|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Irregular galaxy, faint blue galaxy follow Solar System pattern;#169; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory
--- quoting from Wikipedia on Irregular galaxy and Faint blue galaxy
--- Some galaxies do not have a regular shape, like a spiral or an elliptical galaxy. Those galaxies are known as irregular galaxies. Their shape is uncommon. They do not fall into any of the regular classes of the Hubble sequence, and they are often chaotic in appearance, with neither a nuclear bulge nor any trace of spiral arm structure. Collectively they are thought to make up about a quarter of all galaxies. Most irregular galaxies were once spiral or elliptical galaxies but were deformed by gravitational action. Irregular galaxies also contain abundant amounts of gas and dust. There are two major Hubble types of irregular galaxies: An Irr-I galaxy (Irr I) is an irregular galaxy that features some structure but not enough to place it cleanly into the Hubble sequence. de Vaucouleurs subtypes this into galaxies that have some spiral structure Sm, and those that do not Im. An Irr-II galaxy (Irr II) is an irregular galaxy that does not appear to feature any structure that can place it into the Hubble sequence. A third classification of irregular galaxies are the dwarf irregulars, labelled as dI or dIrrs. This type of galaxy is now thought to be important to understand the overall evolution of galaxies, as they tend to have a low level of metallicity and relatively high levels of gas, and are thought to be similar to the earliest galaxies that populated the Universe. They may represent a local (and therefore more recent) version of the faint blue galaxies known to exist in deep field galaxy surveys. --- A faint blue galaxy is a distant, irregularly shaped galaxy in which star formation occurs at a high rate. From the late 1970s it became apparent in deep galaxy surveys that a population of these blue galaxies existed at vast distances. Later investigation confirmed that going back in cosmological time suddenly a population of small, blue galaxies appears. The exact redshift at which this happens is still uncertain. These systems are small and far away. Little is known about their structure. However, they form stars very efficiently, hence the blue colours. One possibility is that these galaxies contain Population III stars. --- end quoting Wikipedia --- Now if the Universe follows similar patterns from the atom to the Solar System to Galaxies to the whole of the Cosmos, would mean that the evolution of the Solar System should be in evidence in galaxies. So that give a birth of a Solar system, it should be rather round and spherical shaped and not a flat disc of a ecliptic plane and this is what we see in galaxies as well as our Solar System. Our Solar System when newly borne was irregular shaped just the same as those Faint blue galaxy. But once a solar system had been around for more than billions of years, its mechanics of motion of Positron-Space-Gravity would have flattened the system into a disc shape of a plane of ecliptic. So our own Milky Way must be billions of years old such as 10 billion years of age whereas the roundish globular galaxies of Faint blue must be perhaps closer to their birth of 1 or less billion years. And this similarity pattern also follows from Solar System to galaxy of the Mercury precession in that galactic centers have a spew forth of emission pressure on nearby stars that forces them to have a noticeably larger precession. And also the tilt of Pluto from the plane of ecliptic should be seen in galaxies in that the furthest stars from the galactic center should have a larger tilt from the galactic plane than usual. I think this is the case of observed data. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Irregular galaxy, faint blue galaxy follow Solar System pattern; #169; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory
"Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message ... Now if the Universe follows similar patterns from the atom to the Solar System to Galaxies to the whole of the Cosmos... but it doesn't does it. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Irregular galaxy, faint blue galaxy follow Solar System pattern;#171; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory
Cwatters wrote: "Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message ... Now if the Universe follows similar patterns from the atom to the Solar System to Galaxies to the whole of the Cosmos... but it doesn't does it. Well it does. When we study the atom of hydrogen it is a ball like structure with dots as the electron cloud and where the dense nucleus is tiny and massive. The Solar System with its Oort Cloud is what? I am guessing 50,000 Au? Wikipedia has a nice picture of the Oort Cloud which is the last gravitationally bonded structure of the solar system. And of course the nucleus of the Oort Cloud would be the Sun with its planets. Now as for galaxies, there are round ball like galaxies with a nuclear interior where most of the mass lies. But as for all galaxies, well, they all seem to have a nuclear interior where most of the mass lies. As for the Cosmos itself, well, we have the Great Wall and now the Sloan Great Wall and quasars beyond the Sloan Great Wall. This leads us to suspect that the Walls + quasars are either the nucleus of the Cosmos or in the direction of the nucleus of the Cosmos. So, I would say yes, that the available evidence to date is pointing in the direction that from atoms to that of solar systems to galaxies to the Cosmos itself have the same underlying structure and the same pattern or mechanisms that built those structures. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
interesting new question and idea about the nuclei of atoms #172; 3rded; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory
Archimedes Plutonium wrote: Cwatters wrote: "Archimedes Plutonium" wrote in message ... Now if the Universe follows similar patterns from the atom to the Solar System to Galaxies to the whole of the Cosmos... but it doesn't does it. Well it does. When we study the atom of hydrogen it is a ball like structure with dots as the electron cloud and where the dense nucleus is tiny and massive. The Solar System with its Oort Cloud is what? I am guessing 50,000 Au? Wikipedia has a nice picture of the Oort Cloud which is the last gravitationally bonded structure of the solar system. And of course the nucleus of the Oort Cloud would be the Sun with its planets. Now as for galaxies, there are round ball like galaxies with a nuclear interior where most of the mass lies. But as for all galaxies, well, they all seem to have a nuclear interior where most of the mass lies. As for the Cosmos itself, well, we have the Great Wall and now the Sloan Great Wall and quasars beyond the Sloan Great Wall. This leads us to suspect that the Walls + quasars are either the nucleus of the Cosmos or in the direction of the nucleus of the Cosmos. So, I would say yes, that the available evidence to date is pointing in the direction that from atoms to that of solar systems to galaxies to the Cosmos itself have the same underlying structure and the same pattern or mechanisms that built those structures. Many, perhaps even most new ideas begin as by the example of the above. Where I was answering a question, and where in that answer is borne a new question. So if the atom is a fractal of the Solar System and that a fractal of the galaxy and that a fractal of the Cosmos. Leads to a very exciting question. Is the nucleus of a typical atom arranged like what the Solar System is arranged of its Sun, inner planets and gas giants and plane of ecliptic? So far, physics has only given an image of the nuclei as some sort of tiny ball where some neutrons orbit on the edge of the ball. But if the idea that the atom mirror images the Solar System, would then extend the picture of what a nuclei should look like. Of course not a hydrogen atom or helium but a multi neutron and proton nuclei. So can we expect the nucleus of a typical heavy element to have most of its neutrons and protons at a dead center corresponding to the Sun. Then can we expect some protons and neutrons to be orbiting this ball of dead center nuclei, much like the planets in the solar system? If we can determine through Physics experiments that a heavy element atom has what appears to be a **plane of ecliptic** of that nuclei, then I would say yes, that the atom structure of the nuclei is similar in shape and form to the Solar System structure. So, do we have any Physics Experiments that hints or suggests that their exists a **Nuclei Plane of Ecliptic** It would most certainly advance nuclear physics in leaps and bounds, because once we know the correct geometry of a structure, we easily make alot of progress. So is anyone aware of physics experiments where a plane of ecliptic type structure could be found? Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
geometry of atomic nuclei as solar-system shaped #173; 3rd ed; AtomTotality (Atom Universe) theory
I spent a good proportion of today reviewing of what is known about
the geometry of atomic nuclei and whether any experiments turned up a disc shape similar to the solar system of planets. I saw alot of stuff, everything from Widmanstatten structure to liquid-drop model to shell model. Even saw a recently filed research report that sulfur?? nuclei turn spherical and then football shaped. If nuclei are shaped like the Sun's plane of ecliptic, would then be experimentally measurable by the scattering pattern. Imagine the solar system and if a large number of rockets were launched at various points in the Oort cloud with the aim of hitting something in the center. Well if you aim at the center you may hit the Sun. But if you were in the Oort Cloud there is a special circle as a shooting platform that coincides with the plane of ecliptic. So if you shoot your rockets from the Oort Cloud from the plane of ecliptic would be the maximum vantage point of hitting something, whether a planet or the Sun. So if the shape of atomic nuclei have a plane of ecliptic shape, then that should be experimentally observable as a special firing platform to fire say X-rays or some other particle and reveal whether atomic nuclei are shaped like our solar system. Now in the Shell Model, rather than the Liquid Drop Model, we actually have protons and neutrons in shells just like the planets, however, in the Shell Model we do not have them in a plane of ecliptic. Now I wonder if this plane of ecliptic has already been discovered for atomic nuclei but not realized. Because when we do crystallography that we end up with a pattern of the atoms that imply the nuclei are plane-of- ecliptic. Archimedes Plutonium www.iw.net/~a_plutonium whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
organizing the evidence from Earth to furthest galaxy #161; 3rd ed;Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | August 21st 09 12:25 AM |
mean density of Jupiter moons follows pattern of the inner planets ;#148; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | August 16th 09 06:23 AM |
conservation of angular momentum only in an atom totality structure#142; 3rd ed; Atom Totality (Atom Universe) theory | Archimedes Plutonium[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 6 | August 13th 09 04:00 PM |
MECO theory reinforced by Atom Totality theory #48 ;3rd edition book:ATOM TOTALITY (Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | May 21st 09 07:51 PM |
Tifft quantized galaxy speeds #22 ;3rd edition book: ATOM TOTALITY(Atom Universe) THEORY | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 1 | May 9th 09 11:01 PM |