
angle expected of a
Universe that is shaped as a Cube.

So the Luminet team made a mistake somewhere in their calculations
around with the Microwave
Background radiation and forgot to apply a 1/2 correction for it is
not 12 faces but 6 faces.
Similarly in the early 2000s a Johns Hopkins team announced the
Observable Cosmos has
a pale green color but a Rochester Optics team pointed out they
neglected a correction factor
and now it is widely known the Cosmos is a silvery white color close
to the color of what
a sample of the metal plutonium looks like.

So, ever since Luminet's team announced Dodecahedron, I have been
giving them the benefit
of doubt and fixing my Plutonium Atom Totality to accomodate a
Dodecahedron, but now
that I see there is a Experimental Test to decide on whether
Dodecahedron or Cube, I see
that the Luminet Team was in error and the Plutonium Atom Totality was
correct all along
with a 6 faced Cosmos as a 6 lobed figure.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies