|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Venus is alive and kicking our NASA's butt
Guth Venus is way more alive than Usenet
http://mygate.mailgate.org/mynews/re...=smart&p=1/443 http://groups.google.com/group/rec.o...add59b61fb9f50 - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Venus is alive and kicking our NASA's butt
How unfortunate, that the ESA Venus EXPRESS truth and nothing but the
truth can't even be Usenet shared without blowing yet another mainstream status quo fuse. Must be because of what the likes of John Ackerman had to say as of provided within his "Alternative View of Venus", and of what a few others before and after having suggested that the planetology of Venus isn't nearly as old as we'd been informed by our very own NASA. I guess unlike our NASA's hocus-pocus moon, the regular laws of physics and of planetology factors are working exactly as they should on behalf of Venus. Sorry to say that the digital radar obtained composite image of what's easily interpreted as including what's looking so intelligently artificial about Venus, that as such it still (after nearly 7 years) stands the test of time and of surviving more peer review flak than you or I could have imagined. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Venus is alive and kicking our NASA's butt
The moon is a little bit further from Earth with each passing year.
If the Chinesees expect to land a rice-muncher on it, they'd better hurry. It will be out of reach soon. "Brad Guth" wrote in message news:1980f8d381c348f62a64122ad50006f2.49644@mygate .mailgate.org... How unfortunate, that the ESA Venus EXPRESS truth and nothing but the truth can't even be Usenet shared without blowing yet another mainstream status quo fuse. Must be because of what the likes of John Ackerman had to say as of provided within his "Alternative View of Venus", and of what a few others before and after having suggested that the planetology of Venus isn't nearly as old as we'd been informed by our very own NASA. I guess unlike our NASA's hocus-pocus moon, the regular laws of physics and of planetology factors are working exactly as they should on behalf of Venus. Sorry to say that the digital radar obtained composite image of what's easily interpreted as including what's looking so intelligently artificial about Venus, that as such it still (after nearly 7 years) stands the test of time and of surviving more peer review flak than you or I could have imagined. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Venus is alive and kicking our NASA's butt
"BluntForceTraumaT"
wrote in message The moon is a little bit further from Earth with each passing year. If the Chinesees expect to land a rice-muncher on it, they'd better hurry. It will be out of reach soon. And you actually think China is that dumb and dumber, and as otherwise as dumbfounded as yourself? Why go for the naked anticathode moon that's so freaking lethal in more ways than you can shake a fist full of flaming sticks at, when instead they'll simply grab the holy grail of high ground by way of taking over LL-1 - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Venus is alive and kicking our NASA's butt
"BluntForceTraumaT" wrote in message ... The moon is a little bit further from Earth with each passing year. hmmm, i'm impressed that you knew that twink. good work! |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Venus is alive and kicking our NASA's butt
"captain." wrote in message
news:0lvMg.787$bf5.127@edtnps90 hmmm, i'm impressed that you knew that twink. good work! How absolutely silly of yourself, and proof-positive of what rusemasters you folks actually are. Before we blindly leap ourselves onto our moon (for the first time), perhaps we should think again. You folks have got to be absolutely kidding about utilizing the physically dark surface of our extremely dusty and highly reactive moon, especially for much of anything that's on behalf of optical astronomy. At best, the LL-1 zone (60,000 km away from the moon) is relatively clean of debris and perhaps far enough away from that nasty moon of our's in order to humanly survive the combined solar/cosmic/moon TBI dosage, but that's only if well enough shielded by a few meters of water. Our moon's surface is highly if not entirely exposed to solar wind driven electrostatics and otherwise being that of a naked anticathode environment that's rather solar/cosmic and locally DNA lethal (far worse off than anything Van Allen belt related), plus continually and unavoidably running itself into stuff at 30+ km/s, and otherwise gravity attracting upon all that's nearby, is perhaps good for the sorts of robust robotics of those tough little SAR image receiving modules, but otherwise hardly suited for that of anything optical or otherwise end-user-friendly unless it's going deep underground. Do any of you folks even realize what absolutely terrific resolution a given focal length of 384,000 km can do on behalf SAR imaging? (I didn't think so) Such pure robotics on behalf of accomplishing such extended SAR/VLA imaging is actually based upon extremely efficient deployments of what should not represent 10% of a given Apollo mission, and/or perhaps not even involving 1% the mass per SAR image receiving module, and without folks ever having to endure the trauma as to what that sort of nasty lunar surface environment would otherwise be nailing countless strands of human DNA per second. Of course the regular laws of physics and I could be entirely wrong. In which case, how much DNA trauma and/or physical impact trauma can a human or that of anything optical withstand? - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Venus is alive and kicking our NASA's butt
"Brad Guth" wrote in message news:ef1e6bcc620f386c664f803c5a55fcba.49644@mygate .mailgate.org... "captain." wrote in message news:0lvMg.787$bf5.127@edtnps90 hmmm, i'm impressed that you knew that twink. good work! How absolutely silly does absolute silliness have a numerical value? of yourself, and proof-positive of what rusemasters you folks actually are. well yes, the twinker and myself are behind the plot to convince the public that the moon is migrating outwards with each passing year. we almost had you all fooled. Before we blindly leap ourselves onto our moon (for the first time), perhaps we should think again. You folks have got to be absolutely kidding about utilizing the physically dark surface of our extremely dusty and highly reactive moon, especially for much of anything that's on behalf of optical astronomy. aren't you the guy who thinks there should be a colony on venus? now that's crazy! At best, the LL-1 zone (60,000 km away from the moon) is relatively clean of debris and perhaps far enough away from that nasty moon of our's in order to humanly survive the combined solar/cosmic/moon TBI dosage, but that's only if well enough shielded by a few meters of water. Our moon's surface is highly if not entirely exposed to solar wind driven electrostatics and otherwise being that of a naked anticathode environment that's rather solar/cosmic and locally DNA lethal (far worse off than anything Van Allen belt related), plus continually and unavoidably running itself into stuff at 30+ km/s, and otherwise gravity attracting upon all that's nearby, is perhaps good for the sorts of robust robotics of those tough little SAR image receiving modules, but otherwise hardly suited for that of anything optical or otherwise end-user-friendly unless it's going deep underground. Do any of you folks even realize what absolutely terrific resolution a given focal length of 384,000 km can do on behalf SAR imaging? (I didn't think so) we'll look into it right away sir!@ Such pure robotics on behalf of accomplishing such extended SAR/VLA imaging is actually based upon extremely efficient deployments of what should not represent 10% of a given Apollo mission, and/or perhaps not even involving 1% the mass per SAR image receiving module, and without folks ever having to endure the trauma as to what that sort of nasty lunar surface environment would otherwise be nailing countless strands of human DNA per second. Of course the regular laws of physics and I could be entirely wrong. In which case, how much DNA trauma and/or physical impact trauma can a human or that of anything optical withstand? - Brad Guth it's not something that i consider on a daily basis. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Venus is alive and kicking our NASA's butt
"captain." wrote in message news:q7KMg.392$cz3.215@edtnps82... "Brad Guth" wrote in message news:ef1e6bcc620f386c664f803c5a55fcba.49644@mygate .mailgate.org... "captain." wrote in message news:0lvMg.787$bf5.127@edtnps90 hmmm, i'm impressed that you knew that twink. good work! How absolutely silly does absolute silliness have a numerical value? of yourself, and proof-positive of what rusemasters you folks actually are. well yes, the twinker and myself are behind the plot to convince the public that the moon is migrating outwards with each passing year. we almost had you all fooled. It is fact that the Orb of Guthian is moving further away from Earth each year. Before we blindly leap ourselves onto our moon (for the first time), perhaps we should think again. You folks have got to be absolutely kidding about utilizing the physically dark surface of our extremely dusty and highly reactive moon, especially for much of anything that's on behalf of optical astronomy. aren't you the guy who thinks there should be a colony on venus? now that's crazy! At best, the LL-1 zone (60,000 km away from the moon) is relatively clean of debris and perhaps far enough away from that nasty moon of our's in order to humanly survive the combined solar/cosmic/moon TBI dosage, but that's only if well enough shielded by a few meters of water. Our moon's surface is highly if not entirely exposed to solar wind driven electrostatics and otherwise being that of a naked anticathode environment that's rather solar/cosmic and locally DNA lethal (far worse off than anything Van Allen belt related), plus continually and unavoidably running itself into stuff at 30+ km/s, and otherwise gravity attracting upon all that's nearby, is perhaps good for the sorts of robust robotics of those tough little SAR image receiving modules, but otherwise hardly suited for that of anything optical or otherwise end-user-friendly unless it's going deep underground. Do any of you folks even realize what absolutely terrific resolution a given focal length of 384,000 km can do on behalf SAR imaging? (I didn't think so) we'll look into it right away sir!@ Such pure robotics on behalf of accomplishing such extended SAR/VLA imaging is actually based upon extremely efficient deployments of what should not represent 10% of a given Apollo mission, and/or perhaps not even involving 1% the mass per SAR image receiving module, and without folks ever having to endure the trauma as to what that sort of nasty lunar surface environment would otherwise be nailing countless strands of human DNA per second. Of course the regular laws of physics and I could be entirely wrong. In which case, how much DNA trauma and/or physical impact trauma can a human or that of anything optical withstand? - Brad Guth it's not something that i consider on a daily basis. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Venus is alive and kicking our NASA's butt
captain; does absolute silliness have a numerical value?
Not that I'm aware of. Although, within a naysay black hole of all that infomercial-science that you're so proud of, perhaps anything is possible. captain; aren't you the guy who thinks there should be a colony on venus? now that's crazy! I never once insisted that we humans and of our wussy DNA that's sequestered within our frail water-bag bodies should so much as set a naked hot foot on Venus, nor much less for that matter a double IR roasted moonboot upon our anticathode moon of lethal gamma and X-rays, nor even upon good old and sub-frozen and cosmic radiated to death Mars seems damn iffy, as well as Mars being something that's terribly time consuming and spendy as all get out. Besides, most of us still aren't good enough at surviving Earth, especially of these global warming days if you can't swim or otherwise outrun a storm, and it's only getting worse yet if you're Muslim, happen to look like Usama bin Laden could certainly get a little testy, and your ass is grass if our resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) is the only soul on Earth that thinks you've got WMD. I have insisted upon a fully robotic science platform as efficiently station-keeping itself within the halo of Venus L2, and I've suggested that even a "tomcat" fat-waverider of a composite rigid airship is entirely doable as long as the 19 months of a crew being on location isn't too much to ask for. Cruising throughout the mostly nighttime cool atmosphere of what's mostly of harmless dry CO2 that's just below those thick clouds, perhaps as high off the geothermally roasting deck as 35~40 km, or perhaps as low as 25~30 km seems perfectly doable. On the other hand, obviously you've already excluded those pesky regular laws of physics and otherwise having banished whatever's the best available science of such newish planetology, and haven't we entirely forgotten about observationology. Way to go, Uncle Hitler, ignoring the truth at the risk of losing the war (oops! I do believe that's exactly what happened). captain; it's not something that i consider on a daily basis. I totally agree, though perhaps at best our moon offers an hourly basis of survival if you've got that personal cash of banked bone marrow in reserve, and I believe that's only advisable if your TBI exposure was accomplished via earthshine. Whereas otherwise, on a bad sort of solar day you could be all the way down to minutes shortly after sunrise. - Brad Guth -- Posted via Mailgate.ORG Server - http://www.Mailgate.ORG |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Venus is alive and kicking our NASA's butt
On Sun, 10 Sep 2006 06:46:48 -0400, in uk.sci.astronomy ,
"BluntForceTraumaT" wrote: It is fact that the Orb of Guthian is moving further away from Earth each year. -- _____________________ /| /| | | ||__|| | Please do not | / O O\__ | feed the | / \ | Trolls | / \ \|_____________________| / _ \ \ || / |\____\ \ || / | | | |\____/ || / \|_|_|/ | _|| / / \ |____| || / | | | --| | | | |____ --| * _ | |_|_|_| | \-/ *-- _--\ _ \ | || / _ \\ | / ` * / \_ /- | | | * ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Venus is alive and kicking our NASA's butt | Brad Guth | Policy | 210 | April 12th 07 06:43 PM |
Venus/Moon ~ to Terraform, to DNA Seed, to Visit or NOT! | Brad Guth | Policy | 3 | August 12th 06 04:11 PM |
Venus/Moon ~ to Terraform, to DNA Seed, to Visit or NOT! | Brad Guth | Astronomy Misc | 3 | August 12th 06 04:11 PM |
Venus/Moon ~ to Terraform, to DNA Seed, to Visit or NOT! | Brad Guth | History | 1 | August 12th 06 09:22 AM |
Venus/Moon ~ to Terraform, to DNA Seed, to Visit or NOT! | Brad Guth | UK Astronomy | 1 | August 12th 06 09:22 AM |