|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#61
|
|||
|
|||
Androcles Descends into Infantile Rage
On Feb 24, 7:08 pm, "Androcles"
wrote: There are millions of stars. Only those that change in brightness interest anyone Quite the contrary. ================= [SNIPPED infantile raging, restoring unanswered comment] Quite the contrary. For instance, stars with dead constant luminosity are of immense interest in the Kepler project. The target stars in Kepler are pre-screened for constant luminosity, since it is only against an almost non-varying background that there is any hope of detecting transits by Earth-sized planets. After only four months of observation, THOUSANDS of potential exoplanets have been detected, ranging from candidate hot jupiters to candidate nearly Earthlike planets populating the habitable zone. It is estimated that perhaps 80% of these preliminary candidates will pan out and represent genuine discoveries. One remarkable candidate system comprises six planets closely orbiting a star referred to as Kepler 11. One remarkable result, so far as Henry and Androcles would be concerned, is that NONE of the light curves from these stars, even those orbited by hot jupiters, bear any resemblance to the light curves predicted by emission theory. Rather, they look just the way the light curves would look if the stars were of dead constant luminosity but were periodically transited. Jerry |
#62
|
|||
|
|||
plonk
"Jerry" wrote in message ... | On Feb 24, 7:08 pm, "Androcles" | wrote: | | There are millions of stars. Only those that change in brightness | interest anyone | | Quite the contrary. | ================= | | [SNIPPED I've had enough if you, ****. You bore me. -- *plonk* Do not reply to this generic message, it was automatically generated; you have been kill-filed, either for being boringly stupid, repetitive, unfunny, ineducable, repeatedly posting politics, religion or off-topic subjects to a sci. newsgroup, attempting cheapskate free advertising for profit, because you are a troll, because you responded to George Hammond the complete fruit cake, simply insane or any combination or permutation of the aforementioned reasons; any reply will go unread. Boringly stupid is the most common cause of kill-filing, but because this message is generic the other reasons have been included. You are left to decide which is most applicable to you. There is no appeal, I have despotic power over whom I will electronically admit into my home and you do not qualify as a reasonable person I would wish to converse with or even poke fun at. Some weirdoes are not kill- filed, they amuse me and I retain them for their entertainment value as I would any chicken with two heads, either one of which enables the dumb bird to scratch dirt, step back, look down, step forward to the same spot and repeat the process eternally. This should not trouble you, many of those plonked find it a blessing that they are not required to think and can persist in their bigotry or crackpot theories without challenge. You have the right to free speech, I have the right not to listen. The kill-file will be cleared annually with spring cleaning or whenever I purchase a new computer or hard drive. Update: the last clearance was 19/08/10. Some individuals have been restored to the list. I'm fully aware that you may be so stupid as to reply, but the purpose of this message is to encourage others to kill-file ****wits like you. I hope you find this explanation is satisfactory but even if you don't, damnly my frank, I don't give a dear. Have a nice day and **** off. |
#63
|
|||
|
|||
Tom&Jeery the faux female faggot is contrary Mary again.
On 28.02.2011 11:27, Androcles wrote:
REPEAT: 2.2 usec in the stationary frame, tau = 2.2 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) in the moving frame. Einstein's equation - not a thing you can do about it, Quite right, John. 2.2 us in the stationary frame is 2.2 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) us in the moving frame. 2.2 us in the moving frame is 2.2/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) in the stationary frame. The muon lives 2.2 us in the moving frame. The moving muon lives longer than 2.2 us in the stationary frame. Did you get something backwards, John? Please tell me names, John, I know this is the one thing you can: I can squeeze your balls and you can only squeal. And I'm not letting go until you cry "uncle" or **** off out of here, you *******. I'm teaching physics to guys like Gehan and tords like you are in the way. ****ing weep, arsehole. It is NOT possible that I have made a mistake, you ****ING LYING INCOMPETENT STOOOOOOOPID INSANE MORONIC ARROGANT COWARDLY FRAUDULENT BIGOT, AS ALWAYS! "You won't admit this, of course..." -- Tom&Jeery Sneers, Androcles. Quite an interesting study in a sick mind, that. I don't think your ball squeezing will impress Jerry, though. -- Paul http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/ |
#64
|
|||
|
|||
Tom&Jeery the faux female faggot is contrary Mary again.
"Paul B. Andersen" wrote in message ... | On 28.02.2011 11:27, Androcles wrote: | REPEAT: | 2.2 usec in the stationary frame, tau = 2.2 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) in the moving | frame. Einstein's equation - not a thing you can do about it, | | Quite right, John. | | 2.2 us in the stationary frame is 2.2 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) us | in the moving frame. Quite right, Tusseladd, which is a lot less than the 64 usec actually measured by Bailey, Borer et. al., http://ivanik3.narod.ru/TimeLifeMezon/301-305Nature.pdf where v = 0.9994c (claimed). 2.2 * sqrt(1 - 0.9994^2) = 2.2* sqrt( 1 - 0.99880036) = 2.2 * sqrt(0.00119964) = 2.2 * 0.034635819609184939857979236036402 = 0.076198803140206867687554319280085 usec. Relativistic arithmetic is hilarious, yes? Still, at least you agree with the imbecile Einstein, silly grin. |
#65
|
|||
|
|||
"The program use REAL time." -- Wilson.
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:31:15 -0000, "Androcles"
wrote: "Henry Wilson DSc" ..@.. wrote in message .. . | On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:11:40 -0000, "Androcles" | | I take that to mean you cannot answer the question. It's your pink elephant, you explain why you can't see it. | CONSIDER A GALAXY 50,000 LYS ACROSS AND 100,000,000 LYS AWAY. I did, it looks like this: http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...sonsGalaxy.JPG | | | A vertical time axis makes a theoretical fantasy physicist instantly | | recognisable and distinct from the rest of the world. | | "Fantastic", said Jane. | | "Very dim", said Dick. | | "Where is Spot?", said Wilson, still on page one. | | | | Fiucking old dope! The vertical axis is ORBIT PHASE, not time. | | The number 73 runs from King's Cross along Oxford Street to Victoria | and back to King's Cross every orbit. | http://tinyurl.com/5tg7gpz | I was on one last Tuesday, I'd had my check up at the hospital | and did some shopping in Oxford St. | There'll be another bus along in a quarter phase if you missed | that one, they run four buses on that orbit. | Eh? No, sorry, a phase is not time, ask Wilson how long you'll | have to wait for the next one. | | Phase is angle not time. I'll remember to pass that on to the hands of every old clock I see. http://www.london-attractions.info/i...s/big-ben2.jpg It's 90 degrees past 270 degrees and the next bus will be along in about 10 degrees. | | | The program use | | REAL time. | | Ah...that explains a lot. All the more reason not to d/l it then. | You must be modelling Jupiter which will complete its orbit | in another year, its period is 12 years and you've been writing | the program for 11 years, real time. No wonder you said it will | be ready soon. Watching grass grow in real time is more fun. | | ignored | | | When you run it, the lines change shape as you watch....but you're | | too stubborn to do that... | | I won't live long enough to see a change, "The program use REAL | time." I suppose I could watch paint drying instead. | | ignored | | | I have spent another whole day making it chimp proof just for you...but it | | isn't on the website yet. | | | Never mind, it'll only be another year for Jupiter to complete one | orbit, REAL time. You've still got 364 days to go. | | ignored | | | I wrote a new one on a spreadsheet. It took me a 5 hours. Yours isn't | | finished yet and has taken 11 years. I can write programs 24*365.25*11/5 | = | | 19285.2 times faster than you because I'm 19285.2 times smarter than you. | | | | the difference is that mine work. | | | Yeah, in REAL time. Grass grows faster than you write code, | This is Feb 27th, I'll be seeing the lawnmowers out before you | you are ready to put it on your web site, and even then it'll have | more bugs than the grass. | | ignored | | | one and now you've lost this one. | | A planet that goes around a circle with constant velocity meets one that | | goes | | around a Keplerian ellipse at two places, 0 and pi. If it has constant | | velocity | | then it has to go through equal angles in equal times. If it goes through | | equal angles then it sweeps equal areas. | | | | BWAHAHAHHHAHAHHAHA! Wait till Tusseladd sees that one. | | He won't look at this thread, it has his name in the title where I quoted | him verbatim to his enormous embarrassment. Hilarious, yes? | When you pop your clogs and get to heaven I hope the angels have | plenty of red to knock you out, because Kepler is waiting with a baseball | bat and he's got all eternity to knock some sense into your idiot skull. | | If your program uses the above principle then I cannot fathom how it produces | the right curves. That's your problem, not Kepler's. | THE RADIUS VECTOR OF AN ELLIPSE DOES NOT GO THROUGH EQUAL ANGLES IN EQUAL | TIMES. Nobody said it did. The radius vector of a CIRCLE does go through equal areas in equal times. Kepler's equation maps the radius vector of an ellipse to the radius vector of a circle. I suppose you need an animation to see it.sigh http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...rsEquation.gif The red planet with the green sun sweeps equal areas in equal times, obviously, it has constant velocity. The blue planet with the yellow sun sweeps equal areas in equal times. Count the pixels for proof. Nobody is saying the blue area equals the red area, because obviously it doesn't. But the blue segments have the same area as each other. There is no connection between the circle and the ellipse. The focus (where the yellow sun is) is the horizontal distance from the circle and equal to the eccentricity if the circle has radius 1. If the eccentricity is 0, the focus is at the centre. If the eccentricity is 1, the focus is at the circle's locus. If the eccentricity is 1, the focus is outside the circle and we have a parabolic orbit, the planet encounters the sun once and leaves with escape velocity, as some comets do. Kepler's equation relates the angle of the red planet to the angle of the blue planet, but the reason why is beyond your capability. Either learn basic trigonometry or accept that M = E-e.sin(E), YOU ****ING CACKLING IGNORANT IMBECILE! END OF STORY! | | | Kepler's equation relates the angle | | around the ellipse to the angle around the circle. Your "don't want to" | is | | childish stubborn stupidity, but then, I'm 19285.2 times smarter than | you. | | | | My method is better and faster. No doubt about it. | | | "The program use REAL time." -- Wilson. | | | Added to my list under: | "Then we have to provide figures for distance and orbit velocity, figures | which are hopefully obtainable from Wilson's arse" --Wilson, reference | | | Hope springs eternal | | Know then thyself, presume not God to scan | The proper study of Mankind is Man. | Placed on this isthmus of a middle state, | A Being darkly wise, and rudely great: | With too much knowledge for the Sceptic side, | With too much weakness for the Stoic's pride, | He hangs between; in doubt to act, or rest; | In doubt to deem himself a God, or Beast; | In doubt his mind or body to prefer; | Born but to die, and reas'ning but to err; | Alike in ignorance, his reason such, | Whether he thinks too little, or too much; | Chaos of Thought and Passion, all confus'd; | Still by himself, abus'd or disabus'd; | Created half to rise and half to fall; | Great Lord of all things, yet a prey to all, | Sole judge of truth, in endless error hurl'd; | The glory, jest and riddle of the world. | | | Go, wondrous creature! mount where science guides, | Go, measure earth, weigh air, and state the tides; | Instruct the planets in what orbs to run, | Correct old time, and regulate the sun; | Go, soar with Plato to th' empyreal sphere, | To the first good, first perfect, and first fair; | Or tread the mazy round his followers trod, | And quitting sense call imitating God; | As Eastern priests in giddy circles run, | And turn their heads to imitate the sun. | Go, teach Eternal Wisdom how to rule- | Then drop into thyself, and be a fool! | | | -- Alexander Pope, 1734 | | ignored | | | | | Nah. Wont accept that answer. 0/10...go and stand in the corner for an | hour. | | | | I found a £2 coin in the corner and bought an icecream for a reward | for my fabled, fabulous and famous common sense and insight. The | only drawback is I have a tooth that is sensitive to the cold. | | ..well borrow one from the chimp.. | | | | Henry Wilson... Henry Wilson... |
#66
|
|||
|
|||
"The program use REAL time." -- Wilson.
"Henry Wilson DSc" ..@.. wrote in message ... | On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 00:31:15 -0000, "Androcles" | wrote: | | | "Henry Wilson DSc" ..@.. wrote in message | .. . | | On Sun, 27 Feb 2011 15:11:40 -0000, "Androcles" | | | | | I take that to mean you cannot answer the question. | | It's your pink elephant, you explain why you can't see it. | | | CONSIDER A GALAXY 50,000 LYS ACROSS AND 100,000,000 LYS AWAY. | | I did, it looks like this: | http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...sonsGalaxy.JPG | | | | | | | A vertical time axis makes a theoretical fantasy physicist instantly | | | recognisable and distinct from the rest of the world. | | | "Fantastic", said Jane. | | | "Very dim", said Dick. | | | "Where is Spot?", said Wilson, still on page one. | | | | | | Fiucking old dope! The vertical axis is ORBIT PHASE, not time. | | | | The number 73 runs from King's Cross along Oxford Street to Victoria | | and back to King's Cross every orbit. | | http://tinyurl.com/5tg7gpz | | I was on one last Tuesday, I'd had my check up at the hospital | | and did some shopping in Oxford St. | | There'll be another bus along in a quarter phase if you missed | | that one, they run four buses on that orbit. | | Eh? No, sorry, a phase is not time, ask Wilson how long you'll | | have to wait for the next one. | | | | Phase is angle not time. | | I'll remember to pass that on to the hands of every old clock I see. | http://www.london-attractions.info/i...s/big-ben2.jpg | It's 90 degrees past 270 degrees and the next bus will be along in | about 10 degrees. | | | | | | The program use | | | REAL time. | | | | Ah...that explains a lot. All the more reason not to d/l it then. | | You must be modelling Jupiter which will complete its orbit | | in another year, its period is 12 years and you've been writing | | the program for 11 years, real time. No wonder you said it will | | be ready soon. Watching grass grow in real time is more fun. | | | | ignored | | | | | When you run it, the lines change shape as you watch....but you're | | | too stubborn to do that... | | | | I won't live long enough to see a change, "The program use REAL | | time." I suppose I could watch paint drying instead. | | | | ignored | | | | | I have spent another whole day making it chimp proof just for you...but | it | | | isn't on the website yet. | | | | | Never mind, it'll only be another year for Jupiter to complete one | | orbit, REAL time. You've still got 364 days to go. | | | | ignored | | | | | I wrote a new one on a spreadsheet. It took me a 5 hours. Yours isn't | | | finished yet and has taken 11 years. I can write programs | 24*365.25*11/5 | | = | | | 19285.2 times faster than you because I'm 19285.2 times smarter than | you. | | | | | | the difference is that mine work. | | | | | Yeah, in REAL time. Grass grows faster than you write code, | | This is Feb 27th, I'll be seeing the lawnmowers out before you | | you are ready to put it on your web site, and even then it'll have | | more bugs than the grass. | | | | ignored | | | | | one and now you've lost this one. | | | A planet that goes around a circle with constant velocity meets one | that | | | goes | | | around a Keplerian ellipse at two places, 0 and pi. If it has constant | | | velocity | | | then it has to go through equal angles in equal times. If it goes | through | | | equal angles then it sweeps equal areas. | | | | | | BWAHAHAHHHAHAHHAHA! Wait till Tusseladd sees that one. | | | | He won't look at this thread, it has his name in the title where I quoted | | him verbatim to his enormous embarrassment. Hilarious, yes? | | When you pop your clogs and get to heaven I hope the angels have | | plenty of red to knock you out, because Kepler is waiting with a baseball | | bat and he's got all eternity to knock some sense into your idiot skull. | | | | If your program uses the above principle then I cannot fathom how it | produces | | the right curves. | | That's your problem, not Kepler's. | | | THE RADIUS VECTOR OF AN ELLIPSE DOES NOT GO THROUGH EQUAL ANGLES IN EQUAL | | TIMES. | | Nobody said it did. | | The radius vector of a CIRCLE does go through equal areas in equal times. | Kepler's equation maps the radius vector of an ellipse to the radius vector | of a circle. | I suppose you need an animation to see it.sigh | http://www.androcles01.pwp.blueyonde...rsEquation.gif | The red planet with the green sun sweeps equal areas in equal times, | obviously, it has constant velocity. | The blue planet with the yellow sun sweeps equal areas in equal times. | Count the pixels for proof. | Nobody is saying the blue area equals the red area, because obviously | it doesn't. But the blue segments have the same area as each other. | | There is no connection between the circle and the ellipse. There is no connection between Wilson and mathematics. | The focus (where the yellow sun is) is the horizontal distance from the | circle and equal to the eccentricity if the circle has radius 1. | If the eccentricity is 0, the focus is at the centre. | If the eccentricity is 1, the focus is at the circle's locus. | If the eccentricity is 1, the focus is outside the circle and we have a | parabolic orbit, the planet encounters the sun once and leaves with | escape velocity, as some comets do. | Kepler's equation relates the angle of the red planet to the angle of the | blue planet, but the reason why is beyond your capability. Either learn | basic trigonometry or accept that M = E-e.sin(E), YOU ****ING | CACKLING IGNORANT IMBECILE! | | END OF STORY! | | | | | | Kepler's equation relates the angle | | | around the ellipse to the angle around the circle. Your "don't want | to" | | is | | | childish stubborn stupidity, but then, I'm 19285.2 times smarter than | | you. | | | | | | My method is better and faster. No doubt about it. | | | | | "The program use REAL time." -- Wilson. | | | | | | Added to my list under: | | "Then we have to provide figures for distance and orbit velocity, figures | | which are hopefully obtainable from Wilson's arse" --Wilson, reference | | | | | | Hope springs eternal | | | | Know then thyself, presume not God to scan | | The proper study of Mankind is Man. | | Placed on this isthmus of a middle state, | | A Being darkly wise, and rudely great: | | With too much knowledge for the Sceptic side, | | With too much weakness for the Stoic's pride, | | He hangs between; in doubt to act, or rest; | | In doubt to deem himself a God, or Beast; | | In doubt his mind or body to prefer; | | Born but to die, and reas'ning but to err; | | Alike in ignorance, his reason such, | | Whether he thinks too little, or too much; | | Chaos of Thought and Passion, all confus'd; | | Still by himself, abus'd or disabus'd; | | Created half to rise and half to fall; | | Great Lord of all things, yet a prey to all, | | Sole judge of truth, in endless error hurl'd; | | The glory, jest and riddle of the world. | | | | | | Go, wondrous creature! mount where science guides, | | Go, measure earth, weigh air, and state the tides; | | Instruct the planets in what orbs to run, | | Correct old time, and regulate the sun; | | Go, soar with Plato to th' empyreal sphere, | | To the first good, first perfect, and first fair; | | Or tread the mazy round his followers trod, | | And quitting sense call imitating God; | | As Eastern priests in giddy circles run, | | And turn their heads to imitate the sun. | | Go, teach Eternal Wisdom how to rule- | | Then drop into thyself, and be a fool! | | | | | | -- Alexander Pope, 1734 | | | | ignored | | | | | | | | Nah. Wont accept that answer. 0/10...go and stand in the corner for an | | hour. | | | | | | | I found a £2 coin in the corner and bought an icecream for a reward | | for my fabled, fabulous and famous common sense and insight. The | | only drawback is I have a tooth that is sensitive to the cold. | | | | ..well borrow one from the chimp.. | | | | | | | | Henry Wilson... | | | Henry Wilson... |
#67
|
|||
|
|||
"The program use REAL time." -- Wilson.
On 27 Feb., 16:11, "Andrex spluttered all over his mother's keyboard:
I'd had my check-up at the hospital... And what did your child psychiatrist have to say this time? |
#68
|
|||
|
|||
"The program use REAL time." -- Wilson.
"Chris.B" wrote in message ... On 27 Feb., 16:11, "Andrex spluttered all over his mother's keyboard: I'd had my check-up at the hospital... And what did your child psychiatrist have to say this time? Don't be silly. A child can't be a psychiatrist. |
#69
|
|||
|
|||
"The program use REAL time." -- Wilson.
On 1 Mar., 08:05, "T.T." wrote:
Don't be silly. A child can't be a psychiatrist. Dugh? Why not? There are brightly coloured, buckets-full of child physicists around here. Most of them don't pretend to be old enough to have read anything which didn't involve pictures with dialogue bubbles. Their idea of theory building doesn't stretch much beyond Lego: http://www.sciencebase.com/science-b...with-lego.html |
#70
|
|||
|
|||
Tom&Jeery the faux female faggot is contrary Mary again.
AHAHAHAHA...ahahahaha... AHAHAHAHA....
"Paul B. Andersen" wrote: Androcles -John wrote: Androcles wrote: REPEAT: 2.2 usec in the stationary frame, tau = 2.2 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) in the moving frame. It's Einstein's equation - not a thing you can do about it, Paul wrote: Quite right, John. 2.2 us in the stationary frame is 2.2 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) us in the moving frame. 2.2 us in the moving frame is 2.2/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) in the stationary frame. The muon lives 2.2 us in the moving frame. The moving muon lives longer than 2.2 us in the stationary frame. Did you get something backwards, John? Please tell/call me names, John, I know this is the one thing you can: Andro John wrote: I can squeeze your balls and you can only squeal. And I'm not letting go until you cry "uncle" or **** off out of here, you *******. I'm teaching physics to guys like Gehan and tords like you are in the way. ****ing weep, arsehole. It is NOT possible that I have made a mistake, you ****ING LYING INCOMPETENT STOOOOOOOPID INSANE MORONIC ARROGANT COWARDLY FRAUDULENT BIGOT, AS ALWAYS! "You won't admit this, of course..." -- Tom&Jeery Sneers, Androcles, aka John Parker Andi wrote: Quite an interesting study in a sick mind, that. I don't think your ball squeezing will impress Jerry, though. hanson wrote: ahahahha.. Why should that be an interesting study? It's not. Nor is it sick. You are lucky though that John didn't called you "****", liker he usually does. If that would be the case then, yes, it would be somewhat interesting, cuz real hermaphordites are rare... ahaha... Now, let me repeat and simplify your "2.2usec" lines and say "embankment" instead of "stationary" and "train" instead of "moving" and "passenger" instead of "muon", and set gamma at "0.5" as it is always 1 But, |||| First of all there is a third party, you, the Observer |||| in the game, & you make value judgments. |||| Who appointed you?... Your gig is already fishy. Anyway, your assertion says: ||| Ori1: 2.2 us in the stationary frame is ||| Ori2: 2.2 * sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) us in the moving frame. = == alt1: 2.2 us in the embankment's frame is == alt1: 2.2 * 0.5 us in the train's frame. ||| Ori2: 2.2 us in the moving frame is ||| Ori2: 2.2/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) in the stationary frame. = ||| alt2: 2.2 us in the Train's frame is ||| alt2: 2.2 / 0.5 in the embankment's frame. ||| Ori3: The muon lives 2.2 us in the moving frame. ||| Ori3: The moving muon lives longer than 2.2 us ||| Ori3: in the stationary frame. = ||| alt3: The passenger lives 2.2 us in the train frame. ||| alt3: The moving passenger lives longer than 2.2 us ||| alt3: in the embankment frame. Now, let me rewrite alt3 into normal street lingo so that any "****" can understand it, and change "usec" to "years". The final relativistic edict/prediction now says: ||| alt4: The passenger lives 2.2 years when he's in the train. ||| alt4: The passenger in the train lives longer than 2.2 years ||| alt4: when he's being watched by the dude who sits on ||| alt4: he embankment, who is looking at the passenger ||| alt4: in the train that went by and is gone. worse: |||| alt4 is a subjective report given by YOU, the Observer. And that is physics?... All this Relativity gag says to any rational obseerver, = any reader who reads your SR story =, that, YOU, the outside Observer is obviously delusional to say the least ... ahahaha... But if you insist that all this is real, then **** all the MDs & Obama care. All we gotta do is to call an Einstein Dingleberry, hop onto a bicycle, pedal & the watching ED will convince us that we are living longer because an Einstein Dingleberry is watching us... ahahaha... That sounds very much like the dude who was feeding 7000 people with one gefilte fish, while he was walking on water... ahaha No wonder enlightened folks called relativity as being nothing more than a religion, a belief-system... ahahahaha... where wonders still do happen, especially relativistic ones. Thanks for the laughs, guys... ahahahah... ahahahanson -- Paul Ande wrote: http://home.c2i.net/pb_andersen/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
RELATIVIST PAUL ANDERSEN ABOUT THE SPEED OF LIGHT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 14 | May 11th 07 08:26 AM |
Anyone here remember a "Professor Nordheim?" | Chuck | Amateur Astronomy | 21 | August 4th 06 05:01 PM |
NY Times: "Brazil's Man in Space: A Mere 'Hitchhiker,' or a Hero?" | Jim Oberg | Space Station | 0 | April 8th 06 05:09 AM |