A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Nonsense



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old April 10th 21, 05:46 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Nonsense

John Stachel: Einstein's constant speed of light "seems to be nonsense":

John Stachel: "But this seems to be nonsense. How can it happen that the speed of light relative to an observer cannot be increased or decreased if that observer moves towards or away from a light beam? Einstein states that he wrestled with this problem over a lengthy period of time, to the point of despair." http://www.aip.org/history/exhibits/...relativity.htm

The constancy of the speed of light is OBVIOUS NONSENSE. Frequency and speed of light pulses vary proportionally for the moving observer https://youtube.com/watch?v=bg7O4rtlwEE, in accordance with the formula

(frequency) = (speed of pulses)/(distance between pulses)

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
Ads
  #2  
Old April 10th 21, 10:17 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Nonsense

"Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelson–Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c ± v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory

So, in 1887, the Michelson-Morley experiment was compatible with Newton's variable speed of light, c'=c±v. Was the experiment simultaneously (that is, in 1887) compatible with the constant (independent of the motion of the emitter) speed of light, c'=c? In Einstein's schizophrenic world the answer is "yes".

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
  #3  
Old April 11th 21, 12:10 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Nonsense

Einstein's 1905 constant-speed-of-light nonsense that killed physics:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=-Irlq3TFr8Q

Space and time had to merge into a preposterous "spacetime", to fit the nonsensical constancy, and physics died - was replaced by an insane ideology immeasurably more powerful than Big Brother's ideology:

"In special relativity, the speed of light remains constant by allowing both space and time to change in such a way as to keep the speed of light constant." https://coursehero.com/tutors-proble...e-same-for-al/

Michelle Thaller: "All of the universe shifts around this constant, the speed of light." https://youtube.com/watch?v=DO7J2YIz8tY

Brian Greene: "If space and time did not behave this way, the speed of light would not be constant and would depend on the observer's state of motion. But it is constant; space and time do behave this way. Space and time adjust themselves in an exactly compensating manner so that observations of light's speed yield the same result, regardless of the observer's velocity." http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/physics...-nutshell.html

Neil deGrasse Tyson, Death by Black Hole: And Other Cosmic Quandaries, pp. 123-124: "If everyone, everywhere and at all times, is to measure the same speed for the beam from your imaginary spacecraft, a number of things have to happen. First of all, as the speed of your spacecraft increases, the length of everything - you, your measuring devices, your spacecraft - shortens in the direction of motion, as seen by everyone else. Furthermore, your own time slows down exactly enough so that when you haul out your newly shortened yardstick, you are guaranteed to be duped into measuring the same old constant value for the speed of light. What we have here is a COSMIC CONSPIRACY OF THE HIGHEST ORDER." https://www.amazon.com/Death-Black-H.../dp/039335038X

See mo https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Nonsense and Big Brother's 2+2=5 Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 July 22nd 20 12:43 AM
Physics without Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Nonsense Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 April 28th 19 05:30 PM
Why Einstein's Constant-Speed-of-Light Postulate Is Nonsense Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 March 2nd 19 07:01 AM
Why Einstein's Constant Speed of Light Is Nonsense Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 February 18th 19 07:52 PM
Einstein's Constant Speed of Light: Consistent Nonsense Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 September 3rd 17 08:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.