|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Stages of stellar evolution
In article ,
Oh No writes: I am not quite clear about what happens exactly at the end of the main sequence. As I understand, the subgiant branch starts from ignition of the thick Hydrogen shell, You have to distinguish between empirical and theoretical classifications. "Subgiant branch" is empirical, based on observed temperature and surface gravity. Hydrogen shell burning is theoretical. Obviously the two will often correspond (given that stellar evolution theory is pretty good), but sometimes the demarcations between one class and another won't coincide. Another thing to be careful of is that evolution depends critically on stellar mass. Not all masses go through all stages, and the time scales are different for different masses. interpret a diagram, not the text, as indicating a short period of re- ignition of hydrogen in the core before ignition of the shell. Back when I was in school -- admittedly some years ago -- the theoretical end of main sequence burning was when the core hydrogen was used up. If that's correct, there can't be any reignition. When the hydrogen is used up, the core contracts and heats up. It isn't obvious to me (nor do I remember) which starts first: core helium burning or shell hydrogen burning. I would expect the time delay from the start of one to the other to be small, but I could be wrong. Both sequence and timing may well depend on mass. I don't see a name for either the contraction following the horizontal branch, That's an extremely brief phase, so there won't be an empirical name for it. or the subsequent phase when there is a thick helium burning shell (corresponding to the subgiant branch) and before the asymptotic giant branch. Subgiant or giant? (You can see my memory is limited.) Since the initial contraction is classified as part of the main sequence, Presumably that refers to the empirical classification, the outer layers not yet showing observable changes even while the core is contracting. why is this contraction not considered part of the horizontal branch? HB is an empirical classification. If I recall correctly (and see above about limited memory), there are several theoretical stages all belonging to the empirical horizontal branch. -- Steve Willner Phone 617-495-7123 Cambridge, MA 02138 USA (Please email your reply if you want to be sure I see it; include a valid Reply-To address to receive an acknowledgement. Commercial email may be sent to your ISP.) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Stages of stellar evolution
Thus spake Steve Willner
In article , Oh No writes: I am not quite clear about what happens exactly at the end of the main sequence. As I understand, the subgiant branch starts from ignition of the thick Hydrogen shell, You have to distinguish between empirical and theoretical classifications. "Subgiant branch" is empirical, based on observed temperature and surface gravity. Hydrogen shell burning is theoretical. Obviously the two will often correspond (given that stellar evolution theory is pretty good), but sometimes the demarcations between one class and another won't coincide. That makes sense. The (theoretical) evolutionary tracks of Iben (reproduced in Carroll & Ostlie) actually show ignition marginally before the point described as the start of the subgiant branch. Another thing to be careful of is that evolution depends critically on stellar mass. Not all masses go through all stages, and the time scales are different for different masses. Very true, but for my purpose it seems ok to simply think of, e.g. low mass stars, terminating at the Helium flash and skipping the remaining stages. interpret a diagram, not the text, as indicating a short period of re- ignition of hydrogen in the core before ignition of the shell. Back when I was in school -- admittedly some years ago -- the theoretical end of main sequence burning was when the core hydrogen was used up. If that's correct, there can't be any reignition. I had thought that, but that is actually the source of my confusion. In the theoretical description, the end of the main sequence is a couple of steps after core hydrogen burning stops. Core hydrogen burning is followed by a period of contraction, in which a star gets hotter and brighter, then the star gets dimmer and cooler again. If I understand it right this is due to fuel in the core - I assumed it must be residual H, but I don't think it says, so perhaps it is a very short period of He burning. I don't think so though, because He burning in the core of giants is shown in a much smaller region - or so it appears - it could be illusion, because they don't actually say what the vertical axis on the graph means :-\. Only after this short phase of core burning does hydrogen start to burn in the shell, and the star almost immediately enters the subgiant branch, in which there is only shell burning. When the hydrogen is used up, the core contracts and heats up. It isn't obvious to me (nor do I remember) which starts first: core helium burning or shell hydrogen burning. I would expect the time delay from the start of one to the other to be small, but I could be wrong. Both sequence and timing may well depend on mass. As far as I can tell, the sequence is the same for all stars (except perhaps those with very extreme masses), though of course the timing is very different. Core burning, whether He or H, does not last long at this point. The main He core burning phase does not start until the horizontal branch. I don't see a name for either the contraction following the horizontal branch, That's an extremely brief phase, so there won't be an empirical name for it. or the subsequent phase when there is a thick helium burning shell (corresponding to the subgiant branch) and before the asymptotic giant branch. Subgiant or giant? (You can see my memory is limited.) Subgiant. The subgiant branch has stars with thick H burning shells, this phase has stars with thick He burning shells, and follows a similar track but much brighter (without checking the tables, I think also more shortlived). As far as I can guess from studying H-R diagrams etc, Cepheids and W Virganis stars are probably in this phase, and have variability caused by a similar process to delta scutids and RR Lyrae (which are in the Horizontal branch). But I can't find any reference to confirm or deny this guess. Is it even known? Since the initial contraction is classified as part of the main sequence, Presumably that refers to the empirical classification, the outer layers not yet showing observable changes even while the core is contracting. I guess the only observable change is that the star is getting hotter and brighter - but I imagine we can't observe that over the timescales for which we have observation. why is this contraction not considered part of the horizontal branch? HB is an empirical classification. If I recall correctly (and see above about limited memory), there are several theoretical stages all belonging to the empirical horizontal branch. C & O, with diagrams from Iben, describe the horizontal branch as the core Helium burning phase, though there are distinct stages within that, not all of which are necessarily described. Both books made me think that horizontal branch described the direction of the theoretical tracks, just as assymptotic branch describes the direction of the track directly upwards, similar to the red giant branch. Possibly, if I am going to really understand this, I need to get a specialist book on stellar evolution. Any recommendations for something which I can rely on as being up to date, complete and accurate? Regards -- Charles Francis moderator sci.physics.foundations. charles (dot) e (dot) h (dot) francis (at) googlemail.com (remove spaces and braces) http://www.teleconnection.info/rqg/MainIndex |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Stages of stellar evolution
Charles Francis wrote:
Possibly, if I am going to really understand this, I need to get a specialist book on stellar evolution. Any recommendations for something which I can rely on as being up to date, complete and accurate? I recommend Clayton, Principles of Stellar Evolution and Nucleosynthesis. Not necessarily up to date but puts a lot more effort into the fundamentals than other (too descriptive) texts. -- ciao, Bruce drift wave turbulence: http://www.rzg.mpg.de/~bds/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Stages of stellar evolution | Oh No | Research | 2 | February 4th 09 08:48 AM |
All change for stellar evolution (Jan 13) | Sam Wormley | Amateur Astronomy | 9 | January 17th 05 05:15 PM |
Help with Stellar Evolution | Aladar | Astronomy Misc | 18 | June 28th 03 08:24 PM |
Help with Stellar Evolution | Aladar | Solar | 32 | June 28th 03 08:24 PM |
Help with Stellar Evolution | DrPostman | Solar | 0 | June 22nd 03 08:11 PM |