A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old August 30th 07, 08:33 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro,alt.astronomy,rec.radio.amateur.space,uk.sci.astronomy
Radium[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 109
Default What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

Hi:

What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

According to the link below, it is 3438 GHz:

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?re...=11719&page=11

Is 3438 GHz the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?


Thanks,

Radium

  #2  
Old August 30th 07, 12:33 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro,alt.astronomy,rec.radio.amateur.space,uk.sci.astronomy
gwatts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

Radium wrote:
Hi:

What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

According to the link below, it is 3438 GHz:

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?re...=11719&page=11

Is 3438 GHz the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?


If you read on a little farther you'll find
'blurring the distinction between radio astronomy and infrared astronomy.'

So where do you want to draw the line between radio astronomy and
infrared astronomy? There's you're answer.
  #3  
Old August 30th 07, 01:51 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro,alt.astronomy,rec.radio.amateur.space,uk.sci.astronomy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 300
Default What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

So where do you want to draw the line between radio astronomy and
infrared astronomy? There's you're answer.


Why don't you just call it all electromagnetic astronomy?

  #4  
Old August 30th 07, 01:56 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro,alt.astronomy,rec.radio.amateur.space,uk.sci.astronomy
gwatts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

wrote:
So where do you want to draw the line between radio astronomy and
infrared astronomy? There's you're answer.



Why don't you just call it all electromagnetic astronomy?


It's not my call.
  #5  
Old August 30th 07, 04:03 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro,alt.astronomy,rec.radio.amateur.space,uk.sci.astronomy
Margo Schulter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 304
Default What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

In sci.astro.amateur gwatts wrote:

Radium wrote:
Hi:

What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

According to the link below, it is 3438 GHz:

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?re...=11719&page=11

Is 3438 GHz the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?


If you read on a little farther you'll find
'blurring the distinction between radio astronomy and infrared astronomy.'

So where do you want to draw the line between radio astronomy and
infrared astronomy? There's you're answer.


Hi, Radium, gwatts, and all.

I'd agree that the real question here may be where to draw the line
between radio and infrared, and thus between radio astronomy and
infrared astronomy.

What I learned about 40 years ago was that while the line wasn't
a clear one, the shortest or highest-frequency range of radio waves
traditionally placed in that classification were "millimeter waves"
with a wavelength of 1-10mm. Given that the speed of light, c, is
very close to 3 x 10^10 centimeters per second, so that a 1 cm or
10mm wave would have a frequency of around 30 Gz, this category
(also known as Extremely High Frequency or EHF) has a 30-300GHz
range.

A frequency of 3438 GHz, with a wavelength a bit shorter than
100 microns, would thus be about an order of magnitude higher
in frequency than the top of the EHF range. While I'm not sure
if there's a specific technical name for this range (analogous
to the various categories of radio waves like EHF), my first
layperson's guess would be that it could be considered very
far infrared (that is, far from the visual spectrum and close
to radio).

It's interesting question how radio and infrared astronomy are
distinguished: mainly by the nature of the waves, or also by
the apparatus used. I'd like to to learn more of this myself.

Again, I'd emphasize that in giving the range for EHF, I'm not
saying that anything above 300 GHz wouldn't be considered radio,
only mentioning this category as an example of what was
traditionally considered near the top of the radio spectrum.

Maybe Laura or others could comment more expertly on this.

Most appreciatively,

Margo Schulter

Lat. 38.566 Long. -121.430

  #6  
Old August 30th 07, 04:34 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro,alt.astronomy,rec.radio.amateur.space,uk.sci.astronomy
Peter Webb[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 927
Default What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?


"Margo Schulter" wrote in message
...
In sci.astro.amateur gwatts wrote:

Radium wrote:
Hi:

What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

According to the link below, it is 3438 GHz:

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?re...=11719&page=11

Is 3438 GHz the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?


If you read on a little farther you'll find
'blurring the distinction between radio astronomy and infrared
astronomy.'

So where do you want to draw the line between radio astronomy and
infrared astronomy? There's you're answer.


Hi, Radium, gwatts, and all.

I'd agree that the real question here may be where to draw the line
between radio and infrared, and thus between radio astronomy and
infrared astronomy.

What I learned about 40 years ago was that while the line wasn't
a clear one, the shortest or highest-frequency range of radio waves
traditionally placed in that classification were "millimeter waves"
with a wavelength of 1-10mm. Given that the speed of light, c, is
very close to 3 x 10^10 centimeters per second, so that a 1 cm or
10mm wave would have a frequency of around 30 Gz, this category
(also known as Extremely High Frequency or EHF) has a 30-300GHz
range.

A frequency of 3438 GHz, with a wavelength a bit shorter than
100 microns, would thus be about an order of magnitude higher
in frequency than the top of the EHF range. While I'm not sure
if there's a specific technical name for this range (analogous
to the various categories of radio waves like EHF), my first
layperson's guess would be that it could be considered very
far infrared (that is, far from the visual spectrum and close
to radio).

It's interesting question how radio and infrared astronomy are
distinguished: mainly by the nature of the waves, or also by
the apparatus used. I'd like to to learn more of this myself.

Again, I'd emphasize that in giving the range for EHF, I'm not
saying that anything above 300 GHz wouldn't be considered radio,
only mentioning this category as an example of what was
traditionally considered near the top of the radio spectrum.

Maybe Laura or others could comment more expertly on this.

Most appreciatively,

Margo Schulter

Lat. 38.566 Long. -121.430


So its your contention that the atmosphere is transparent all the way up
from microwaves to IR?


  #7  
Old August 30th 07, 04:50 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro,alt.astronomy,rec.radio.amateur.space,uk.sci.astronomy
AustinMN
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 234
Default What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

On Aug 30, 10:34 am, "Peter Webb"
wrote:
"Margo Schulter" wrote in message

...





In sci.astro.amateur gwatts wrote:


Radium wrote:
Hi:


What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?


According to the link below, it is 3438 GHz:


http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?re...=11719&page=11


Is 3438 GHz the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?


If you read on a little farther you'll find
'blurring the distinction between radio astronomy and infrared
astronomy.'


So where do you want to draw the line between radio astronomy and
infrared astronomy? There's you're answer.


Hi, Radium, gwatts, and all.


I'd agree that the real question here may be where to draw the line
between radio and infrared, and thus between radio astronomy and
infrared astronomy.


What I learned about 40 years ago was that while the line wasn't
a clear one, the shortest or highest-frequency range of radio waves
traditionally placed in that classification were "millimeter waves"
with a wavelength of 1-10mm. Given that the speed of light, c, is
very close to 3 x 10^10 centimeters per second, so that a 1 cm or
10mm wave would have a frequency of around 30 Gz, this category
(also known as Extremely High Frequency or EHF) has a 30-300GHz
range.


A frequency of 3438 GHz, with a wavelength a bit shorter than
100 microns, would thus be about an order of magnitude higher
in frequency than the top of the EHF range. While I'm not sure
if there's a specific technical name for this range (analogous
to the various categories of radio waves like EHF), my first
layperson's guess would be that it could be considered very
far infrared (that is, far from the visual spectrum and close
to radio).


It's interesting question how radio and infrared astronomy are
distinguished: mainly by the nature of the waves, or also by
the apparatus used. I'd like to to learn more of this myself.


Again, I'd emphasize that in giving the range for EHF, I'm not
saying that anything above 300 GHz wouldn't be considered radio,
only mentioning this category as an example of what was
traditionally considered near the top of the radio spectrum.


Maybe Laura or others could comment more expertly on this.


Most appreciatively,


Margo Schulter

Lat. 38.566 Long. -121.430


So its your contention that the atmosphere is transparent all the way up
from microwaves to IR?


Nobody limited the discussion to *terrestrial* astronomy. If one is
working from space, the transparency of the atmosphere is irrelevant.

Austin

  #8  
Old August 30th 07, 04:55 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro,alt.astronomy,rec.radio.amateur.space,uk.sci.astronomy
gwatts
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 9
Default What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

Peter Webb wrote:

....

So its your contention that the atmosphere is transparent all the way up
from microwaves to IR?


I didn't see anything referring to atmospheric transparency in Ms.
Schulter's response but I'll point you to
http://www.alma.nrao.edu/memos/html-...7/memo187.html
or
'MMA Memo 187: Modeling of the Submillimeter Opacity on Chajnantor'

specifically figures 1-6 which show opacities through air paths and
modeled opacities over Mauna Kea, HI. Farther on the authors discuss
predicting opacities over the ALMA site in Chile.

What it comes down to is: No, the atmosphere is not 'transparent all
the way up from microwaves to IR,' but there are windows of transparency
where valuable observations can be made.

Something else possibly worth perusing is
http://www.cv.nrao.edu/naasc/present...07_Handout.pdf

and of course the entire ALMA/MMA Memo Series,
http://www.alma.info/
  #9  
Old September 3rd 07, 12:21 AM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro,alt.astronomy,rec.radio.amateur.space,uk.sci.astronomy
Margo Schulter
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 304
Default What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

In sci.astro.amateur gwatts wrote:
Peter Webb wrote:

...

So its your contention that the atmosphere is transparent all the way up
from microwaves to IR?


I didn't see anything referring to atmospheric transparency in Ms.
Schulter's response but I'll point you to
http://www.alma.nrao.edu/memos/html-...7/memo187.html
or
'MMA Memo 187: Modeling of the Submillimeter Opacity on Chajnantor'

specifically figures 1-6 which show opacities through air paths and
modeled opacities over Mauna Kea, HI. Farther on the authors discuss
predicting opacities over the ALMA site in Chile.


Hi, Peter, and thank you for your correct conclusion that in my post
I really wasn't concerned with transparency or propagation questions,
only with the general question of how to describe what I now have learned
is often called the submillieter portion of the spectrum.


What it comes down to is: No, the atmosphere is not 'transparent all
the way up from microwaves to IR,' but there are windows of transparency
where valuable observations can be made.


That sounds to me like good summary, which would also fit what I recall
from the 1960's about certain regions of EHF -- maybe around 60GHz or
so -- where attentuation or extinction from water vapor is especially
notable. Maybe this is a bit analogous to the absorption lines of
visual spectroscopy.

Of course, as Laura has pointed out, in space this kind of attenuation
is not really a problem!

Something else possibly worth perusing is
http://www.cv.nrao.edu/naasc/present...07_Handout.pdf

and of course the entire ALMA/MMA Memo Series,
http://www.alma.info/


Thanks for these links, which I'll study.

Most appreciatively,

Margo Schulter

Lat. 38.566 Long. -121.430
  #10  
Old August 30th 07, 05:03 PM posted to sci.astro.amateur,sci.astro,alt.astronomy,rec.radio.amateur.space,uk.sci.astronomy
George Dishman[_1_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,509
Default What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?


"Peter Webb" wrote in message
...
"Margo Schulter" wrote in message
...
In sci.astro.amateur gwatts wrote:
Radium wrote:
Hi:

What is the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

According to the link below, it is 3438 GHz:

http://books.nap.edu/openbook.php?re...=11719&page=11

Is 3438 GHz the highest radio frequency used for radio astronomy?

....
in frequency than the top of the EHF range. While I'm not sure
if there's a specific technical name for this range (analogous
to the various categories of radio waves like EHF), my first
layperson's guess would be that it could be considered very
far infrared (that is, far from the visual spectrum and close
to radio).


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_spectrum

3.4THz would be well into the far infra-red.

It's interesting question how radio and infrared astronomy are
distinguished: mainly by the nature of the waves, or also by
the apparatus used. I'd like to to learn more of this myself.

Again, I'd emphasize that in giving the range for EHF, I'm not
saying that anything above 300 GHz wouldn't be considered radio,
only mentioning this category as an example of what was
traditionally considered near the top of the radio spectrum.

....
So its your contention that the atmosphere is transparent all the way up
from microwaves to IR?


I don't believe Margo suggested that at all. This
page lists some of the sources of line features
in that region:

http://kp12m.as.arizona.edu/docs/wha...millimeter.htm

George


 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What is the best frequency for detecting audible AM radio signals from magnetars? Radium[_2_] Astronomy Misc 1 July 16th 07 03:35 PM
What is the best frequency for detecting audible AM radio signals from magnetars? Radium[_2_] Amateur Astronomy 1 July 16th 07 03:35 PM
What is the best frequency for detecting audible AM radio signals from magnetars? Radium[_2_] UK Astronomy 1 July 16th 07 03:35 PM
radio receivers for radio astronomy Peter Smith Amateur Astronomy 24 January 13th 04 03:32 PM
Radio frequency controls Christopher Technology 0 January 10th 04 09:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.