#2041
|
|||
|
|||
From Nightbat:
...seems oc just wanted out to watch the fireworks from afar. Naw, just wanted to be chivalrous and give the last guffaw to Zinni, stalwart guardian of the Faith and slayer of heresies.. safeguarding for generations the Void-Space Paradijjum and his transverse gravity waves.g oc |
#2042
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 18:40:12 GMT
Ralph Hertle wrote: Ray Vingnutte wrote: [clip] Yeah I see the post in your reply but not the original, the only posts I shouldn't see are posts cross posted to more than five groups as they are filtered out by me. [clip] I copied the location, or address line, one of the culprit 90+ posts, and that is: To see the text of the bad message displayed correctly as a normal newsgroup message enter that location as a URL on your internet browser, The alt.astronomy NG will appear and display the message. Just what that message is all about I haven't the slightest idea. The 90+ messages include a considerable amount of code. Ralph Hertle Thanks Ralph but I cannot get it to work, just keep getting connection refused at verizon.net. It doesn't matter really if it's as bad as others have said I expect someone must have reported the culprit by now. |
#2043
|
|||
|
|||
On Sun, 09 Jan 2005 18:51:45 GMT
Ralph Hertle wrote: Double-A: The sender of the 90 virus posts identifies himself as: , and a sample of the culprit's message is found at the alt.astronomy newsgroup site that is available at URL, . How can that intervention be stopped? Can you post the culprits message headers, just the headers in full detail and not the whole post. But as I say someone must have reported it by now I would have thought. Ralph Hertle . |
#2044
|
|||
|
|||
What if I can theorize three different worlds? Our
world(universe) with its electrons. Treb's world(universe) with its positrons. The third universe is the tricky one. Its a "virtual" universe. This virtual universe is in reality that had created the other two. Bert |
#2045
|
|||
|
|||
What if our "regular" universe is sitting side by side with the
"virtual" universe? Yes it is. We are using virtual more and more. I first knew of virtual because it is are reflected image.(mirror image.) Now astronomers are telling us there can be our regular universe and it could have an infinite number of mirror images(virtual) "go figure" Easy to form a theory(idea) from this that goes like this "For every particle there is a virtual particle that goes with it." I've posted this is my reason to explain the two slit experiment. This experiment has shown not just photons,and electrons can make these double interference patterns but stuff like bucky ball(60 atoms) and a virus also work. What if viewing our universe from great distances we can't' tell what is regular,or what is virtual? QM has virtual particles becoming real for a very short period of time when these virtual particles borrow space energy. This has never been observed,and I have know idea why nature is doing this. My "Spin is in theory" needs virtual particles. Our theory of magnetisim needs virtual photons. I for many moons have known without a shadow of a doubt that the graviton is a virtual particle Bert |
#2046
|
|||
|
|||
"I have know idea why nature is doing this.
My "Spin is in theory" needs virtual particles. Our theory of magnetisim needs virtual photons. I for many moons have known without a shadow of a doubt that the graviton is a virtual particle." ~ Bert So, like, what for? _______ Blog, or dog? Who knows. But if you see my lost pup, please ping me! http://journals.aol.com/virginiaz/DreamingofLeonardo |
#2047
|
|||
|
|||
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: What if our "regular" universe is sitting side by side with the "virtual" universe? Yes it is. We are using virtual more and more. What about that third universe you mentioned, the one with all the positrons. Don't we need that to store all the antimatter? I first knew of virtual because it is are reflected image.(mirror image.) Now astronomers are telling us there can be our regular universe and it could have an infinite number of mirror images(virtual) "go figure" Easy to form a theory(idea) from this that goes like this "For every particle there is a virtual particle that goes with it." How about a "hole" in the virtual universe to go with every particle in this universe? Sort of like the positively charged holes that move through a semiconductor. I've posted this is my reason to explain the two slit experiment. This experiment has shown not just photons,and electrons can make these double interference patterns but stuff like bucky ball(60 atoms) and a virus also work. What if viewing our universe from great distances we can't' tell what is regular,or what is virtual? QM has virtual particles becoming real for a very short period of time when these virtual particles borrow space energy. This has never been observed,and I have know idea why nature is doing this. My "Spin is in theory" needs virtual particles. Our theory of magnetisim needs virtual photons. I for many moons have known without a shadow of a doubt that the graviton is a virtual particle Bert Double-A |
#2048
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Whitty,and Double-A you guys get up early to answer my "What if"
I'm having problems sleeping,so have more time to think. Don't know what you mean by our universe storing positrons? Where are they stored? I use anti-particles as the matter for our parrel universe(where Treb lives) Double-A you put Double-A after Bert Was that mean as an "A" plus for this "What if?" (hope so) Bert |
#2049
|
|||
|
|||
G=EMC^2 Glazier wrote: Hi Whitty,and Double-A you guys get up early to answer my "What if" We arise in the night to seek your wisdom, O great guru! I'm having problems sleeping,so have more time to think. Don't know what you mean by our universe storing positrons? Where are they stored? I use anti-particles as the matter for our parrel universe(where Treb lives) That's what I meant, Treb's universe. Double-A you put Double-A after Bert Was that mean as an "A" plus for this "What if?" (hope so) Bert Sure Bert, a double A+ for the day. Now we have matter and anitmatter arising from the virtual universe and then segregating into a matter universe and an antimatter universe (Treb's). That's all very logical. Of course we still have the problem of where did the virtual universe come from? Double-A |
#2050
|
|||
|
|||
Hi Double-A Thanks for the A+ for the day. Been called lots of
things,but never a great guru. I think you have to grow old to become a guru,so at my long flowing spacetime it fits Double-A you asked "Where did the virtual universe come from?" It did not have to come from. It was always there. It was there before the big bang. The virtual part of the universe is the fabric of space itself. As I've posted in other "What if's" Space energy+ Gravity= Universe It takes virtual energy to create virtual particles. It takes virtual particles to create sub-microscopic (real particles) and these become photons than electrons,than quarks going up the latter to the hydrogen atom. The great compression force of gravity that is found in the Planck size universe( a centimeter divided by 1 with thirty three zeros after it) Double-A our problem is living in the very big sizes of our macro universe we are out of "touch" with the reality of the very small. that is not good,for going back to the very beginning Our universe has had many phases as it took gravity eons and eons(much time) to evolve it to what we see today. The universe is much older that its 15 billion years as told to us by the telescopes we have now. Bert |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|