Sirius and us, Newtonian inseparable / FAS & Brad Guth

On Feb 11, 12:21*pm, BradGuth wrote:
On Dec 24 2009, 6:58*pm, BradGuth wrote:



On Dec 24, 11:35*am, Nightcrawler wrote:

On 12/24/2009 1:21 PM, BradGuth wrote:

Your perpetual obfuscation and systematic policy of denial is noted..

Your inability to follow a thought and abject refusal to accept
reality is noted.

At least I believe in those regular laws of physics that are not
conditional, politically correct nor faith-based approved.

Can you explain how the Newtonian laws of gravity do not apply in this
case?

Are you suggesting that something other than gravity has those Kuiper
belt and TNO asteroids, plus scads of Oort zone Items hanging around
(including Sedna and at least a few thousand others)?

Tell us how we're supposedly not the least bit tidal associated with
Sirius star system that used to be worth 12.5 solar masses.

Do you have some new and improved formula for gravity?

What kinds of planets and their moons would a truly massive (18e30 kg
star that rather quickly consumed itself down to a mass of 6e30 kg as
a red supergiant) as per such an extremely vibrant star like Sirius(B)
have had before everything went to hell?

I suppose we could further review what we can do with our
moon(Selene), such as using it for accommodating my Lunar Space
Elevator and its International Space Station within the Counter Mass
(LSE-CM/ISS), as well as using it to shade Earth by 3%.

~ BG