A Space & astronomy forum. SpaceBanter.com

Go Back   Home » SpaceBanter.com forum » Astronomy and Astrophysics » Astronomy Misc
Site Map Home Authors List Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Web Partners

Take your own advice, Tom Roberts.



 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old September 4th 17, 07:34 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Yousuf Khan[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,692
Default Take your own advice, Tom Roberts.

On 18/08/2017 10:30 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
A very dense objects, yes.
TRUE black holes, no.

Black Holes violate the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.


The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle wavelength would be extremely tiny
for a black hole, way less than a Planck Length. The larger an object
is, the smaller its uncertainty is. So try another principle of physics
which you don't understand, maybe that one will stick?

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/uncer.html

Yousuf Khan

--
Sent from Giganews on Thunderbird on my Toshiba laptop
  #2  
Old September 5th 17, 03:04 PM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity
Michael Moroney
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 124
Default "Black Holes" are forever a notion, never measured.

Jeff-Relf.Me @. writes:

If a delusion benefits a kook, he'll go with it,
even if he, and everyone else, knows it's a delusion.


Certainly sounds like many of your posts.
  #3  
Old December 29th 17, 04:24 AM posted to sci.physics,sci.astro,sci.physics.relativity,comp.os.linux.advocacy
Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 76
Default Take your own advice, Tom Roberts.

Yousuf Khan wrote:

On 18/08/2017 10:30 PM, Jeff-Relf.Me@. wrote:
A very dense objects, yes.
TRUE black holes, no.

Black Holes violate the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle.


The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle wavelength


JFTR:

There is no such thing. You have just invented that term.

would be extremely tiny for a black hole, way less than a Planck Length.
The larger an object is, the smaller its uncertainty is.


Such a nonsense, it is not even wrong.

So try another principle of physics which you don't understand, maybe that
one will stick?


Pot calling the kettle black.

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/uncer.html


You cannot have read this, or you are lacking the competence to understand
it.

--
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. /Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
 




Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tom Roberts and Reality. Lord Androcles, Zeroth Earl of Medway[_8_] Amateur Astronomy 0 March 23rd 13 08:48 PM
DIRK MOORTEL GLORIFIES TOM ROBERTS Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 3 September 14th 07 03:26 PM
THE DISCOVERY OF LEBLOND-ROBERTS-HSU Pentcho Valev Astronomy Misc 1 September 4th 07 06:49 AM
Poor Tom Roberts. brian a m stuckless Astronomy Misc 0 October 13th 05 10:44 AM
Poor Tom Roberts. brian a m stuckless Policy 0 October 13th 05 10:44 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 SpaceBanter.com.
The comments are property of their posters.