|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Retained LM ascent stage
Does anyone else recall an artist's concept, ca. 1970, showing the
first J-series mission (identified as Apollo 16 with Young, Mattingly and Duke) executing their Trans-Earth EVA with the LM ascent stage still attached? I have searched my clipping files and Googled, to no avail. Please don't tell me I just imagined it... John Charles Houston, Texas (apologies if this is a repeat message--some difficulties with Google Groups) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Retained LM ascent stage
"John Charles" wrote in message
oups.com... Does anyone else recall an artist's concept, ca. 1970, showing the first J-series mission (identified as Apollo 16 with Young, Mattingly and Duke) executing their Trans-Earth EVA with the LM ascent stage still attached? I have searched my clipping files and Googled, to no avail. Please don't tell me I just imagined it... John Charles Houston, Texas Are you sure it was Trans-Earth EVA and not still in lunar orbit, but before TEI ? gb |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Retained LM ascent stage
gb,
After 36 years, I cannot swear to anything, but my very strong impression is that it was en route back to Earth. But you raise an interesting question: why was the EVA done after TEI and not before it, still in lunar orbit? John Charles Houston, Texas g. beat wrote: "John Charles" wrote in message oups.com... Does anyone else recall an artist's concept, ca. 1970, showing the first J-series mission (identified as Apollo 16 with Young, Mattingly and Duke) executing their Trans-Earth EVA with the LM ascent stage still attached? .. Are you sure it was Trans-Earth EVA and not still in lunar orbit, but before TEI ? gb |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Retained LM ascent stage
In message .com, John
Charles writes g. beat wrote: "John Charles" wrote in message oups.com... Does anyone else recall an artist's concept, ca. 1970, showing the first J-series mission (identified as Apollo 16 with Young, Mattingly and Duke) executing their Trans-Earth EVA with the LM ascent stage still attached? .. Are you sure it was Trans-Earth EVA and not still in lunar orbit, but before TEI ? gb, After 36 years, I cannot swear to anything, but my very strong impression is that it was en route back to Earth. But you raise an interesting question: why was the EVA done after TEI and not before it, still in lunar orbit? Because they were collecting data for as long as possible in lunar orbit? What else did they do en route to Earth? Not much, I would guess. And I don't see why anyone would depict the LM ascent stage still attached after TEI, because it doesn't make sense. You wouldn't want to propel that mass out of orbit, and one of the aims of the flights was to drop the LM on the moon to provide a signal for the seismometers. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Retained LM ascent stage
In article .com,
John Charles wrote: But you raise an interesting question: why was the EVA done after TEI and not before it, still in lunar orbit? Don't think I've ever seen this addressed. However, I think I can guess. In terms of the spacewalk itself, there's no obvious reason to prefer one time or the other. But there's plenty of time between TEI and reentry when the crew don't really have a lot to do, so that's the obvious time. To make time for it in lunar orbit, you'd either have to end science operations early, or delay TEI. Moreover, doing it in lunar orbit would insert a complicated procedure, which expends a lot of time, effort, and oxygen, *before* a critical maneuver. Better to do the absolutely-vital maneuver first, and then, when that's successfully completed and assorted contingency plans are no longer needed, look after the desirable-but-not-essential spacewalk. -- spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Retained LM ascent stage
In article ,
g. beat @spam protected wrote: Does anyone else recall an artist's concept, ca. 1970, showing the first J-series mission (identified as Apollo 16 with Young, Mattingly and Duke) executing their Trans-Earth EVA with the LM ascent stage still attached? ... Are you sure it was Trans-Earth EVA and not still in lunar orbit, but before TEI ? Given the date (had to be early 1970 at the latest, for Apollo 16 to still be listed as the first J-series flight), the mission plans probably hadn't fully settled down. Could be that doing the spacewalk in lunar orbit was the original plan, and it was changed later. -- spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Retained LM ascent stage
I wrote:
To make time for it in lunar orbit, you'd either have to end science operations early, or delay TEI... Moreover, doing it in lunar orbit would insert a complicated procedure, which expends a lot of time, effort, and oxygen, *before* a critical maneuver... A friend observes that there's a third issue: after TEI they had continuous contact with the ground, while in lunar orbit they were out of touch for perhaps one-third of every orbit. So doing it after TEI meant better ground monitoring, making the spacewalk a bit simpler and safer. -- spsystems.net is temporarily off the air; | Henry Spencer mail to henry at zoo.utoronto.ca instead. | |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Retained LM ascent stage
On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:03:37 GMT, (Henry Spencer)
wrote: A friend observes that there's a third issue: after TEI they had continuous contact with the ground, while in lunar orbit they were out of touch for perhaps one-third of every orbit. So doing it after TEI meant better ground monitoring, making the spacewalk a bit simpler and safer. "America, Houston. How'd the EVA go?" "Uh, well, Houston, we sort of lost Ron while on the back side..." OM -- ]=====================================[ ] OMBlog - http://www.io.com/~o_m/omworld [ ] Let's face it: Sometimes you *need* [ ] an obnoxious opinion in your day! [ ]=====================================[ |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Retained LM ascent stage
OM wrote: On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:03:37 GMT, (Henry Spencer) wrote: A friend observes that there's a third issue: after TEI they had continuous contact with the ground, while in lunar orbit they were out of touch for perhaps one-third of every orbit. So doing it after TEI meant better ground monitoring, making the spacewalk a bit simpler and safer. "America, Houston. How'd the EVA go?" "Uh, well, Houston, we sort of lost Ron while on the back side..." OM Yes, but if you let go of the CSM during a TEI EVA, look how much further you have to fall. Rusty |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Retained LM ascent stage
apollo 11s ascent stage wasnt crashed into the moon, it was left
abanndoned in orbit and eventually crashed at a unknown location. it would of been nice to take 11s LM along to TEI, there was plenty of capability, and LM could of been placed in heliospheric orbit for retrieval in the far distant future. |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The foam did not do it | columbiaaccidentinvestigation | Space Shuttle | 25 | March 16th 06 10:40 PM |
Hybrid Motor Performance | william mook | Technology | 0 | October 14th 04 07:42 PM |
Apollo 10 reusable crasher stage | Carsten Nielsen | History | 5 | July 19th 04 04:26 PM |
cheap access to space - majority opinion | Cameron Dorrough | Technology | 15 | June 27th 04 03:35 AM |
Apollo 11 LM ascent stage | Scott Hedrick | History | 5 | August 5th 03 01:31 AM |