|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Photons Have No Building Particles
Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Photons Have No Building Particles
On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert No doubt, those electrons are made of something photon. Secondary/recoil photons are not the same as the original photon. Still no objective proof that any original singular photon actually moves, other than within its wavelength. The actions of entangled photons prove that the original photon need not have moved, because the quantum entangled result is simply much FTL, as though all photons are somehow connected, as within an aether matrix. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Photons Have No Building Particles
"Brad Guth" wrote in message
... On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote: Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert No doubt, those electrons are made of something photon. Secondary/recoil photons are not the same as the original photon. Still no objective proof that any original singular photon actually moves, other than within its wavelength. The actions of entangled photons prove that the original photon need not have moved, because the quantum entangled result is simply much FTL, as though all photons are somehow connected, as within an aether matrix. *** An "Aether Matrix" ???? Boy oh boy ... if that's not Nobel material ..... |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Photons Have No Building Particles
On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert Its possible to use particle coupling for instant messages,but never for space ships to go faster than light. TreBert |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Photons Have No Building Particles
On Monday, July 21, 2014 7:57:20 AM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote:
On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote: Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert No doubt, those electrons are made of something photon. Secondary/recoil photons are not the same as the original photon. Still no objective proof that any original singular photon actually moves, other than within its wavelength. You mean that space is compressed to zero length for them? The actions of entangled photons prove that the original photon need not have moved, because the quantum entangled result is simply much FTL, as though all photons are somehow connected, as within an aether matrix. What if there is only one photon in the universe? Double-A |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Photons Have No Building Particles
On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert AA Feynman and Wheeler had the thought of just one electron being everywhere at once,but one photon is very far out. STILL TreBert |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Photons Have No Building Particles
On Monday, July 21, 2014 1:01:29 PM UTC-7, Double-A wrote:
On Monday, July 21, 2014 7:57:20 AM UTC-7, Brad Guth wrote: On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote: Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert No doubt, those electrons are made of something photon. Secondary/recoil photons are not the same as the original photon. Still no objective proof that any original singular photon actually moves, other than within its wavelength. You mean that space is compressed to zero length for them? That's an interesting interpretation that goes nicely with quantum entanglement. The actions of entangled photons prove that the original photon need not have moved, because the quantum entangled result is simply much FTL, as though all photons are somehow connected, as within an aether matrix. What if there is only one photon in the universe? Double-A More likely trillions upon trillions upon trillions per cm3, just sitting out there waiting to be told what to do. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Photons Have No Building Particles
On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert If random is in the photon fits How many leave the stars each second? Think of how many don't hit the Earth,Still man can make a laser. Can mother nature? I made a mechanical laser (whitelight) Blow uo a red balloon at 50 feet.TreBert |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Photons Have No Building Particles
On Thursday, July 24, 2014 12:20:19 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote: Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert If random is in the photon fits How many leave the stars each second? Think of how many don't hit the Earth,Still man can make a laser. Can mother nature? I made a mechanical laser (whitelight) Blow uo a red balloon at 50 feet.TreBert Imagine how many photons never even get to exit away from the photosphere, is probably at least a good trillionfold more than those that do. A supernova event creates how many all-inclusive photons per year? |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Photons Have No Building Particles
On Thursday, July 24, 2014 12:20:19 PM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote:
On Monday, July 21, 2014 5:22:35 AM UTC-7, G=EMC^2TreBert wrote: Same photons that came out of the BB are with us today.They get their speed from electron spin since they are building blocks of electrons. Here you are reading two of my QM theories. Spin is in,and Structure of electrons TreBert If random is in the photon fits How many leave the stars each second? Think of how many don't hit the Earth,Still man can make a laser. Can mother nature? I made a mechanical laser (whitelight) Blow uo a red balloon at 50 feet.TreBert This may sound far out, but how do we know that the photons that don't hit the Earth leave the stars at all? Double-A |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Photons May Emit Faster-Than-Light Particles! | Double-A[_4_] | Misc | 9 | July 19th 14 09:40 PM |
Solar Sails driven by Photons or Particles? | Michael Weber | Misc | 18 | July 20th 06 11:07 PM |
Solar Sails driven by Photons or Particles? | Art Deco | Astronomy Misc | 0 | July 11th 06 04:42 AM |
Solar Sails driven by Photons or Particles? | Michael Weber | UK Astronomy | 5 | July 10th 06 03:38 PM |
Solar Sails driven by Photons or Particles? | Michael Weber | Solar | 0 | July 7th 06 12:03 AM |