|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Relativity of microwave background radiation map.
I have questions about relativity of microwave background radiation
map. ---------------- Thought experiment: Observer A gathers information upon the area close to event horizon (for instance - microwave background radiation map). Observer B accomplishes the similar observation from different observation point. "Different observation point" means that B and A move relatively each other, or B is separated from A by distance. The particular redshift distribution patterns have to be different for A and B =(?) we may expect a different microwave background radiation maps as well. The more relative speed or distance the more different map would be acquired. Analogy with traditional horizon is good illustration (only for distance). The implication of it is striking (for me). The conditions shortly after Big Bang are a relative matter. Actually, it means that past is a relative matter. The "0/1" is a relative matter. And even more, the near Big Bang conditions may cause different fundamental laws of physics (see Smolin/Linde) and all subset of laws which still is able to manifest what I perceive as "background radiation map" and would allow me to keep self-identity, all this subset (may be beyond as well) is free to be chosen. May be "free will" is the direct implication of this freedom. The consequence of this is that the multiverse construct is not something hypothetical it is a daily life routine. Probably my assumption about "different map" may be wrong. ---------------- This thought experiment shows that the reality itself may be a relative matter. Questions: -Is it wrong assumption about "different map"? - If maps are different does it cause the relativity of past? I would appreciate your comments. Thanks, |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Relativity of microwave background radiation map.
Ulf Torkelsson wrote in message ...
Effectively this means that it is not possible to measure any primordial dipole pattern in the microwave background, since A and B will measure different dipole components, and will not agree on who is at rest. Therefore their images of the microwave radiation will differ in the details, though we expect the two images two have the same statistical properties. If the statistical properties of the images would differ, You are evidently right about technical aspects of microwave background radiation (MBR) measurements. I had considered the thought experiment as an abstract construct. Assume that we are able to filter out any contribution to MBR beyond/after some duration (D) after Big Bang. If D tends to zero the MBR map difference tends to be statistically undistinguishable for any observer. However the patterns fluctuation will keep the constant rate for any singular sub area of D (I may explain why). These fluctuations are consequences of ideal picture (this is the key). The fluctuation for D-0 has to cause the different matter (galaxy) distribution (however statistically (for 13-15 billions light years observation) it has to be undistinguishable). Again it is a consequence of ideal picture not a technical limitation of measurements. Regards, George Buyanovsky |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Relativity of microwave background radiation map.
Ulf Torkelsson wrote in message ...
Effectively this means that it is not possible to measure any primordial dipole pattern in the microwave background, since A and B will measure different dipole components, and will not agree on who is at rest. Therefore their images of the microwave radiation will differ in the details, though we expect the two images two have the same statistical properties. If the statistical properties of the images would differ, You are evidently right about technical aspects of microwave background radiation (MBR) measurements. I had considered the thought experiment as an abstract construct. Assume that we are able to filter out any contribution to MBR beyond/after some duration (D) after Big Bang. If D tends to zero the MBR map difference tends to be statistically undistinguishable for any observer. However the patterns fluctuation will keep the constant rate for any singular sub area of D (I may explain why). These fluctuations are consequences of ideal picture (this is the key). The fluctuation for D-0 has to cause the different matter (galaxy) distribution (however statistically (for 13-15 billions light years observation) it has to be undistinguishable). Again it is a consequence of ideal picture not a technical limitation of measurements. Regards, George Buyanovsky |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Interstellar radiation part of Mars challenge | Kent Betts | History | 0 | December 10th 03 05:37 AM |
New NASA Facility Will Help Protect Space Crews From Radiation | Ron Baalke | Space Station | 0 | October 14th 03 04:23 PM |
Relativity of microwave background radiation map | George Buyanovsky | Science | 1 | September 1st 03 02:30 AM |