|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Neil Armstrongs Shadow Found in Thin Section?
Neil Armstrongs shadow is found in thin section of Lunar Sample
10065? His body, lunar vines, animal neuron fossils are all found and identified in http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...044228676&p=29 Source of above image: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/sample...e_id=S69-54910 Did NASA fake the photo? Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Neil Armstrongs Shadow Found in Thin Section?
On 4月4日, 下午4時56分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
Neil Armstrong’s shadow is found in thin section of Lunar Sample 10065? His body, lunar vines, animal neuron fossils are all found and identified inhttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044228676&p=29 Source of above image:http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/sample...n/?mission=Apo... Did NASA fake the photo? Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: NASA Faked Moon Rocks Neil Armstrong’s shadow is found in thin section of Lunar Sample 10065? His body, lunar vines, animal neuron fossils are all found and identified in http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...676& ;p=29 Source of above image: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/sample...i d=S69-54910 The image is claimed to be a thin-section image of lunar sample 10065: http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/sample...1&sample=10065 Did NASA fake the photo? Compare the size of Armstrong’s hand glove with that of the “vines”. Yes, NASA faked the photo. Read more at http://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Neil Armstrongs Shadow Found in Thin Section?
On 4月4日, 下午8時39分, Wretch Fossil wrote:
On 4月4日, m wrote: Neil Armstrong’s shadow is found in thin section of Lunar Sample 10065? His body, lunar vines, animal neuron fossils are all found and identified inhttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=1044228676&p=29 Source of above image:http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/sample...n/?mission=Apo... Did NASA fake the photo? Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 New edition: NASA Faked Moon Rocks Neil Armstrong’s shadow is found in thin section of Lunar Sample 10065? His body, lunar vines, animal neuron fossils are all found and identified inhttp://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?i=lin440315&b=30&f=104422... Source of above image:http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/sample...n/?mission=Apo... The image is claimed to be a thin-section image of lunar sample 10065:http://www.lpi.usra.edu/lunar/sample...sion=Apollo%20... Did NASA fake the photo? Compare the size of Armstrong’s hand glove with that of the “vines”. Yes, NASA faked the photo. Read more athttp://www.wretch.cc/blog/lin440315&category_id=0 Reply From Lunar and Planetary Institute: Unfortunately that image should not have been in the Lunar Sample Atlas. It is an Earth-based astronaut training photo. The image is mislabeled. That image number should have been a lunar sample image. We will be checking the collection for additional mislabeled images and remove them. The image appears to be one of the early images taking at one of several astronaut training sites most likely at Cinder Lakes, Arizona. The vegetation in the image appears to be native sage brush plant. This image was NOT taken on the Moon. Since this image was mislabeled at some time in the last 40+ years, it is difficult to determine who's shadow is in the image. If I find out more information, I will pass it on to you. Mary Ann _________________ Mary Ann Hager Library / RPIF Lunar and Planetary Institute |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Neil Armstrong’s Shadow Found in Thin Section?
On 4/9/2012 7:35 AM, Wretch Fossil wrote:
However, the above image shows not only biotic branches http://www.wretch.cc/album/show.php?...044228676&p=29 but also crosshairs and human shadows without human images, just like many other "moon landing" images. No such things happen in the Apollo training images (see http://galaxywire.net/2009/06/29/apo...to-collection/ ) So, the photo containing the "sage brush" is not mistakenly placed in the Lunar Sample Atlas. It was meant to be there. Well, sure. The "mistake" was weeds on the "moon". There is absolutely no doubt for a great MANY reasons that the "rocket trips" to the moon were faked. You can look them up yourself. But the biggest sign is the cavalier attitude NASA takes toward so-called Moon "artifacts" and data. Does one, simply "lose" original footage of what has to be THE greatest event in the entire history of mankind? Hardly. One can lose some old Hollywood footage, on the other hand and while buffs take a fit, it's not that big a deal. Of course that doesn't mean that trips to the moon were fake or that mankind had not set foot there. I only said the ROCKET trips were fake. The only theory that makes sense is that "man" had been on the moon secretly for quite some time. And they did it with technology, that takes you there as easy as driving to the corner 7-11. So why spend all those billions to put a "man on the moon"? I believe the answer can be found in the book "Report from Iron Mountain" (Dial Press) where a massive space program is proposed as one possible "substitute for the war system". I presume the moon shot was a "test" of that idea. Today we are testing the "massive pollution" war substitute idea. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Neil Armstrong’s Shadow Found in Thin Section?
In sci.physics Sam Wormley wrote:
Ben, I knew you weren't the smartest kid on the block, denying global warming, and the Apollo program. I doubt you would do very well in the college astronomy course I teach, because I doubt you would read the textbook and do the homework. Did you get your astronomy credentials the same way the last astromomer I met did by hauling telescope parts up a mountain and being cheaper to support than a donkey? |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Neil Armstrongs Shadow Found in Thin Section?
On 4/9/2012 3:53 PM, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 4/9/12 1:25 PM, wrote: There is absolutely no doubt for a great MANY reasons that the "rocket trips" to the moon were faked. You can look them up yourself. Ben, I knew you weren't the smartest kid on the block, denying global warming, and the Apollo program. I doubt you would do very well in the college astronomy course I teach, because I doubt you would read the textbook and do the homework. http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/transcr...tothemoon.html I doubt I'd do well, since the first time you opened your stupid pie-hole I'd tell you that you are full of **** and then prove it! And you'd, of course, respond by flunking me and trying to ruin my life forever. But luckily, you are not smart enough to teach real official college courses, so I don't have to worry. Gosh nice Nova transcript. That sure proves something... but I'm not sure what. Oh yeah, I remember, it proves PBS is a major source of political science propaganda and lies. What I want to see are the medical records showing the astronauts dead and dying of cancer from the massive radiation dose they should have received on their trip to the moon. I haven't heard a peep about that, have you? And as for classes, I don't take them from establishment spokesmen like you are. I take them from Nobel prize winners (and had no trouble with them). I'll bet you have never even MET a Nobel prize winner, let alone studied physics from one! You are such a sad little man. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Neil Armstrongs Shadow Found in Thin Section?
You do know Iron-Mountain is a long-exposed hoax, a piece of classic
kook/paranoid literature, right? As to Apollo and the Moon landings: I'll go with the guys I've met who have BEEN THERE. Regards Matt |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Neil Armstrongs Shadow Found in Thin Section?
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:01:31 -0700 (PDT), Matt
wrote: You do know Iron-Mountain is a long-exposed hoax, a piece of classic kook/paranoid literature, right? And one somehow suspects that even if it had been an Evil Conspiracy blueprint, they'd have been forced to change their plans after it was published as a book, 45 years ago. As to Apollo and the Moon landings: I'll go with the guys I've met who have BEEN THERE. -- Bill Snyder [This space unintentionally left blank] |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Neil Armstrongs Shadow Found in Thin Section?
On 4/9/12 3:07 PM, wrote:
In sci.physics Sam wrote: Ben, I knew you weren't the smartest kid on the block, denying global warming, and the Apollo program. I doubt you would do very well in the college astronomy course I teach, because I doubt you would read the textbook and do the homework. Did you get your astronomy credentials the same way the last astromomer I met did by hauling telescope parts up a mountain and being cheaper to support than a donkey? Take the class and find out, jimp! http://edu-observatory.org/mcc/syllabus/ |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Neil Armstrong Vindicated | micheel | Amateur Astronomy | 18 | October 5th 06 04:25 AM |
mission of Neil Armstrong | [email protected] | History | 10 | April 14th 06 06:29 PM |
Neil Armstrong biography? | Ilpo Lagerstedt | History | 3 | January 4th 04 10:26 PM |
Neil Armstrong in Dublin | David McArthur | History | 9 | November 28th 03 12:25 PM |
Neil Armstrong saying | Rod Stevenson | History | 17 | October 8th 03 02:21 PM |