A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » UK Astronomy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

revisiting Apollo



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old July 18th 04, 11:52 PM
Mark McIntyre
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:32:13 GMT, in uk.sci.astronomy , Yoda
wrote:

Again for those who need it spelled out for them.....take an H, take an
A, take an O, take an X, put them together,....what does that spell?
Hoax right? Now take a V, take an I, take a D, take an E, and take an
O, and put them together ok? What does that spell? Video...right. Now
take a P, take an I, take a C, take a T, take an I, take an R, take an
E, take an S, and put that together...what does that spell?
Pictures..right....now we are getting somewhere. Do you understand yet,
or do you still need it spelled out for you?


The only thing we need spelled out is how much of troll you are, total, or
merely quite large. Maybe they like this nonsense over in sci,astro or
alt.astronomy, though I doubt it





--
Mark McIntyre
CLC FAQ http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/top.html
CLC readme: http://www.angelfire.com/ms3/bchambless0/welcome_to_clc.html


----== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers - Total Privacy via Encryption =---
  #22  
Old July 18th 04, 11:55 PM
Yoda
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Mark McIntyre wrote:

On Sun, 18 Jul 2004 22:32:13 GMT, in uk.sci.astronomy , Yoda
wrote:


Again for those who need it spelled out for them.....take an H, take an
A, take an O, take an X, put them together,....what does that spell?
Hoax right? Now take a V, take an I, take a D, take an E, and take an
O, and put them together ok? What does that spell? Video...right. Now
take a P, take an I, take a C, take a T, take an I, take an R, take an
E, take an S, and put that together...what does that spell?
Pictures..right....now we are getting somewhere. Do you understand yet,
or do you still need it spelled out for you?



The only thing we need spelled out is how much of troll you are, total, or
merely quite large. Maybe they like this nonsense over in sci,astro or
alt.astronomy, though I doubt it


Well you guys demonstrate such a duh factor when it comes to scientific
cross talk that you make bafoons of yourselves with almost every so
called 'attack' on my points of view. Like to discuss anything of
seriousness requires everyone never 'crossing' the imaginary line of
your dumb arse. You guys sometimes only prove that the science of the
last one hundred years is really just a new religion.

  #23  
Old July 18th 04, 11:57 PM
vonroach
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 18 Jul 2004 16:08:09 -0700, Gruebait wrote:

For example
there is no 'mud' on the moon, and yet the most famous
pictures of the so-called "first footprint" clearly shows mud.


snip more kookiness

Clearly.

Dust, moron, not mud. No water has been found on the moon.

  #24  
Old July 19th 04, 12:02 AM
Yoda
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You're the moron to believe that picture which clearly shows moon mud is
dust. Dust doesnt leave footprints. And what museum has samples of
this dust so that we can all view it and compare samples? Please you
have to do better than that.

vonroach wrote:

On 18 Jul 2004 16:08:09 -0700, Gruebait wrote:


For example
there is no 'mud' on the moon, and yet the most famous
pictures of the so-called "first footprint" clearly shows mud.


It was the US government in the documentary who was laughing about the
muddy footprint photo that the whole world believes is true, and
ofcourse morons like yourself who think it depicts "moon dust".


snip more kookiness

Clearly.


Dust, moron, not mud. No water has been found on the moon.


Duh....

The flag is clearly seen fluttering in the wind. Duh...there is no wind
on the moon because it has no atmosphere, unless you believe the
Russians who say it has developed an atmosphere of recent times.

  #25  
Old July 19th 04, 12:08 AM
Gruebait
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On 18 Jul 2004, Yoda astonished sci.astro by claiming:


The `scientific proof of the first moon walk' is one that all
can share in the very detailed records and televised pictures
that remain. It was a fact, just as Pearl Harbor was a fact
regardless of the spin put on the facts.


Ian


snip

For example
there is no 'mud' on the moon, and yet the most famous
pictures of the so-called "first footprint" clearly shows mud.


snip more kookiness

Clearly.

--
gruebait
one furlong/fortnight = 0.997857143 centimeters/minute
  #26  
Old July 19th 04, 12:38 AM
Tim Auton
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Yoda wrote:

The `scientific proof of the first moon walk' is one that all can
share in the very detailed records and televised pictures that remain.
It was a fact, just as Pearl Harbor was a fact regardless of the spin
put on the facts.


The US government openly admitted recently that the moon pictures were
hoaxed on the direct order of President Nixon.

[snip]
Anyhow the Moon Hoax pictures and video documentary which proves this is
fact was shown on CBC and made by CBC.


I presume you meant this documentary:

http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...oon/about.html

"This is no ordinary documentary. Its intent is to inform and
entertain the viewer, but also to shake him up - make him aware that
one should always view television with a critical eye."

You failed. The purpose of the documentary is not to make revelations
about the moon landings, but to demonstrate why fools like you
shouldn't blindly believe everything you see on TeeVee.


Tim
--
My last .sig was rubbish too.
  #27  
Old July 19th 04, 12:43 AM
Yoda
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Did you watch the video? Probably not.


My friends are laughing there asses off at what you just said because
they know me very well cause they listen to me all the time, and they
know that I keep watch for propaganda more than any other person they
know. So please your American ignorance is showing through....perhaps
you should lay off the Disney movies for a while.

Tim Auton wrote:

Yoda wrote:

The `scientific proof of the first moon walk' is one that all can
share in the very detailed records and televised pictures that remain.
It was a fact, just as Pearl Harbor was a fact regardless of the spin
put on the facts.


The US government openly admitted recently that the moon pictures were
hoaxed on the direct order of President Nixon.


[snip]

Anyhow the Moon Hoax pictures and video documentary which proves this is
fact was shown on CBC and made by CBC.



I presume you meant this documentary:

http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...oon/about.html

"This is no ordinary documentary. Its intent is to inform and
entertain the viewer, but also to shake him up - make him aware that
one should always view television with a critical eye."

You failed. The purpose of the documentary is not to make revelations
about the moon landings, but to demonstrate why fools like you
shouldn't blindly believe everything you see on TeeVee.


Tim


  #29  
Old July 19th 04, 12:51 AM
Yoda
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default



Tim Auton (American Dumbass) wrote:

Anyhow the Moon Hoax pictures and video documentary which proves this is
fact was shown on CBC and made by CBC.



I presume you meant this documentary:

http://www.cbc.ca/passionateeyesunda...oon/about.html

"This is no ordinary documentary. Its intent is to inform and
entertain the viewer, but also to shake him up - make him aware that
one should always view television with a critical eye."

You failed. The purpose of the documentary is not to make revelations
about the moon landings, but to demonstrate why fools like you
shouldn't blindly believe everything you see on TeeVee.

You fail to understand English or Canadian TV, especially the Passionate
Eye program. What they are saying is what you just proved, in that
anything can be taken out of context and twisted to suit one's own
diabolical purposes, propaganda is usally always lies and half truths,
never the truth. In such the documentary proves that the American
public and the world, were duped by the Hoaxed footage.

See the documentary for yourself and then say something. Otherwise
remain an ignorant American with pathetic commentary on Canadian
programming. I'll bet the documentary is not being received very well by
those who argued incessently that there was no hoax.

Unless ofcourse you really believe that the Moon has wind, which
considering how you analysed the first page of a documentary on the moon
hoax pictures, I wouldn't be shocked if you did believe that there is
not only mud there but an atmosphere to boot.




Tim


  #30  
Old July 19th 04, 12:55 AM
Yoda
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Another stupid ass American claiming to know it all about a documentary
he hasn't even seen, no doubt. Your type of analysis is better left for
people like the Jehovah Witnesses or better yet how about the
Mennonites, you know those guys in horse drawn carriages who don't
believe in the tooth fairy, or santa claus or radio's and TV's for that
matter. Go talk to them, maybe they will understand your nonsense.

Alan LeHun wrote:

In article BkDKc.1058410$Ar.541753
@twister01.bloor.is.net.cable.rogers.com,
says...


You're the moron to believe that picture which clearly shows moon mud is
dust. Dust doesnt leave footprints.



Oh dear!! I suggest you get your coat.


And what museum has samples of
this dust so that we can all view it and compare samples? Please you
have to do better than that.



Go to your local art supplies shop. Ask for moulding sand. Better still,
try flour. Not exactly the same results but not exactly the same
substances either.




The flag is clearly seen fluttering in the wind. Duh...there is no wind
on the moon because it has no atmosphere, unless you believe the
Russians who say it has developed an atmosphere of recent times.


Are you suggesting that the Americans, trying to create hoax video's in
a studio, deliberately created a wind to make it look more patriotic?
That the Russians wouldn't say "Hold on a moment"? Or are you just
ignorant of the principles behind inertia and momentum. Hint: The flag
stops "fluttering" shortly after being left alone.

As for your earlier examples of photographic expertise, the less said,
the better.

You may be right about the hoaxing. There was certainly incentive for
it. However, you will never be able to convince anyone of this with the
"evidence" you have put forward. You have only convinced people of your
scientific naivety.


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The Apollo Hoax FAQ (is not spam) :-) Nathan Jones Astronomy Misc 5 July 29th 04 06:14 AM
Apollo Buzz alDredge Astronomy Misc 5 July 28th 04 10:05 AM
Apollo Buzz alDredge Misc 5 July 28th 04 10:05 AM
The Apollo Hoax FAQ darla Astronomy Misc 15 July 25th 04 02:57 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.