|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillati
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm
motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame) In 1964 it was I.I.Shapiro who made precise radar reflection measurements on Venus and Mercury. He found a peculiar reflection anomaly for both planets around the moment of conjunction. He didn't have a clear explanation for this anomaly ( see the text on top of page 170) Around the 10-15th of may and 20-27 july 1964, we can see a clear change in the radar reflection of Venus, which in my perspective can only have one origin: the influence of the overlapping Earth related globular extinction LASOF (local anti-symmetrical oscillating vacuum frame) with Venus. This was reason to accept that the radius of the LASOF globule should be about 70 million km. As a logic result, the Venus related LASOF should have a radius of 54 million km. For Mercury the LASOF radius should be 21 million km. see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...ightspeed.html Leo Vuyk. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscil
If a radar signal leaves the Earth with a speed C-v, (v. earth orbital
speed)and after a 70 million km travel the speed has become C (extinct), --after bouncing back on the approaching Venus--- the radar signal leaves Venus with the speed of C+v, (v. Venus orbital speed) and after 54 million km this speed has become also C, THEN FIGURE 3-4 ( see below) OF THE SHAPIRO RADAR REFLECTION ANOMALY CAN BE EXPAINED, by the mutual overlap of Venus and later Earth of te "extinction distances". Leo Vuyk. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscil
On Nov 4, 2:42 pm, " wrote:
If a radar signal leaves the Earth with a speed C-v, (v. earth orbital speed)and after a 70 million km travel the speed has become C (extinct), --after bouncing back on the approaching Venus--- the radar signal leaves Venus with the speed of C+v, (v. Venus orbital speed) and after 54 million km this speed has become also C, THEN FIGURE 3-4 ( see below) OF THE SHAPIRO RADAR REFLECTION ANOMALY CAN BE EXPAINED, by the mutual overlap of Venus and later Earth of te "extinction distances". LeoVuyk. For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/2006/02/g ravity-dependent- lightspeed.html |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscil
On Nov 6, 3:05 pm, " wrote:
On Nov 4, 2:42 pm, " wrote: If a radar signal leaves the Earth with a speed C-v, (v. earth orbital speed)and after a 70 million km travel the speed has become C (extinct), --after bouncing back on the approaching Venus--- the radar signal leaves Venus with the speed of C+v, (v. Venus orbital speed) and after 54 million km this speed has become also C, THEN FIGURE 3-4 ( see below) OF THE SHAPIRO RADAR REFLECTION ANOMALY CAN BE EXPAINED, by the mutual overlap of Venus and later Earth of te "extinction distances". LeoVuyk. For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...ity-dependent- lightspeed.html "Short Period Quasi-Regular Oscillations" of Venus and Mercury of about 30 days, are described by I.I Shapiro in Radar Astronomy 1968, page 170-172. see at the end of the file mentioned below. Examples of QPOs (Quasi Periodic Oscillations) or Orbital Periodicities of Binaries are supposed to be examples of gravity influenced LASOF lightspeed anomalies just like Venus and Mercury. see below articles by: H.Lehmann, (Binary RZ-cas.) and P.G.Ostrov, (Binary HV 2543). http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...influence.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscil
On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:54:12 -0800, "
wrote: On Nov 6, 3:05 pm, " wrote: On Nov 4, 2:42 pm, " wrote: If a radar signal leaves the Earth with a speed C-v, (v. earth orbital speed)and after a 70 million km travel the speed has become C (extinct), --after bouncing back on the approaching Venus--- the radar signal leaves Venus with the speed of C+v, (v. Venus orbital speed) and after 54 million km this speed has become also C, THEN FIGURE 3-4 ( see below) OF THE SHAPIRO RADAR REFLECTION ANOMALY CAN BE EXPAINED, by the mutual overlap of Venus and later Earth of te "extinction distances". LeoVuyk. For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...ity-dependent- lightspeed.html "Short Period Quasi-Regular Oscillations" of Venus and Mercury of about 30 days, are described by I.I Shapiro in Radar Astronomy 1968, page 170-172. see at the end of the file mentioned below. Examples of QPOs (Quasi Periodic Oscillations) or Orbital Periodicities of Binaries are supposed to be examples of gravity influenced LASOF lightspeed anomalies just like Venus and Mercury. see below articles by: H.Lehmann, (Binary RZ-cas.) and P.G.Ostrov, (Binary HV 2543). http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...influence.html The key though, is understanding that doppler measuerments, do not involve changes in the velocity of the carrier, but changes in the frequency of a _modulation_ carried on this. The velocity of the signal in each direction is the same (C). There is no 'starting off at C+v'. Best Wshes |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscil
On 7 nov, 17:28, Roger Hamlett
wrote: On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:54:12 -0800, " wrote: On Nov 6, 3:05 pm, " wrote: On Nov 4, 2:42 pm, " wrote: If a radar signal leaves the Earth with a speed C-v, (v. earth orbital speed)and after a 70 million km travel the speed has become C (extinct), --after bouncing back on the approaching Venus--- the radar signal leaves Venus with the speed of C+v, (v. Venus orbital speed) and after 54 million km this speed has become also C, THEN FIGURE 3-4 ( see below) OF THE SHAPIRO RADAR REFLECTION ANOMALY CAN BE EXPAINED, by the mutual overlap of Venus and later Earth of te "extinction distances". LeoVuyk. For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...ity-dependent- lightspeed.html "Short Period Quasi-Regular Oscillations" of Venus and Mercury of about 30 days, are described by I.I Shapiro in Radar Astronomy 1968, page 170-172. see at the end of the file mentioned below. Examples of QPOs (Quasi Periodic Oscillations) or Orbital Periodicities of Binaries are supposed to be examples of gravity influenced LASOF lightspeed anomalies just like Venus and Mercury. see below articles by: H.Lehmann, (Binary RZ-cas.) and P.G.Ostrov, (Binary HV 2543). http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...all-anomalies-... The key though, is understanding that doppler measuerments, do not involve changes in the velocity of the carrier, but changes in the frequency of a _modulation_ carried on this. The velocity of the signal in each direction is the same (C). There is no 'starting off at C+v'. Best Wshes- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven - - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven - Roger, Sorry for the delay. The key is that the speed of light is in a complex way dependent on the mass of the carrier inside the Solar frame.. see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...ightspeed.html Leo VuyK |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscil
On Nov 8, 10:52 am, " wrote:
On 7 nov, 17:28, Roger Hamlett wrote: On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:54:12 -0800, " wrote: On Nov 6, 3:05 pm, " wrote: On Nov 4, 2:42 pm, " wrote: If a radar signal leaves the Earth with a speed C-v, (v. earth orbital speed)and after a 70 million km travel the speed has become C (extinct), --after bouncing back on the approaching Venus--- the radar signal leaves Venus with the speed of C+v, (v. Venus orbital speed) and after 54 million km this speed has become also C, THEN FIGURE 3-4 ( see below) OF THE SHAPIRO RADAR REFLECTION ANOMALY CAN BE EXPAINED, by the mutual overlap of Venus and later Earth of te "extinction distances". LeoVuyk. For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...ity-dependent- lightspeed.html "Short Period Quasi-Regular Oscillations" of Venus and Mercury of about 30 days, are described by I.I Shapiro in Radar Astronomy 1968, page 170-172. see at the end of the file mentioned below. Examples of QPOs (Quasi Periodic Oscillations) or Orbital Periodicities of Binaries are supposed to be examples of gravity influenced LASOF lightspeed anomalies just like Venus and Mercury. see below articles by: H.Lehmann, (Binary RZ-cas.) and P.G.Ostrov, (Binary HV 2543). http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...all-anomalies-... The key though, is understanding that doppler measuerments, do not involve changes in the velocity of the carrier, but changes in the frequency of a _modulation_ carried on this. The velocity of the signal in each direction is the same (C). There is no 'starting off at C+v'. Best Wshes- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven - - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven - Roger, Sorry for the delay. The key is that the speed of light is in a complex way dependent on the mass of the carrier inside the Solar frame.. see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...y-dependent-li... LeoVuyK- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sorry, again The key is that the speed of light is in a complex way dependent on the mass of the carrier inside the Solar or the Earth Frame . Thus a GPS satellite's mass has NO influence on the speed of the emitted signal. Into the direction of the Earth there is an Earth related lightspeed. Hoewever, into other directions the GPS signal has a complex change which is more related to the Sola frame. Which is why Satellite GPS PODs are found to be often unreliable. because the biased measurements are assumed to be depending on the direction to the Earth orbital motion. see: |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscil
On Nov 8, 11:03 am, " wrote:
On Nov 8, 10:52 am, " wrote: On 7 nov, 17:28, Roger Hamlett wrote: On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:54:12 -0800, " wrote: On Nov 6, 3:05 pm, " wrote: On Nov 4, 2:42 pm, " wrote: If a radar signal leaves the Earth with a speed C-v, (v. earth orbital speed)and after a 70 million km travel the speed has become C (extinct), --after bouncing back on the approaching Venus--- the radar signal leaves Venus with the speed of C+v, (v. Venus orbital speed) and after 54 million km this speed has become also C, THEN FIGURE 3-4 ( see below) OF THE SHAPIRO RADAR REFLECTION ANOMALY CAN BE EXPAINED, by the mutual overlap of Venus and later Earth of te "extinction distances". LeoVuyk. For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...ity-dependent- lightspeed.html "Short Period Quasi-Regular Oscillations" of Venus and Mercury of about 30 days, are described by I.I Shapiro in Radar Astronomy 1968, page 170-172. see at the end of the file mentioned below. Examples of QPOs (Quasi Periodic Oscillations) or Orbital Periodicities of Binaries are supposed to be examples of gravity influenced LASOF lightspeed anomalies just like Venus and Mercury. see below articles by: H.Lehmann, (Binary RZ-cas.) and P.G.Ostrov, (Binary HV 2543). http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...all-anomalies-... The key though, is understanding that doppler measuerments, do not involve changes in the velocity of the carrier, but changes in the frequency of a _modulation_ carried on this. The velocity of the signal in each direction is the same (C). There is no 'starting off at C+v'. Best Wshes- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven - - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven - Roger, Sorry for the delay. The key is that the speed of light is in a complex way dependent on the mass of the carrier inside the Solar frame.. see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...y-dependent-li... LeoVuyK- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sorry, again The key is that the speed of light is in a complex way dependent on the mass of the carrier inside the Solar or the Earth Frame . Thus a GPS satellite's mass has NO influence on the speed of the emitted signal. Into the direction of the Earth there is an Earth related lightspeed. Hoewever, into other directions the GPS signal has a complex change which is more related to the Sola frame. Which is why Satellite GPS PODs are found to be often unreliable. because the biased measurements are assumed to be depending on the direction to the Earth orbital motion. see:- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - To get more clarity about the key arguments I am using for my LASOF idea, I searched and found new impressive data. It is a clear example that GPS signals skimming the earth passing near or at Higher altitudes, are less related to the earth frame and more by the Solar frame. In this case (CHAMP) providing outliers of 200 meters. A clear example of GPS signal failures for the CHAMP Low Earth Orbiters at 430 km altitude, is one of the reasons that so called Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination (POD) by GPS readings is not possible. Several other ground based systems and complex computer programs are needed to compensate these errors. However, if the LASOF idea about gravity (or Mass) related lightspeed is incorporated in the GPS readings, then these errors are supposed to vanish for a great deal. I made a copy with my comment see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...influence.html The information described above was found in "Near real time Precise orbit determination of low earth satellites etc. pdf page 85, by:Tae- Suk-Bae 2006. Ohio state university. See: http://www.ceegs.ohio-state.edu/gsre...report_481.pdf Leo Vuyk. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
The "Venus/Mercury Radar Reflection Conjunction Anomaly", is a firm motive to question Special relativity and a support for the idea of "Planetary lightspeed frame dragging" by a so called LASOF. ( Local Anti-Symmetrical Oscil
On Nov 9, 5:46 am, " wrote:
On Nov 8, 11:03 am, " wrote: On Nov 8, 10:52 am, " wrote: On 7 nov, 17:28, Roger Hamlett wrote: On Wed, 07 Nov 2007 04:54:12 -0800, " wrote: On Nov 6, 3:05 pm, " wrote: On Nov 4, 2:42 pm, " wrote: If a radar signal leaves the Earth with a speed C-v, (v. earth orbital speed)and after a 70 million km travel the speed has become C (extinct), --after bouncing back on the approaching Venus--- the radar signal leaves Venus with the speed of C+v, (v. Venus orbital speed) and after 54 million km this speed has become also C, THEN FIGURE 3-4 ( see below) OF THE SHAPIRO RADAR REFLECTION ANOMALY CAN BE EXPAINED, by the mutual overlap of Venus and later Earth of te "extinction distances". LeoVuyk. For more clarity, I added a new image (C2) representing the geometry of the Venus-Earth situation on 10th of April 1964. see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...ity-dependent- lightspeed.html "Short Period Quasi-Regular Oscillations" of Venus and Mercury of about 30 days, are described by I.I Shapiro in Radar Astronomy 1968, page 170-172. see at the end of the file mentioned below. Examples of QPOs (Quasi Periodic Oscillations) or Orbital Periodicities of Binaries are supposed to be examples of gravity influenced LASOF lightspeed anomalies just like Venus and Mercury. see below articles by: H.Lehmann, (Binary RZ-cas.) and P.G.Ostrov, (Binary HV 2543). http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...all-anomalies-... The key though, is understanding that doppler measuerments, do not involve changes in the velocity of the carrier, but changes in the frequency of a _modulation_ carried on this. The velocity of the signal in each direction is the same (C). There is no 'starting off at C+v'. Best Wshes- Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht niet weergeven - - Tekst uit oorspronkelijk bericht weergeven - Roger, Sorry for the delay. The key is that the speed of light is in a complex way dependent on the mass of the carrier inside the Solar frame.. see: http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...y-dependent-li... LeoVuyK- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Sorry, again The key is that the speed of light is in a complex way dependent on the mass of the carrier inside the Solar or the Earth Frame . Thus a GPS satellite's mass has NO influence on the speed of the emitted signal. Into the direction of the Earth there is an Earth related lightspeed. Hoewever, into other directions the GPS signal has a complex change which is more related to the Sola frame. Which is why Satellite GPS PODs are found to be often unreliable. because the biased measurements are assumed to be depending on the direction to the Earth orbital motion. see:- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - To get more clarity about the key arguments I am using for my LASOF idea, I searched and found new impressive data. It is a clear example that GPS signals skimming the earth passing near or at Higher altitudes, are less related to the earth frame and more by the Solar frame. In this case (CHAMP) providing outliers of 200 meters. A clear example of GPS signal failures for the CHAMP Low Earth Orbiters at 430 km altitude, is one of the reasons that so called Kinematic Precise Orbit Determination (POD) by GPS readings is not possible. Several other ground based systems and complex computer programs are needed to compensate these errors. However, if the LASOF idea about gravity (or Mass) related lightspeed is incorporated in the GPS readings, then these errors are supposed to vanish for a great deal. I made a copy with my comment see:http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot...all-anomalies-... The information described above was found in "Near real time Precise orbit determination of low earth satellites etc. pdf page 85, by:Tae- Suk-Bae 2006. Ohio state university. See:http://www.ceegs.ohio-state.edu/gsre...report_481.pdf Leo Vuyk.- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - My conclusion is still, that the reference frames of the planets (Earth) and Sun are interfering in smooth way what I dubbed a LASOF (Local A-Symmetrical Oscillating vacuum Frame). The LASOF influences the quality of GPS signals if they are not travelling into (or away from) the Earth surface and if they are passing the Earth at a larger distance. The LASOF influences also the speed of the outgoing signals from Earth (like radar signals to Venus) and the additional speed (C+/-v ) will become extinct after 70 million km from Earth. Leo Vuyk. http://bigbang-entanglement.blogspot.com/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Precession of Mercury's longitude of perihelion - (so called "anomaly") | Androcles | Astronomy Misc | 132 | May 27th 07 07:24 PM |
Precession of Mercury's longitude of perihelion - (so called "anomaly") | Androcles | Astronomy Misc | 0 | May 12th 07 01:36 AM |
Cosmic relief GR "predicts" (within 7 micro-seconds) EARth's ROTATiON ..and in an EARth-centered frame-of-reference.!! | brian a m stuckless | Policy | 0 | December 14th 05 10:37 PM |
" Universe matter develop equation" must replace "The theory of relativity" finally | xszxsz | Science | 0 | October 28th 04 08:54 AM |