|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Aether Foreshortning at c
On Feb 22, 7:48*am, Painius wrote:
On Tue, 21 Feb 2012 20:06:14 -0800 (PST), "G=EMC^2" wrote: On Feb 20, 2:49*pm, Painius wrote: On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 08:14:04 -0500, HVAC wrote: On 2/20/2012 7:33 AM, Painius wrote: There is no known way for any singularity to begin to expand under the crushing weight of its own gravitational field. *So why would any reasonable scientist continue to believe that it were possible? I'd call 'strawman' on this, but a strawman implies a knowledge that the OP understands the lies he is fostering. In your case, Painus, it's simple ignorance. Gravity was born when the big bang started expanding. All matter, all forces, all time, all EVERYTHING came into existence with the big bang. There was no 'before'. So, you seem to say that everything, to include the singularity, was "born" with the Big Bang. *So, that mother of all singularities was able to expand simply because any gravitational field it would have generated was evidently not yet "in place". Actually, on the surface, that's not an exceedingly implausible argument. *Are you actually learning things by reading this newsgroup? NaHHHHHHHHhhhh ! You're still an ignorant slut, HoVAC. Gravitation is an instant phenomenon as shown by what would happen to the orbits of the planets in our Solar system if it weren't an instant phenomenon. *So even if the singularity and its gravitation were both "born" in the same instant, the gravitational field of the singularity would be "in place" too quickly to allow any expansion of the singularity. *The Big Bang was an impossibility. *Face it, and stop your pronounced lack of civility. 96% of the universe is missing. Universes at humankinds time (Now) are impossible . Might as well go with the hocus pocus of Gods. *LET THERE BE LIGHT * *TreBert That's close enough, Bert. *The figures are 4.5% known matter, and 95.5% space. *The present model figures that the 95.5% is made up of "dark matter" and "dark energy". *It is much more likely that there is no need to postulate dark energy, and dark matter is just space itself. *There is a lot of matter in space, matter that comes from stars and other celestial bodies. *Matter that is pretty much all free particles, so since these free particles are rather small, "dark matter" cannot be observed. *In addition, there are the so-called "virtual particles" that pop in and pop out of existence. *The quantum foamy-like structure of space makes up for the amount of matter that stellar winds and such cannot account for. *Spacetime = dark matter. -- Indelibly yours, Paine @http://astronomy.painellsworth.net/ "History is extremely kind to those who write it." Exactly, because space is chock full of rogue electrons, protons, neutrons and perhaps 1e100 photons per atom. The universe is supposedly worth 1e84 atoms, so that makes 1e184 photons thus far. http://groups.google.com/groups/search http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Aether Foreshortning at c | G=EMC^2[_2_] | Misc | 3 | March 1st 12 07:51 AM |
Aether | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 22 | July 17th 11 02:21 AM |
Aether | Koobee Wublee | Astronomy Misc | 4 | July 11th 11 01:57 AM |
Aether or whatever | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 2 | October 17th 06 05:17 AM |