A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old November 19th 18, 11:06 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?

On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM:
On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast
wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays
the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and
that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came
first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a
spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL
singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference
in mass of that point will have differing effects on the
mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in
circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it
a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon
is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the
circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean
space.

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no
space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to
implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two
universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one
positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only
universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us
why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops
at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall
to the event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical
singularity at the center!

If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to
the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center??


The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!?

Double-A

Oh!! What caused the shrinking??

--
Daniel



Eistein's theory!

Double-A


  #32  
Old November 20th 18, 07:36 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Daniel60
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 307
Default What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?

Double-A wrote on 20/11/2018 9:06 AM:
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM:
On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast
wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays
the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and
that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came
first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a
spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL
singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference
in mass of that point will have differing effects on the
mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in
circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it
a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon
is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the
circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean
space.

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no
space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to
implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two
universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one
positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only
universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us
why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops
at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall
to the event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical
singularity at the center!

If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to
the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center??

The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!?

Oh!! What caused the shrinking??


Eistein's theory!

Which one??

--
Daniel
  #33  
Old November 20th 18, 11:03 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?

On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 10:36:58 PM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 20/11/2018 9:06 AM:
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM:
On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast
wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays
the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and
that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came
first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a
spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL
singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference
in mass of that point will have differing effects on the
mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in
circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it
a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon
is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the
circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean
space.

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no
space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to
implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two
universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one
positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only
universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us
why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops
at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall
to the event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical
singularity at the center!

If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to
the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center??

The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!?

Oh!! What caused the shrinking??


Eistein's theory!

Which one??

--
Daniel



GR.

Double-A

  #34  
Old November 21st 18, 06:54 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Daniel60
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 307
Default What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?

Double-A wrote on 21/11/2018 9:03 AM:
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 10:36:58 PM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 20/11/2018 9:06 AM:
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM:
On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast
wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays
the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and
that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came
first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a
spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL
singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference
in mass of that point will have differing effects on the
mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in
circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it
a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon
is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the
circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean
space.

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no
space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to
implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two
universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one
positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only
universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us
why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops
at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall
to the event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical
singularity at the center!

If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to
the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center??

The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!?

Oh!! What caused the shrinking??

Eistein's theory!

Which one??


GR.

Double-A

Ah!! O.K., I never understood Gen Rel!! ;-)

--
Daniel
  #35  
Old November 24th 18, 07:41 PM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?

On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM:
On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast
wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays
the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and
that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came
first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a
spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL
singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference
in mass of that point will have differing effects on the
mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in
circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it
a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon
is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the
circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean
space.

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no
space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to
implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two
universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one
positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only
universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us
why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops
at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall
to the event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical
singularity at the center!

If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to
the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center??


The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!?

Double-A

Oh!! What caused the shrinking??

--
Daniel


Shrinking was cased by "IMPLOSION" Imperial thinkers have our sun implosing in 5 billion more years. Always know implosion,and explision is part on natures balancing act.In reality implosion can be more creative. Bert
  #36  
Old November 25th 18, 12:24 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?

On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 10:41:25 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM:
On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast
wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays
the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and
that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came
first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a
spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL
singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference
in mass of that point will have differing effects on the
mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in
circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it
a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon
is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the
circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean
space.

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no
space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to
implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two
universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one
positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only
universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us
why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops
at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall
to the event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical
singularity at the center!

If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to
the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center??

The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!?

Double-A

Oh!! What caused the shrinking??

--
Daniel


Shrinking was cased by "IMPLOSION" Imperial thinkers have our sun implosing in 5 billion more years. Always know implosion,and explision is part on natures balancing act.In reality implosion can be more creative. Bert



On the day the Sun implodes, I bet the stock market will be down!

Double-A

  #37  
Old November 26th 18, 03:27 AM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?

On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 3:24:40 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 10:41:25 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM:
On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast
wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays
the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and
that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came
first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a
spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL
singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference
in mass of that point will have differing effects on the
mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in
circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it
a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon
is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the
circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean
space.

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no
space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to
implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two
universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one
positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only
universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us
why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops
at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall
to the event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical
singularity at the center!

If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to
the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center??

The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!?

Double-A

Oh!! What caused the shrinking??

--
Daniel


Shrinking was cased by "IMPLOSION" Imperial thinkers have our sun implosing in 5 billion more years. Always know implosion,and explision is part on natures balancing act.In reality implosion can be more creative. Bert



On the day the Sun implodes, I bet the stock market will be down!

Double-A


In 5 billion years there will be no stock market.I just got $35for opening a Walmart credit card.Walmart will be 100% the finance of the world. Their home office will be in Swizerland.They will own all crops,cattle,fish and drugs.There will be only one means of transpertation.Everyone living in Walmart underground units.No police,and only one government run by Walmart. Longest workers can live to is 105.Walmart GOPers are cloned at 67 and do not show age (MSP) in pills. It started 30 years ago,and you can see it today.3 Waltons are each worth 43 billion bucks.Bert
  #38  
Old November 26th 18, 11:03 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Daniel60
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 307
Default What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?

Herbert Glazier wrote on 26/11/2018 1:27 PM:
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 3:24:40 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 10:41:25 AM UTC-8, Herbert
Glazier wrote:
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60
wrote:
Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM:
On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60
wrote:
Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60
wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7,
Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7,
Double-A wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM
UTC-7, Bast wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their
size stays the same.More dense means
greater force of gravity,and that means
greater accretion disk. I must add BHs
came first and control galaxies core.One
head on look at a spiral galaxy shows this
reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes. They
are ALL singularities, of varying immense
mass.

A single point is always a single point. The
difference in mass of that point will have
differing effects on the mass and space
surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should
increase in circumference as the mass
increases. However assigning it a diameter is
tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is
highly distorted. A diameter calculated from
the circumference is best said to be one
projected on Euclidean space.

My critical mass density theory kicks in when
there is no space for even an electron inside a
black hole.It has to implode.It has the
energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it
does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive
(Treb's) Only universes are infinite in
numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good
reasoning tells us why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH
time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing
moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things
just fall to the event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very,
crowded!!

So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some
hypothetical singularity at the center!

If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did
anything get to the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at
the center??

The distance to the center relativistically shrank to
zero!!!?

Oh!! What caused the shrinking??

Shrinking was cased by "IMPLOSION" Imperial thinkers have our sun
implosing in 5 billion more years. Always know implosion,and
explision is part on natures balancing act.In reality implosion
can be more creative. Bert



On the day the Sun implodes, I bet the stock market will be down!


In 5 billion years there will be no stock market.I just got $35for
opening a Walmart credit card.Walmart will be 100% the finance of the
world. Their home office will be in Swizerland.They will own all
crops,cattle,fish and drugs.There will be only one means of
transpertation.Everyone living in Walmart underground units.No
police,and only one government run by Walmart. Longest workers can
live to is 105.Walmart GOPers are cloned at 67 and do not show age
(MSP) in pills. It started 30 years ago,and you can see it today.3
Waltons are each worth 43 billion bucks.Bert

Gee Whiz, you are full of crap, Herbert!!

--
Daniel
  #39  
Old November 26th 18, 06:27 PM posted to alt.astronomy
herbert glazier
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,045
Default What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?

On Monday, November 26, 2018 at 2:03:03 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 26/11/2018 1:27 PM:
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 3:24:40 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 10:41:25 AM UTC-8, Herbert
Glazier wrote:
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60
wrote:
Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM:
On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60
wrote:
Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 Crap alone proves Earth is a microbe world.Farts as well.Bert
wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7,
Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7,
Double-A wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM
UTC-7, Bast wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their
size stays the same.More dense means
greater force of gravity,and that means
greater accretion disk. I must add BHs
came first and control galaxies core.One
head on look at a spiral galaxy shows this
reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes. They
are ALL singularities, of varying immense
mass.

A single point is always a single point. The
difference in mass of that point will have
differing effects on the mass and space
surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should
increase in circumference as the mass
increases. However assigning it a diameter is
tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon is
highly distorted. A diameter calculated from
the circumference is best said to be one
projected on Euclidean space.

My critical mass density theory kicks in when
there is no space for even an electron inside a
black hole.It has to implode.It has the
energy,and mass to create two universes,and so it
does.One negative(Bert's) and one positive
(Treb's) Only universes are infinite in
numbers.Only universes are infinite in size.Good
reasoning tells us why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH
time stops at the event horizon.Without time nothing
moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things
just fall to the event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very,
crowded!!

So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some
hypothetical singularity at the center!

If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did
anything get to the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at
the center??

The distance to the center relativistically shrank to
zero!!!?

Oh!! What caused the shrinking??

Shrinking was cased by "IMPLOSION" Imperial thinkers have our sun
implosing in 5 billion more years. Always know implosion,and
explision is part on natures balancing act.In reality implosion
can be more creative. Bert


On the day the Sun implodes, I bet the stock market will be down!


In 5 billion years there will be no stock market.I just got $35for
opening a Walmart credit card.Walmart will be 100% the finance of the
world. Their home office will be in Swizerland.They will own all
crops,cattle,fish and drugs.There will be only one means of
transpertation.Everyone living in Walmart underground units.No
police,and only one government run by Walmart. Longest workers can
live to is 105.Walmart GOPers are cloned at 67 and do not show age
(MSP) in pills. It started 30 years ago,and you can see it today.3
Waltons are each worth 43 billion bucks.Bert

Gee Whiz, you are full of crap, Herbert!!

--
Daniel


  #40  
Old November 26th 18, 11:16 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default What if Black Holes Are Created in One Size?

On Sunday, November 25, 2018 at 6:27:39 PM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 3:24:40 PM UTC-8, Double-A wrote:
On Saturday, November 24, 2018 at 10:41:25 AM UTC-8, Herbert Glazier wrote:
On Monday, November 19, 2018 at 12:53:19 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 19/11/2018 9:01 AM:
On Sunday, November 18, 2018 at 12:20:49 AM UTC-8, Daniel60 wrote:
Double-A wrote on 18/04/2018 7:01 AM:
On Tuesday, April 17, 2018 at 1:14:45 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 17/04/18 04:22:
On Sunday, April 15, 2018 at 2:27:14 AM UTC-7, Daniel60 wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote on 15/04/18 05:55:
On Thursday, April 12, 2018 at 2:11:31 PM UTC-7, Double-A
wrote:
On Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 3:16:07 AM UTC-7, Bast
wrote:
Herbert Glazier wrote:
That they can only get more dense,but their size stays
the same.More dense means greater force of gravity,and
that means greater accretion disk. I must add BHs came
first and control galaxies core.One head on look at a
spiral galaxy shows this reality.Bert

That is the definition of black holes. They are ALL
singularities, of varying immense mass.

A single point is always a single point. The difference
in mass of that point will have differing effects on the
mass and space surrounding it.

But the event horizon is variable, and should increase in
circumference as the mass increases. However assigning it
a diameter is tricky, since spacetime inside event horizon
is highly distorted. A diameter calculated from the
circumference is best said to be one projected on Euclidean
space.

My critical mass density theory kicks in when there is no
space for even an electron inside a black hole.It has to
implode.It has the energy,and mass to create two
universes,and so it does.One negative(Bert's) and one
positive (Treb's) Only universes are infinite in numbers.Only
universes are infinite in size.Good reasoning tells us
why.Bert

What would be that "Good reasoning", Herbert??

Reason is once it has the mass density to become a BH time stops
at the event horizon.Without time nothing moves.Bert

Ah!! So nothing ever falls into a Black Hole ... things just fall
to the event horizon ... and then stop!!

The event horizon must, eventually, get very, very, crowded!!

So that is where most of its mass must be, not in some hypothetical
singularity at the center!

If everything just stops at the event horizon, how did anything get to
the supposed, hypothetical, singularity at the center??

The distance to the center relativistically shrank to zero!!!?

Double-A

Oh!! What caused the shrinking??

--
Daniel

Shrinking was cased by "IMPLOSION" Imperial thinkers have our sun implosing in 5 billion more years. Always know implosion,and explision is part on natures balancing act.In reality implosion can be more creative. Bert



On the day the Sun implodes, I bet the stock market will be down!

Double-A


In 5 billion years there will be no stock market.I just got $35for opening a Walmart credit card.Walmart will be 100% the finance of the world. Their home office will be in Swizerland.They will own all crops,cattle,fish and drugs.There will be only one means of transpertation.Everyone living in Walmart underground units.No police,and only one government run by Walmart. Longest workers can live to is 105.Walmart GOPers are cloned at 67 and do not show age (MSP) in pills. It started 30 years ago,and you can see it today..3 Waltons are each worth 43 billion bucks.Bert



The New York Stock Exchange and Walmart headquarters will probably have moved to one of the moons of Jupiter or Saturn by then. The Earth will have become hotter than the sunny side of Mercury long before then.

Double-A

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How are black holes created? LARGE HADRON COLLIDER oldcoot Misc 1 September 20th 08 08:09 PM
How are black holes created? LARGE HADRON COLLIDER G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 0 September 9th 08 03:17 PM
Black Holes Created by Spacetime G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 1 August 1st 07 02:34 PM
Use of Black Holes Created by Supernova imploding & Exploding nightbat[_1_] Misc 0 July 24th 07 06:45 PM
Micro Black Holes Created by Strings G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] Misc 2 May 10th 07 01:53 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:58 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.