Any celebrations to be held in honor of Challenger and Columbia tragedies?

In article ,
"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...
**sigh** Those were T-38 crashes.

So somehow they don't count?

(snip)

Okay, Greg, educate me here - it's okay for you and rk to continue to
debate a troll with no redeeming qualities whatsoever but I'm supposed
to take the high road with Lowther . . . I sense a disconnect here.

If you two would take your advice I'd never have to see her posts at
all.

--
Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D., GPG Key ID: BBF6FC1C
"Pray: To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf of a single
petitioner confessedly unworthy." -- Ambrose Bierce
http://dischordia.blogspot.com
http://www.angryherb.net

Too bad Linda Ham doesn't jump off the Vehicle Assembly building. That
would appear to be an acceptance on her part.

thats not right but then again all managers ionvoplved should of been fired,
not offered safety positions
..
..
End the dangerous wasteful shuttle now before it kills any more astronauts....

"Herb Schaltegger" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...
**sigh** Those were T-38 crashes.

So somehow they don't count?

(snip)

Okay, Greg, educate me here - it's okay for you and rk to continue to
debate a troll with no redeeming qualities whatsoever but I'm supposed
to take the high road with Lowther . . . I sense a disconnect here.

Yes, you do.

Let's see. Lawyers and tsunamis. That has what to do with space history?

Astronaut deaths: That has what to do with space history?

If you can't figure out the difference, I'll be very surprised.



If you two would take your advice I'd never have to see her posts at
all.

--
Herb Schaltegger, B.S., J.D., GPG Key ID: BBF6FC1C
"Pray: To ask that the laws of the universe be annulled in behalf of a
single
petitioner confessedly unworthy." -- Ambrose Bierce
http://dischordia.blogspot.com
http://www.angryherb.net

"Greg D. Moore \" ) writes:
"Herb Schaltegger" wrote in message
...
In article ,
"Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" wrote:

wrote in message
oups.com...
**sigh** Those were T-38 crashes.

So somehow they don't count?

(snip)

Okay, Greg, educate me here - it's okay for you and rk to continue to
debate a troll with no redeeming qualities whatsoever but I'm supposed
to take the high road with Lowther . . . I sense a disconnect here.

Yes, you do.

Let's see. Lawyers and tsunamis. That has what to do with space history?

Well, tsunamis issues include space based observation systems...

Astronaut deaths: That has what to do with space history?

Incorrect description.

Fact based, serious, astronaut death issues, on topic.

Raving, ranting, fact *free* astronaut deaths conspiracy " theories "
trolls... Why, far MORE off topic that tsunamis...

If you can't figure out the difference, I'll be very surprised.

Likewise. The only time I see LaDouchebag's effluents is why folks
like you reply to the deranged scumbucket, and leave her ravings in.

You might note that I don't reply to such a pitiable *troll*...

If you two would take your advice I'd never have to see her posts at
all.

Agreed.

Andre

--
" I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
The Man Prayer, Red Green.

Ummmmmmmmmm, if you're going to accuse me of something, RK, it would
TRULY be nice if you were ACCURATE. Everyone who has EVER read my
posts has b****ed about the fact I do NOT snip quotes....I don't have a
"snip" option on the program I am using, and if I do, I still do not
care to figure out how to use it because I want people to know EXACTLY
to what I am responding.
NOW THEN, let's get back to quoting in CONTEXT. When responding to
someone, it is a very good thing to read the context in which they
write something BEFORE you use clearly ILLOGICAL tactics to try and
discredit them.
Try responding to WHAT I AM SAYING, RK. You'll get FAR better results.

Oh for CH**** sake. It is CLEAR to me you folks did NOT have critical
thinking courses in your colleges, because you cannot STAY ON POINT!
Let's see, let's put your argument into a syllogism (and if you don't
know what THAT is...GET A DICTIONARY!): "Some astronauts died while
flying aircraft. All astronauts who die in the air while working for
NASA die in space. Therefore, all astronauts who died while flying
died in space." DUHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!! THAT IS A COMPLETELY ILLOGICAL
ARGUMENT!!!!!! This thread is about the loss of life in the pursuit of
space...NOT about the unreliability of the early T-38!!!!!! GET ON
POINT, OR SHUT UP!!!!

Check below. I pretty much shut ALL of you down with today's
post...whether you acquired enough skills in college to recognize it or
not. :-)

P.S. Let me make this COMPLETELY CLEAR for those who OBVIOUSLY do not
understand the art of LOGICAL argument: Just because a man dies on a
747 on his way to NASA, it does NOT make his death the result of our
space program! It does not diminish his LIFE, either, but you people
are mixing TWO COMPLETELY DIFFERENT ARGUMENTS! Elliott See, et al,
were working for NASA...TRUE. But they were NOT in pursuit of their
jobs at the time their T-38's crashed because the T-38 was an extremely
dicey aircraft! So STOP trying to SLAM ME!!!!!! in the process of
making ILLOGICAL arguments, go back to your Socrates (if you REMEMBER!)
and fire off a REAL!!!!! argument! Then, perhaps someone will listen.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Check below. I pretty much shut ALL of you down with today's
post...whether you acquired enough skills in college to recognize it or
not. :-)


Hmm, looking below I see that your post is blank.

Ayup, that really makes an argument.

wrote in message
oups.com...
Ummmmmmmmmm, if you're going to accuse me of something, RK, it would
TRULY be nice if you were ACCURATE. Everyone who has EVER read my
posts has b****ed about the fact I do NOT snip quotes....


Umm, to quote Herb. Liar.

Look at this post of yours. Not a single part of it quotes rk. Therefore
you've snipped it ALL.

I don't have a
"snip" option on the program I am using, and if I do, I still do not
care to figure out how to use it because I want people to know EXACTLY
to what I am responding.
NOW THEN, let's get back to quoting in CONTEXT. When responding to
someone, it is a very good thing to read the context in which they
write something BEFORE you use clearly ILLOGICAL tactics to try and
discredit them.
Try responding to WHAT I AM SAYING, RK. You'll get FAR better results.

That's the problem hpywife, people are reading what you're saying.