#1
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light
On Jul 16, 10:46 am, Tom Roberts wrote:
This is just plain wrong. Outrageously so. You will never be able to contribute to physics until you STUDY THE LITERATURE. Blathering on and on in your own little world is not physics. What's the point of just making things like this up, and then posting them as if they were true? There are almost a dozen papers on this listed he http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...periments.html Tom is not peddling the truth. These experiments also indicate that THE AETHER MUST EXIST. See the following links. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6f9bf6fff69aae http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...124977a68c1edc Unlike you, Einstein was aware that "absolutely synchronous clocks" cannot happen in the world we inhabit. So such a statement as you attribute to him would be nonsensical. Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. So, why listen to such a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar unless that same nitwit, that same plagiarist, and that same liar is your personal God. That is indeed very dumb to worship a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar as a God in which the works of the self-styled physicists reflect so. shrug Synchronization is not an issue here. In fact, if the absolute frame of reference (the Aether) does exist, synchronization can always be done. The issue is if the Aether exists or elusive where any of these experimentations cannot distinguish. In doing so, claiming one hypothesis as valid and rejecting the others is OUTRAGEOUSLY UNPROFESSIONAL, FRAUDULENT, AND STUPID. shrug Tom needs to study and understand how communication satellites work. Tom needs to study and understand how interferometers work. Without time being absolute, there would be no coherence in data communication through satellites. Without time being absolute, there would be no coherent interference patterns. With no coherent interference patterns, the MMX cannot register null results. The invariant speed of light is actually a property of the absolute frame of reference. shrug TIME MUST BE ABSOLUTE WHILE THE CURVATURE OF SPACE MUST BE RELATIVE. Or else, the laws of physics would be what have been observed. shrug |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light
On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:24:20 -0700 (PDT), Koobee Wublee
wrote: On Jul 16, 10:46 am, Tom Roberts wrote: This is just plain wrong. Outrageously so. You will never be able to contribute to physics until you STUDY THE LITERATURE. Blathering on and on in your own little world is not physics. What's the point of just making things like this up, and then posting them as if they were true? There are almost a dozen papers on this listed he http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...periments.html Tom is not peddling the truth. These experiments also indicate that THE AETHER MUST EXIST. See the following links. They don't. They prove that light is ballistic. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6f9bf6fff69aae http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...124977a68c1edc Unlike you, Einstein was aware that "absolutely synchronous clocks" cannot happen in the world we inhabit. So such a statement as you attribute to him would be nonsensical. Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. He was. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light
"Henry Wilson DSc." wrote in message ... On Mon, 16 Jul 2012 11:24:20 -0700 (PDT), Koobee Wublee wrote: On Jul 16, 10:46 am, Tom Roberts wrote: This is just plain wrong. Outrageously so. You will never be able to contribute to physics until you STUDY THE LITERATURE. Blathering on and on in your own little world is not physics. What's the point of just making things like this up, and then posting them as if they were true? There are almost a dozen papers on this listed he http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...periments.html Tom is not peddling the truth. These experiments also indicate that THE AETHER MUST EXIST. See the following links. They don't. They prove that light is ballistic. ===================================== Kinky's faith is as strong as any relativist's. If Roberts is the Pope then Kinky is the Ayatollah, they both believe in one god and one speed of light. It's a waste of time arguing there is no god with either of them. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6f9bf6fff69aae http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...124977a68c1edc Unlike you, Einstein was aware that "absolutely synchronous clocks" cannot happen in the world we inhabit. So such a statement as you attribute to him would be nonsensical. Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. He was. ======================================== His self promotion was too successful to call him a nitwit, con artists are quite intelligent. He has fooled most of the people all of the time, that doesn't prove he believed it himself. Look how many Catholic priests are homosexual paedophiles, it's the ideal situation in which to practice their perversions. They have a one day working week, get paid well and nobody notices or turns a blind eye to what they are up to. Einstein got what he wanted, his feet up on a desk in Princeton, women, fame and money. Plagiarist yes, liar yes, but not a nitwit. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light
On Jul 16, 11:24*am, Koobee Wublee wrote:
On Jul 16, 10:46 am, Tom Roberts wrote: This is just plain wrong. Outrageously so. You will never be able to contribute to physics until you STUDY THE LITERATURE. Blathering on and on in your own little world is not physics. What's the point of just making things like this up, and then posting them as if they were true? There are almost a dozen papers on this listed he http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physic...periments.html Tom is not peddling the truth. *These experiments also indicate that THE AETHER MUST EXIST. *See the following links. http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/6e6f9bf6fff... http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...sg/ce124977a68... Unlike you, Einstein was aware that "absolutely synchronous clocks" cannot happen in the world we inhabit. So such a statement as you attribute to him would be nonsensical. Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. *So, why listen to such a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar unless that same nitwit, that same plagiarist, and that same liar is your personal God. *That is indeed very dumb to worship a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar as a God in which the works of the self-styled physicists reflect so. shrug Synchronization is not an issue here. *In fact, if the absolute frame of reference (the Aether) does exist, synchronization can always be done. *The issue is if the Aether exists or elusive where any of these experimentations cannot distinguish. *In doing so, claiming one hypothesis as valid and rejecting the others is OUTRAGEOUSLY UNPROFESSIONAL, FRAUDULENT, AND STUPID. *shrug Tom needs to study and understand how communication satellites work. Tom needs to study and understand how interferometers work. *Without time being absolute, there would be no coherence in data communication through satellites. *Without time being absolute, there would be no coherent interference patterns. *With no coherent interference patterns, the MMX cannot register null results. *The invariant speed of light is actually a property of the absolute frame of reference. shrug TIME MUST BE ABSOLUTE WHILE THE CURVATURE OF SPACE MUST BE RELATIVE. Or else, the laws of physics would be what have been observed. shrug Dark matter that creates a cosmic IGM lens that's warped or morphed by gravity, is very real. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light
On Jul 16, 4:29 pm, "Androcles" wrote:
Koobee Wublee wrote: Kinky's faith is as strong as any relativist's. If Roberts is the Pope then Kinky is the Ayatollah, they both believe in one god and one speed of light. Go figure that one out. ** Andro denied the Aether by embracing Newtonian model of light as corpuscles --- classical particles. In doing so, Andro has not even tried to understand electromagnetism which was developed between Newton’s model of light and relativity. shrug ** Tom Roberts rejected the Aether for a different reason than Andro. Tom did so by cherry-picking a mathematical model out of infinite others. It turns out that the one chosen by Tom is the only that indicates an elusive Aether, even if it exists, while all the others support the absolute frame of reference which means the Aether must exist. shrug Both are Aether denier where they have decided the outcome before any influences of experimental results. Koobee Wublee cannot figure which one is the more ignorant of the two. shrug It's a waste of time arguing there is no god with either of them. The existence of god has never been raised by Koobee Wublee, and as far as Koobee Wublee knows, not by Tom, either. In fact, Koobee Wublee would never engage in discussion of the existence of god or gods. shrug Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. His self promotion was too successful to call him a nitwit, con artists are quite intelligent. Nonsense! The image of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was totally fabricated and synthesized by the self-styled physicists. In a sense, Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was promoted as a false prophet. shrug He has fooled most of the people all of the time, that doesn't prove he believed it himself. Another nonsense. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar fooled no one except ignorant morons like Andro himself. shrug Look how many Catholic priests are homosexual paedophiles, it's the ideal situation in which to practice their perversions. Dude! Humans are driven with sexual passions through biological constructs. Homosexuality can happen in any social and ethnic groups including the psychos in which Andro belongs. Are you now gay, Andro? shrug Plagiarist yes, liar yes, but not a nitwit. Let’s see. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar: ** Could not understand the difference between speed and acceleration when the principle of equivalence was rediscovered by this nitwit and when gravitational time dilation was first suggested by this same nitwit. shrug ** Fudged (E = m c^2 / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2) by blatantly abusing the roles of the two observes and the observed --- this nitwit did not understand the Galilean transform. shrug ** Suggested a negative mass density in vacuum --- what a fvcking nitwit! shrug And there are more. shrug Andro is still clueless where his understanding of science still stuck in the eighteenth century --- a whopping 200 years ago. shrug Andro is easily deceived by a nitwit --- Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. Only a nitwit can easily be deceived by another nitwit. shrug Andro is in bed with self-styled physicist by denying the Aether. shrug |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Speed of light
"Koobee Wublee" wrote in message ... On Jul 16, 4:29 pm, "Androcles" wrote: Koobee Wublee wrote: Kinky's faith is as strong as any relativist's. If Roberts is the Pope then Kinky is the Ayatollah, they both believe in one god and one speed of light. Go figure that one out. ** Andro denied the Aether by embracing Newtonian model of light as corpuscles --- classical particles. In doing so, Andro has not even tried to understand electromagnetism which was developed between Newton’s model of light and relativity. shrug ================================================== == Bwahahahaha! Electromagnetism is what replaces Kinky's mechanical aether. Electromagnetic photons are Newton's corpuscles. Pity Kinky can't figure that one out. ** Tom Roberts rejected the Aether for a different reason than Andro. Tom did so by cherry-picking a mathematical model out of infinite others. It turns out that the one chosen by Tom is the only that indicates an elusive Aether, even if it exists, while all the others support the absolute frame of reference which means the Aether must exist. shrug Both are Aether denier where they have decided the outcome before any influences of experimental results. Koobee Wublee cannot figure which one is the more ignorant of the two. shrug =============================================== Androcles long ago figured out Kinky doesn't understand electromagnetism, if he did he'd have no need of mechanical aether. Roberts replaced the mechanical aether with mysticism. It's a waste of time arguing there is no god with either of them. The existence of god has never been raised by Koobee Wublee, and as far as Koobee Wublee knows, not by Tom, either. In fact, Koobee Wublee would never engage in discussion of the existence of god or gods. shrug ================================================= Kinky Wobbly isn't bright enough to understand an analogy. The Pope and the Ayatollah both agree in the existence of a god, but argue. Humpty Roberts and Kinky Wobbly both agree on one speed of light, but argue. Androcles, Alfonso and Henry Wilson don't believe in only one speed of light, all speeds are relative. Anyway, I was talking about you, not to you. shrug Einstein was a nitwit, a plagiarist, and a liar. His self promotion was too successful to call him a nitwit, con artists are quite intelligent. Nonsense! The image of Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was totally fabricated and synthesized by the self-styled physicists. In a sense, Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar was promoted as a false prophet. shrug He has fooled most of the people all of the time, that doesn't prove he believed it himself. Another nonsense. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar fooled no one except ignorant morons like Andro himself. shrug Look how many Catholic priests are homosexual paedophiles, it's the ideal situation in which to practice their perversions. Dude! Humans are driven with sexual passions through biological constructs. Homosexuality can happen in any social and ethnic groups including the psychos in which Andro belongs. Are you now gay, Andro? shrug Plagiarist yes, liar yes, but not a nitwit. Let’s see. Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar: ** Could not understand the difference between speed and acceleration when the principle of equivalence was rediscovered by this nitwit and when gravitational time dilation was first suggested by this same nitwit. shrug ** Fudged (E = m c^2 / sqrt(1 – v^2 / c^2) by blatantly abusing the roles of the two observes and the observed --- this nitwit did not understand the Galilean transform. shrug ** Suggested a negative mass density in vacuum --- what a fvcking nitwit! shrug And there are more. shrug Andro is still clueless where his understanding of science still stuck in the eighteenth century --- a whopping 200 years ago. shrug Andro is easily deceived by a nitwit --- Einstein the nitwit, the plagiarist, and the liar. Only a nitwit can easily be deceived by another nitwit. shrug Andro is in bed with self-styled physicist by denying the Aether. shrug ================================================== ===== Kinky, who doesn't understand his blind faith in mechanical aether (made of unobtainium) is a religion, is obsessed with sex on beds. Go argue with Roberts, fool, at least you both agree on one speed of light only. shrug |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
THE SPEED OF LIGHT VARIES WITH THE SPEED OF THE OBSERVER | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 9 | March 3rd 12 10:55 AM |
Speed of individual photons cannot exceed speed of light in a vacuum | Yousuf Khan[_2_] | Astronomy Misc | 78 | August 11th 11 06:30 PM |
Is speed of sound higher then the speed of light??? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 9th 08 12:48 AM |
Why is the Speed of Light the Limiting Speed. | [email protected] | Misc | 20 | September 4th 06 06:34 PM |
parllel universe have diffrent speed of light 128 168 300 299 thats how you find diffrent universe i'm from the planet earth that is the 7th from the sun stuck on one that the planet is 3rd from the sun the speed of light is 128 and 32 dimentions | Roger Wilco | Misc | 1 | December 30th 03 11:15 PM |