|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom
I just had the luxury of surfing the Internet for the first time in
several months, and ran across several postings by Hallerb and Scott Grissom. Please allow me to clarify some things. 1. I am the person who obtained the FBI dossier on Apollo One regarding "espionage and enemy sabotage." Notable is not just the FBI paperwork, but also the federal agencies who were assisting the FBI in their investigation: The ACSI, ONI, OSI, and Secret Service. I have FOIA's pending to obtain these files as well. (Note to the person who compared it to his term paper: No one said this is the complete file. This is only what they were willing to RELEASE.) 2. Scott is not the best at explaining evidence, although he does his best. Gus Grissom, Ed White, and Roger Chaffee all had, as the second PRIMARY cause of death HEMORRHAGIC pulmonary edema. This type of P.E. takes 15 to 20 minutes to develop, and P.E. does not develop post-mortem. As for one person' comment that the doctors on scene were in the best position to determine the crew's fate: The doctors were ordered by security NOT to proceed to the Command Module until 7PM, and did not arrive at the White Room until 7:02, 31 minutes after the fire. By then it was too late. Finally on this point: The only medical intervention needed to revers both apoxia (the first primary cause of death) and hemorrhagic pulmonary edema was oxygen. Prompt medical treatment would have saved all three men. 3. My own, independent investigation has not only confirmed Scott's allegations but has also revealed much more supporting evidence. Anyone who is interested may feel free to post to this thread, email me, or both. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Herb Schaltegger wrote in message ...
In article , (LaDonna Wyss) wrote: First, I am not going to post Gus Grissom's autopsy report on the Internet. I wouldn't even DREAM of asking Betty Grissom's permission to do such a thing. Second, my medical credentials have nothing to do with it. Yes they do when you bandy terms about in a conclusory fashion, terms you clearly don't understand. Scott had that report examined by a top forensic pathologist; you should ask for HIS credentials. Yes, I know what hemorrhagic pulmonary edema means; are you incapable of doing an Internet search? I am quite capable of it. Moreover, I consult with and depose medical professionals of all types (including pathologists, emergency medical providers and cardiologists) routinely. You apparently do not. It is basically internal bleeding of the lungs. As the air sacs are depleted of oxygen, the surrounding blood vessels bleed into them. As for buying bridges, I'm not in the market for real estate. I have a fire to solve. That was solved decades ago. What you do have to do is stroke a conspiratorial ego (or two, if one includes your own). If you are claiming the Apollo One fire was "solved" decades ago, you have obviously not spent one minute going over the Congressional Record. Not only did NASA not PUBLICLY solve the fire (what went on behind closed doors is another matter entirely), but they lied repeatedly to Congress about what they DID admit to finding. Pull out those 3,000 pages, and after you've studied them, get back to me. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On 3 Jun 2004 22:56:55 -0700, (LaDonna Wyss)
wrote: Pull out those 3,000 pages, ....You first, but keep them to yourself, It's obvious that you've got them crammed so far up your festering ass that it's competing for space with your feeble brain. OM -- "No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society - General George S. Patton, Jr |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message om... Pull out those 3,000 pages, and after you've studied them, get back to me. If you disagree with the official report, then please provide *specific* objections and a verifiable reference to the page you have a specific objection to. If your investigation has been as comprehensive as you want us to believe, then you've read them all and took notes along the way. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
LaDonna Wyss wrote:
Scott had that report examined by a top forensic pathologist; you should ask for HIS credentials. Scott never told us who his top forensic pathologist was. Can you? Jim Davis |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|