#1
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth
Why isn't he banned for his discriminatory comments
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth
Umm
wrote in message oups.com... Why isn't he banned for his discriminatory comments |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth
wrote in message oups.com... Why isn't he banned for his discriminatory comments Umm, banned from what? You can't ban someone from using Usenet given its design. I see you're from google. Don't confuse google groups with usenet groups. -- Greg Moore SQL Server DBA Consulting Remote and Onsite available! Email: sql (at) greenms.com http://www.greenms.com/sqlserver.html |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth
On Sep 29, 11:51 am, wrote:
Why isn't he banned for his discriminatory comments Lets see; Of my sharing in honestly deductive obtained science is somehow within your good book of "discriminatory comments"? Of my returning the warm and fuzzy favor of those clearly faith-based into topic/author bashings and banishment by way of your very own mainstream status quo, as for my doing so with all the love and affection that I can muster, as for my having to involve a few of those pesky "discriminatory comments" that clearly fit, then where's the harm in my lose cannons returning such friendly fire along with the very same flak? Why on Earth would I bother to discriminate against the truth, especially if it's the whole truth and nothing but the truth? If the regular laws of physics function reliably right here on good old mother Earth, that's getting summarily raped, pillaged and polluted to death by those of your kind, then why the hell should those same physics not function on behalf of our moon or Venus? Has asking too many of those pesky questions or the sharing upon my best interpretaion of observationology any part of those supposed "discriminatory comments" that you do not like? Just because I manage to slip in a few of those well deserved zingers from time to time, as such isn't nearly as bad off as what our born- again resident LLPOF warlord(GW Bush) and of others within his company has created, is it. If I thought I could get away with it, I'd go a whole lot more retrocative butt-kicking postal than merely sharing those "discriminatory comments". - Brad Guth - |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth
On Sat, 29 Sep 2007 11:51:11 -0700, in a place far, far away,
made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way as to indicate that: Why isn't he banned for his discriminatory comments Because there is no way to ban someone in Usenet. Put him in your killfile, as the rest of us have. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth
On Sep 29, 12:36 pm, jacob navia wrote:
wrote: Why isn't he banned for his discriminatory comments He is a Nazi. Always against "the jews", soon he will start proposing a final solution for the jewish problem. Since I am a jew, I do not propose any final solution to the Brad Guth problem, and I do not want him "banned". It would be nice however, that more people write answering him that antisemtic diatribes aren't welcome. jacob Since you're supposedly one of the few and far between good Jews within this usenet that otherwise sucks and blows, I'd agree that of others like myself as having been forced into defending our honest intentions of doing only good for humanity and that of salvaging our badly failing environment, as such should not have to put up with such incest cultivated crapolla as contributed by such Zion/Yid imposed flak. Staying the Old Testament course regardless of the global consequences is no longer one of our viable options, don't you think. Do you good folks intend to ever police your own Rabbi "Art Deco" kind, or of those pretend atheists of yours? - Brad Guth - |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth
On Sep 29, 11:51 am, wrote:
Why isn't he banned for his discriminatory comments Killfile hell is your only viable option as long as I'm not otherwise getting MIB terminated or my poor old PC summarily trashed by way of those pesky Yiddish MI5/NSA/CIA orchestrated spermware/****ware efforts. Even though "jacob navia" has clearly stated that "He is a Nazi. Always against "the jews"" is supposedly not the least bit worthy of such being within the same class of "discriminatory comments", I'll gladly take such nasty wordage flak into my cache of lose cannon fire, with such warm and fuzzy flak directed right back at your private parts. Since "jacob navia" is supposedly one of the few and far between good Jews within this usenet that otherwise sucks and blows, I'd agree that of others much like myself as having been forced into defending our honest intentions of doing only good for humanity and that of salvaging our badly failing environment, as such should not have to put up with such insurmountable incest cultivated crapolla as contributed by such Zion/Yid imposed flak. Staying the Old Testament course regardless of the global consequences is simply no longer one of our viable bully options, don't you think. Do you good folks intend to ever police your own Rabbi "Art Deco" kind, or on behalf of any of those pretend atheists of yours? - Brad Guth - |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Brad Guth
On Sep 29, 1:50 pm, Fred J. McCall wrote:
wrote: : :Why isn't he banned for his discriminatory comments : Because in free countries you don't get 'banned' for your opinions, no matter how stupid or outrageous they might be. Just who do you think is going to 'ban' him and how? You are, of course, free to not read him. Many people don't. Actually, going by way of the GOOGLE count, many do read my stuff, though few contribute. Terribly sorry about that. - Brad Guth - |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Brad Guth is RIGHT!!! | John Griffin | Space Shuttle | 0 | April 6th 06 12:44 AM |
Brad Guth is RIGHT!!! | John Griffin | Space Station | 0 | April 6th 06 12:44 AM |
Brad Guth is...... | Brad Guth | History | 16 | February 18th 04 04:03 PM |
Brad Guth is........ | edo | Space Shuttle | 1 | December 30th 03 10:41 AM |
Brad Guth is...... | OM | History | 0 | December 26th 03 11:36 PM |