|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift.
On 27 Oct 2005 11:57:01 -0700, "Jerry" wrote:
Dirk Van de moortel wrote: "Jerry" wrote in message oups.com... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: "Jerry" wrote in message oups.com... Henri Wilson wrote: I take that to mean you have no evidence that IR comes from the same layer as visible. Henri, 1) How big does the Sun look in visible light? 2) How big does the Sun look in IR light? 3) How big does the Sun look in UV light? 4) How big does the Sun look at radio frequencies? 5) How big does the Sun look in X_rays? Watch Henri invent another eponymous law to explain why our observations of the Sun aren't relevant... He will probably say something silly like for instance: "I don't think we can judge the whole universe by our local knowledge of it." ;-) Dirk Vdm If Henri had ANY knowledge of solar physics, he would have caught you on X-rays. The photosphere is very dim in X-rays. http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/ssl/pad/solar/corona.htm He didn't correct you, which just goes to show how totally ignorant he is. I don't read his messages. Jerry HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm see: www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/variablestars.exe "Sometimes I feel like a complete failure. The most useful thing I have ever done is prove Einstein wrong". |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift.
On Thu, 27 Oct 2005 23:16:00 +0200, "Paul B. Andersen"
wrote: Dirk Van de moortel wrote: "Jerry" wrote in message ups.com... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: "Jerry" wrote in message oups.com... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: "Jerry" wrote in message oups.com... Henri Wilson wrote: I take that to mean you have no evidence that IR comes from the same layer as visible. Henri, 1) How big does the Sun look in visible light? 2) How big does the Sun look in IR light? 3) How big does the Sun look in UV light? 4) How big does the Sun look at radio frequencies? 5) How big does the Sun look in X_rays? Watch Henri invent another eponymous law to explain why our observations of the Sun aren't relevant... He will probably say something silly like for instance: "I don't think we can judge the whole universe by our local knowledge of it." ;-) Dirk Vdm If Henri had ANY knowledge of solar physics, he would have caught you on X-rays. The photosphere is very dim in X-rays. http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/ssl/pad/solar/corona.htm Ah yes, since the photosphere is *much* cooler than the corona. I should have thought of that one. For my defense, I can say that my course on Stellar Internals and Atmospheres happened 27 years ago... pages and pages and pages covering one single equation - horrible ;-) He didn't correct you, which just goes to show how totally ignorant he is. Thanks for correcting me :-) Cheers, Dirk Vdm I think this discussion started with my claim that all the radiation comes from the photosphere. This is obviously not strictly true. What I meant (and also said, but didn't repeat every time) is that all the black body radiation comes from the same layer - the photosphere. This is rather obvious - the black body radiation comes from the part of the star which is dense enough to act as a "body" and emit a continuous spectrum. Deeper layers are not transparent. The 10um IR radiation is part of the black body radiation like visible light is. But radio frequencies and X-rays are not. Is our sun your sole reference for this? Paul HW. www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/index.htm see: www.users.bigpond.com/hewn/variablestars.exe "Sometimes I feel like a complete failure. The most useful thing I have ever done is prove Einstein wrong". |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift.
"Henri Wilson" HW@.. wrote in message ... On 27 Oct 2005 11:57:01 -0700, "Jerry" wrote: Dirk Van de moortel wrote: "Jerry" wrote in message oups.com... Dirk Van de moortel wrote: "Jerry" wrote in message oups.com... Henri Wilson wrote: I take that to mean you have no evidence that IR comes from the same layer as visible. Henri, 1) How big does the Sun look in visible light? 2) How big does the Sun look in IR light? 3) How big does the Sun look in UV light? 4) How big does the Sun look at radio frequencies? 5) How big does the Sun look in X_rays? Watch Henri invent another eponymous law to explain why our observations of the Sun aren't relevant... He will probably say something silly like for instance: "I don't think we can judge the whole universe by our local knowledge of it." ;-) Dirk Vdm If Henri had ANY knowledge of solar physics, he would have caught you on X-rays. The photosphere is very dim in X-rays. http://science.msfc.nasa.gov/ssl/pad/solar/corona.htm He didn't correct you, which just goes to show how totally ignorant he is. I don't read his messages. So, how do you call these? http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...407930ffabdc33 http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...85fa65d2599881 http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...7398b1d0ef1a91 http://groups.google.com/group/sci.p...6462ceee8f9b29 Lies or brain rot? ;-) Dirk Vdm |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift.
You think stalking me in other NGs is gonna get rid of me in this one, think
again, **** for brains. I've pretty much ignored your anger, bitterness, and general small mindedness for nearly a year now, but I post just a couple of messages here lately and you come and stalk me not only here, but in other NGs? What's the point of that, Van Moortel? Did I strike a nerve way back then? Was outing you as the bitter, lowly, immoral, pathetic old man all that hurtful? Does my mere presence remind you of the fact that you have no life and no claim to fame and that you've accomplished nothing in your pathetic life? Is that why you've posted here for so long and devoted yourself to McCarthy-like tactics to silence those who challenge you? Is it because this is all you have, and to have it challenged in any way would destroy the only reason you have for continuing to waste fresh air? Well, think again, asshole. Whatever your motive in going after me for absolutely no reason could possibly have been, it backfired. I'm not going anywhere, dick head. Deal with it. I'm going to re-devote myself to exposing you for the empty shell of a person you really are. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift.
AllYou! wrote:
You think stalking me in other NGs is gonna get rid of me in this one, think again, **** for brains. I've pretty much ignored your anger, bitterness, and general small mindedness for nearly a year now, but I post just a couple of messages here lately and you come and stalk me not only here, but in other NGs? What's the point of that, Van Moortel? Did I strike a nerve way back then? Was outing you as the bitter, lowly, immoral, pathetic old man all that hurtful? Does my mere presence remind you of the fact that you have no life and no claim to fame and that you've accomplished nothing in your pathetic life? Is that why you've posted here for so long and devoted yourself to McCarthy-like tactics to silence those who challenge you? Is it because this is all you have, and to have it challenged in any way would destroy the only reason you have for continuing to waste fresh air? Well, think again, asshole. Whatever your motive in going after me for absolutely no reason could possibly have been, it backfired. I'm not going anywhere, dick head. Deal with it. I'm going to re-devote myself to exposing you for the empty shell of a person you really are. Don't waste your time exposing Dirk, Moronicus; you have no credibility in the sci groups. Allyou will accomplish is getting yourself included in more killfiles. |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift.
jem wrote:
AllYou! wrote: You think stalking me in other NGs is gonna get rid of me in this one, think again, **** for brains. I've pretty much ignored your anger, bitterness, and general small mindedness for nearly a year now, but I post just a couple of messages here lately and you come and stalk me not only here, but in other NGs? What's the point of that, Van Moortel? Did I strike a nerve way back then? Was outing you as the bitter, lowly, immoral, pathetic old man all that hurtful? Does my mere presence remind you of the fact that you have no life and no claim to fame and that you've accomplished nothing in your pathetic life? Is that why you've posted here for so long and devoted yourself to McCarthy-like tactics to silence those who challenge you? Is it because this is all you have, and to have it challenged in any way would destroy the only reason you have for continuing to waste fresh air? Well, think again, asshole. Whatever your motive in going after me for absolutely no reason could possibly have been, it backfired. I'm not going anywhere, dick head. Deal with it. I'm going to re-devote myself to exposing you for the empty shell of a person you really are. Don't waste your time exposing Dirk, Moronicus; you have no credibility in the sci groups. Allyou will accomplish is getting yourself included in more killfiles. Oops, I mean don't waste rotations of the Earth - sorry M. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
A link between solar activity and earth buffeting caused earthquakeson www.electricquakes.com ?,,This site has some pretty cool grpahics andyou can monitor changes in earth spin and solar activity and earthquakesto visually see any correlations.,Pret
A link between solar activity and earth buffeting caused earthquakes on
www.electricquakes.com ? This site has some pretty cool grpahics and you can monitor changes in earth spin and solar activity and earthquakes to visually see any correlations. Pretty cool. |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
A link between solar activity and earth buffeting caused earthquakes on www.electricquakes.com ?,,This site has some pretty cool grpahics and you can monitor changes in earth spin and solar activity and earthquakes to visually see any correlation
geo wrote: A link between solar activity and earth buffeting caused earthquakes on www.electricquakes.com ? This site has some pretty cool grpahics and you can monitor changes in earth spin and solar activity and earthquakes to visually see any correlations. Pretty cool. no. actually pretty crappy. |
|
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift. | Jerry | Misc | 17 | July 4th 06 11:04 AM |
Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift. | [email protected] | Misc | 2 | October 20th 05 09:44 AM |
Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift. | [email protected] | UK Astronomy | 2 | October 20th 05 09:44 AM |
Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift. | has.mac | Misc | 0 | October 15th 05 07:18 PM |
Absorption lines are unaffected by Doppler shift. | has.mac | UK Astronomy | 0 | October 15th 05 07:18 PM |