|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars
Please note if you are worried about your tax dollars being wasted look to
other parts of the gov. NASA makes up a smaller percentage of the US Gov budget than people think, but it gets the most publicity of any organization. Since, it is related to space and oo ahh that is cool and probably expensive people blame NASA for loss of money. Our Gov wastes a lot of money on other things and some money just vanishes at rates of billions. Over the past 2yrs our gov has run up nearly trillion in debt not counting other previous things................ My note on the shuttle replacement issue.... Right now it seems like NASA is going to actually try and do the OSP (Orbital Space Plane) which only is meant to carry people. Therefore the OSP cannot be a full replacement for the shuttle (since it can only carry people). There will be missions where NASA will need a shuttle class/type of aircraft at some point in time after the shuttles are retired. I think for a quick fix they should be replaced w/ a MODIFIED and UPDATED RSA Buran. Not necessarily a RSA Buran, but something designed w/ some of the ideas that the Buran was built upon like the energia rocket it used which was also had a dual purpose to haul satellites in to space (I think a rather nice way to kill 2 birds w/ one stone). Also, if you are complaining about satellites being lost. It is a very hard thing to land / placing orbit a craft on a planet by remote control. I do not see you doing any thing to make that easier and send the gov your tax dollars is not really an answer. In contrast to that, the satellites and craft that have successfully worked have worked well past there lifetime and have been extremely awarding. One nice example of this is GALILEO. Has been at Jup since 96 is going to be laid to rest in Sept. It has out lasted and out worked what it was going to originally do. Taken on some 18 times the amount of radiation and has had its life extended many times. NASA also has various joint projects like SOHO which is important in our day to day lives. It helps people make forecasts of the solar weather. In doing this it enables companies to know when and to be prepared if/when something happens to their satellites. Our world relies upon satellites for a lot of things: TV (cable, Al-antenna, and satellite) rely upon satellites, live radio casts (national), the internet, phone calls, cell phones, GPS (many things rely upon this: medical, firedepts, shipping, taxi's(some), aviation, a lot more....)........ Also, note NASA is run ultimately by the senate appropriations committee. They decide really what NASA can do b/c they control the money flow to NASA. - Stefan |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars | Jorge R. Frank | Space Shuttle | 17 | July 20th 03 10:01 PM |
NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars | Rusty B | Policy | 0 | July 18th 03 10:34 PM |
NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars | Rusty B | Policy | 4 | July 18th 03 10:14 PM |
NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars | Jorge R. Frank | Policy | 1 | July 17th 03 09:02 PM |
NASA Budget 1958 - 2003 in constant (1996) dollars | Jorge R. Frank | Policy | 1 | July 17th 03 05:17 AM |