|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#291
|
|||
|
|||
Neil DeGrasse Tyson headed down same loony road as Carl Sagan?
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 12:15:20 AM UTC-6, Quadibloc wrote:
On Thursday, October 11, 2018 at 4:45:45 PM UTC-6, Gary Harnagel wrote: Your argument depends upon what YOU assume "their" goal is. What do you THINK would happen to a civilization (or an individual) if all their problems were taken care of for them? "Any man who thinks he can be happy andÂ*prosperous by letting the government take care of him had better take a closer look at the American Indian." -- Anon. This may be a good point, but I'm not making assumptions about their _goal_. Rather, since individual human beings have rights, and no natural creature is fundamentally superior to a human being in the way that human beings are superior to beasts by virtue of having a bit more technology or being a bit smarter, the ordinary obligations of being a witness to an emergency where one has the power to intervene without risk to oneself apply. Sure, that's OUR responsibility. For little things, non-interference to permit a culture to develop normally may be reasonable. The Holocaust was not a little thing. So why did God allow it? This is an old, old argument. "Why do bad things happen to good people?" The Book of Job is a case in point. In general, though, although I am in disagreement with you, I have not been inclined to argue the point. It seems to me that for some reason, you want the Universe to be so organized as to demand a certain kind of thinking from people - and you have just seized on advanced aliens, instead of the traditional God of the Christian religion, as a means to the same goal. I have stated my aim more than once so I it's amazing why it's not understood. Thus, your position appears to me to be based on so many, and such profound, false assumptions that meaningful discussion is almost impossible. John Savard YOU seem to be the one making assumptions. You assume that "the traditional God of Christianity" MUST be "supernatural" for one. I am merely proposing that He might be using natural laws that we haven't learned yet, so then "supernatural" is essentially an oxymoron. As Clarke observed: “Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.” -- Arthur C. Clarke Once you get your mind around THAT concept, it's not such a big leap to thinking about an advanced civilization as God. So your prejudices govern what you believe about God. If you believe that God MUST operate by methods forever unexplainable by man, then my position may be repugnant to you. OTOH, if you believe everything including "miracles" CAN be explained by science, or at least some future science, then you imply that God is part of the universe (or at least not outside it, somehow) or you must claim that some experiences are reported by loony people (which is what atheists do). |
#292
|
|||
|
|||
Neil DeGrasse Tyson headed down same loony road as Carl Sagan?
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 11:34:29 AM UTC-6, Gary Harnagel wrote:
Once you get your mind around THAT concept, it's not such a big leap to thinking about an advanced civilization as God. So your prejudices govern what you believe about God. If you believe that God MUST operate by methods forever unexplainable by man, then my position may be repugnant to you. OTOH, if you believe everything including "miracles" CAN be explained by science, or at least some future science, then you imply that God is part of the universe (or at least not outside it, somehow) or you must claim that some experiences are reported by loony people (which is what atheists do). Since loony people exist, and human beings have also been known to tell lies (and the ability to control and manipulate other people is a motivating factor for prevarication), I think the position that the existence of advanced aliens who *could* have, a la Erich von Danniken, faked parts of the Old Testament does not constitute proof that the things in the Old Testament really happened... is highly reasonable. Plus, there are other religions than Christianity. That has a whole other level of implications. Also: if advanced aliens are not intervening in human history out of a high level of responsibility of some kind... then why are they starting religions which promote sexism and xenophobia? That would seem irresponsible. John Savard |
#293
|
|||
|
|||
Neil DeGrasse Tyson headed down same loony road as Carl Sagan?
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 12:43:36 AM UTC-6, Paul Schlyter wrote:
On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:01:39 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel wrote: On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 7:05:30 AM UTC-6, Paul Schlyter wrote: I'm not saying it cannot have happened. I'm merely objecting when you claim we can be certain it has happened. We can **not** be certain about that! There are just too many unknowns involved... I haven't said it's certain. I believe I used the term "virtually certain" once or twice, which isn't the same thing A minor difference. Not at all. When we deal with possibilities where VERY large numbers are involved, it is ridiculous to claim certainty but not at all ridiculous to claim virtual certainty. You admit that in principle it might not have happened but you believe the probability for that is negligibly low. Yep. And if you agree that it could have happened before then we are in agreement. That's enough to place a stumbling block in front of the dedicated atheist. Advanced civilizations and supernatural gods are two very different things. I don't believe in the "supernatural." Do you? An advanced civilization has reached farther, perhaps immensely farther, than we but still came into existence through natural processes and must obey natural laws. A supernatural God, as proclaimed in the monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam, created the entire universe and also created the natural laws within it. Quite a big difference. An atheist merely does not believe in that supernatural God but has no problem with the existence of advanced civilizations. I don't believe anything that happens is "supernatural." At the moment we aren't, that's true. But what about our descendants in a million years? IF we're given the time. Taking Chris's argument, maybe we'll destroy ourselves :-) I don't think we will, though, because we're being watched over. Then why did WWI and WWII happen? Why did the holocaust happen? Why did the Armenian genocide happen? And why were atomic bombs dropped over Japan in August 1945? Did those watching over us turn away when those things happened, or what? Because free will is more important than death. Intervention may be necessary IF total destruction is likely, but wars in general don't qualify. You WILL note that a nuclear exchange with the USSR was avoided when many thought it would happen. |
#294
|
|||
|
|||
Neil DeGrasse Tyson headed down same loony road as Carl Sagan?
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 5:11:58 PM UTC-6, Quadibloc wrote:
On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 11:34:29 AM UTC-6, Gary Harnagel wrote: Once you get your mind around THAT concept, it's not such a big leap to thinking about an advanced civilization as God. So your prejudices govern what you believe about God. If you believe that God MUST operate by methods forever unexplainable by man, then my position may be repugnant to you. OTOH, if you believe everything including "miracles" CAN be explained by science, or at least some future science, then you imply that God is part of the universe (or at least not outside it, somehow) or you must claim that some experiences are reported by loony people (which is what atheists do). Since loony people exist, and human beings have also been known to tell lies (and the ability to control and manipulate other people is a motivating factor for prevarication), I think the position that the existence of advanced aliens who *could* have, a la Erich von Danniken, faked parts of the Old Testament does not constitute proof that the things in the Old Testament really happened... is highly reasonable. This doesn't seem to me to be a response to my argument. Plus, there are other religions than Christianity. That has a whole other level of implications. Also: if advanced aliens are not intervening in human history out of a high level of responsibility of some kind... then why are they starting religions which promote sexism and xenophobia? That would seem irresponsible. John Savard People have free will. THEY are the ones that set up religions. Loony, remember? |
#295
|
|||
|
|||
Neil DeGrasse Tyson headed down same loony road as Carl Sagan?
It is remarkable, albeit in the worst parts of human nature that it is possible, to see the empirical ideology of extermination and invasion get away completely free from its application in history -
” A lopsided education has helped to encourage that illusion. Man must realize that a fundamental law of necessity reigns throughout the whole realm of Nature and that his existence is subject to the law of eternal struggle and strife. He will then feel that there cannot be a separate law for mankind in a world in which planets and suns follow their orbits, where moons and planets trace their destined paths, where the strong are always the masters of the weak and where those subject to such laws must obey them or be destroyed.” Hitler and National Socialism This was the Darwin/Wallace notion taken to its logical conclusion and waiting for someone with an aggressive streak to pin their convictions on, after the destruction they simply whitewashed the empirical breeding notion out and carried on as if it had no input into the death of so many millions of people. A person is not meant to dwell on these things but neither can they be ignored for the mass appeal of empirical convictions has returned to influence politics once more. |
#296
|
|||
|
|||
Neil DeGrasse Tyson headed down same loony road as Carl Sagan?
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 20:33:37 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel
wrote: People have free will. THEY are the ones that set up religions. Good that you finally admit that religions are fantasies created by primitive people. But don't forget this the next time you want to quote from the Bible. |
#297
|
|||
|
|||
Neil DeGrasse Tyson headed down same loony road as Carl Sagan?
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 19:41:23 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel
wrote: On Friday, October 12, 2018 at 12:43:36 AM UTC-6, Paul Schlyter wrote: On Thu, 11 Oct 2018 11:01:39 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel wrote: On Tuesday, October 9, 2018 at 7:05:30 AM UTC-6, Paul Schlyter wrote: I'm not saying it cannot have happened. I'm merely objecting when you claim we can be certain it has happened. We can **not** be certain about that! There are just too many unknowns involved... I haven't said it's certain. I believe I used the term "virtually certain" once or twice, which isn't the same thing A minor difference. Not at all. When we deal with possibilities where VERY large numbers are involved, it is ridiculous to claim certainty but not at all ridiculous to claim virtual certainty. You admit that in principle it might not have happened but you believe the probability for that is negligibly low. Yep. So you claim that a negligible small difference is more than a minor difference. Which means you are contradicting yourself. And if you agree that it could have happened before then we are in agreement. That's enough to place a stumbling block in front of the dedicated atheist. Advanced civilizations and supernatural gods are two very different things. I don't believe in the "supernatural." Do you? Which means you don't believe in the Bible, a book full of references to the supernatural... An advanced civilization has reached farther, perhaps immensely farther, than we but still came into existence through natural processes and must obey natural laws. A supernatural God, as proclaimed in the monotheistic religions Judaism, Christianity and Islam, created the entire universe and also created the natural laws within it. Quite a big difference. An atheist merely does not believe in that supernatural God but has no problem with the existence of advanced civilizations. I don't believe anything that happens is "supernatural." Which means you believe that the supernatural events described in the Bible never happened. Right? At the moment we aren't, that's true. But what about our descendants in a million years? IF we're given the time. Taking Chris's argument, maybe we'll destroy ourselves :-) I don't think we will, though, because we're being watched over. Then why did WWI and WWII happen? Why did the holocaust happen? Why did the Armenian genocide happen? And why were atomic bombs dropped over Japan in August 1945? Did those watching over us turn away when those things happened, or what? Because free will is more important than death. Intervention may be necessary IF total destruction is likely, but wars in general don't qualify. You WILL note that a nuclear exchange with the USSR was avoided when many thought it would happen. Did that happen because Nikita Chrustchev listened to God and removed his missiles from Cuba in 1962? evil grin |
#298
|
|||
|
|||
Neil DeGrasse Tyson headed down same loony road as Carl Sagan?
Astronomers and the renowned Christians share a common language that connects the individual to the Universal or, in spiritual language, a person to God. It looks exuberant to those who haven't yet encountered the experience so they tend to mock what they haven't felt.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Canticle_of_the_Sun Behind all the many traditions in the Bible, some saying opposite things to each other including the writing before and after Christ, is this spiritual language that peels away from the human traditions and poetic language that causes doubt and fear. The network of connections between a moving Earth and the changes in the year and the seasons then comes to the fore and delights the person in their walks or in those moments when the daily and weekly business is done.Such is spirituality and physical nature. |
#299
|
|||
|
|||
Neil DeGrasse Tyson headed down same loony road as Carl Sagan?
On Saturday, October 13, 2018 at 1:30:27 AM UTC-6, Paul Schlyter wrote:
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 20:33:37 -0700 (PDT), Gary Harnagel wrote: People have free will. THEY are the ones that set up religions. Good that you finally admit that religions are fantasies created by primitive people. But don't forget this the next time you want to quote from the Bible. I didn't say ALL religions were fantasies, and I didn't say most were created by primitive people, either. Denying that a religion set up by an individual (or group thereof) is efficacious is the real fantasy :-) You admit that in principle it might not have happened but you believe the probability for that is negligibly low. Yep. So you claim that a negligible small difference is more than a minor difference. Which means you are contradicting yourself. I overlooked the "negligibly" and took it as "very" so I retract my "yep." Advanced civilizations and supernatural gods are two very different things. I don't believe in the "supernatural." Do you? Which means you don't believe in the Bible, a book full of references to the supernatural... Only in YOUR opinion. The word "supernatural" does not appear in the Bible. Then why did WWI and WWII happen? Why did the holocaust happen? Why did the Armenian genocide happen? And why were atomic bombs dropped over Japan in August 1945? Did those watching over us turn away when those things happened, or what? Because free will is more important than death. Intervention may be necessary IF total destruction is likely, but wars in general don't qualify. You WILL note that a nuclear exchange with the USSR was avoided when many thought it would happen. Did that happen because Nikita Chrustchev listened to God and removed his missiles from Cuba in 1962? evil grin No, but JFK may have listened to Him. I believe that a large fraction of humanity has received and receives inspiration, likely unbeknownst to themselves. I don't believe anything that happens is "supernatural." Which means you believe that the supernatural events described in the Bible never happened. Right? Wrong. Just because we don't understand how it was done doesn't make it "supernatural." |
#300
|
|||
|
|||
Neil DeGrasse Tyson headed down same loony road as Carl Sagan?
Next year will be 50 years since the Apollo mission which landed a person on the moon and yet none of you feel what has become of that innovative organisation or rather what happened as theorists eventually overtook it.
https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap170319.html Primitive people ! - if this is what space exploration has accomplished then it would have been better not to have ventured there at all. There will always be people prepared to lean on old ways that were never creative/productive in the first place so it is with hope that the generation I lived through after the Apollo mission innovators will eventually come to their senses and work with imaging rather than manipulate them, if not then hopefully the younger generations will. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Denial of Neil deGrasse Tyson's Science | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | April 24th 17 06:58 PM |
NEIL DEGRASSE TYSON DISHONEST OR JUST SILLY? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 3 | August 6th 15 12:14 PM |
Neil (EGO) Degrasse Tyson STEALS directly from Sagan | RichA[_6_] | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | April 17th 15 09:38 AM |
NEIL DEGRASSE TYSON : CONSPIRACY OF THE HIGHEST ORDER | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 2 | July 14th 14 04:32 PM |
'My Favorite Universe' (Neil deGrasse Tyson) | M Dombek | UK Astronomy | 1 | December 29th 05 12:01 AM |