|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
THE WINNOWING OUT PROCESS IN PHYSICS
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/con...ent=a909857880
Peter Hayes "The Ideology of Relativity: The Case of the Clock Paradox" : Social Epistemology, Volume 23, Issue 1 January 2009, pages 57-78: "The gatekeepers of professional physics in the universities and research institutes are disinclined to support or employ anyone who raises problems over the elementary inconsistencies of relativity. A winnowing out process has made it very difficult for critics of Einstein to achieve or maintain professional status. Relativists are then able to use the argument of authority to discredit these critics. Were relativists to admit that Einstein may have made a series of elementary logical errors, they would be faced with the embarrassing question of why this had not been noticed earlier. Under these circumstances the marginalisation of antirelativists, unjustified on scientific grounds, is eminently justifiable on grounds of realpolitik. Supporters of relativity theory have protected both the theory and their own reputations by shutting their opponents out of professional discourse." The result: http://www.staqs.com/images/Waterloo...in_09-2005.jpg Pentcho Valev |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
THE WINNOWING OUT PROCESS IN PHYSICS
The marginalisation of antirelativists (that is, the disappearance of any real opposition to Einsteinana) has had a natural consequence: Einsteinians don't need to lie constantly and can even tell dangerous truths sometimes. So they explain the Doppler frequency shift (moving observer) by correctly assuming that the wavelength is not affected by the motion of the observer:
http://www.einstein-online.info/spotlights/doppler Albert Einstein Institute: "Here is an animation of the receiver moving towards the source: (...) By observing the two indicator lights, you can see for yourself that, once more, there is a blue-shift - the pulse frequency measured at the receiver is somewhat higher than the frequency with which the pulses are sent out. This time, THE DISTANCES BETWEEN SUBSEQUENT PULSES ARE NOT AFFECTED, but still there is a frequency shift: As the receiver moves towards each pulse, the time until pulse and receiver meet up is shortened.." Needless to say, if the wavelength remains unchanged, the speed of the light waves relative to the moving observer varies with the speed of the observer, in violation of special relativity. Then the same Einsteinians inform the world that the Pound-Rebka experiment has in fact confirmed Newton's emission theory of light: http://www.einstein-online.info/spot...t_white_dwarfs Albert Einstein Institute: "One of the three classical tests for general relativity is the gravitational redshift of light or other forms of electromagnetic radiation. However, in contrast to the other two tests - the gravitational deflection of light and the relativistic perihelion shift -, you do not need general relativity to derive the correct prediction for the gravitational redshift. A combination of Newtonian gravity, a particle theory of light, and the weak equivalence principle (gravitating mass equals inertial mass) suffices. (...) The gravitational redshift was first measured on earth in 1960-65 by Pound, Rebka, and Snider at Harvard University..." Finally, Einsteinians find it suitable to explain that, even though it is universally taught that the Michelson-Morley experiment has gloriously confirmed the constancy of the speed of light, it has in fact confirmed the variable speed of light predicted by Newton's emission theory of light: http://www.philoscience.unibe.ch/doc...S07/Norton.pdf John Norton: "These efforts were long misled by an exaggeration of the importance of one experiment, the Michelson-Morley experiment, even though Einstein later had trouble recalling if he even knew of the experiment prior to his 1905 paper. This one experiment, in isolation, has little force. Its null result happened to be fully compatible with Newton's own emission theory of light. Located in the context of late 19th century electrodynamics when ether-based, wave theories of light predominated, however, it presented a serious problem that exercised the greatest theoretician of the day." http://philsci-archive.pitt.edu/1743/2/Norton.pdf John Norton: "In addition to his work as editor of the Einstein papers in finding source material, Stachel assembled the many small clues that reveal Einstein's serious consideration of an emission theory of light; and he gave us the crucial insight that Einstein regarded the Michelson-Morley experiment as evidence for the principle of relativity, whereas later writers almost universally use it as support for the light postulate of special relativity. Even today, this point needs emphasis. The Michelson-Morley experiment is fully compatible with an emission theory of light that CONTRADICTS THE LIGHT POSTULATE." Why do Einsteinians both lie and tell the truth? Because that's the way ahah ahah they like it, ahah ahah: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEyfr10lgNw Pentcho Valev |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
THE WINNOWING OUT PROCESS IN PHYSICS
On Dec 29, 3:51*pm, Pentcho Valev wrote:
http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/con...ent=a909857880 Peter Hayes "The Ideology of Relativity: The Case of the Clock Paradox" : Social Epistemology, Volume 23, Issue 1 January 2009, pages 57-78: "The gatekeepers of professional physics in the universities and research institutes are disinclined to support or employ anyone who raises problems over the elementary inconsistencies of relativity. A winnowing out process has made it very difficult for critics of Einstein to achieve or maintain professional status. Relativists are then able to use the argument of authority to discredit these critics. Were relativists to admit that Einstein may have made a series of elementary logical errors, they would be faced with the embarrassing question of why this had not been noticed earlier. Under these circumstances the marginalisation of antirelativists, unjustified on scientific grounds, is eminently justifiable on grounds of realpolitik. Supporters of relativity theory have protected both the theory and their own reputations by shutting their opponents out of professional discourse." The result: http://www.staqs.com/images/Waterloo...in_09-2005.jpg Pentcho Valev Hitler and GW Bush each used the exact same policies in order to exclude and/or banish anyone that wasn't onboard with the exact same mainstream closed mindset. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
THE WINNOWING OUT PROCESS IN PHYSICS
Divine Einstein:
http://i.imgur.com/rwrnL.jpg Isaac Newton and Neil deGrasse Tyson are both Divine Albert's apostles but Neil deGrasse Tyson is somewhat superior since he understands Divine Albert's Divine Theory while Newton does not. Official Hymns in Einsteiniana: http://www.haverford.edu/physics/songs/divine.htm DIVINE EINSTEIN. "No-one's as dee-vine as Albert Einstein not Maxwell, Curie, or Bohr! His fame went glo-bell, he won the Nobel - He should have been given four! No-one's as dee-vine as Albert Einstein, Professor with brains galore! No-one could outshine Professor Einstein! He gave us special relativity, That's always made him a hero to me! No-one's as dee-vine as Albert Einstein, Professor in overdrive!" http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5PkLLXhONvQ We all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. Yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. Everything is relative, even simultaneity, and soon Einstein's become a de facto physics deity. 'cos we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. We all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. Yes we all believe in relativity, relativity, relativity. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vEyfr10lgNw "That's the way ahah ahah we like it, ahah ahah!" Pentcho Valev |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
THE WINNOWING OUT PROCESS IN PHYSICS
Einsteinians in the past - ready to destroy any heretic:
http://www.gamoholic.net/images/stor...tion_red_5.jpg Einsteinians nowadays - seeing the sky falling: http://www.theglaringfacts.com/wp-co...fearappeal.jpg Pentcho Valev |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
An eye on an ancient starburst | Physics Update - Physics Today | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | June 28th 12 06:33 PM |
Physics Today: Discoverers of the accelerating expansion of the universeshare this year's physics Nobel | Sam Wormley[_2_] | Amateur Astronomy | 2 | October 6th 11 11:27 PM |
Teach physics to computer and it learns physics. | G=EMC^2 Glazier[_1_] | Misc | 0 | February 16th 09 01:06 PM |
Teach physics to computer and it learns physics. | oldcoot[_2_] | Misc | 0 | February 15th 09 03:05 PM |
Process run log | Manik Roy | Amateur Astronomy | 0 | September 24th 07 12:02 AM |