A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

LIGO's "Discoveries" Are Obviously Fake



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old March 12th 21, 02:11 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default LIGO's "Discoveries" Are Obviously Fake

Gamma rays are gravitationally deflected or blocked by cosmic matter. Gravitational waves are not, Einsteinians teach. Therefore, gamma rays and gravitational waves CANNOT arrive "from the same location of the sky", almost simultaneously:

"On 8:41 am EDT August 17, 2017, LIGO detected a new gravitational wave source, dubbed GW170817 to mark its discovery date. Just two seconds later NASA's Fermi satellite detected a weak pulse of gamma rays from the same location of the sky." https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2017-30

LIGO's "discoveries" are obviously fake.

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
  #2  
Old March 12th 21, 02:48 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default LIGO's "Discoveries" Are Obviously Fake

Nima Arkani-Hamed: "Almost all of us believe that spacetime doesn't really exist, spacetime is doomed and has to be replaced" https://youtu.be/U47kyV4TMnE?t=369

But LIGO's "ripples in spacetime" must remain, like the grin of the Cheshire Cat (otherwise LIGO fakers will have to go to jail):

https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon....1J-7PIffiL.jpg

The speed of light is VARIABLE AS PER NEWTON, which implies that spacetime does not exist and neither do gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime). LIGO fakers still feel safe, protected by the all-powerful ideology of the Einstein cult, but in the long run they are doomed:

"The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an emission theory of light that CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE." http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf

"Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the Special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelson–Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c ± v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory

"A BEAM OF LIGHT WILL ACCELERATE IN A GRAVITATIONAL FIELD AS DO OBJECTS WITH REST MASS. For example, near the surface of Earth light will fall with acceleration 9.8 m/s^2." http://web.pdx.edu/~pmoeck/books/Tipler_Llewellyn.pdf

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GREAT "American" eclipse was fake news! Chris.B[_3_] Amateur Astronomy 3 December 27th 17 04:31 AM
So why didnt Soviets expose the "fake" moon landing? oldcoot[_2_] Misc 0 January 8th 09 04:20 PM
Check out "Netsender" in a.b.test for translation / explanation so why didnt soviets expose fake moon landing? rick UK Astronomy 0 December 23rd 08 10:19 PM
New "discoveries" from the 2008 National Philosophy AllianceConference Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 June 20th 08 02:07 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.