![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "asps" wrote in message ... Subject: A revolutionary propulsion system We inform you of our the recent and decisive progress in a propulsion system SC2.12 finally alternative to rocketry because it was conceived in the final purpose of a propulsion system that can perform manned outposts in the Moon and Mars. The PNNE (Propulsione Non Newtoniana Eletromagnetica) uses the electromagnetic field as mass of reaction with reaction momentum p greather than p=E/c (E= electromagnetic energy , c= velocity of light). PNNE therefore is distinguished from the chemical and ionic propulsion (using mass of reaction) as well as the propulsion based on solar sail i.e. the photonic propulsion (which impulse cannot exceed p=E/c). Its primary source of energy is of electric nature so SC2.12 is a propellanless propulsion system. One of the advantages of SC2.12 is that no reaction mass is used and that the specific momentum is million times greather than the momentum of the ionic motors (which have a specific impulse much greater one of the chemical rockets). There is a videoclip in http://www.asps.it/nucleoin.htm A fifty-fifty mix of gobbledegook and bull****. Franz Heymann |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Franz Heymann" wrote ...
"asps" wrote in message There is a videoclip in http://www.asps.it/nucleoin.htm A fifty-fifty mix of gobbledegook and bull****. Ah, but is it _non-Newtonian_ bull**** that can propel with no loss of reaction mass? Obviously asps has tapped into the fabric of usenet itself where no matter how much bull**** is removed more will always remain. With such a dangerous method I can only pray there will be no leaks. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "asps" wrote in message ... "Paul Blay" ha scritto nel messaggio ... "Franz Heymann" wrote ... "asps" wrote in message There is a videoclip in http://www.asps.it/nucleoin.htm A fifty-fifty mix of gobbledegook and bull****. Ah, but is it _non-Newtonian_ bull**** that can propel with no loss of reaction mass? Obviously asps has tapped into the fabric of usenet itself where no matter how much bull**** is removed more will always remain. With such a dangerous method I can only pray there will be no leaks. every human progress is accompanied with the **** ........ if it is so good then why are you still begging for investors instead of rolling in money? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "David Robbins" ha scritto nel messaggio ... "asps" wrote in message ... "Paul Blay" ha scritto nel messaggio ... "Franz Heymann" wrote ... "asps" wrote in message There is a videoclip in http://www.asps.it/nucleoin.htm A fifty-fifty mix of gobbledegook and bull****. Ah, but is it _non-Newtonian_ bull**** that can propel with no loss of reaction mass? Obviously asps has tapped into the fabric of usenet itself where no matter how much bull**** is removed more will always remain. With such a dangerous method I can only pray there will be no leaks. every human progress is accompanied with the **** ........ if it is so good then why are you still begging for investors instead of rolling in money? Since July 2002 , every 3 or 4 months , we have road shows wth italian aerospace industries (and we have still) . The problem is the procedure ....... they want generally : 1) the know-how of PNN before they try to find who can pay Asps. 2) to be the only owner of pnn before they try to find who can pay Asps We want at the same time and to avoid loss of know-how we have a procedure to show SC2.12 in a closed box http://www.asps.it/propnn.htm (for safety no patent at now) Besides we want money only if SC2.12 is a revolution in space transport system. Against us work that the fact we are very small and PNN is simplew incredible. Several industries said ud that don't like PNN for the fact that is less expensive than the rocketry. They said to us that PNN will be interesting if italian goverment put in it the same money that put in rocketry..... |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
asps wrote:
Since July 2002 , every 3 or 4 months , we have road shows wth italian aerospace industries (and we have still) . The problem is the procedure ...... they want generally : 1) the know-how of PNN before they try to find who can pay Asps. 2) to be the only owner of pnn before they try to find who can pay Asps We want at the same time and to avoid loss of know-how we have a procedure to show SC2.12 in a closed box http://www.asps.it/propnn.htm (for safety no patent at now) Besides we want money only if SC2.12 is a revolution in space transport system. Suuuuuure you have. You've been spamming this bull**** on usenet since 1996. It reeked then, and it has not improved with age. Your patent excuse is utterly ridiculous and contemptible. Against us work that the fact we are very small and PNN is simplew incredible. Several industries said ud that don't like PNN for the fact that is less expensive than the rocketry. They said to us that PNN will be interesting if italian goverment put in it the same money that put in rocketry..... The biggest thing working against you is the unfortunate fact it's all a pile of steaming ****. At least you got the 'incredible' (meaning: without credibility) part right. Paul |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul F. Dietz" ha scritto nel messaggio ... asps wrote: Since July 2002 , every 3 or 4 months , we have road shows wth italian aerospace industries (and we have still) . The problem is the procedure ...... they want generally : 1) the know-how of PNN before they try to find who can pay Asps. 2) to be the only owner of pnn before they try to find who can pay Asps We want at the same time and to avoid loss of know-how we have a procedure to show SC2.12 in a closed box http://www.asps.it/propnn.htm (for safety no patent at now) Besides we want money only if SC2.12 is a revolution in space transport system. Suuuuuure you have. You've been spamming this bull**** on usenet since 1996. It reeked then, and it has not improved with age. please our "bull****" is updated since 1979 http://www.asps.it .........but .....but only in 2001 we reach the goal of the super**** i.e. what is the ruin of "carthago" scientists as you are, that are the arrogance of mathematical physicists giving priority to formalism against empirical facts.... I am not glad to win if mathematical physicists will not be destroyed by PNN too ...as soon as you will reach togheter mr. Uncle the gothalist http://www.asps.it/gotha.htm Your patent excuse is utterly ridiculous and contemptible. Against us work that the fact we are very small and PNN is simplew incredible. Several industries said ud that don't like PNN for the fact that is less expensive than the rocketry. They said to us that PNN will be interesting if italian goverment put in it the same money that put in rocketry..... The biggest thing working against you is the unfortunate fact it's all a pile of steaming ****. At least you got the 'incredible' (meaning: without credibility) part right. you idiot don't speak about: Is wrong this too ? : [5] Kirk T. McDonald ,Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 (Nov. 15, 1998) [PDF]The Transverse Momentum of an Electron in a Wave 1 Problem 2 ... Formato file: PDF/Adobe Acrobat - Versione HTML Page 1. The Transverse Momentum of an Electron in a Wave Kirk T. McDonald Joseph Henry Laboratories, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 (Nov. 15, 1998) 1 ... http://www.hep.princeton.edu/~mcdona.../transmom2.pdf - Experiments are the alone thing that have physical meaning, you **** charlatan don't exist in front of PNN experiments E.Laureti p.s. : ceterum censeo Carthago delenda est ......id est : ceterum censeo mathematical physicists delendi sunt |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() asps wrote: E.Laureti p.s. : ceterum censeo Carthago delenda est ......id est : ceterum censeo mathematical physicists delendi sunt When will the reactionless motor run. Should I hold my breath till it happens? Believed when seen. Bob Kolker |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "asps" wrote in message ... called asps names... "Paul F. Dietz" ha scritto nel messaggio ... asps wrote: unfortunately replied with more name calling... this will go no where on this group. without proof there can be no logical discussion. but you refuse to provide proof without money up front. there will be no money up front from anyone who reads this group, so your presence here is not useful. may i suggest that you seal up the secret stuff in a box and take it to a reputable university physics department and have them measure it's effects in a controlled experiment, publish the results and measurement method and see if that helps. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Paul F. Dietz" wrote in message ... asps wrote: Since July 2002 , every 3 or 4 months , we have road shows wth italian aerospace industries (and we have still) . The problem is the procedure ...... they want generally : 1) the know-how of PNN before they try to find who can pay Asps. 2) to be the only owner of pnn before they try to find who can pay Asps We want at the same time and to avoid loss of know-how we have a procedure to show SC2.12 in a closed box http://www.asps.it/propnn.htm (for safety no patent at now) Besides we want money only if SC2.12 is a revolution in space transport system. Suuuuuure you have. You've been spamming this bull**** on usenet since 1996. It reeked then, and it has not improved with age. Your patent excuse is utterly ridiculous and contemptible. I just realized, this reactionless drive BS seems to generate a lot of reaction around here. We should just ignore it. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
A revolutionary propulsion system | asps | Space Shuttle | 49 | December 21st 03 10:25 PM |
A revolutionary propulsion system | Allen Meece | Policy | 5 | December 16th 03 08:29 AM |
A revolutionary propulsion system | asps | Policy | 5 | December 12th 03 01:33 AM |
A revolutionary propulsion system | Sam Wormley | Policy | 0 | December 11th 03 11:33 PM |
A revolutionary propulsion system | Harry Conover | Policy | 0 | December 11th 03 09:18 PM |