A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Space Science » Policy
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

NASA to aid commercial RLV industry



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old October 19th 09, 01:31 AM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 687
Default NASA to aid commercial RLV industry

"NASA and the U.S. Air Force say they are
developing a "technology roadmap" for a
commercial reusable launch vehicle, or RLV,
industry.

"NASA is committed to stimulating the
emerging commercial reusable launch vehicle
industry," said Lori Garver, the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration's deputy
administrator. "There is a natural evolutionary
path from today's emerging commercial
suborbital RLV industry to growing and developing
the capability to provide low-cost, frequent and
reliable access to low Earth orbit.""

See:

http://www.space-travel.com/reports/...ustry_999.html
  #2  
Old October 19th 09, 04:06 AM posted to sci.space.policy
gaetanomarano
external usenet poster
 
Location: Italy
Posts: 493
Default NASA to aid commercial RLV industry

..

3.5 years ago I've already explained WHY we absolutely NEED a reusable
vehicle in this VISUAL article:

http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/008visual.html

..
  #3  
Old October 19th 09, 01:47 PM posted to sci.space.policy
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,516
Default NASA to aid commercial RLV industry

On Oct 18, 8:31�pm, wrote:
"NASA and the U.S. Air Force say they are
developing a "technology roadmap" for a
commercial reusable launch vehicle, or RLV,
industry.

"NASA is committed to stimulating the
emerging commercial reusable launch vehicle
industry," said Lori Garver, the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration's deputy
administrator. "There is a natural evolutionary
path from today's emerging commercial
suborbital RLV industry to growing and developing
the capability to provide low-cost, frequent and
reliable access to low Earth orbit.""

See:

http://www.space-travel.com/reports/...ial_RLV_indust...


NASA help?

They are a old derelict paper pushing agency too busy with pork piggie
projects to be useful or effective at much of anything........

its sad the agency that took us too the moon cant build a new capsule
vehicle to LEO.....
  #4  
Old October 19th 09, 04:31 PM posted to sci.space.policy
Robert Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,150
Default NASA to aid commercial RLV industry

On Oct 18, 11:06*pm, gaetanomarano wrote:
.

3.5 years ago I've already explained WHY we absolutely NEED a reusable
vehicle in this VISUAL article:

http://www.gaetanomarano.it/articles/008visual.html

.


Nice visual aid there.
Get's the point across.

Bob Clark
  #5  
Old October 19th 09, 06:03 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.astro,sci.physics
Robert Clark
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,150
Default NASA to aid commercial RLV industry

On Oct 18, 8:31*pm, wrote:
"NASA and the U.S. Air Force say they are
developing a "technology roadmap" for a
commercial reusable launch vehicle, or RLV,
industry.

"NASA is committed to stimulating the
emerging commercial reusable launch vehicle
industry," said Lori Garver, the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration's deputy
administrator. "There is a natural evolutionary
path from today's emerging commercial
suborbital RLV industry to growing and developing
the capability to provide low-cost, frequent and
reliable access to low Earth orbit.""

See:

http://www.space-travel.com/reports/...ial_RLV_indust...


I would love to be able to go to the conference mentioned:

NASA Announces Commercial RLV Technology Roadmap Project.
PRESS RELEASE
Date Released: Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Source: NASA HQ
"NASA is committed to stimulating the emerging commercial reusable
launch vehicle industry," said Lori Garver, deputy administrator at
NASA Headquarters in Washington. "There is a natural evolutionary path
from today's emerging commercial suborbital RLV industry to growing
and developing the capability to provide low-cost, frequent and
reliable access to low Earth orbit. One part of our plan is to partner
with other federal agencies to develop a consensus roadmap of the
commercial RLV industry's long-range technology needs."
....
"This NASA and Air Force study will begin at the Commercial and
Government Responsive Access to Space Technology Exchange 2009, held
in Dayton, Ohio, Oct. 26-29. NASA and the Air Force Research Lab, with
participation from the Federal Aviation Administration's Office of
Commercial Space Transportation, will meet with representatives from
the commercial RLV industry to explore and understand their long-range
growth plans and the technology they could use to implement those
plans successfully."
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=29390

2009 Commercial and Government Responsive Access to Space Technology
Exchange (RASTE) Oct. 26-29, Dayton, OH.
http://www.usasymposium.com/craste/cfa_extend.htm

But attendance fees are in the range of $650. Why do such aerospace
conferences such as the AIAA meetings always have such high attendance
fees? Do they think the only people interested would have the fees
picked up by their industry firms?

Bob Clark
  #6  
Old October 19th 09, 06:45 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.astro,sci.physics
[email protected]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,346
Default NASA to aid commercial RLV industry

In sci.physics Robert Clark wrote:
On Oct 18, 8:31Â*pm, wrote:
"NASA and the U.S. Air Force say they are
developing a "technology roadmap" for a
commercial reusable launch vehicle, or RLV,
industry.

"NASA is committed to stimulating the
emerging commercial reusable launch vehicle
industry," said Lori Garver, the National
Aeronautics and Space Administration's deputy
administrator. "There is a natural evolutionary
path from today's emerging commercial
suborbital RLV industry to growing and developing
the capability to provide low-cost, frequent and
reliable access to low Earth orbit.""

See:

http://www.space-travel.com/reports/...ial_RLV_indust...


I would love to be able to go to the conference mentioned:

NASA Announces Commercial RLV Technology Roadmap Project.
PRESS RELEASE
Date Released: Tuesday, October 13, 2009
Source: NASA HQ
"NASA is committed to stimulating the emerging commercial reusable
launch vehicle industry," said Lori Garver, deputy administrator at
NASA Headquarters in Washington. "There is a natural evolutionary path
from today's emerging commercial suborbital RLV industry to growing
and developing the capability to provide low-cost, frequent and
reliable access to low Earth orbit. One part of our plan is to partner
with other federal agencies to develop a consensus roadmap of the
commercial RLV industry's long-range technology needs."
...
"This NASA and Air Force study will begin at the Commercial and
Government Responsive Access to Space Technology Exchange 2009, held
in Dayton, Ohio, Oct. 26-29. NASA and the Air Force Research Lab, with
participation from the Federal Aviation Administration's Office of
Commercial Space Transportation, will meet with representatives from
the commercial RLV industry to explore and understand their long-range
growth plans and the technology they could use to implement those
plans successfully."
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewpr.html?pid=29390

2009 Commercial and Government Responsive Access to Space Technology
Exchange (RASTE) Oct. 26-29, Dayton, OH.
http://www.usasymposium.com/craste/cfa_extend.htm

But attendance fees are in the range of $650. Why do such aerospace
conferences such as the AIAA meetings always have such high attendance
fees? Do they think the only people interested would have the fees
picked up by their industry firms?

Bob Clark


The high fees:

Keep the space cadets out.

Ensure that attendees have the necessary deep pockets to maybe do something.

Are about the only source of human space flight income other than gee-whiz
flights by rich circus clowns.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Republican Donations, Aerospace Industry (NASA) Craig Fink Policy 0 February 4th 08 05:18 PM
Republican Donations, Aerospace Industry (NASA) Craig Fink History 0 February 4th 08 05:18 PM
NASA culture worse than industry? Danny Dot Space Shuttle 15 November 26th 06 10:08 PM
NASA culture worse than industry? Danny Dot Space Station 15 November 26th 06 10:08 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.