A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Research
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Alternative cosmological model



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 31st 03, 10:13 AM
Eric Flesch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Alternative cosmological model

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:45:17 GMT, Ulf Torkelsson
wrote:
It does make a couple of assumptions on the universe that seem strange.
Firstly in general you need gravity to get convection. The hot, light
fluid elements rises and expands while the dense, cold elements fall
down. Thus you need to assume either a global direction in which
gravity is pointing in the universe, or you need to assume that the
universe has a center of mass, and thus gravity.


Randall-Sundrum cosmologies provide for this in modelling our universe
as a brane wrapped around a 5-D bulk. The center of the bulk provides
both direction and a source of gravity (in one variant).

in conflict with the cosmological principle, which says that there
is nothing special with our position in the universe. Essentially the
universe looks the same from all points in the universe, which
means that the convection currents will not know in which
direction they should go.


That's another beauty of Randall-Sundrum, in that each place in the
universe has a unique orientation, or polarization, respective to the
5-D center. Thus it confers an absolutism; indeed, the absolutism is
essential, else the math fails.

Eric
  #2  
Old October 31st 03, 10:13 AM
Eric Flesch
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default Alternative cosmological model

On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 21:45:17 GMT, Ulf Torkelsson
wrote:
It does make a couple of assumptions on the universe that seem strange.
Firstly in general you need gravity to get convection. The hot, light
fluid elements rises and expands while the dense, cold elements fall
down. Thus you need to assume either a global direction in which
gravity is pointing in the universe, or you need to assume that the
universe has a center of mass, and thus gravity.


Randall-Sundrum cosmologies provide for this in modelling our universe
as a brane wrapped around a 5-D bulk. The center of the bulk provides
both direction and a source of gravity (in one variant).

in conflict with the cosmological principle, which says that there
is nothing special with our position in the universe. Essentially the
universe looks the same from all points in the universe, which
means that the convection currents will not know in which
direction they should go.


That's another beauty of Randall-Sundrum, in that each place in the
universe has a unique orientation, or polarization, respective to the
5-D center. Thus it confers an absolutism; indeed, the absolutism is
essential, else the math fails.

Eric
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Popping The Big Bang Jim Greenfield Astronomy Misc 701 July 8th 07 05:40 PM
PDF (Planetary Distance Formula) explains DW 2004 / Quaoar and Kuiper Belt hermesnines Astronomy Misc 10 February 27th 04 02:14 AM
Cosmological Polaris effect Oriel36 Astronomy Misc 3 January 23rd 04 05:02 PM
DDRDE model of 4D space (curved 3D space w/ invertibility) Scandere Astronomy Misc 0 January 15th 04 12:57 AM
Neutrino Oscillations greywolf42 Astronomy Misc 59 October 10th 03 08:23 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.