Earth w/o Moon / by Brad Guth

In article
,
Damien Valentine wrote:

On Jun 9, 1:40*pm, wrote:
Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite.
Links please.
Thanks.

Mr. Guth neither cites nor researches. He simply asserts.
Apparently, his unpublished "subjective opinion" -- which at this
point I am forced to read as "made up out of whole cloth"

Woven paper towels, I'd say.

-- is
supposed to be worth more to us than published, objective findings
from generations of professionals. (Not to mention plain common
sense.)

We established this at least as far back as the "there are no
Paleolithic depictions of the Moon" farce...and probably farther back
than that. Why is this thread still active?

It was quiet for a while, but Brad keeps coming back to scratch at the
scab, to see if he can get anyone else to bite.

I've made a practice of ignoring any post in which he scampers off into
the weeds about DARPA, the Nazis, the Zionists, or any permutation
thereof. If he wants to be taken seriously, then he can act that way. If
he wants to be mistaken for a kook, then he should go on making kooky
concatenations of calamitous cabals.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot com http://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.

On Jun 10, 10:22 am, Damien Valentine wrote:
On Jun 9, 1:40 pm, wrote:

Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite.
Links please.
Thanks.

Mr.Guth neither cites nor researches. He simply asserts.
Apparently, his unpublished "subjective opinion" -- which at this
point I am forced to read as "made up out of whole cloth" -- is
supposed to be worth more to us than published, objective findings
from generations of professionals. (Not to mention plain common
sense.)

We established this at least as far back as the "there are no
Paleolithic depictions of the Moon" farce...and probably farther back
than that. Why is this thread still active?

I've always given credit where credit was due.

Why bother to make stuff up, when some of our best science comes
directly via your DARPA/NASA?

Of course, having an independent mind that can deductively connect the
dots is kinda necessary, whereas your mindset is kinda like used
toilet paper.

Why not run computer simulations?

Why is JAXA/Selene taboo/nondisclosure rated?

Why is Venus so unusually taboo/nondisclosure rated?

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

David Grinspoon quotes: http://thinkexist.com/quotes/david_grinspoon/
“We're ignorant of life in the universe. We only have one planet that
serves as an example and in science it's not good to derive
information from a sample size of one.”

On Jun 10, 9:38 pm, wrote:
On Jun 9, 8:42 pm, BradGuth wrote:

On Jun 9, 1:40 pm, wrote:

On Jun 7, 12:37 pm, BradGuth wrote:

That's entirely possible, especially since it's so gamma producing
like no other moon, planet or even that of our sun.

Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite.
Links please.
Thanks.

Cite yourself.

Our NASA supposedly took pictures within the gamma spectrum, and our

Only word worth any of your gamma salt is "supposedly." I have n-ASS-a
moon rocks - $1,000ea. Ca$h only.

Are you now admitting that our NASA lied to us?

What's "gamma salt"? (mos DARPA damage-control)


moon indicated as rather nicely gamma worthy as all get out. I think
most of that gamma was secondary/recoil photons, although some of that
gamma must have been directly from the radioactive moon itself.
The sodium cloud that surrounds our moon by more than 8r, and trails
by 900,000 km may be of the metallic mineral of sodium, although the
extremely low density of the moon's core might otherwise suggest
there's plain old salt that's sequestered below that unusually thick
crust.

Earth seems to have received way more than its fair share of salt.

wrt what? your french fries?

So, where's the moon salt hiding, and for that matter where's all the
Mars salt hiding??

Where's those sources hiding I requested?

If Mars had salt; would not that have been one of the very first of
most basic elements discovered and quantified?

If we'd walked on the physically dark moon; besides blinded by the
vibrant look of Venus, wouldn't we have noticed all the remainders of
salt, and otherwise noticed the terrific vapors of sodium leaving that
gamma saturated moon of ours?

Why isn't there any science as to raw ice in space?

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

David Grinspoon quotes: http://thinkexist.com/quotes/david_grinspoon/
“We're ignorant of life in the universe. We only have one planet that
serves as an example and in science it's not good to derive
information from a sample size of one.”

On Jun 10, 10:58 pm, Timberwoof
wrote:
In article
,
Damien Valentine wrote:

On Jun 9, 1:40 pm, wrote:
Cite. Links please. You once said the moon was extremely salty. Cite.
Links please.
Thanks.

Mr.Guthneither cites nor researches. He simply asserts.
Apparently, his unpublished "subjective opinion" -- which at this
point I am forced to read as "made up out of whole cloth"

Woven paper towels, I'd say.

-- is
supposed to be worth more to us than published, objective findings
from generations of professionals. (Not to mention plain common
sense.)

We established this at least as far back as the "there are no
Paleolithic depictions of the Moon" farce...and probably farther back
than that. Why is this thread still active?

It was quiet for a while, butBradkeeps coming back to scratch at the
scab, to see if he can get anyone else to bite.

I've made a practice of ignoring any post in which he scampers off into
the weeds about DARPA, the Nazis, the Zionists, or any permutation
thereof. If he wants to be taken seriously, then he can act that way. If
he wants to be mistaken for a kook, then he should go on making kooky
concatenations of calamitous cabals.

--
Timberwoof me at timberwoof dot comhttp://www.timberwoof.com
"When you post sewage, don't blame others for
emptying chamber pots in your direction." ‹Chris L.

You'd like us to believe that no such faith-based group is ever in
charge of anything, and that our government doesn't make mistakes or
much less tells us lies. Have you told that funny one to our resident
LLPOF warlord(GW Bush)?

Your MI5/CIA~DARPA/NASA and their Zionist/Nazi army of brown-nosed
minions appreciates those damage-control efforts of keeping us
snookered and dumbfounded. Your bonus check is in the mail, and you
can now go back to the usual status quo of perpetrating cold and hot
wars, killing off innocent folks and otherwise inflating the cost of
energy.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

On Jun 11, 5:45*am, BradGuth wrote:

Are you now admitting that our NASA lied to us?
oh heaven's noooooo
diversion noted


What's "gamma salt"? (mos DARPA damage-control)
look it up
diversion noted

If Mars had salt; *would not that have been one of the very first of
most basic elements discovered and quantified?
now onto mars .. diversion noted

If we'd walked on the physically dark moon; *besides blinded by the
vibrant look of Venus, wouldn't we have noticed all the remainders of
salt, and otherwise noticed the terrific vapors of sodium leaving that
gamma saturated moon of ours?
now venus
so we walked on the moon - you spin in every direction


Why isn't there any science as to raw ice in space?
google "comet"

On Jun 11, 7:59 am, wrote:
On Jun 11, 5:45 am, BradGuth wrote:

Are you now admitting that our NASA lied to us?

oh heaven's noooooo
diversion noted



What's "gamma salt"? (mos DARPA damage-control)

look it up
diversion noted

What has "gamma salt" have to do with this topic or that of my sub-
topics, other than your having posted such diverted crapolla?


If Mars had salt; would not that have been one of the very first of
most basic elements discovered and quantified?

now onto mars .. diversion noted

If we'd walked on the physically dark moon; besides blinded by the
vibrant look of Venus, wouldn't we have noticed all the remainders of
salt, and otherwise noticed the terrific vapors of sodium leaving that
gamma saturated moon of ours?

now venus
so we walked on the moon - you spin in every direction



Why isn't there any science as to raw ice in space?

google "comet"

That's not peer replicated science. It's purely science conjecture
that's at best subjective, because no science instrument has ever made
physical contact with such supposed comet ice.

How much of comet ice is pure h2o? (0.1%, 1%, 10%?)

How long will a cubic meter of raw h2o ice last (fully solar
illuminated) at 1 AU? (same goes for salty ice). This science of ice
surviving in space should have been easily established as of 50 years
ago, but thus far we still have absolutely nothing.

If on the moon and in full sun, how long will that same m3 of raw ice
last? (kinda explosive I'd bet)

BTW, this is my topic, so I can divert all that I like, especially
when it relates to uncovering the LLPOF mindset of the incest mutated
Zionist/Nazi types like yourself.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

On Jun 11, 10:13*am, BradGuth wrote:

What has "gamma salt" have to do with this topic or that of my sub-
topics, other than your having posted such diverted crapolla?
trolling noted.


google "comet"

That's not peer replicated science. *It's purely science conjecture
that's at best subjective, because no science instrument has ever made
physical contact with such supposed comet ice.

How much of comet ice is pure h2o? (0.1%, 1%, 10%?)

So 0.1% ice isn't ice?

How long will a cubic meter of raw h2o ice last (fully solar
illuminated) at 1 AU? (same goes for salty ice). *This science of ice
surviving in space should have been easily established as of 50 years
ago, but thus far we still have absolutely nothing.
ice = diversion = noted

YOU SAID THE MOON IS VERY SALTY. CITE.


If on the moon and in full sun, how long will that same m3 of raw ice
last? (kinda explosive I'd bet)

ice ice baby

BTW, *this is my topic, so I can divert all that I like, especially
when it relates to uncovering the LLPOF mindset of the incest mutated
Zionist/Nazi types like yourself.

diversion acknowledged?

On Jun 11, 11:18 am, wrote:
On Jun 11, 10:13 am, BradGuth wrote:

What has "gamma salt" have to do with this topic or that of my sub-
topics, other than your having posted such diverted crapolla?

trolling noted.

google "comet"

That's not peer replicated science. It's purely science conjecture
that's at best subjective, because no science instrument has ever made
physical contact with such supposed comet ice.

How much of comet ice is pure h2o? (0.1%, 1%, 10%?)

So 0.1% ice isn't ice?

I certainly didn't say that, but if 99.9% of whatever's coming off a
comet isn't pure h2o, then what is it?


How long will a cubic meter of raw h2o ice last (fully solar
illuminated) at 1 AU? (same goes for salty ice). This science of ice
surviving in space should have been easily established as of 50 years
ago, but thus far we still have absolutely nothing.

ice = diversion = noted

So, you haven't a freaking clue about raw h2o ice in space. Figures,
doesn't it.


YOU SAID THE MOON IS VERY SALTY. CITE.

It has to be salty, especially if having been made from Earth and as
equally pulverized by those multi-teratonne salty iceberg comets,
because where the hell else would all of that remainder of salt have
gone?

Salt (as sodium chloride) doesn't exactly evaporate, at least not at
the daytime temperatures and 3e-15 bar vacuum of our physically dark
moon. There is however the 9r surrounding vapor cloud of sodium, plus
its 900,000 km trail of that metallic sodium element that's fairly
obvious.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium
"Sodium is present in great quantities in the earth's oceans as
sodium chloride (common salt)."

How many tonnes per day of evaporated/vaporized sodium would it take
to create and sustain that surrounding cloud and comet like trail of
sodium?


If on the moon and in full sun, how long will that same m3 of raw ice
last? (kinda explosive I'd bet)

ice ice baby

That's certainly very DARPA typical and/or brown-nosed minion of
yourself.


BTW, this is my topic, so I can divert all that I like, especially
when it relates to uncovering the LLPOF mindset of the incest mutated
Zionist/Nazi types like yourself.

diversion acknowledged?

Your inability to focus upon the "Earth w/o Moon" or "Earth w/o moon
is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin" as the introduction basis of
this topic is par for your Zionist/Nazi (aka DARPA) kind.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth

On Jun 11, 12:27*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Jun 11, 11:18 am, wrote:





On Jun 11, 10:13 am, BradGuth wrote:

What has "gamma salt" have to do with this topic or that of my sub-
topics, other than your having posted such diverted crapolla?

trolling noted.

google "comet"

That's not peer replicated science. *It's purely science conjecture
that's at best subjective, because no science instrument has ever made
physical contact with such supposed comet ice.

How much of comet ice is pure h2o? (0.1%, 1%, 10%?)

So 0.1% ice isn't ice?

I certainly didn't say that, but if 99.9% of whatever's coming off a
comet isn't pure h2o, then what is it?



How long will a cubic meter of raw h2o ice last (fully solar
illuminated) at 1 AU? (same goes for salty ice). *This science of ice
surviving in space should have been easily established as of 50 years
ago, but thus far we still have absolutely nothing.

ice = diversion = noted

So, you haven't a freaking clue about raw h2o ice in space. *Figures,
doesn't it.



YOU SAID THE MOON IS VERY SALTY. CITE.

It has to be salty, especially if having been made from Earth and as
equally pulverized by those multi-teratonne salty iceberg comets,
because where the hell else would all of that remainder of salt have
gone?

Salt (as sodium chloride) doesn't exactly evaporate, at least not at
the daytime temperatures and 3e-15 bar vacuum of our physically dark
moon. *There is however the 9r surrounding vapor cloud of sodium, plus
its 900,000 km trail of that metallic sodium element that's fairly
obvious.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium
*"Sodium is present in great quantities in the earth's oceans as
sodium chloride (common salt)."

How many tonnes per day of evaporated/vaporized sodium would it take
to create and sustain that surrounding cloud and comet like trail of
sodium?



If on the moon and in full sun, how long will that same m3 of raw ice
last? (kinda explosive I'd bet)

ice ice baby

That's certainly very DARPA typical and/or brown-nosed minion of
yourself.



BTW, *this is my topic, so I can divert all that I like, especially
when it relates to uncovering the LLPOF mindset of the incest mutated
Zionist/Nazi types like yourself.

diversion acknowledged?

Your inability to focus upon the "Earth w/o Moon" or "Earth w/o moon
is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin" as the introduction basis of
this topic is par for your Zionist/Nazi (aka DARPA) kind.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You'd have saved us both time by saying "I HAVE NO SOURCES, just full
of diversions."

On Jun 12, 3:28 pm, wrote:
On Jun 11, 12:27 pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Jun 11, 11:18 am, wrote:

On Jun 11, 10:13 am, BradGuth wrote:

What has "gamma salt" have to do with this topic or that of my sub-
topics, other than your having posted such diverted crapolla?

trolling noted.

google "comet"

That's not peer replicated science. It's purely science conjecture
that's at best subjective, because no science instrument has ever made
physical contact with such supposed comet ice.

How much of comet ice is pure h2o? (0.1%, 1%, 10%?)

So 0.1% ice isn't ice?

I certainly didn't say that, but if 99.9% of whatever's coming off a
comet isn't pure h2o, then what is it?

How long will a cubic meter of raw h2o ice last (fully solar
illuminated) at 1 AU? (same goes for salty ice). This science of ice
surviving in space should have been easily established as of 50 years
ago, but thus far we still have absolutely nothing.

ice = diversion = noted

So, you haven't a freaking clue about raw h2o ice in space. Figures,
doesn't it.

YOU SAID THE MOON IS VERY SALTY. CITE.

It has to be salty, especially if having been made from Earth and as
equally pulverized by those multi-teratonne salty iceberg comets,
because where the hell else would all of that remainder of salt have
gone?

Salt (as sodium chloride) doesn't exactly evaporate, at least not at
the daytime temperatures and 3e-15 bar vacuum of our physically dark
moon. There is however the 9r surrounding vapor cloud of sodium, plus
its 900,000 km trail of that metallic sodium element that's fairly
obvious.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sodium
"Sodium is present in great quantities in the earth's oceans as
sodium chloride (common salt)."

How many tonnes per day of evaporated/vaporized sodium would it take
to create and sustain that surrounding cloud and comet like trail of
sodium?

If on the moon and in full sun, how long will that same m3 of raw ice
last? (kinda explosive I'd bet)

ice ice baby

That's certainly very DARPA typical and/or brown-nosed minion of
yourself.

BTW, this is my topic, so I can divert all that I like, especially
when it relates to uncovering the LLPOF mindset of the incest mutated
Zionist/Nazi types like yourself.

diversion acknowledged?

Your inability to focus upon the "Earth w/o Moon" or "Earth w/o moon
is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin" as the introduction basis of
this topic is par for your Zionist/Nazi (aka DARPA) kind.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You'd have saved us both time by saying "I HAVE NO SOURCES, just full
of diversions."

I have the same sources available to others, like yourself.
Apparently that's not good enough.

What's the matter this time? Is dot connecting forbidden to the same
extent as any kind of deductive thinking is taboo/nondisclosure rated?

"Earth w/o moon is also moon w/o South Pole-Aitken basin" represents
the revised topic about this same rant.

- Brad Guth Brad_Guth Brad.Guth BradGuth