|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Nonlocality Does Not Exist
For the journal paper with this post's eponymous title, see:
Frank J. Tipler, "Quantum nonlocality does not exist", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 111, No. 31 (Aug. 5, 2014), pp. 11281-11286, doi:10.1073/pnas.1324238111, http://www.pnas.org/content/111/31/11281.full.pdf , https://wayback.archive.org/web/2015...11281.full.pdf , http://www.webcitation.org/6WeupHQoM , http://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/08/0...er-11281-6.pdf , http://megalodon.jp/2014-0807-1142-1...er-11281-6.pdf .. What physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's foregoing paper demonstrates is that a large portion of the physics community has falsely and unthinkingly assumed that experimental confirmations of quantum entanglement meant that nonlocality is real. Tipler's said paper shows that that assumption doesn't follow, and it is invaluable in clearing away the miasma of befuddled thinking that has long lain over the physics community regarding this subject. Moreover, if one accepts the validity of General Relativity (which has been confirmed by every experiment to date), then nonlocality does not exist, since the speed of light is the fastest anything can travel, and therefore the multiverse of the Many-Worlds Interpretation logically must exist (i.e., due to the reason given in Prof. Tipler's above paper: that experiments of quantum entanglement actually involve three measurements within the multiverse rather than two measurements within a single universe). The assumption that General Relativity does not apply to quantum entanglement is an invalid presupposition which came from assuming that quantum entanglement necessarily had to have a nonlocal explanation, and hence experiments confirming quantum entanglement were erroneously taken to confirm that General Relativity is not valid when applied to such quantum mechanical phenomena. Since this assumption of nonlocality is a non sequitur, this means that there has never been any experimental evidence that anything travels faster than the speed of light. Given that there has never been any empirical evidence for superluminal-speed phenomena, unless and until such time as said experimental evidence should be forthcoming, then there exists no rational reason to believe that the speed-restriction imposed by General Relativity can be violated (not counting the always-known mathematical exception of when energies become infinite). Therefore, when the speed-restriction required by General Relativity is taken into account, what this further means is that the multiverse of the Many-Worlds Interpretation is experimentally confirmed to exist in doing quantum entanglement experiments. And the existence of the multiverse can be experimentally confirmed in other ways: see Frank J. Tipler, "Testing Many-Worlds Quantum Theory By Measuring Pattern Convergence Rates", arXiv:0809.4422, Sept. 25, 2008, http://arxiv.org/abs/0809.4422 ; and Frank Tipler, "Experimentally Testing the Mulitverse/Many-Worlds Theory", American Astronomical Society 224th Meeting, June 1-5, 2014, #304.01 (June 4), bibcode: 2014AAS...22430401T, http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014AAS...22430401T . Further, if Quantum Mechanics is true, then the multiverse's existence follows as a mathematically-unavoidable consequence. For the details, see Frank J. Tipler, The Physics of Immortality: Modern Cosmology, God and the Resurrection of the Dead (New York, NY: Doubleday, 1994), pp. 483-488. ***** Prof. Tipler's above PNAS paper is based on: Frank J. Tipler, "Does Quantum Nonlocality Exist? Bell's Theorem and the Many-Worlds Interpretation", arXiv:quant-ph/0003146, Mar. 30, 2000, http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0003146 . Which in turn is based upon: Frank J. Tipler, "Quantum Nonlocality Does Not Exist: Bell's Theorem and the Many-Worlds Interpretation", 3rd draft, Feb. 13, 1998; PS, 396121 bytes, MD5: c61e88935bf21bfc02d632bb931f3b73, ftp://bach.math.tulane.edu/pub/tipler/tipler.ps , http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc...=10.1.1.48.268 , http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc...p=rep1&type=ps , https://wayback.archive.org/web/2015...p=rep1&type=ps , http://www.webcitation.org/69fnybAIK , http://megalodon.jp/2015-0416-0220-0...p=rep1&type=ps .. The proof that nonlocality is obviated in the Many-Worlds Interpretation is apparently original to Prof. Tipler, even though it has long been thought that such is the case. Regarding this matter, Tipler writes in his aforecited PNAS paper, p. 1: "" I outlined the arguments in an earlier paper (6). Everett was the first to suggest (ref. 3, p. 149) that nonlocality would disappear in the MWI, but this paper is to my knowledge the first to prove what Everett claimed. "" Wherein "(6)" is Frank J. Tipler, "Nonlocality as Evidence for a Multiverse Cosmology", Modern Physics Letters A, Vol. 27, No. 4 (Feb. 10, 2012), Art. No. 1250019, 6 pp., doi:10.1142/S0217732312500198, bibcode: 2012MPLA...2750019T, http://www.webcitation.org/6F9YgJKkD ; which is based on id., "Nonlocality as Evidence for a Multiverse Cosmology", arXiv:1008.2764, Aug. 16, 2010, http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.2764 . And wherein "ref. 3" is the reprint of Hugh Everett III, "'Relative State' Formulation of Quantum Mechanics", Reviews of Modern Physics, Vol. 29, No. 3 (July-Sept. 1957), pp. 454-462, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.29.454, contained in pp. 141-149 of Bryce S. DeWitt and Neill Graham (Eds.), The Many-Worlds Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1973). Everett's passage on p. 149 of the reprint that Prof. Tipler refers to is the following: "" Consider the case where the states of two object systems are correlated, but where the two systems do not interact. Let one observer perform a specified observation on the first system, then let another observer perform an observation on the second system, and finally let the first observer repeat his observation. Then it is found that the first observer always gets the same result both times, and the observation by the second observer has no effect whatsoever on the outcome of the first's observations. Fictitious paradoxes like that of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen which are concerned with such correlated, noninteracting systems are easily investigated and clarified in the present scheme. "" ***** In addition to Prof. Tipler's above-cited work in demonstrating that the multiverse is a requirement of the known physical laws, Tipler has shown that the known laws of physics (viz., the Second Law of Thermodynamics, General Relativity, and Quantum Mechanics) mathematically require that sapient life take control over all matter in the universe, for said life to eventually force the collapse of the universe, and for the computational resources of the universe (in terms of both processor speed and memory space) to diverge to infinity as the universe collapses into a final singularity, termed the Omega Point. Said Omega Point cosmology is also an intrinsic component of the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model Theory of Everything (TOE) correctly describing and unifying all the forces in physics, of which TOE is itself mathematically forced by the aforesaid known physical laws. The Omega Point cosmology has been published and extensively peer-reviewed in leading physics journals. Interestingly, the Omega Point final singularity has all the unique properties (quiddities) claimed for God in the traditional religions. For much more on this, see my following article, which also addresses the societal implications of the Omega Point cosmology: James Redford, "The Physics of God and the Quantum Gravity Theory of Everything", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Sept. 10, 2012 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2011), 186 pp., doi:10.2139/ssrn.1974708; PDF, 1741424 bytes, MD5: 8f7b21ee1e236fc2fbb22b4ee4bbd4cb, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1974708 , https://archive.org/details/ThePhysi...OfEveryth ing , http://theophysics.host56.com/Redfor...ics-of-God.pdf , https://alphaomegapoint.files.wordpr...ics-of-god.pdf , http://sites.google.com/site/physico...ics-of-God.pdf .. Additionally, in the below resource are six sections which contain very informative videos of Prof. Tipler explaining the Omega Point cosmology and the Feynman-DeWitt-Weinberg quantum gravity/Standard Model TOE. The seventh section therein contains an audio interview of Tipler. I also provide some helpful notes and commentary for some of these videos. James Redford, "Video of Profs. Frank Tipler and Lawrence Krauss's Debate at Caltech: Can Physics Prove God and Christianity?", alt.sci.astro, Message-ID: , July 30, 2013, https://groups.google.com/forum/#!to...ro/KQWt4KcpMVo , http://archive.today/a04w9 , http://webcitation.org/6IUTAMEyS . The plain text of this post is available at: TXT, 42423 bytes, MD5: b199e867e42d54b2b8bf6adcb4127761, http://ge.tt/3lOTVbp , http://webcitation.org/6WGd90MBa , http://archive.today/cVRmc . ---------------------------------------- James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 4, 2011 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2001), doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761 , http://theophysics.host56.com/anarchist-jesus.pdf , http://webcitation.org/66AIz2rJw Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist (a website with information on Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point Theorem and the quantum gravity Theory of Everything [TOE]), http://theophysics.host56.com , http://theophysics.freevar.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Nonlocality Does Not Exist
On 4/16/2015 9:14 PM, James Redford wrote:
... ... What physicist and mathematician Prof. Frank J. Tipler's foregoing paper demonstrates is that a large portion of the physics community has falsely and unthinkingly assumed that experimental confirmations of quantum entanglement meant that nonlocality is real. Why do you think a large portion assumes so?! The standard model of physics is purely built on local quantum field theory. .... ... and therefore the multiverse of the Many-Worlds Interpretation logically must exist It is more like a non-interpretation. Many-worlds takes quantum mechanics for real, the interpretations try to somehow bring it back to classical physics. They (the interpretations) try to get rid of the superposition of different situations which each have nonzero amplitude. Some interpretations use the "collapse" idea to make all but one component vanish. Other interpretations are using "probability amplitude" instead of amplitude, a suggestive wording to express the believe that even with many non- zero amplitudes, there is still just one component of the superposition which is the true one. Many-worlds makes no such attempt. It simply accepts the Schroedinger evolution of the quantum state and if this state turns out to describe different situations in a superposition, then so be it. In my view this means it is not an interpretation (which is one of its merits). -- Jos |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Nonlocality Does Not Exist
In , on 04/16/2015
at 03:14 PM, James Redford said: Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.physics.electromag,sci.math,sci.phi losophy.meta Your nonsense has nothing to do with Mathematics or with Electromagnetism. Moreover, if one accepts the validity of General Relativity (which has been confirmed by every experiment to date), then nonlocality does not exist, since the speed of light is the fastest anything can travel, That is a common misconception, but the fact is that nothing in either SR or GR precludes the existence of tachyons. -- Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, SysProg and JOAT http://patriot.net/~shmuel Unsolicited bulk E-mail subject to legal action. I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact me. Do not reply to |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Quantum Nonlocality Does Not Exist
On Fri, 17 Apr 2015 00:44:22 -0400, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
wrote: In , on 04/16/2015 at 03:14 PM, James Redford said: Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.physics.electromag,sci.math,sci.ph ilosophy.meta Your nonsense has nothing to do with Mathematics or with Electromagnetism. Moreover, if one accepts the validity of General Relativity (which has been confirmed by every experiment to date), then nonlocality does not exist, since the speed of light is the fastest anything can travel, That is a common misconception, but the fact is that nothing in either SR or GR precludes the existence of tachyons. Hi, Seymour J. Metz. The assumption that General Relativity does not apply to quantum entanglement is an invalid presupposition which came from assuming that quantum entanglement necessarily had to have a nonlocal explanation, and hence experiments confirming quantum entanglement were erroneously taken to confirm that General Relativity is not valid when applied to such quantum mechanical phenomena. Since this assumption of nonlocality is a non sequitur, this means that there has never been any experimental evidence that anything travels faster than the speed of light. Given that there has never been any empirical evidence for superluminal-speed phenomena, unless and until such time as said experimental evidence should be forthcoming, then there exists no rational reason to believe that the speed-restriction imposed by General Relativity can be violated (not counting the always-known mathematical exception of when energies become infinite). Therefore, when the speed-restriction required by General Relativity is taken into account, what this further means is that the multiverse of the Many-Worlds Interpretation is experimentally confirmed to exist in doing quantum entanglement experiments. For more on this, see the following Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences paper: Frank J. Tipler, "Quantum nonlocality does not exist", Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, Vol. 111, No. 31 (Aug. 5, 2014), pp. 11281-11286, doi:10.1073/pnas.1324238111, http://www.pnas.org/content/111/31/11281.full.pdf , https://wayback.archive.org/web/2015...11281.full.pdf , http://www.webcitation.org/6WeupHQoM , http://www.pdf-archive.com/2014/08/0...er-11281-6.pdf , http://megalodon.jp/2014-0807-1142-1...er-11281-6.pdf .. ---------------------------------------- James Redford, author of "Jesus Is an Anarchist", Social Science Research Network (SSRN), Dec. 4, 2011 (orig. pub. Dec. 19, 2001), doi:10.2139/ssrn.1337761, http://ssrn.com/abstract=1337761 , http://theophysics.host56.com/anarchist-jesus.pdf , http://webcitation.org/66AIz2rJw Theophysics: God Is the Ultimate Physicist (a website with information on Prof. Frank J. Tipler's Omega Point Theorem and the quantum gravity Theory of Everything [TOE]), http://theophysics.host56.com , http://theophysics.freevar.com |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Quantum of Mass, The Quantum of Time and The Quantum of Length | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 3 | October 19th 07 07:17 AM |
America's Psi Warriors & Retro-causal Signal Nonlocality | nightbat | Misc | 3 | February 9th 07 08:44 PM |
Nonlocality of Gravity Energy | [email protected] | Astronomy Misc | 0 | April 6th 05 11:12 PM |
Roger Penrose on the nonlocality of gravity vacuum energy | ACE | Astronomy Misc | 0 | March 26th 05 07:37 PM |
Nonlocality of Energy in General Relativity | Luigi Caselli | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 26th 04 11:36 AM |