A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Speed of light



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 16th 12, 07:24 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Koobee Wublee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Speed of light

On Jul 16, 10:46 am, Tom Roberts wrote:

This is just plain wrong. Outrageously so. You will never be able to contribute
to physics until you STUDY THE LITERATURE. Blathering on and on in your own
little world is not physics. What's the point of just making things like this
up, and then posting them as if they were true?

There are almost a dozen papers on this listed he
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...periments.html


Tom is not peddling the truth. These experiments also indicate that
THE AETHER MUST EXIST. See the following links.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6f9bf6fff69aae

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...124977a68c1edc

Unlike you, Einstein was aware that "absolutely synchronous
clocks" cannot happen in the world we inhabit. So such a
statement as you attribute to him would be nonsensical.


Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. So, why listen to
such a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar unless that same nitwit, that
same plagiarist, and that same liar is your personal God. That is
indeed very dumb to worship a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar as a
God in which the works of the self-styled physicists reflect so.
shrug

Synchronization is not an issue here. In fact, if the absolute frame
of reference (the Aether) does exist, synchronization can always be
done. The issue is if the Aether exists or elusive where any of these
experimentations cannot distinguish. In doing so, claiming one
hypothesis as valid and rejecting the others is OUTRAGEOUSLY
UNPROFESSIONAL, FRAUDULENT, AND STUPID. shrug

Tom needs to study and understand how communication satellites work.
Tom needs to study and understand how interferometers work. Without
time being absolute, there would be no coherence in data communication
through satellites. Without time being absolute, there would be no
coherent interference patterns. With no coherent interference
patterns, the MMX cannot register null results. The invariant speed
of light is actually a property of the absolute frame of reference.
shrug

TIME MUST BE ABSOLUTE WHILE THE CURVATURE OF SPACE MUST BE RELATIVE.
Or else, the laws of physics would be what have been observed.
shrug
  #2  
Old July 16th 12, 11:39 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Henry Wilson DSc.
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 451
Default Speed of light

On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:24:20 -0700 (PDT), Koobee Wublee
wrote:

On Jul 16, 10:46 am, Tom Roberts wrote:

This is just plain wrong. Outrageously so. You will never be able to contribute
to physics until you STUDY THE LITERATURE. Blathering on and on in your own
little world is not physics. What's the point of just making things like this
up, and then posting them as if they were true?

There are almost a dozen papers on this listed he
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...periments.html


Tom is not peddling the truth. These experiments also indicate that
THE AETHER MUST EXIST. See the following links.


They don't. They prove that light is ballistic.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6f9bf6fff69aae

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...124977a68c1edc

Unlike you, Einstein was aware that "absolutely synchronous
clocks" cannot happen in the world we inhabit. So such a
statement as you attribute to him would be nonsensical.


Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar.


He was.
  #3  
Old July 17th 12, 12:29 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Androcles[_79_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default Speed of light



"Henry Wilson DSc." wrote in message
...

On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:24:20 -0700 (PDT), Koobee Wublee
wrote:

On Jul 16, 10:46 am, Tom Roberts wrote:

This is just plain wrong. Outrageously so. You will never be able to
contribute
to physics until you STUDY THE LITERATURE. Blathering on and on in your
own
little world is not physics. What's the point of just making things like
this
up, and then posting them as if they were true?

There are almost a dozen papers on this listed he
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...periments.html


Tom is not peddling the truth. These experiments also indicate that
THE AETHER MUST EXIST. See the following links.


They don't. They prove that light is ballistic.
=====================================
Kinky's faith is as strong as any relativist's. If Roberts is the Pope
then Kinky is the Ayatollah, they both believe in one god and one
speed of light. It's a waste of time arguing there is no god with
either of them.


http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6f9bf6fff69aae

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...124977a68c1edc

Unlike you, Einstein was aware that "absolutely synchronous
clocks" cannot happen in the world we inhabit. So such a
statement as you attribute to him would be nonsensical.


Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar.


He was.
========================================
His self promotion was too successful to call him a nitwit,
con artists are quite intelligent. He has fooled most of the
people all of the time, that doesn't prove he believed it
himself. Look how many Catholic priests are homosexual
paedophiles, it's the ideal situation in which to practice
their perversions. They have a one day working week,
get paid well and nobody notices or turns a blind eye to
what they are up to. Einstein got what he wanted, his feet
up on a desk in Princeton, women, fame and money.
Plagiarist yes, liar yes, but not a nitwit.




  #4  
Old July 17th 12, 05:38 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default Speed of light

On Jul 16, 11:24*am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Jul 16, 10:46 am, Tom Roberts wrote:

This is just plain wrong. Outrageously so. You will never be able to contribute
to physics until you STUDY THE LITERATURE. Blathering on and on in your own
little world is not physics. What's the point of just making things like this
up, and then posting them as if they were true?


There are almost a dozen papers on this listed he
http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...periments.html


Tom is not peddling the truth. *These experiments also indicate that
THE AETHER MUST EXIST. *See the following links.

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/6e6f9bf6fff...

http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/ce124977a68...

Unlike you, Einstein was aware that "absolutely synchronous
clocks" cannot happen in the world we inhabit. So such a
statement as you attribute to him would be nonsensical.


Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. *So, why listen to
such a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar unless that same nitwit, that
same plagiarist, and that same liar is your personal God. *That is
indeed very dumb to worship a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar as a
God in which the works of the self-styled physicists reflect so.
shrug

Synchronization is not an issue here. *In fact, if the absolute frame
of reference (the Aether) does exist, synchronization can always be
done. *The issue is if the Aether exists or elusive where any of these
experimentations cannot distinguish. *In doing so, claiming one
hypothesis as valid and rejecting the others is OUTRAGEOUSLY
UNPROFESSIONAL, FRAUDULENT, AND STUPID. *shrug

Tom needs to study and understand how communication satellites work.
Tom needs to study and understand how interferometers work. *Without
time being absolute, there would be no coherence in data communication
through satellites. *Without time being absolute, there would be no
coherent interference patterns. *With no coherent interference
patterns, the MMX cannot register null results. *The invariant speed
of light is actually a property of the absolute frame of reference.
shrug

TIME MUST BE ABSOLUTE WHILE THE CURVATURE OF SPACE MUST BE RELATIVE.
Or else, the laws of physics would be what have been observed.
shrug


Dark matter that creates a cosmic IGM lens that's warped or morphed by
gravity, is very real.
  #5  
Old July 17th 12, 06:19 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Koobee Wublee
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 815
Default Speed of light

On Jul 16, 4:29 pm, "Androcles" wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:


Kinky's faith is as strong as any relativist's. If Roberts is the Pope
then Kinky is the Ayatollah, they both believe in one god and one
speed of light.


Go figure that one out.

** Andro denied the Aether by embracing Newtonian model of light as
corpuscles --- classical particles. In doing so, Andro has not even
tried to understand electromagnetism which was developed between
Newton’s model of light and relativity. shrug

** Tom Roberts rejected the Aether for a different reason than
Andro. Tom did so by cherry-picking a mathematical model out of
infinite others. It turns out that the one chosen by Tom is the only
that indicates an elusive Aether, even if it exists, while all the
others support the absolute frame of reference which means the Aether
must exist. shrug

Both are Aether denier where they have decided the outcome before any
influences of experimental results. Koobee Wublee cannot figure which
one is the more ignorant of the two. shrug

It's a waste of time arguing there is no god with
either of them.


The existence of god has never been raised by Koobee Wublee, and as
far as Koobee Wublee knows, not by Tom, either. In fact, Koobee
Wublee would never engage in discussion of the existence of god or
gods. shrug

Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar.


His self promotion was too successful to call him a nitwit,
con artists are quite intelligent.


Nonsense! The image of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the
liar was totally fabricated and synthesized by the self-styled
physicists. In a sense, Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the
liar was promoted as a false prophet. shrug

He has fooled most of the
people all of the time, that doesn't prove he believed it
himself.


Another nonsense. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar
fooled no one except ignorant morons like Andro himself. shrug

Look how many Catholic priests are homosexual
paedophiles, it's the ideal situation in which to practice
their perversions.


Dude! Humans are driven with sexual passions through biological
constructs. Homosexuality can happen in any social and ethnic groups
including the psychos in which Andro belongs. Are you now gay,
Andro? shrug

Plagiarist yes, liar yes, but not a nitwit.


Let’s see. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar:

** Could not understand the difference between speed and acceleration
when the principle of equivalence was rediscovered by this nitwit and
when gravitational time dilation was first suggested by this same
nitwit. shrug

** Fudged (E = m c^2 / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2) by blatantly abusing the
roles of the two observes and the observed --- this nitwit did not
understand the Galilean transform. shrug

** Suggested a negative mass density in vacuum --- what a fvcking
nitwit! shrug

And there are more. shrug

Andro is still clueless where his understanding of science still stuck
in the eighteenth century --- a whopping 200 years ago. shrug

Andro is easily deceived by a nitwit --- Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar. Only a nitwit can easily be deceived by
another nitwit. shrug

Andro is in bed with self-styled physicist by denying the Aether.
shrug
  #6  
Old July 17th 12, 07:42 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.math,sci.astro
Androcles[_79_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 32
Default Speed of light



"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message
...

On Jul 16, 4:29 pm, "Androcles" wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote:


Kinky's faith is as strong as any relativist's. If Roberts is the Pope
then Kinky is the Ayatollah, they both believe in one god and one
speed of light.


Go figure that one out.

** Andro denied the Aether by embracing Newtonian model of light as
corpuscles --- classical particles. In doing so, Andro has not even
tried to understand electromagnetism which was developed between
Newton’s model of light and relativity. shrug


================================================== ==
Bwahahahaha!
Electromagnetism is what replaces Kinky's mechanical aether.
Electromagnetic photons are Newton's corpuscles.
Pity Kinky can't figure that one out.




** Tom Roberts rejected the Aether for a different reason than
Andro. Tom did so by cherry-picking a mathematical model out of
infinite others. It turns out that the one chosen by Tom is the only
that indicates an elusive Aether, even if it exists, while all the
others support the absolute frame of reference which means the Aether
must exist. shrug

Both are Aether denier where they have decided the outcome before any
influences of experimental results. Koobee Wublee cannot figure which
one is the more ignorant of the two. shrug
===============================================
Androcles long ago figured out Kinky doesn't understand electromagnetism,
if he did he'd have no need of mechanical aether.
Roberts replaced the mechanical aether with mysticism.

It's a waste of time arguing there is no god with
either of them.


The existence of god has never been raised by Koobee Wublee, and as
far as Koobee Wublee knows, not by Tom, either. In fact, Koobee
Wublee would never engage in discussion of the existence of god or
gods. shrug
=================================================
Kinky Wobbly isn't bright enough to understand an analogy.
The Pope and the Ayatollah both agree in the existence of a god,
but argue.
Humpty Roberts and Kinky Wobbly both agree on one speed of light,
but argue.
Androcles, Alfonso and Henry Wilson don't believe in only one
speed of light, all speeds are relative.

Anyway, I was talking about you, not to you. shrug


Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar.


His self promotion was too successful to call him a nitwit,
con artists are quite intelligent.


Nonsense! The image of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the
liar was totally fabricated and synthesized by the self-styled
physicists. In a sense, Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the
liar was promoted as a false prophet. shrug

He has fooled most of the
people all of the time, that doesn't prove he believed it
himself.


Another nonsense. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar
fooled no one except ignorant morons like Andro himself. shrug

Look how many Catholic priests are homosexual
paedophiles, it's the ideal situation in which to practice
their perversions.


Dude! Humans are driven with sexual passions through biological
constructs. Homosexuality can happen in any social and ethnic groups
including the psychos in which Andro belongs. Are you now gay,
Andro? shrug

Plagiarist yes, liar yes, but not a nitwit.


Let’s see. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar:

** Could not understand the difference between speed and acceleration
when the principle of equivalence was rediscovered by this nitwit and
when gravitational time dilation was first suggested by this same
nitwit. shrug

** Fudged (E = m c^2 / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2) by blatantly abusing the
roles of the two observes and the observed --- this nitwit did not
understand the Galilean transform. shrug

** Suggested a negative mass density in vacuum --- what a fvcking
nitwit! shrug

And there are more. shrug

Andro is still clueless where his understanding of science still stuck
in the eighteenth century --- a whopping 200 years ago. shrug

Andro is easily deceived by a nitwit --- Einstein the nitwit, the
plagiarist, and the liar. Only a nitwit can easily be deceived by
another nitwit. shrug

Andro is in bed with self-styled physicist by denying the Aether.
shrug

================================================== =====
Kinky, who doesn't understand his blind faith in mechanical aether
(made of unobtainium) is a religion, is obsessed with sex on beds.
Go argue with Roberts, fool, at least you both agree on one speed
of light only. shrug



 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
THE SPEED OF LIGHT VARIES WITH THE SPEED OF THE OBSERVER Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 9 March 3rd 12 10:55 AM
Speed of individual photons cannot exceed speed of light in a vacuum Yousuf Khan[_2_] Astronomy Misc 78 August 11th 11 06:30 PM
Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light??? Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 September 9th 08 12:48 AM
Why is the Speed of Light the Limiting Speed. [email protected] Misc 20 September 4th 06 06:34 PM
parllel universe have diffrent speed of light 128 168 300 299 thats how you find diffrent universe i'm from the planet earth that is the 7th from the sun stuck on one that the planet is 3rd from the sun the speed of light is 128 and 32 dimentions Roger Wilco Misc 1 December 30th 03 11:15 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.