#21
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 12, 9:05*am, Brad Guth wrote:
On Nov 12, 4:11*am, mpc755 wrote: On Nov 12, 2:55*am, Painius wrote: On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 11, 6:13 pm, Painius wrote: Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. Yet, the aether cannot do that on its own. It must have help. There must be a pressure exerted on the aether. What, in your opinion, might be the source of that pressure? Aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both. What, again in your opinion, causes the disappearance of the interference pattern when a sensor is placed near a slit? 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE' http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles. any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous energetic contact with a hidden medium The hidden medium of de Broglie wave mechanics is the aether. The energetic contact is the state of displacement of the aether. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined path which takes it through one slit. The associated wave in the aether passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves are disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and it no longer creates an interference pattern. Fascinating! What is it about the detection of the particle that turns the associated aether wave into "chop"? *The detector does nothing but "detect", correct? *So how does a device that does nothing but detect have any affect at all upon the aether wave that's associated with the particle? -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Words without actions are like galaxies without stars." In a boat double slit experiment there are pilings at the exits to the slits with sensors on them to detect the boat. As the boat exits the slits the pilings turn the bow wave into chop. The detection destroys the coherence of the associated wave in the aether. The detection destroys the coherence between the particle and its associated wave in the aether. What is it about this aether volume and its supersolid flow of filling in wherever ordinary mass used to exist, that's creating or producing directional gravity? Is this aether intelligent mass that always knows exactly what and when to do everything, so that its gravity of pushing everything together is what makes us think that ordinary matter and its atomic binding force is the source of gravity? Aether has mass. Aether physically occupies three dimensional space. Aether is physically displaced by matter. Displaced aether pushes back and exerts inward pressure toward matter. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:11:06 -0800 (PST), mpc755
wrote: On Nov 12, 2:55*am, Painius wrote: On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 11, 6:13 pm, Painius wrote: Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. Yet, the aether cannot do that on its own. It must have help. There must be a pressure exerted on the aether. What, in your opinion, might be the source of that pressure? Aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both. What, again in your opinion, causes the disappearance of the interference pattern when a sensor is placed near a slit? 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE' http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles. any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous energetic contact with a hidden medium The hidden medium of de Broglie wave mechanics is the aether. The energetic contact is the state of displacement of the aether. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined path which takes it through one slit. The associated wave in the aether passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves are disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and it no longer creates an interference pattern. Fascinating! What is it about the detection of the particle that turns the associated aether wave into "chop"? *The detector does nothing but "detect", correct? *So how does a device that does nothing but detect have any affect at all upon the aether wave that's associated with the particle? In a boat double slit experiment there are pilings at the exits to the slits with sensors on them to detect the boat. As the boat exits the slits the pilings turn the bow wave into chop. The detection destroys the coherence of the associated wave in the aether. The detection destroys the coherence between the particle and its associated wave in the aether. But where do those "pilings" come from? How does the detection instrument generate those pilings? How does the detection destroy the dual coherence you describe? All it happens to be is a detector, an instrument that merely *receives* information. It's noted that the detector must somehow do something to destroy the dual coherence, but precisely how does an instrument that is only there to receive information have any effect at all upon the particle or the wave? -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Happiness makes up in height for what it lacks in length." |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 12, 4:35*pm, Painius wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:11:06 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 12, 2:55*am, Painius wrote: On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 11, 6:13 pm, Painius wrote: Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. Yet, the aether cannot do that on its own. It must have help. There must be a pressure exerted on the aether. What, in your opinion, might be the source of that pressure? Aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both. What, again in your opinion, causes the disappearance of the interference pattern when a sensor is placed near a slit? 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE' http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles. any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous energetic contact with a hidden medium The hidden medium of de Broglie wave mechanics is the aether. The energetic contact is the state of displacement of the aether. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined path which takes it through one slit. The associated wave in the aether passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves are disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and it no longer creates an interference pattern. Fascinating! What is it about the detection of the particle that turns the associated aether wave into "chop"? *The detector does nothing but "detect", correct? *So how does a device that does nothing but detect have any affect at all upon the aether wave that's associated with the particle? In a boat double slit experiment there are pilings at the exits to the slits with sensors on them to detect the boat. As the boat exits the slits the pilings turn the bow wave into chop. The detection destroys the coherence of the associated wave in the aether. The detection destroys the coherence between the particle and its associated wave in the aether. But where do those "pilings" come from? *How does the detection instrument generate those pilings? *How does the detection destroy the dual coherence you describe? *All it happens to be is a detector, an instrument that merely *receives* information. *It's noted that the detector must somehow do something to destroy the dual coherence, but precisely how does an instrument that is only there to receive information have any effect at all upon the particle or the wave? -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Happiness makes up in height for what it lacks in length." The detector detects the particle by physically interacting with the particle. The detector also physically interacts with the associated wave in the aether. The detector turns the aether wave into chop. It is amazing you can make up magical particles which magically flow toward the Earth and magically transition from mass to energy and back again but you can't understand how physically detecting the a particle can turn the associated wave in the aether into chop. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:21:10 -0800 (PST), mpc755
wrote: On Nov 12, 4:35*pm, Painius wrote: On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:11:06 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 12, 2:55*am, Painius wrote: On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 11, 6:13 pm, Painius wrote: Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. Yet, the aether cannot do that on its own. It must have help. There must be a pressure exerted on the aether. What, in your opinion, might be the source of that pressure? Aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both. What, again in your opinion, causes the disappearance of the interference pattern when a sensor is placed near a slit? 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE' http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles. any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous energetic contact with a hidden medium The hidden medium of de Broglie wave mechanics is the aether. The energetic contact is the state of displacement of the aether. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined path which takes it through one slit. The associated wave in the aether passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves are disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and it no longer creates an interference pattern. Fascinating! What is it about the detection of the particle that turns the associated aether wave into "chop"? *The detector does nothing but "detect", correct? *So how does a device that does nothing but detect have any affect at all upon the aether wave that's associated with the particle? In a boat double slit experiment there are pilings at the exits to the slits with sensors on them to detect the boat. As the boat exits the slits the pilings turn the bow wave into chop. The detection destroys the coherence of the associated wave in the aether. The detection destroys the coherence between the particle and its associated wave in the aether. But where do those "pilings" come from? *How does the detection instrument generate those pilings? *How does the detection destroy the dual coherence you describe? *All it happens to be is a detector, an instrument that merely *receives* information. *It's noted that the detector must somehow do something to destroy the dual coherence, but precisely how does an instrument that is only there to receive information have any effect at all upon the particle or the wave? The detector detects the particle by physically interacting with the particle. The detector also physically interacts with the associated wave in the aether. The detector turns the aether wave into chop. It is amazing you can make up magical particles which magically flow toward the Earth and magically transition from mass to energy and back again but you can't understand how physically detecting the a particle can turn the associated wave in the aether into chop. lol! It is you, Mike, who proffers effect without cause. So it is you who make up the magic of an aether that causes gravity merely by being displaced by matter. Without a pressure/force behind that aether, then it operates on fairy wings. -- Indelibly yours, Paine @ http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "Happiness makes up in height for what it lacks in length." |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 11/14/2012 2:11 PM, Painius wrote:
It is amazing you can make up magical particles which magically flow toward the Earth and magically transition from mass to energy and back again but you can't understand how physically detecting the a particle can turn the associated wave in the aether into chop. lol! It is you, Mike, who proffers effect without cause. So it is you who make up the magic of an aether that causes gravity merely by being displaced by matter. Without a pressure/force behind that aether, then it operates on fairy wings. Good...So finally we all agree that ether doesn't exist at all. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮 http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 14, 2:11*pm, Painius wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:21:10 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 12, 4:35 pm, Painius wrote: On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 04:11:06 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 12, 2:55 am, Painius wrote: On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 16:13:58 -0800 (PST), mpc755 wrote: On Nov 11, 6:13 pm, Painius wrote: Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. Yet, the aether cannot do that on its own. It must have help. There must be a pressure exerted on the aether. What, in your opinion, might be the source of that pressure? Aether exists everywhere particles of matter do not. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels through a single slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both. What, again in your opinion, causes the disappearance of the interference pattern when a sensor is placed near a slit? 'Interpretation of quantum mechanics by the double solution theory - Louis de BROGLIE' http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-classiques/aflb124p001.pdf When in 1923-1924 I had my first ideas about Wave Mechanics I was looking for a truly concrete physical image, valid for all particles, of the wave and particle coexistence discovered by Albert Einstein in his "Theory of light quanta". I had no doubt whatsoever about the physical reality of waves and particles. any particle, even isolated, has to be imagined as in continuous energetic contact with a hidden medium The hidden medium of de Broglie wave mechanics is the aether. The energetic contact is the state of displacement of the aether. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined path which takes it through one slit. The associated wave in the aether passes through both. As the aether wave exits the slits it creates wave interference. As the particle exits a single slit the direction it travels is altered by the wave interference. This is the wave piloting the particle of pilot-wave theory. Detecting the particle strongly exiting a single slit turns the associated aether wave into chop. The aether waves exiting the slits interact with the detectors and become many short waves with irregular motion. The waves are disorganized. There is no wave interference. The particle pitches and rolls through the chop. The particle gets knocked around by the chop and it no longer creates an interference pattern. Fascinating! What is it about the detection of the particle that turns the associated aether wave into "chop"? The detector does nothing but "detect", correct? So how does a device that does nothing but detect have any affect at all upon the aether wave that's associated with the particle? In a boat double slit experiment there are pilings at the exits to the slits with sensors on them to detect the boat. As the boat exits the slits the pilings turn the bow wave into chop. The detection destroys the coherence of the associated wave in the aether. The detection destroys the coherence between the particle and its associated wave in the aether. But where do those "pilings" come from? How does the detection instrument generate those pilings? How does the detection destroy the dual coherence you describe? All it happens to be is a detector, an instrument that merely *receives* information. It's noted that the detector must somehow do something to destroy the dual coherence, but precisely how does an instrument that is only there to receive information have any effect at all upon the particle or the wave? The detector detects the particle by physically interacting with the particle. The detector also physically interacts with the associated wave in the aether. The detector turns the aether wave into chop. It is amazing you can make up magical particles which magically flow toward the Earth and magically transition from mass to energy and back again but you can't understand how physically detecting the a particle can turn the associated wave in the aether into chop. lol! *It is you, Mike, who proffers effect without cause. *So it is you who make up the magic of an aether that causes gravity merely by being displaced by matter. *Without a pressure/force behind that aether, then it operates on fairy wings. You are unable or unwilling to understand aether existing everywhere particles of matter do not means there is pressure. |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 14, 2:26*pm, HVAC wrote:
On 11/14/2012 2:11 PM, Painius wrote: It is amazing you can make up magical particles which magically flow toward the Earth and magically transition from mass to energy and back again but you can't understand how physically detecting the a particle can turn the associated wave in the aether into chop. lol! *It is you, Mike, who proffers effect without cause. *So it is you who make up the magic of an aether that causes gravity merely by being displaced by matter. *Without a pressure/force behind that aether, then it operates on fairy wings. Good...So finally we all agree that ether doesn't exist at all. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. A moving particle has an associated aether displacement wave. In a double slit experiment the particle travels a well defined path which takes it through one slit and the associated wave in the aether passes through both. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 11/14/2012 4:00 PM, mpc755 wrote:
Good...So finally we all agree that ether doesn't exist at all. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. 100% wrong. Ether exists exactly as much as god exists. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮 http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On Nov 14, 4:41*pm, HVAC wrote:
On 11/14/2012 4:00 PM, mpc755 wrote: Good...So finally we all agree that ether doesn't exist at all. Displaced aether pushing back and exerting inward pressure toward matter is gravity. 100% wrong. Ether exists exactly as much as god exists. Are you able to understand objects interact with a supersolid? You are in a bowling alley filled with a supersolid. You roll the bowling ball toward the pins. You are able to understand the bowling ball displaces the supersolid, correct? You are able to understand there is no loss of energy between the bowling ball and the supersolid because that's what supersolid means, correct? You are able to understand the bowling ball will roll forever through the supersolid, correct? The interaction of an object and a supersolid does not mean no interaction. It means no loss of energy in the interaction. The bowling ball requires energy to displace the supersolid. The supersolid returns to the bowling ball the same amount of energy as the supersolid 'displaces back'. Q. Is the bowling ball displacing the supersolid or is the supersolid displacing the bowling ball? A. Both occur simultaneously with equal force. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Aether has mass
On 11/14/2012 4:52 PM, mpc755 wrote:
100% wrong. Ether exists exactly as much as god exists. Are you able to understand objects interact with a supersolid? Ether = God. God does not exist = Ether does not exist. I'm just smarter and better than you, MP3. -- "OK you ****s, let's see what you can do now" -Hit Girl http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CjO7kBqTFqo .. 变亮 http://www.richardgingras.com/tia/im...logo_large.jpg |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Experimental evidence aether has mass | mpc755 | Astronomy Misc | 4 | November 27th 10 01:50 PM |
Yes, REAL suspected Black Holes can RiP you APART.!! But NOT in GR gtr Tivity.!! Because in GR Tivity you would be a POiNT ..and if you COULD have a mass, in GR, you would be a POiNT-mass. POiNT-mass CANNOT *STRETCH* with TOP & BOTTOM ROCKETs att | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 16th 05 08:54 AM |
Yes, REAL suspected Black Holes can RiP you APART.!! But NOT in GR gtr Tivity.!! Because in GR Tivity you would be a POiNT ..and if you COULD have a mass, in GR, you would be a POiNT-mass. POiNT-mass CANNOT *STRETCH* with TOP & BOTTOM ROCKETs attache | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 15th 05 12:22 PM |
Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass implies imaginary mass | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 1st 05 08:36 PM |