|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
3 knockdown arguments against human caused Global warming
Moon, soot and biology running itself amok in more nasty ways than
mere flatulence. Mother Earth herself is actually cooling off from the inside out (so that's not at fault). "2 knockdown arguments againt human caused Global warming?" http://groups.google.com/group/cam.m...e e48c6cf7759 Apparently "cam.misc" operates within its very own MI cloaked topic and/or client selective robo stealth moderation mode, though it's about what you'd expect of most anything UK that believes they're extra special folks with such extra tight butt-cracks, that perhaps they don't have to share squat if they don't want to. In spite of their perceived reluctance as to share and share alike, I'll offer up a perfectly valid third reason for global warming, or at least of what I believe is mostly responsible for a good 75% of it, if not representing as great as being worth a 90% GW factor. For starters, 300 PPM in CO2 simply isn't providing a sufficient cause and affect, that's being continually mainstream touted as the GW holy grail. Soot (white or black) on the other hand has a measured degree of GW potential via global dimming and of certain thermal retention factors, and otherwise our extremely massive and nearby moon simply can't avoid taking up the vast bulk of those GW credits. Apparently the holy grail of our moon's L1 is still fully hocus-pocus rated, meaning that it can't be honestly discussed in most any context without taking on a serious butt-load of flak. However, my notion of moving our salty moon into Earth's L1 simply doesn't get any crazier or any less flak worthy, or does it? I honestly do believe that's what it's going to take, in order to drastically moderate this ongoing GW situation that's only getting more soot polluted and thus global dimmed by the day, is by way of moving that primary root cause of GW further away, and otherwise by simply utilizing such a nifty placement on behalf of creating a literal spot of badly needed shade. Of what's totally crazy are those notions of educating common folks into appreciating the regular laws of physics, and thus accepting upon the best available science, as for such an accomplishment would become the ultimate demise of most religions, as well as having uncovered our mutually perpetrated cold-wars for what utter contrivances they actually were, and as you and I should know better, that we simply can't have that sort of truthful outcome, can we. As for my asking silly questions, like any of these following, is usually the same as asking for yet another Usenet butt-load of trouble, or simply more of the same lethal loads of mainstream flak as being tossed our way without so much as a stitch of remorse. How much h2o does our atmosphere hold? (I've heard it stated as worth 50e12 tonnes) How much applied energy is our atmospheric gravity-forced tide worth these days? Is our badly soot polluted atmospheric pressure going up, or is it going down? Wouldn't those nifty little diatoms (if given half a chance) once again manage to save our CO2/GW polluted day? How much applied energy does having that massive and nearby moon zipping around Earth manage to transfer into our badly failing environment (including of what's well below our two dumbfounded left feet, that wich also includes the ongoing demise of our magnetosphere)? Unfortunately, most Usenet folks (including myself) are not happy campers, especially those of us having since realized just how badly snookered and summarily dumbfounded we've all been taken through the infomercial cleaners, of having our intellectual clocks cleaned by way of whatever the mainstream status quo had within their silly Old Testament mindset, as to do to the rest of us village idiots what they did to one of their own kind if need be. Perhaps that's also why I'm still having a tough time of saying what I mean to say. Such as all the flak others and I've taken over those few sorts of perfectly honest notions, as fully intended in order to once and for all fix what's happening to our frail environment that's unavoidably going GW postal on us, that's for the most part taking place in spite of our environment having also received as much ongoing human contributed global warming that has essentially gotten more than a little out of control. The seriously weird if not next to impossible notion of moving icy little Sedna into Earth's L1 would likely become slightly more than sufficient, with shade to burn (sort of speak). However, moving our existing and obviously no longer so icy moon into Earth's L1 would become a whole lot better, and obviously offering us soot producing heathens loads of spare shade to burn, not to mention having reduced the moon's orbital worth of gravitational trauma and of extensively moderating those pesky tidal forces (inside and out) by a good reduction factor of nearly 16:1. With that pesky moon relocated into Earth's L1, I believe that at the most we'd end up with is roughly half again as much as the existing solar tidal energy to deal with, by which we could all live with that modus 24 hour tide as we greatly benefit from the more than sufficient degree of solar isolation. Remember, that as far as we know of, as for our having any absolute certainty, we've only had that somewhat salty moon of ours since the last ice age this unusually wet and salty planet will ever see, and we've also been a little extra seasonal tilted ever since having survived that initial lithobraking encounter. Going back 15,000 BC and there's simply no such moon to behold, as well as having a nearly monoseason Earth and obviously as having much less ocean and of hardly any tide to deal with. Even as of 12,000 BC remains as somewhat moon iffy, though highly intelligent souls had in fact been somehow managing to exist/coexist upon this badly traumatised planet (apparently they were all highly dumbfounded heathens or otherwise of a biologically blind species of humans, because at the time and especially of before then, as such they simply could not see or having otherwise appreciated that absolutely nearby and extremely vibrant looking moon of ours). Of course, folks here within this mostly Old Testament faith-based Usenet land of naysayism, of what's mostly based upon their one and only Earth and of their all-knowing naysay hypology and infomercialism that's usually mainstream promoted in order to look as though it's of good physics and replicated science, that's unfortunately nearly all hocus-pocus based upon their skewed conditional laws of physics that favors anything NASA/Apollo, and/or of that which supports their notions that we're the one and only worthy intelligent souls within this entire universe, whereas such they are not buying into any of this truth worthy crapolla because, I'm afraid that it seriously rocks their silly faith based good ship LOLLIPOP. Trust me, it's actually not my fault if those pesky regular laws of physics and of the best available of independently replicated science are of what's not being allowed, especially banished if such honest physics were intended as to apply whatever understandings on behalf of appreciating our unusually massive, nearby and somewhat salty moon, or much less on behalf of appreciating anything whatsoever that pertains to Venus. Apparently our GW fiasco is still officially sequestered as some kind of a 100% terrestrial thing, that's somehow not having been caused by way of anything big-energy contributed, and even though Earth's core has been cooling off, apparently there's something other of a weird faith-based form of those extra special conditional thermal laws of hocus-pocus physics taking place, that which entirely excludes any of those pesky regular laws of physics, or of otherwise having merely excluded upon whatever the best available science has been telling us otherwise. Needless to say, I do not buy into the all terrestrial GW thing, any more so than having bought into the sun getting itself so much hotter and then so much cooler each and every 100,000 some odd years, or that Venus is even all that technically insurmountable, nor do I believe that our moon is supposedly nothing worse off than a passive guano island like environment. In other words, I have a few problems with what the mainstream status quo wants all the rest of us village idiots to beieve. - Brad Guth |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
3 knockdown arguments against human caused Global warming
wrote:
Moon, soot and biology running itself amok in more nasty ways than mere flatulence. Mother Earth herself is actually cooling off from [...] and then so much cooler each and every 100,000 some odd years, or that Venus is even all that technically insurmountable, nor do I believe that our moon is supposedly nothing worse off than a passive guano island like environment. In other words, I have a few problems with what the mainstream status quo wants all the rest of us village idiots to beieve. You forgot to whine about "salt", "LLPOF", and the Venusian dirigibles in this post, Brad. -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
3 knockdown arguments against human caused Global warming
On Mar 18, 11:32 am, Art Deco wrote:
wrote: Moon, soot and biology running itself amok in more nasty ways than mere flatulence. Mother Earth herself is actually cooling off from [...] and then so much cooler each and every 100,000 some odd years, or that Venus is even all that technically insurmountable, nor do I believe that our moon is supposedly nothing worse off than a passive guano island like environment. In other words, I have a few problems with what the mainstream status quo wants all the rest of us village idiots to beieve. You forgot to whine about "salt", "LLPOF", and the Venusian dirigibles in this post, Brad. -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert words like 'whine', cut the radical supremacy, boy. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
3 knockdown arguments against human caused Global warming
Apparently Mars is seriously lacking in whatever salt, but otherwise
not the least bit lacking in the usual borg collective gauntlet of brown nosed clowns that keep popping out of those silly little MI/NSA clown cars. Is there a little something Old Testament getting ****ed off, or what? Is this why I keep getting those pesky GOOGLE/Usenet posting error messages? Is this why my poor old PC is getting spermware/****ware trashed via Usenet servers? Is this why I'm being stalked and hijacked into "alt.fan.art-bell" and "alt.usenet.kooks"? Is this another perpetrated cold-war lid that's coming off the Jewish Third Reich need-to-know jar of salt, yet another example of whatever else there is to know about? - Brad Guth |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
3 knockdown arguments against human caused Global warming
Moon, soot and biology running itself amok in more nasty ways than
mere flatulence. Mother Earth herself is actually cooling off from [...] and then so much cooler each and every 100,000 some odd years, or that Venus is even all that technically insurmountable, nor do I believe that our moon is supposedly nothing worse off than a passive guano island like environment. In other words, I have a few problems with what the mainstream status quo wants all the rest of us village idiots to beieve. You forgot to whine about "salt", "LLPOF", and the Venusian dirigibles in this post, Brad. -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert words like 'whine', cut the radical supremacy, boy. In days of slavery the situation was the same. There was the all-wise slave-owner and I pulled and stretched his nipples long and said: "Look, now you have long and pointy man-nipples. You can sniff it, but don't bite it! It might give a bad image to the slaves." |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
3 knockdown arguments against human caused Global warming
" wrote:
On Mar 18, 11:32 am, Art Deco wrote: wrote: Moon, soot and biology running itself amok in more nasty ways than mere flatulence. Mother Earth herself is actually cooling off from [...] and then so much cooler each and every 100,000 some odd years, or that Venus is even all that technically insurmountable, nor do I believe that our moon is supposedly nothing worse off than a passive guano island like environment. In other words, I have a few problems with what the mainstream status quo wants all the rest of us village idiots to beieve. You forgot to whine about "salt", "LLPOF", and the Venusian dirigibles in this post, Brad. -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert words like 'whine', cut the radical supremacy, boy. Coherent much? -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
3 knockdown arguments against human caused Global warming
wrote:
Apparently Mars is seriously lacking in whatever salt, but otherwise not the least bit lacking in the usual borg collective gauntlet of brown nosed clowns that keep popping out of those silly little MI/NSA clown cars. Is there a little something Old Testament getting ****ed off, or what? Is this why I keep getting those pesky GOOGLE/Usenet posting error messages? Is this why my poor old PC is getting spermware/****ware trashed via Usenet servers? Is this why I'm being stalked and hijacked into "alt.fan.art-bell" and "alt.usenet.kooks"? Is this another perpetrated cold-war lid that's coming off the Jewish Third Reich need-to-know jar of salt, yet another example of whatever else there is to know about? Some cheese with your whine today, Brad? -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
3 knockdown arguments against human caused Global warming
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
3 knockdown arguments against human caused Global warming
As we can clearly see, the MI/NSA Usenet clown as having by far the
biggest and longest brown nose of them all, is right here to show off his warm and fuzzy Third Reich butt licking expertise. Too bad that "cam.misc" as such represents UKs most wussy of folks, that wouldn't so much as dare to break wind or whatever rank over something this important. - Brad Guth |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
3 knockdown arguments against human caused Global warming
On Mar 18, 11:56 am, Art Deco wrote:
wrote: Apparently Mars is seriously lacking in whatever salt, but otherwise not the least bit lacking in the usual borg collective gauntlet of brown nosed clowns that keep popping out of those silly little MI/NSA clown cars. Is there a little something Old Testament getting ****ed off, or what? Is this why I keep getting those pesky GOOGLE/Usenet posting error messages? Is this why my poor old PC is getting spermware/****ware trashed via Usenet servers? Is this why I'm being stalked and hijacked into "alt.fan.art-bell" and "alt.usenet.kooks"? Is this another perpetrated cold-war lid that's coming off the Jewish Third Reich need-to-know jar of salt, yet another example of whatever else there is to know about? Some cheese with your whine today, Brad? -- Supreme Leader of the Brainwashed Followers of Art Deco "To err is human, to cover it up is Weasel" -- Dogbert Terrorist supremacist, KKK. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
3 knockdown arguments against human caused Global warming | [email protected] | History | 54 | March 26th 07 01:12 AM |
dinosaur extinction/global cooling &human extinction/global warming | 281979 | Astronomy Misc | 0 | December 17th 06 12:05 PM |
Probability of solar caused global warming | [email protected] | Policy | 0 | October 6th 05 02:32 PM |
Killer 'triple burp' of methane caused massive global warming (Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 15th 05 06:01 PM |
Killer 'triple burp' of methane caused massive global warming(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | September 15th 05 05:27 PM |