A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Dynamic A.I./ Human Feedback / Navigation Model



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 8th 10, 06:59 PM posted to alt.astronomy
American
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,224
Default Dynamic A.I./ Human Feedback / Navigation Model

Introduction

Applied _intuitive compliance_ to natural physical laws
out-performs antiquated, dogmatic science by the time
overwhelming statistics about relativities (of individual
exceptions to the mathematical laws) arrives on the scene,
and thus becomes too overwhelming or impossible to
apply for predictive purposes - even as there is no other
way other than statistics to predict an approximate
position or momentum, the observer immerses himself
into an ever deepening kinetic/potential energy balance
equation, where all perceiving mindsets become unique
again with each additional consideration added, for the
more "universal" observer.

However "universality" in the scientific sense, is what
happens when a purely mathematical construct of
energy-based laws are used to predict the integrated
behavior of multi-component systems, acting in concert
for the desired ends, which is a total system response,
esp. when 'generic' system statistics are not enough.

Yet the need again to continuously verify, depends upon
an increasingly adaptive or universal consciousness -
consciousness that some species of mankind could
use to apply with any particular 'tool' that may help to
extend one's consciousness for their own preferred
conditions, enhancing and/or extending survival to the
extreme - where innovation and marketability for the
masses becomes useful - the wealth of adaptation
technology sells for a price to those willing to accept
the same tools that the "advanced others" have used
for their own adaptation.

A.I. would be an extreme example of 'adaptation technology'.

Yet there exists a mysterious nature of things like Fitz'
coherence/non-coherence in Planck space, and IMO
would help to construct an aether theory that makes
more sense, in terms of constructing a time model
that uses things like phase centroids, and adding ideas
like Hodowanec's Rhysmonic Cosmology, Prime Number
Sums, Ramanujan's 8- and 24- dimension-like modular
functions, Munck's "Gematrian frequency numbers",
Robert Lawlor's "Sacred Geometry", as well as
Becker / Hagens UVG 120 Polyhedron.


Background for Calculating an A.I. Base for Cognitive
Working Memory in a Parallel Space-Time Sheet

Neutrons, protons, electrons, and neutrinos at the
human cell membrane space-time sheet act in our
current world spacetime as 3 types of human memory:
sensory/motor memory (proton,neutron), short term
memory (electron), and cognitive working
memory (neutrino).

We will be investigating phonon centroids, and how
the theoretical quantization spectrum representing the
zeros (horizon of primes) of the Riemann Zeta function
can be identified as a universal number that affects
CPT invariance for cognitive working memory systems
between current and parallel space-time sheets.

As suggested, a limit of capacitance depends upon
the level of zero that is selected from the Riemann
horizon of primes. The higher the frequency, the higher
the spectral resolution, and the higher the amplitude
(and therefore imaginary mass). However, the key
here is phase centroids, and how they become evaluated
across an expanding wavefront, in terms of its mapping
onto another "current" parallel spacetime worldsheet,
using a variable point of prime on the Riemann horizon.

By decreasing the prime, the sideband frequencies
are pulled "against" conscious entrainment, because the
lower primes tend to anchor their harmonics slower
than the higher ones do. Inversely, the sidebands may
become strengthened when anchoring a higher prime
"inside" a lower one, as the sidebands are pulled
"towards" conscious entrainment, because the higher
primes anchor their harmonics faster than the lower
ones do.

The characteristics of establishing a pulse probe
sequencing program for a 24 dimensional elliptical
modular grid is a function of the phonon phase centroids,
amplitude, and pulsing frequency.

The phase centroid can be found by measuring the
wave group speed of a modulated, longitudinally oscillating
field, using the oscillation frequency, separation distance
between phonon group mass, and measured phase shift.

The phase centroid velocity is the velocity of propogation
of the field patterns, and for waveguides is greater than c,
and is equal to c x l_g / l , where l_g is the wavelength in
the waveguide, equal to l / sqrt [ ( 1 - ( f_c / f )^2 ] where l
is the entering wavelength, f_c is the cutoff frequency in
the waveguide, and f is the entering frequency.

For angular modulation, or phase modulation, the phase
modulation index (PM), or D_q, where q is the phase
deviation of the carrier caused by the modulating signal.
If D_qpeak = b = D_fpeak / m, where b is the argument
of the Bessel Function of the first kind of order n, where n
is an integer and described by J0(b), J1(b), J2(b), ...Jn(b)
(in the table of Bessel Functions of the the first kind, see
below), and m is the modulation signal frequency in Hz.

The value of these Bessel Functions is representative of
the magnitude of the signal's sidebands plus and minus n.
It can be shown that the values for the minus values (or for
the lower sideband) of n in the Bessel chart represent a
dimunition of frequency and therefore an additional increase
in the phase velocity, since phase speed is a function of
frequency, or space. (The carrier frequency becomes
represented by setting n = 0).

b Jn=0 Jn=1 Jn=2 Jn=3 Jn=4 Jn=5 Jn=6 Jn=7 Jn=8 Jn=9 Jn=10
0.0 1.00
0.2 0.99 0.10
0.4 0.96 0.20 0.02
0.6 0.91 0.29 0.04
0.8 0.85 0.37 0.08 0.01
1.0 0.77 0.44 0.11 0.02
1.2 0.67 0.50 0.16 0.03 0.01
1.4 0.57 0.54 0.21 0.05 0.01
1.6 0.46 0.57 0.26 0.07 0.01
1.8 0.34 0.58 0.31 0.10 0.02
2.0 0.22 0.58 0.35 0.13 0.03 0.01
2.2 0.11 0.56 0.40 0.16 0.05 0.01
2.4 0.00 0.52 0.43 0.20 0.06 0.02
2.6 -0.10 0.47 0.46 0.24 0.08 0.02 0.01
2.8 -0.19 0.41 0.48 0.27 0.11 0.03 0.01
3.0 -0.26 0.34 0.49 0.31 0.13 0.04 0.01
3.2 -0.32 0.26 0.48 0.34 0.16 0.06 0.02
3.4 -0.36 0.18 0.47 0.37 0.19 0.07 0.02 0.01
3.6 -0.39 0.10 0.44 0.40 0.22 0.09 0.03 0.01
3.8 -0.40 0.01 0.41 0.42 0.25 0.11 0.04 0.01
4.0 -0.40 -0.07 0.36 0.43 0.28 0.13 0.05 0.02
4.2 -0.38 -0.14 0.31 0.43 0.31 0.16 0.06 0.02 0.01
4.4 -0.34 -0.20 0.25 0.43 0.34 0.18 0.08 0.03 0.01
4.6 -0.30 -0.26 0.18 0.42 0.36 0.21 0.09 0.03 0.01
4.8 -0.24 -0.30 0.12 0.40 0.38 0.23 0.11 0.04 0.01
5.0 -0.18 -0.33 0.05 0.36 0.39 0.26 0.13 0.05 0.02 0.01
5.2 -0.11 -0.34-0.02 0.33 0.40 0.29 0.15 0.07 0.02 0.01
5.4 -0.04 -0.35-0.09 0.28 0.40 0.31 0.18 0.08 0.03 0.01
5.6 0.03 -0.33-0.15 0.23 0.39 0.33 0.20 0.09 0.04 0.01
5.8 0.09 -0.31-0.20 0.17 0.38 0.35 0.22 0.11 0.05 0.02 0.01
6.0 0.15 -0.28-0.24 0.11 0.36 0.36 0.25 0.13 0.06 0.02 0.01
6.2 0.20 -0.23-0.28 0.05 0.33 0.37 0.27 0.15 0.07 0.03 0.01
6.4 0.24 -0.18-0.30 -0.01 0.29 0.37 0.29 0.17 0.08 0.03 0.01
6.6 0.27 -0.12-0.31 -0.06 0.25 0.37 0.31 0.19 0.10 0.04 0.01
6.8 0.29 -0.07-0.31 -0.12 0.21 0.36 0.33 0.21 0.11 0.05 0.02
7.0 0.30 0.00 -0.30 -0.17 0.16 0.35 0.34 0.23 0.13 0.06 0.02
7.2 0.30 0.05 -0.28 -0.21 0.11 0.33 0.35 0.25 0.15 0.07 0.03
7.4 0.28 0.11 -0.25 -0.24 0.05 0.30 0.35 0.27 0.16 0.08 0.04
7.6 0.25 0.16 -0.21 -0.27 0.00 0.27 0.35 0.29 0.18 0.10 0.04
7.8 0.22 0.20 -0.16 -0.29 -0.06 0.23 0.35 0.31 0.20 0.11 0.05
8.0 0.17 0.23 -0.11 -0.29 -0.11 0.19 0.34 0.32 0.22 0.13 0.06
8.2 0.12 0.26 -0.06 -0.29 -0.15 0.14 0.32 0.33 0.24 0.14 0.07
8.4 0.07 0.27 0.00 -0.27 -0.19 0.09 0.30 0.34 0.26 0.16 0.08
8.6 0.01 0.27 0.05 -0.25 -0.22 0.04 0.27 0.34 0.28 0.18 0.10
8.8 -0.04 0.26 0.10 -0.22 -0.25 -0.01 0.24 0.34 0.29 0.20 0.11
9.0 -0.09 0.25 0.14 -0.18 -0.27 -0.06 0.20 0.33 0.31 0.21 0.12
9.2 -0.14 0.22 0.18 -0.14 -0.27 -0.10 0.16 0.31 0.31 0.23 0.14
9.4 -0.18 0.18 0.22 -0.09 -0.27 -0.14 0.12 0.30 0.32 0.25 0.16
9.6 -0.21 0.14 0.24 -0.04 -0.26 -0.18 0.08 0.27 0.32 0.27 0.17
9.8 -0.23 0.09 0.25 0.01 -0.25 -0.21 0.03 0.25 0.32 0.28 0.19
10. -0.25 0.04 0.25 0.06 -0.22 -0.23 -0.01 0.22 0.32 0.29 0.21

One may extract the lower sideband transmission, utilize it
as the new carrier frequency, and perform another phase
modulation to again increase phase velocity. This allows
phase velocities to increase in circuitry stages, depending
on the negative values of n in the Bessel chart. Taking the
value of r from r = separation distance between transmitting
antenna and reciever, we have a new iteration taking place
when a circuit stage for the new carrier frequency is set up.

Using D_n = n_i ( GM ) [ 1 / r_i - r_f ] ( from Gravitational
redshift theory ) to measure the frequency shift, the new
value for the lower sideband of carrier frequency is used to
measure the value for rf in a newer geodesic, i.e., a new
constant C in the expression C = 2GM. Note that as the
carrier frequency diminishes, the value for 2GM in the above
expression C = 2GM must compensate in order to balance
the above equation for D_n. It is commonly assumed that G
is invariable, but this is primarily an output of theories
from General Relativity. The post-Newtonian definition
of the Gravitational constant G include parameters w
exactly equal to w(j0) where j0 is the value of j today,
eons after the value of j (that existed in the primordial
universe and in the center of neutron stars).

Filter stages have to be added to each stage in order to
keep the carrier frequency from being subject to
Gaussian noise. In fact, the phase carrier-to-noise and
signal-to-noise ratios are filtered. The phase carrier-to-
noise value keeps the circuit tuned to a specific center
frequency, while the phase signal-to-noise ratio allows
filtering of unwanted harmonics within a specified
bandwidth.

The specified bandwidth can be determined by power
summation because the signal energy is proportional to the
square of the Bessel coefficients included in the summation.

The required bandwidth can be determined for a particular
efficiency. J0(b)2 + 2[J1(b)]2 + 2[J2(b)]2 + ...2[Jn(b)]2 = 1
where b = D_qpeak = D_fpeak / m Where b in this case is
the phase modulation index or the carrier frequency phase
deviation (peak) in radians, n is the order of the Bessel
function (from the above chart), and m is the modulation
signal frequency in Hz. The bandwidth requirements for
phase modulation follow Carson's Rule:

BIF = 2 ( b + 2 ) f_m where BIF is the IF bandwidth, b is
the modulation index for phase modulation or the carrier
frequency phase deviation (peak) in radians, and f_m is
the modulating frequency (highest), with 2 b 10.

What happens when phase velocity of the field patterns
(equal to c x l_g / l ) increases to the point that the
negative propogation time creates a signal reception
at the reciever simultaneously as the pulse is seen to
be leaving the transmission cell? The FTL negative
time difference would then be:

- DT = - (r_f / Vg - r_f / c ) = - ( n_g - 1 ) r_f / c

where n_g represents a group velocity index in the
formula V_g = c / n_g.

Since the wavelength for a given phase velocity can be
expressed by the formula: l = v * sqrt [3 p e^3 / m] where
v is the velocity, m is the mass, and e is the mean interval
between any two adjacent particles of hyperspace, so that
the number of such particles contained in any sphere of
radius r is nearly 4p r^3 / 3e^3, if r be a large multiple of e,
a phase centroid can be designed as follows:

l can be chosen from a specific circuitry stage so that:

circuit stage 1:

l_phase+1 = l_phase x l_group/ l_input

circuit stage 2:

l_phase+2= l_phase+1 x l_group+1/ l_input+1

circuit stage n:

l_phase+n= l_phase+(n-1) x l_group+(n-1)/ l_input+(n-1)

where the specific value of l becomes hardwired
to affect the superluminal phase centroid velocity vector.
(Note: The values of n in the above chart are not related
to the n's in the Bessel chart).

The target phase centroid frequency would be a
combination of phonon induced Rife frequencies,
which coincide with various healing frequencies of
one's own unique human physiology.

Human physiology changes according to one's
chosen path as being instrumental towards a
specific objective - the states of consciousness
involved have been stated in earlier posts as being
either red- or blue- shifted states:

The treatment on red and blue shifted sideband entrainment
frequencies for the integralled phase modulator and
demodulator (Conscious Entrainment Processes, Note 1)
ARE the compression and expansion holomorphics that
can be represented by their associated zero point energies.

In the golden spiral diagram, the red and dark grey lines
show the symmetry of each part of the spiral, as it rotates
into the center of the page. When rotating towards the center,
we say that the spiral has "negative" curvature. When the
spiral rotates from the point closest to the center of the
page outward, we say that the spiral has
"positive" curvature.

The blue half-circles represent what quadrant the spiral
is in, i.e., sectors I thru IV contain three complete rotations
of the spiral, making up 26 different "quadrants:

http://server6.theimagehosting.com/i...0& fullsize=1


Conclusion

IMO each of the studies and/or sciences listed above
are related to Fitz' phase coherence/decoherence
phenomenon, and deserve a place in the intuitive
branches of cutting-edge technology, and for many
in these and other usenets, any long-suffering stance
on their own physics utilizing a coherence/non-coherence
description, outnumbers the petty arguments against,
yet undergirds the foundations of a Unified Field Theory
*for* in the process.

Many are just beginning to see that some sort of Unified
Field Theory may be in reach - yet at the point of creating
a UFT renaissance in the arts and sciences, it has
rather drawn in, a recognition of humanity's own limitations
with the scientific method - questioning, researching,
hypotheses, tests, analyses, and communications that
are requiring the results to become communicated - are
being communicated lackidaisically, half-hazardly, and
sometimes even incoherently to the wrong audience.

Most who are ignorant of this truth either must remain
ignorant, or are actually political-peer spying by invalidating
and discrediting others' contributions, and then pilfering
them as their own, and as our progressive government grows
ever-larger and more ignorant over time, the progressive
transnationalists have their own cronys to thank for each
non-independent inability to compete in the marketplace
of ideas.

I see this as more of a systemic aberration, with
regards to achieving traction for things like energy
independence, heavier earth-to-orbit technology, and
retrieval and exploitation of extraterrestrial resources,
while most other fringe activists practice their usual online
trickle-up obfuscation, invalidation, and usual topic/author
stalking/bashing, particularly with anything having intuitive
merit, innovation, and/or humanitarian gesture.

One can therefore discount any "peer review" process
that's based upon honest disclosure and/or reliable
patent-to-market support, especially if there are the
usual monolithic PAC's accepting their green initiatives,
AND in lieu of any profitable CASH that may have been
better used to R&D the contribution of one's idea having
revolutionary energy technology (that would end up as
an affront to many of the monopolistic practices around
the globe anyway), the original intent of the inventor gets
thrown into the memory closet.

Why is it becoming more apparent over time that most
exceptional innovation becomes sequestered for further
tireless critique and condescension, covered up in levels
of priority for TORT battles reaping the best way that
prosecuting attorneys can rape the technology from a
system, rendering it "inert" and therefore "defunct", and
left as only "prey" that gets crushed between the political
parties, so that their own, most righteous recall of
potential markets of time and energy are the only
thing that matters?

IMO all the more reason to keep up the good work at
posting the most relevant topics, otherwise we're doomed
to repeat the past of our invalidating peers.


American

"Most are willing minions to mass opinions"

Note 1:

Zeros are real numbers that represent pole zeros (positive
and negative) in the space time continuum. Time hops
that use the sequence: 1,1,2,3,5,8,13,21,34,55,89,144,
233,377,610... as the ratio of two successive numbers in
the sequence, i.e., 1/1, 1/2, 2/3, 3/5, 5/8, 8/13, 13/21,
21/34, 34/55, 55/89, 89/144, 144/233, 233/377, 377/610...
tending towards the golden ratio of 1.618033989... are
formulated so that there exist a number of harmonics
of the sequences that are within the 420 - 470 Mhz range.

For example, 466 Mhz is a harmonic of 233; 432 Mhz is
a harmonic of 144; 445 Mhz is a harmonic of 89; 440 Mhz
is a harmonic of 55; 442 455, and 468 Mhz is a harmonic
of 13; 440, 448, 456, and 464 Mhz are all harmonics of 8;
441, 444, 447, 450, 453, 456, 459, 462, 465, and 468 Mhz
are all harmonics of 3; and 420, 422, 424, 426, 428, ...
470 Mhz are all harmonics of 2.

Note: Each hop is chosen so that its lowest wave number
prime is shared between hops, i.e., the prime number 17
is the lowest multiplier between the frequencies 442 Mhz
and 459 Mhz, but do we have either 442 or 459 listed for
any of the harmonics? The answer is yes, as a harmonic
of 13 and 2 for 442, and as a harmonic of 3 for 459.

The corresponding frequency hop between 442 Mhz and
459 Mhz could then be initiated by starting at the higher
filtered phase modulated beat frequency, for example,
using 8/13, to introduce a phase quadrature component
for binaural entrainment, using the 3/5 for the next filtered
phase modulated beat frequency. In other words, the
entrainment signal for the first beat frequency in the
pulse would be 8/13 for 459 Mhz, and 3/5 for 442 Mhz,
in phase modulation, using a Hilbert Transform harmonic
filter, thereby etherically inducing the 5/8 binaural (carrier
compression) ratio (which is, incidentally, between 3/5
and 8/13 in the Fabonacci sequence).Specifically, the
rational number 8/13 for 459 Mhz. means that this
particular Upper Side Band is blue shifted or stretched
or confined to a broader range in the spectrum, with the
new compression ratio of 8/13, and is represented in the
entrainment as an integralled phase modulator, whereas
the 3/5 for 442 Mhz. means that the particular Lower
Side Band is red shifted or compressed to a narrower
range in the spectrum, with a lower expansion ratio of
3/5, represented in the entrainment as an integralled
phase demodulator. Integralled phase modulators and
demodulators are the etheric components of entrainment.

The entraining 5/8 binaural (carrier compression) is
effected by each of these USB (Upper Side Band) and
LSB (Lower Side Band) components, by seeking to
reflect off the USB, into the container frequency, thereby
entraining the new carrier at the desired beat frequency.

The entrainment frequency is first chosen (For example,
O.B.E. (Out of Body Experience) at 22.0 Hz., used in
conjunction with 40 Hz. would be calculated together
by first adding both sidebands for each entrainment:
Carrier @ 22.0 Hz. = 442 Mhz / 20.09090909 Mhz. =
22.0 (Carrier timer) and Carrier @ 40.0 Hz. =
459 Mhz / 11.475 Mhz. = 40.0 (Carrier timer).

Divisor frequencies are selected to create the sideband
carrier compressions. The sidebands are then placed
around the new 5/8 binaural carrier so that the zero point
for entrainment is 0.273 units distance from the LSB side
of the carrier, so as to retain the maximum information
speed. This would represent the closest intermediate
frequency that is approximately 0.273 units distance
between 442 Mhz. and 459 Mhz., which would be near
(0.273)(459 - 442) + 442 = 446.641 Mhz., which is
448.00 Mhz. (Take 8 as the divisor from the 5/8 binaural
carrier to find the multiplier that lands closest to
446.641 Mhz., and you get 8 x 56 = 448.00 Mhz.).

As mentioned earlier, the allophonemics are the key to
unlocking the intermediate frequency by randomly
tweaking combinations of pink allophonemic pulses in
ratios of 1 part pink allophonemic:3 parts pink O.B.E.
(22.0 Hz. + 40.0 Hz.) in the sidebands around the
intermediate frequency until phase lock with the O.B.E.
is accomplished. The pink allophonemic pulses consist
of the 2 x 128 = 256 possible combinations of allophonemic
pink noise frequencies that are used to triangulate the
phase lock on the O.B.E. The allophonemics are
recorded from Rife Frequency physiological health
monitored frequencies, and processed with pink noise
before being synthesized with the upper and lower
sidebands.

Once phase lock on the first resolution is accomplished,
the next sequence would jump between 8/13 and 21/34,
using 429 and 442 Mhz, respectively, in phase modulation,
with a shared prime of 13, thereby using a different
Hilbert Transform harmonic filter, repeating the process
with the USB and LSB etherically induced 13/21 binaural
(carrier compression) ratio, with the "21" from 13/21 as
the new multiplier. The lowest prime, or zero, is called
the real prime at infinity because this is associated with
the real valuation (as in the decimal 0.000 being equal to
0/infinity or infinity/0) (as opposed to any of the p-adic
valuations) on the rationals.

The difference for the real prime at infinity is the one
which completes a fraction to give some decimal number
rather than some reducible fraction or irreducible
prime fraction.

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
state university model import model management model minority modeltrain shows mom cutielittle Astronomy Misc 0 November 16th 08 09:56 PM
David A. Smith (DLZC of sci.astro), prejudistic human rights crimesof stalking, prejudistic semitism of hate crimes, discriminations of educatedpeople on all counts dismissing human rights really fast. Semitism will havejustice on human rights ground gb[_3_] Astronomy Misc 0 November 7th 08 09:02 PM
A New Dynamic Model of the Solar System Bill Clark UK Astronomy 6 September 1st 04 08:16 AM
A New Dynamic Model of the Solar System Bill Clark Astronomy Misc 6 August 29th 04 12:16 PM
Any UTI Experiences or Feedback yet? Photoking Amateur Astronomy 0 September 11th 03 08:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.