|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Space X 2nd stage recovery
https://www.space.com/40313-spacex-r...y-balloon.html
I find this interesting for a couple of reasons. The approach is interesting and I wonder who much it'll impact the final payload numbers. But more so, it seems like both a somewhat low-risk, but also low-reward approach. It's low-risk since if it doesn't work, they're already beating folks on launch costs, so if this fails, they're not out anything. Their business model doesn't depend on ths. On the other hand, recovering a single Merlin won't save them that much money. And if BFR is so close flying, what's the point? I mean I think it's pretty cool, but ultimately, I wonder who much it'll be worth the trouble. (assuming they do catch the thing somewhere in the Pacific, they still have to then get it back to the US mainland.) Though, it suddenly dawns on me, heck, save the engine, forget the tanks and you can fly the engine home in a air-freighter and still save the most costly item. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Space X 2nd stage recovery
Jeff Findley wrote on Tue, 17 Apr 2018
20:05:43 -0400: In article , says... https://www.space.com/40313-spacex-r...y-balloon.html I find this interesting for a couple of reasons. The approach is interesting and I wonder who much it'll impact the final payload numbers. On Falcon 9 the mass of the system would be fairly critical so they might not be able to recover very many of those stages. But on Falcon Heavy, the mass penalty wouldn't matter much, so you'd think they could try to recover many more. But more so, it seems like both a somewhat low-risk, but also low-reward approach. It's low-risk since if it doesn't work, they're already beating folks on launch costs, so if this fails, they're not out anything. Their business model doesn't depend on ths. On the other hand, recovering a single Merlin won't save them that much money. And if BFR is so close flying, what's the point? Practice for the upper stage of BFR. More engineering data. Even when SpaceX doesn't plan to recover a Falcon 9 first stage, they've been using them for test "landings" in the ocean in order to gather more data on "hotter" reentry and landings. I mean I think it's pretty cool, but ultimately, I wonder who much it'll be worth the trouble. (assuming they do catch the thing somewhere in the Pacific, they still have to then get it back to the US mainland.) Though, it suddenly dawns on me, heck, save the engine, forget the tanks and you can fly the engine home in a air-freighter and still save the most costly item. I doubt SpaceX would do that. They'd want the whole stage back for inspection, even if the engine is the only thing they can actually reuse. Again, more engineering data. Build a little, test a little, fly a little. That's how they're gaining their experience in reuse. Oh, I didn't mention it before, but if you're using Falcon Heavy for Moon missions, you're using it in expendable mode because if you try to recover the cores you have nowhere near enough boost for those missions. -- "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man." --George Bernard Shaw |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Space X 2nd stage recovery
On 18/04/2018 5:19 AM, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote:
https://www.space.com/40313-spacex-r...y-balloon.html I find this interesting for a couple of reasons. The approach is interesting and I wonder who much it'll impact the final payload numbers. But more so, it seems like both a somewhat low-risk, but also low-reward approach. It's low-risk since if it doesn't work, they're already beating folks on launch costs, so if this fails, they're not out anything. Their business model doesn't depend on ths. On the other hand, recovering a single Merlin won't save them that much money. And if BFR is so close flying, what's the point? I mean I think it's pretty cool, but ultimately, I wonder who much it'll be worth the trouble. (assuming they do catch the thing somewhere in the Pacific, they still have to then get it back to the US mainland.) Though, it suddenly dawns on me, heck, save the engine, forget the tanks and you can fly the engine home in a air-freighter and still save the most costly item. This may be more about symbolism than economics. If he can recover the second stage, as well as the cowling, then he'll have a 100% reusable launcher. Sylvia. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Space X 2nd stage recovery
"JF Mezei" wrote in message news
On 2018-04-17 20:05, Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... https://www.space.com/40313-spacex-r...y-balloon.html By "party balloon" are we talking helium or Hydrogen filled balloons that will "lift" the stage to slow its descent? (and I assume provide drag initially). I'm guessing nitrogen myself. I don't think lift is nearly as important at this point is as drag over as large a surface area as you can manage. Is this a case of planning bouyancy such that it is massively positive initially to slow down descent, but as it drops into denser atmpsphere, bouyancy dimonishes and they plan it such that it gets to just a tad below neutral bouyancy for a gentle touch down with the engine firing to stop vertical speed just bfore touching ground? Are we talking langing legs and fins? Or is this going to be dead weight falling back help by a balloon and truly fall on some mattress factury like when Batman and Robin had engine problems in a helicopter? Did you read any of the article? How would de-orbit work? From the point stage-2 is no longer needed for payload, isn't it firmly in orbit and coudl stay there for very long time? I assume it would require de-orbit burn? They already deorbit the 2nd stages to reduce the orbital debris problem -- * I promise I will format my posts properly in the future. * Windows Live Mail just can't quote! Luckily, I have found this: * http://www.dusko-lolic.from.hr/wlmquote/ |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Space X 2nd stage recovery
In article ,
says... "JF Mezei" wrote in message news On 2018-04-17 20:05, Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... https://www.space.com/40313-spacex-r...y-balloon.html By "party balloon" are we talking helium or Hydrogen filled balloons that will "lift" the stage to slow its descent? (and I assume provide drag initially). I'm guessing nitrogen myself. I don't think lift is nearly as important at this point is as drag over as large a surface area as you can manage. I heard helium, because while lift isn't important, mass most certainly is. And at the same volume and pressure, helium masses less than nitrogen. The mass of the molecule doesn't enter into the ideal gas law: P*V = N*R*T Jeff -- All opinions posted by me on Usenet News are mine, and mine alone. These posts do not reflect the opinions of my family, friends, employer, or any organization that I am a member of. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Space X 2nd stage recovery
JF Mezei wrote on Wed, 18 Apr 2018
03:24:19 -0400: On 2018-04-17 20:05, Jeff Findley wrote: In article , says... https://www.space.com/40313-spacex-r...y-balloon.html By "party balloon" are we talking helium or Hydrogen filled balloons that will "lift" the stage to slow its descent? (and I assume provide drag initially). Think about the physics. It's going to be almost all drag initially (not much to displace at high altitudes) with gradually increasing lift as it drops lower. Is this a case of planning bouyancy such that it is massively positive initially to slow down descent, but as it drops into denser atmpsphere, bouyancy dimonishes and they plan it such that it gets to just a tad below neutral bouyancy for a gentle touch down with the engine firing to stop vertical speed just bfore touching ground? That would sort of violate the laws of physics. Note that the ship they're talking about using to 'catch' it is intended to catch free falling objects (like fairings). Are we talking langing legs and fins? No. Or is this going to be dead weight falling back help by a balloon and truly fall on some mattress factury like when Batman and Robin had engine problems in a helicopter? That, except it's more of a 'net' than a "mattress factory". Did you actually read the article, Mayfly, or is it that you've forgotten what it said in the time it's taken you to write this. Again, think about the physics. A balloon greatly increases the drag, which I'd bet is the primary slowing method. I wouldn't be surprised if the balloon is designed to be 'parafoil-like' at low altitudes so it can be steered somewhat. How would de-orbit work? From the point stage-2 is no longer needed for payload, isn't it firmly in orbit and coudl stay there for very long time? I assume it would require de-orbit burn? They already do a commanded deorbit burn to drop the stages in the Pacific so they're not cluttering up orbital space. They would just target the reentry point closer to land instead of out in the Pacific and stick a 'catcher' ship out there. This is all described in the article, which you have apparently forgotten the content of in true Mayfly fashion. I would expect this, like fairing recovery, to have a pretty low chance of success. -- "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man." --George Bernard Shaw |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Space X 2nd stage recovery
On 4/17/2018 3:19 PM, Greg (Strider) Moore wrote:
https://www.space.com/40313-spacex-r...y-balloon.html I find this interesting for a couple of reasons. The approach is interesting and I wonder who much it'll impact the final payload numbers. But more so, it seems like both a somewhat low-risk, but also low-reward approach. I remember years back when Musk first propose recovering Falcon 9 stages that the topic of a ballute came up on the a-rocket mailing list, ostensibly as a way to recover the 2nd stage short of propulsive landing. It's low-risk since if it doesn't work, they're already beating folks on launch costs, so if this fails, they're not out anything. Their business model doesn't depend on ths. On the other hand, recovering a single Merlin won't save them that much money. And if BFR is so close flying, what's the point? Yes I agree. I suspect they are using it mainly for learning curve rather than practical economics, with BFR looming. I mean I think it's pretty cool, but ultimately, I wonder who much it'll be worth the trouble. (assuming they do catch the thing somewhere in the Pacific, they still have to then get it back to the US mainland.) Though, it suddenly dawns on me, heck, save the engine, forget the tanks and you can fly the engine home in a air-freighter and still save the most costly item. I suspect this is (primarily) research on ballutes for use on other future projects. You are getting high altitude from orbit returns for free. Why not take advantage? Jeff Findley writes: Build a little, test a little, fly a little. That's how they're gaining their experience in reuse That how they've gained lots of kinds of experience... Dave |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Space X 2nd stage recovery
JF Mezei wrote on Thu, 19 Apr 2018
18:05:00 -0400: On 2018-04-18 20:50, Fred J. McCall wrote: That would sort of violate the laws of physics. Not necessarily. Your giant balloon will shrink as it falls into denser atmosphere. IF the ration of weight of gas inside balloon vs weight of air being displaced by balloon changes, then bouyancy changes. Yes, but likely not the way YOU want it to. Note that the ship they're talking about using to 'catch' it is intended to catch free falling objects (like fairings). Then if it falls on a mattress/net, what are the odds that it remain in usable state? Pretty good if they can actually catch it. If they catch it in the air by the balloon, can the heliocopter land the hanging stage II onto some sort of receptable on ground that will provide proper support so it isn't dropped on engine bell with expectation it remain standing without damage? If they catch it by using guys Roman riding on teams of Pegasi, they can just fly it back to land. Any other moot speculation you'd care to engage in? The idea is for it to hit the net. Did you even bother to read the ****ing article that was linked? They already do a commanded deorbit burn to drop the stages in the Pacific so they're not cluttering up orbital space. Thanks. wasn't aware of that. It was in the linked article. So either you didn't read it or your famous memory is once again in play. -- "Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar territory." --G. Behn |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Space X 2nd stage recovery
JF Mezei wrote on Thu, 19 Apr 2018
18:07:43 -0400: On 2018-04-19 16:20, David Spain wrote: Yes I agree. I suspect they are using it mainly for learning curve rather than practical economics, with BFR looming. Could balloons be used for landing cargo on Mars? (yeah, they would need to be huge ballons due to low atmosphere pressure). Only part way. You could use a balloon (or ballute) to increase cross sectional area to increase drag for aerobraking, but you're not going to actually get enough lift to land anything that way. There was a 'balloon/bouncy house' solution where the balloon(s) expanded around the payload which then aerobraked and was simply allowed to strike the surface. This only works for light payloads and I don't know if they ever tried it. -- "The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable man persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore, all progress depends on the unreasonable man." --George Bernard Shaw |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Space first stage recovery. | Alain Fournier[_3_] | Policy | 94 | January 30th 16 05:20 AM |
Live coverage of Falcon 9 first stage recovery attempt? | David Spain[_4_] | Policy | 0 | December 2nd 14 07:02 PM |
First-stage recovery using minimal Delta-v budget: tethered rotor-wings | Brad Guth[_3_] | Policy | 61 | May 9th 14 12:22 PM |
Airdrop Test for Space Capsule Recovery Experiment Successfully Conducted(Forwarded) | Andrew Yee | News | 0 | August 30th 04 04:33 AM |
NASA Moves Space Shuttle Columbia Recovery Office | Ron Baalke | Space Shuttle | 0 | October 14th 03 08:11 PM |