|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Black hole content of ellipticals (was: Galaxies without dark
In article ,
Gene Partlow wrote: Has there been any *theoretical* work suggesting that some ellipticals should have an unusually low stellar mass black hole content...eg: because conditions exist which have suppressed formation of sufficiently high mass stars whose end states include the creation of bhs? If so, this would be circumstantial evidence for a bh/dark matter link of some sort. I don't know a direct answer to this question, but if you think that massive ellipticals are formed from the merger of smaller systems, including spirals, then there's no obvious reason why they should have many fewer stellar-mass black holes. As I understand it, the theory of what determines the initial mass function of stars in *any* kind of system is pretty sketchy -- perhaps someone who knows something about stars will come out of the woodwork and correct me at this point! Martin -- Martin Hardcastle Department of Physics, University of Bristol A little learning is a dangerous thing; / Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring; / There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain ... |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Black hole content of ellipticals (was: Galaxies without dark
In article ,
Gene Partlow wrote: Has there been any *theoretical* work suggesting that some ellipticals should have an unusually low stellar mass black hole content...eg: because conditions exist which have suppressed formation of sufficiently high mass stars whose end states include the creation of bhs? If so, this would be circumstantial evidence for a bh/dark matter link of some sort. I don't know a direct answer to this question, but if you think that massive ellipticals are formed from the merger of smaller systems, including spirals, then there's no obvious reason why they should have many fewer stellar-mass black holes. As I understand it, the theory of what determines the initial mass function of stars in *any* kind of system is pretty sketchy -- perhaps someone who knows something about stars will come out of the woodwork and correct me at this point! Martin -- Martin Hardcastle Department of Physics, University of Bristol A little learning is a dangerous thing; / Drink deep, or taste not the Pierian spring; / There shallow draughts intoxicate the brain ... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Black hole content of ellipticals (was: Galaxies without dark
Gene Partlow wrote in message
... Several elliptical galaxies (eg: M105) have apparently little or no dark matter content. Some theorists have conjectured that some dark matter is associated with stellar mass black holes, though this does not seem to be the case with our Milky Way spiral galaxy (viz: microlensing and x-ray surveys). However, if these ellipticals do have a unusually low total black hole mass content, that might be a check on the conjectured bh/dark matter link. Stellar mass black holes are notoriously difficult to detect at the distances of the ellipticals in question, so I have a backdoor 'theoretical' question: Has there been any *theoretical* work suggesting that some ellipticals should have an unusually low stellar mass black hole content...eg: because conditions exist which have suppressed formation of sufficiently high mass stars whose end states include the creation of bhs? If so, this would be circumstantial evidence for a bh/dark matter link of some sort. I have wondered if dark matter would always be present with matter, suggesting that it was a characteristic of matter itself that was not understood. I still think that it may be possible that there is a lack of understanding about the dynamics of systems that involve massive core concentrations. Does anyone know if these particular eliptical galaxies have concentrated cores? If they do not I wonder if it is possible to judge whether there is still a need for an external dark matter halo to explain their dynamics with other galaxies? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Black hole content of ellipticals (was: Galaxies without dark
Gene Partlow wrote in message
... Several elliptical galaxies (eg: M105) have apparently little or no dark matter content. Some theorists have conjectured that some dark matter is associated with stellar mass black holes, though this does not seem to be the case with our Milky Way spiral galaxy (viz: microlensing and x-ray surveys). However, if these ellipticals do have a unusually low total black hole mass content, that might be a check on the conjectured bh/dark matter link. Stellar mass black holes are notoriously difficult to detect at the distances of the ellipticals in question, so I have a backdoor 'theoretical' question: Has there been any *theoretical* work suggesting that some ellipticals should have an unusually low stellar mass black hole content...eg: because conditions exist which have suppressed formation of sufficiently high mass stars whose end states include the creation of bhs? If so, this would be circumstantial evidence for a bh/dark matter link of some sort. I have wondered if dark matter would always be present with matter, suggesting that it was a characteristic of matter itself that was not understood. I still think that it may be possible that there is a lack of understanding about the dynamics of systems that involve massive core concentrations. Does anyone know if these particular eliptical galaxies have concentrated cores? If they do not I wonder if it is possible to judge whether there is still a need for an external dark matter halo to explain their dynamics with other galaxies? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Black hole content of ellipticals (was: Galaxies without dark
Ed Keane III wrote in message ...
I have wondered if dark matter would always be present with matter, suggesting that it was a characteristic of matter itself that was not understood. Yes, this is my intuition also...that there are no exotic dark matter particles floating around waiting to be discovered. That the dark matter gravitational potential has its origin in so called luminous matter in some special and unsuspected state. My own toy model involves daughter universes, formed by black holes, propagating some of their gravitation back into our universe as 'dark matter' potential. I'll refrain from details here to keep my mild heresy from being ejected from this garden by the proper authorities. I still think that it may be possible that there is a lack of understanding about the dynamics of systems that involve massive core concentrations. How do you mean? Does anyone know if these particular eliptical galaxies have concentrated cores? Dunno...however some have supermassive black holes (that of M105 in their sample weighing in at ~50 million Msols) and those tend to be associated with concentrated cores or cusps. If they do not I wonder if it is possible to judge whether there is still a need for an external dark matter halo to explain their dynamics with other galaxies? Good question. I don't now if their dynamics with adjacent galaxies has been studied and whether they show higher velocities than ex- pected from their luminous mass. However I suspect that any local dark matter potential effect will be swamped by the overall dark matter content of their home cluster or supercluster of galaxies. Cheers, Gene |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Black hole content of ellipticals (was: Galaxies without dark
Ed Keane III wrote in message ...
I have wondered if dark matter would always be present with matter, suggesting that it was a characteristic of matter itself that was not understood. Yes, this is my intuition also...that there are no exotic dark matter particles floating around waiting to be discovered. That the dark matter gravitational potential has its origin in so called luminous matter in some special and unsuspected state. My own toy model involves daughter universes, formed by black holes, propagating some of their gravitation back into our universe as 'dark matter' potential. I'll refrain from details here to keep my mild heresy from being ejected from this garden by the proper authorities. I still think that it may be possible that there is a lack of understanding about the dynamics of systems that involve massive core concentrations. How do you mean? Does anyone know if these particular eliptical galaxies have concentrated cores? Dunno...however some have supermassive black holes (that of M105 in their sample weighing in at ~50 million Msols) and those tend to be associated with concentrated cores or cusps. If they do not I wonder if it is possible to judge whether there is still a need for an external dark matter halo to explain their dynamics with other galaxies? Good question. I don't now if their dynamics with adjacent galaxies has been studied and whether they show higher velocities than ex- pected from their luminous mass. However I suspect that any local dark matter potential effect will be swamped by the overall dark matter content of their home cluster or supercluster of galaxies. Cheers, Gene |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Jets Spout Far Closer to Black Hole Than Thought, Scientists Say(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 6 | January 7th 04 11:49 PM |
The universe is expending. | sooncf | SETI | 24 | November 5th 03 03:24 PM |
VLT Observes Infrared Flares from Black Hole at Galactic Centre (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 29th 03 09:05 PM |
Knotty Jets, the Tell Tales for Early Dark Matter and Spiral Galaxy formation. | Leo | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | October 16th 03 06:53 AM |
Link between Black Holes and Galaxies Discovered in Our Own Backyard(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 17th 03 07:36 PM |