If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. 


Thread Tools  Display Modes 
#1




LIGO's Gravitational Wave Fraud: Time for Jail?
Gamma rays are gravitationally deflected or blocked by cosmic matter. Gravitational waves are not, Einsteinians teach. Therefore, gamma rays and gravitational waves CANNOT arrive "from the same location of the sky", almost simultaneously. LIGO's "discoveries" are obviously fake:
"Unlike light, gravitational waves donâ€™t care about matter in any way. You can pass gravitational waves through the vacuum of space, through a lens, prism, or other material, or even through the solid Earth itself, and they will continue to propagate at the speed of gravity." https://www.forbes.com/sites/startsw...insteinwrong/ "On 8:41 am EDT August 17, 2017, LIGO detected a new gravitational wave source, dubbed GW170817 to mark its discovery date. Just two seconds later NASA's Fermi satellite detected a weak pulse of gamma rays from the same location of the sky." https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/201730 See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev 
Ads 
#2




LIGO's Gravitational Wave Fraud: Time for Jail?
Einstein's general relativity does not predict that gravitational waves travel at the speed of light  Einstein produced the "prediction" by sleight of hand. Arthur Eddington was unusually honest in exposing this particular fraud:
Arthur Eddington: "If coordinates are chosen so as to satisfy a certain condition which has no very clear geometrical importance, the speed is that of light; if the coordinates are slightly different the speed is altogether different from that of light. The result stands or falls by the choice of coordinates and, so far as can be judged, the coordinates here used were purposely introduced in order to obtain the simplification which results from representing the propagation as occurring with the speed of light. The argument thus follows a vicious circle." The Mathematical Theory of Relativity, pp. 130131 https://www.amazon.com/Mathematical.../dp/0521091659 Arthur Eddington: "The problem of the propagation of disturbances of the gravitational field was investigated by Einstein in 1916, and again in 1918. It has usually been inferred from his discussion that a change in the distribution of matter produces gravitational effects which are propagated with the speed of light; but I think that Einstein really left the question of the speed of propagation rather indefinite. His analysis shows how the coordinates must be chosen if it is desired to represent the gravitational potentials as propagated with the speed of light; but there is nothing to indicate that the speed of light appears in the problem, except as the result of this arbitrary choice." http://rspa.royalsocietypublishing.o...6/268.full.pdf In Einstein's schizophrenic world the statement below, published in Discover Magazine, is a deep truth, not an idiocy: LIGO fakers: "So the fact that the speed of gravitational waves is equal to the speed of electromagnetic waves is simply because they both travel at the speed of information." https://discovermagazine.com/thesci...speedoflight Is "speed of information" defined in physics? Theoretical physicists: "Who cares?" More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev 
#3




LIGO's Gravitational Wave Fraud: Time for Jail?
The speed of light is VARIABLE AS PER NEWTON, which implies that Einstein's spacetime does not exist and neither do LIGO's gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime). LIGO fakers still feel safe, protected by the allpowerful ideology of the Einstein cult, but in the long run they are doomed:
"Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelsonâ€“Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c Â± v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory So, in 1887, the MichelsonMorley experiment was compatible with Newton's variable speed of light, c'=cÂ±v. Was the experiment simultaneously (that is, in 1887, prior to introducing the length contraction fudge factor) compatible with the constant (independent of the motion of the emitter) speed of light, c'=c? In Einstein's schizophrenic world, the answer is "yes".. For any sane person, "no" is obvious. See mo https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev Pentcho Valev 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  


Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
The Gravitational Wave Fraud and the Gullible World  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  2  December 29th 20 09:12 PM 
LIGO's Gravitational Waves: Climax of Einstein Fraud  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  1  January 8th 20 10:50 PM 
LIGO's Gravitational Waves: Obvious Fraud  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  3  June 2nd 19 12:04 PM 
Theoretical Fraud in LIGO Gravitational Waves Business  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  1  February 15th 17 10:22 PM 
Why LIGO's Discovery of Gravitational Waves Is a Fraud  Pentcho Valev  Astronomy Misc  1  October 27th 16 11:35 PM 