A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

The Gravitational Wave Fraud and the Gullible World



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old December 26th 20, 09:59 AM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default The Gravitational Wave Fraud and the Gullible World

"On 8:41 am EDT August 17, 2017, LIGO detected a new gravitational wave source, dubbed GW170817 to mark its discovery date. Just two seconds later NASA's Fermi satellite detected a weak pulse of gamma rays from the same location of the sky." https://www.cfa.harvard.edu/news/2017-30

Optical signals (gamma rays) are gravitationally deflected or blocked by cosmic matter. In contrast, gravitational waves "don't care about matter in any way":

"Unlike light, gravitational waves don’t care about matter in any way. You can pass gravitational waves through the vacuum of space, through a lens, prism, or other material, or even through the solid Earth itself, and they will continue to propagate at the speed of gravity." https://www.forbes.com/sites/startsw...instein-wrong/

Then how can optical signals and gravitational waves arrive "from the same location of the sky", almost simultaneously?

See more he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
Ads
  #2  
Old December 27th 20, 01:00 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default The Gravitational Wave Fraud and the Gullible World

Suicidal honesty in the physics establishment. Natalia Kiriushcheva has disappeared from public debate since this publication - LIGO godfathers must have converted her into an unperson (Orwell: "Withers, however, was already an unperson. He did not exist: he had never existed"):

"On September 16, 2010, a false signal - a so-called "blind injection" - was fed into both the Ligo and Virgo systems as part of an exercise to "test .... detection capabilities". At the time, the vast majority of the hundreds of scientists working on the equipment had no idea that they were being fed a dummy signal. The truth was not revealed until March the following year, by which time several papers about the supposed sensational discovery of gravitational waves were poised for publication. "While the scientists were disappointed that the discovery was not real, the success of the analysis was a compelling demonstration of the collaboration's readiness to detect gravitational waves," Ligo reported at the time. But take a look at the visualisation of the faked signal, says Dr Kiriushcheva, and compare it to the image apparently showing the collision of the twin black holes, seen on the second page of the recently-published discovery paper. "They look very, very similar," she says. "It means that they knew exactly what they wanted to get and this is suspicious for us: when you know what you want to get from science, usually you can get it." The apparent similarity is more curious because the faked event purported to show not a collision between two black holes, but the gravitational waves created by a neutron star spiralling into a black hole. The signals appear so similar, in fact, that Dr Kiriushcheva questions whether the "true" signal might actually have been an echo of the fake, "stored in the computer system from when they turned off the equipment five years before"." https://www.thenational.ae/arts-cult...llide-1.188114

The speed of light is VARIABLE AS PER NEWTON, which implies that Einstein's spacetime does not exist and neither do LIGO's gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime).

Banesh Hoffmann, Einstein's collaborator, admits that, originally ("without recourse to contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations"), the Michelson-Morley experiment directly proved Newton's variable speed of light and disproved the constant speed of light:

"Moreover, if light consists of particles, as Einstein had suggested in his paper submitted just thirteen weeks before this one, the second principle seems absurd: A stone thrown from a speeding train can do far more damage than one thrown from a train at rest; the speed of the particle is not independent of the motion of the object emitting it. And if we take light to consist of particles and assume that these particles obey Newton's laws, they will conform to Newtonian relativity and thus automatically account for the null result of the Michelson-Morley experiment without recourse to contracting lengths, local time, or Lorentz transformations. Yet, as we have seen, Einstein resisted the temptation to account for the null result in terms of particles of light and simple, familiar Newtonian ideas, and introduced as his second postulate something that was more or less obvious when thought of in terms of waves in an ether." Banesh Hoffmann, Relativity and Its Roots, p.92 https://www.amazon.com/Relativity-It.../dp/0486406768

Wikipedia tells the truth about the Michelson-Morley experiment here (elsewhere it says the opposite):

"Emission theory, also called emitter theory or ballistic theory of light, was a competing theory for the special theory of relativity, explaining the results of the Michelson–Morley experiment of 1887. [...] The name most often associated with emission theory is Isaac Newton. In his corpuscular theory Newton visualized light "corpuscles" being thrown off from hot bodies at a nominal speed of c with respect to the emitting object, and obeying the usual laws of Newtonian mechanics, and we then expect light to be moving towards us with a speed that is offset by the speed of the distant emitter (c ± v)." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emission_theory

More he https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
  #3  
Old December 29th 20, 09:12 PM posted to sci.astro
Pentcho Valev
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8,078
Default The Gravitational Wave Fraud and the Gullible World

A few hours ago there was an interview with Rainer Weiss, one of LIGO's godfathers:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=usvDJWiFVQg&t=1026s

I placed this text in the concomitant chat:

"The speed of light is VARIABLE AS PER NEWTON, which implies that Einstein's spacetime does not exist and neither do gravitational waves (ripples in spacetime)."

They immediately blocked my participation in the chat and, after the interview, disabled the chat replay altogether. But they are unable to delete my two comments in youtube (for now).

See mo https://twitter.com/pentcho_valev

Pentcho Valev
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gravitational Waves, LIGO Conspirators, Gullible World Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 November 22nd 18 12:38 PM
How Einsteinians Brainwash the Gullible World Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 August 10th 17 11:33 AM
Einsteinians Fool the Gullible World Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 July 8th 17 09:08 AM
Gravitational Waves: Einsteinians Brainwash the Gullible World Again Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 June 17th 17 09:01 AM
EINSTEIN AND THE GULLIBLE WORLD Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 2 June 7th 15 09:33 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:41 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2022 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.