|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#31
|
|||
|
|||
What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM: On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM: On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22: On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55: On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote: That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass. A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it. But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space. My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert?? Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the event horizon ... and then stop!! The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!! So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center! If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center?? The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!? Double-A Oh!! What caused the shrinking?? -- Daniel Eistein's theory! Double-A |
#32
|
|||
|
|||
What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?
Double-A wrote on 20/11/2018 9:06 AM:
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM: On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM: On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22: On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55: On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote: That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass. A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it. But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space. My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert?? Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the event horizon ... and then stop!! The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!! So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center! If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center?? The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!? Oh!! What caused the shrinking?? Eistein's theory! Which one?? -- Daniel |
#33
|
|||
|
|||
What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 10:36:58 PM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 20/11/2018 9:06 AM: On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM: On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM: On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22: On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55: On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote: That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass. A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it. But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space. My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert?? Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the event horizon ... and then stop!! The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!! So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center! If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center?? The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!? Oh!! What caused the shrinking?? Eistein's theory! Which one?? -- Daniel GR. Double-A |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?
Double-A wrote on 21/11/2018 9:03 AM:
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 10:36:58 PM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 20/11/2018 9:06 AM: On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM: On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM: On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22: On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55: On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote: That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass. A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it. But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space. My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert?? Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the event horizon ... and then stop!! The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!! So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center! If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center?? The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!? Oh!! What caused the shrinking?? Eistein's theory! Which one?? GR. Double-A Ah!! O.K., I never understood Gen Rel!! ;-) -- Daniel |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM: On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM: On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22: On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55: On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote: That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass. A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it. But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space. My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert?? Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the event horizon ... and then stop!! The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!! So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center! If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center?? The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!? Double-A Oh!! What caused the shrinking?? -- Daniel Shrinking was cased by "IMPLOSION" Imperial thinkers have our sun implosing in 5 billion more years. Always know implosion,and explision is part on natures balancing act.In reality implosion can be more creative. Bert |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 10:41:25 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM: On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM: On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22: On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55: On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote: That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass. A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it. But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space. My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert?? Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the event horizon ... and then stop!! The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!! So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center! If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center?? The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!? Double-A Oh!! What caused the shrinking?? -- Daniel Shrinking was cased by "IMPLOSION" Imperial thinkers have our sun implosing in 5 billion more years. Always know implosion,and explision is part on natures balancing act.In reality implosion can be more creative. Bert On the day the Sun implodes, I bet the stock market will be down! Double-A |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 3:24:40 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 10:41:25 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM: On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM: On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22: On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55: On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote: That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass. A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it. But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space. My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert?? Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the event horizon ... and then stop!! The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!! So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center! If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center?? The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!? Double-A Oh!! What caused the shrinking?? -- Daniel Shrinking was cased by "IMPLOSION" Imperial thinkers have our sun implosing in 5 billion more years. Always know implosion,and explision is part on natures balancing act.In reality implosion can be more creative. Bert On the day the Sun implodes, I bet the stock market will be down! Double-A In 5 billion years there will be no stock market.I just got $35for opening a Walmart credit card.Walmart will be 100% the finance of the world. Their home office will be in Swizerland.They will own all crops,cattle,fish and drugs.There will be only one means of transpertation.Everyone living in Walmart underground units.No police,and only one government run by Walmart. Longest workers can live to is 105.Walmart GOPers are cloned at 67 and do not show age (MSP) in pills. It started 30 years ago,and you can see it today.3 Waltons are each worth 43 billion bucks.Bert |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?
Herbert Glazier wrote on 26/11/2018 1:27 PM:
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 3:24:40 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote: On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 10:41:25 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM: On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM: On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22: On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55: On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote: That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass. A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it. But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space. My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert?? Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the event horizon ... and then stop!! The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!! So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center! If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center?? The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!? Oh!! What caused the shrinking?? Shrinking was cased by "IMPLOSION" Imperial thinkers have our sun implosing in 5 billion more years. Always know implosion,and explision is part on natures balancing act.In reality implosion can be more creative. Bert On the day the Sun implodes, I bet the stock market will be down! In 5 billion years there will be no stock market.I just got $35for opening a Walmart credit card.Walmart will be 100% the finance of the world. Their home office will be in Swizerland.They will own all crops,cattle,fish and drugs.There will be only one means of transpertation.Everyone living in Walmart underground units.No police,and only one government run by Walmart. Longest workers can live to is 105.Walmart GOPers are cloned at 67 and do not show age (MSP) in pills. It started 30 years ago,and you can see it today.3 Waltons are each worth 43 billion bucks.Bert Gee Whiz, you are full of crap, Herbert!! -- Daniel |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?
On Monday, November 26, 2018 at 2:03:03 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 26/11/2018 1:27 PM: On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 3:24:40 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote: On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 10:41:25 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM: On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM: On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 Crap alone proves Earth is a microbe world.Farts as well.Bert wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22: On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55: On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote: That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass. A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it. But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space. My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert?? Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the event horizon ... and then stop!! The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!! So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center! If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center?? The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!? Oh!! What caused the shrinking?? Shrinking was cased by "IMPLOSION" Imperial thinkers have our sun implosing in 5 billion more years. Always know implosion,and explision is part on natures balancing act.In reality implosion can be more creative. Bert On the day the Sun implodes, I bet the stock market will be down! In 5 billion years there will be no stock market.I just got $35for opening a Walmart credit card.Walmart will be 100% the finance of the world. Their home office will be in Swizerland.They will own all crops,cattle,fish and drugs.There will be only one means of transpertation.Everyone living in Walmart underground units.No police,and only one government run by Walmart. Longest workers can live to is 105.Walmart GOPers are cloned at 67 and do not show age (MSP) in pills. It started 30 years ago,and you can see it today.3 Waltons are each worth 43 billion bucks.Bert Gee Whiz, you are full of crap, Herbert!! -- Daniel |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?
On Sunday, November 25, 2018 at 6:27:39 PM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 3:24:40 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote: On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 10:41:25 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote: On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM: On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote: Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM: On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22: On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55: On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote: On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast wrote: Herbert Glazier wrote: That they can only get more dense,but their size stays the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL singularities, of varying immense mass. A single point is always a single point. The difference in mass of that point will have differing effects on the mass and space surrounding it. But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean space. My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us why.Bert What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert?? Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall to the event horizon ... and then stop!! The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!! So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical singularity at the center! If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center?? The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!? Double-A Oh!! What caused the shrinking?? -- Daniel Shrinking was cased by "IMPLOSION" Imperial thinkers have our sun implosing in 5 billion more years. Always know implosion,and explision is part on natures balancing act.In reality implosion can be more creative. Bert On the day the Sun implodes, I bet the stock market will be down! Double-A In 5 billion years there will be no stock market.I just got $35for opening a Walmart credit card.Walmart will be 100% the finance of the world. Their home office will be in Swizerland.They will own all crops,cattle,fish and drugs.There will be only one means of transpertation.Everyone living in Walmart underground units.No police,and only one government run by Walmart. Longest workers can live to is 105.Walmart GOPers are cloned at 67 and do not show age (MSP) in pills. It started 30 years ago,and you can see it today..3 Waltons are each worth 43 billion bucks.Bert The New York Stock Exchange and Walmart headquarters will probably have moved to one of the moons of Jupiter or Saturn by then. The Earth will have become hotter than the sunny side of Mercury long before then. Double-A |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
How are black holes created? LARGE HADRON COLLIDER | oldcoot | Misc | 1 | September 20th 08 08:09 PM |
How are black holes created? LARGE HADRON COLLIDER | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | September 9th 08 03:17 PM |
Black Holes Created by Spacetime | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 1 | August 1st 07 02:34 PM |
Use of Black Holes Created by Supernova imploding & Exploding | nightbat[_1_] | Misc | 0 | July 24th 07 06:45 PM |
Micro Black Holes Created by Strings | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 2 | May 10th 07 01:53 PM |