A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Others » Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Photons Have No Building Particles



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 21st 14, 01:22 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2TreBert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,875
Default Photons Have No Building Particles

Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert
  #2  
Old July 21st 14, 03:57 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Photons Have No Building Particles

On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert


No doubt, those electrons are made of something photon.

Secondary/recoil photons are not the same as the original photon.

Still no objective proof that any original singular photon actually moves, other than within its wavelength.

The actions of entangled photons prove that the original photon need not have moved, because the quantum entangled result is simply much FTL, as though all photons are somehow connected, as within an aether matrix.
  #3  
Old July 21st 14, 08:17 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Hägar
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,511
Default Photons Have No Building Particles

"Brad Guth" wrote in message
...

On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their
speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons.
Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure
of electrons TreBert


No doubt, those electrons are made of something photon.

Secondary/recoil photons are not the same as the original photon.

Still no objective proof that any original singular photon actually
moves, other than within its wavelength.

The actions of entangled photons prove that the original photon need not
have moved, because the quantum entangled result is simply much FTL, as
though all photons are somehow connected, as within an aether matrix.



*** An "Aether Matrix" ???? Boy oh boy ... if that's not Nobel material
.....


  #4  
Old July 21st 14, 08:41 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2TreBert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,875
Default Photons Have No Building Particles

On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert

Its possible to use particle coupling for instant messages,but never for space ships to go faster than light. TreBert
  #5  
Old July 21st 14, 09:01 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default Photons Have No Building Particles

On Monday, July 21, 2014 7:57:20 AM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:

Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert




No doubt, those electrons are made of something photon.



Secondary/recoil photons are not the same as the original photon.



Still no objective proof that any original singular photon actually moves, other than within its wavelength.



You mean that space is compressed to zero length for them?


The actions of entangled photons prove that the original photon need not have moved, because the quantum entangled result is simply much FTL, as though all photons are somehow connected, as within an aether matrix.



What if there is only one photon in the universe?

Double-A

  #6  
Old July 22nd 14, 02:46 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2TreBert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,875
Default Photons Have No Building Particles

On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert


AA Feynman and Wheeler had the thought of just one electron being everywhere at once,but one photon is very far out. STILL TreBert
  #7  
Old July 23rd 14, 04:58 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Photons Have No Building Particles

On Monday, July 21, 2014 1:01:29 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Monday, July 21, 2014 7:57:20 AM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:

On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:




Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert








No doubt, those electrons are made of something photon.








Secondary/recoil photons are not the same as the original photon.








Still no objective proof that any original singular photon actually moves, other than within its wavelength.






You mean that space is compressed to zero length for them?


That's an interesting interpretation that goes nicely with quantum entanglement.



The actions of entangled photons prove that the original photon need not have moved, because the quantum entangled result is simply much FTL, as though all photons are somehow connected, as within an aether matrix.



What if there is only one photon in the universe?

Double-A


More likely trillions upon trillions upon trillions per cm3, just sitting out there waiting to be told what to do.
  #8  
Old July 24th 14, 08:20 PM posted to alt.astronomy
G=EMC^2TreBert
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,875
Default Photons Have No Building Particles

On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert


If random is in the photon fits How many leave the stars each second? Think of how many don't hit the Earth,Still man can make a laser. Can mother nature? I made a mechanical laser (whitelight) Blow uo a red balloon at 50 feet.TreBert
  #9  
Old July 24th 14, 08:45 PM posted to alt.astronomy
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Photons Have No Building Particles

On Thursday, July 24, 2014 12:20:19 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:

Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert




If random is in the photon fits How many leave the stars each second? Think of how many don't hit the Earth,Still man can make a laser. Can mother nature? I made a mechanical laser (whitelight) Blow uo a red balloon at 50 feet.TreBert


Imagine how many photons never even get to exit away from the photosphere, is probably at least a good trillionfold more than those that do.

A supernova event creates how many all-inclusive photons per year?

  #10  
Old July 25th 14, 12:24 AM posted to alt.astronomy
Double-A[_4_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 3,515
Default Photons Have No Building Particles

On Thursday, July 24, 2014 12:20:19 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:

Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert




If random is in the photon fits How many leave the stars each second? Think of how many don't hit the Earth,Still man can make a laser. Can mother nature? I made a mechanical laser (whitelight) Blow uo a red balloon at 50 feet.TreBert



This may sound far out, but how do we know that the photons that don't hit the Earth leave the stars at all?

Double-A

 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Photons May Emit Faster-Than-Light Particles! Double-A[_4_] Misc 9 July 19th 14 09:40 PM
Solar Sails driven by Photons or Particles? Michael Weber Misc 18 July 20th 06 11:07 PM
Solar Sails driven by Photons or Particles? Art Deco Astronomy Misc 0 July 11th 06 04:42 AM
Solar Sails driven by Photons or Particles? Michael Weber UK Astronomy 5 July 10th 06 03:38 PM
Solar Sails driven by Photons or Particles? Michael Weber Solar 0 July 7th 06 12:03 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:03 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.