Apollo One, the FBI, and Scott Grissom

"Charleston" wrote in message
news:hSQwc.31801$lL1.1159@fed1read03...
Have you ever spent 8 hours copying documents at the
Archives? Uggh. No one is perfect.

I have spent lots of time copying documents at places just as unpleasant,
risking hantavirus from rodent droppings, among other things.

Of course, it wasn't until afterwards that I realized I should have dragged
the laptop and scanner along, and used them so as to not have to carry so
damn much paper around. A lesson I learned well, since the local clerk of
the court is required by law to charge $1 per page. I now scan whatever I
want and make a donation.

I would not call her a liar for her statement because it could be
based on her reading of the report where such a conclusion is implied.

So far, she hasn't produced any reason why you or anyone else should believe
she's done squat. She said she and her team have been researching this for
years, but she can't seem to produce anything verifiable, or even use a
proper cite.

"Derek Lyons" wrote in message
...
It's fascinating the amount of time and effort she puts into
conversing with OM and and Scott H., while evading substantive
discussion elsewhere.

Yet she doesn't have the time, according to her, to check the archives to
read "scott"'s posts, or to check her own research notes.

"Kevin Willoughby" wrote in message
...
Yep. Her harshest critic, in terms of classical scientific discourse, is
Daniel Maxson, who is continuously trying to interject facts into this
discussion. LsDonna could do worse than to ignore everyone (including
Derek and me) except Daniel.

Who'da thought? That's why I didn't immediately toss him back in the
killfile.

Note that she has failed to answer my question as to who she considers to be
a responsible party.

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
Ummm, I just LOVE when people ass u me things.

OM, she's asking for anal sex again.

Do you HONESTLY think
I sat in front of Gus' widow taking notes on her husband's autopsy
report??????

If you were conducting the investigation you claim you've done, you would be
highly negligent to have not done so.

Yes, I take many, many notes,

you just don't seem to know where they are.

and I did so at her home, but
NOT on the autopsy report.

Why not? How do you expect to do a proper investigation? Are you simply
depending on your memory? What kind of investigation is that?

Where is your heart?

In a responsible location. I'd never consider *not* taking notes, knowing
that failure to do so would require me to have to ask to see the autopsy
report over and over in order to perform a proper investigation. My god, you
must really hate Betty to keep subjecting her to that over and over, as you
must be doing in order to perform an investigation without notes.

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message
...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
I am quoting almost verbatim the president of a national news-tip
service with whom I have been working on this very issue.

What is the name of the service and its president?

Confidential until the story is sold.

Ah, so you're trying to profit off Gus' death.

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
"Scott Hedrick" wrote in message
...
"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
I am quoting almost verbatim the president of a national news-tip
service with whom I have been working on this very issue.

What is the name of the service and its president?

And before you say it, HE gets paid, not me.

He might get the money, but you get publicity, so you're getting paid as
well.

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
I already provided you several citations from the Record.

You haven't provided *one* cite. "Source: National Archives" is not a cite.
Providing the specific document number and paragraph is. Surely you've heard
of Strunk & White?

Are you seriously going to ask for a citation
that is PUBLIC KNOWLEDGE?

If you've read it, then produce it.

As for crew positions when they were found: Dr. Kelly's reports

Cite, please. Which reports, for what?

Why don't you email him and ask for
verification?

I will after you provide specific cites.

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
What makes you think
the Johnson White House was not involved in the Apollo One cover-up?

What makes you think it is? Specific verifiable cites, please.

"LaDonna Wyss" wrote in message
om...
(Derek Lyons) wrote in message
...
(LaDonna Wyss) wrote:
I'm not going to send the product of my work to someone who has spent
four days now proving he is every bit an infantile as OM.

If you are unable to discern the difference between OM's bad behavior
and Scott's asking of questions, you frankly aren't qualified to
conduct *any* investigation.

As I said, if someone who is SERIOUS wants to make that offer, email
me.

Nope. This is an open discussion in an open newsgroup.

I repeat my offer to host the documents.

D.

Are you really so trusting that you would post your home address to a
message board?

No need, he can email you with an appropriate mail drop.

For example, you can mail copies of the documents to me, care of:

DIXICO
US 19 N
Old Town, FL 32680

I'll have them scanned and online within the week.

"OM" om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_researc h_facility.org wrote
in message ...
On 6 Jun 2004 20:51:28 -0700, (LaDonna Wyss)
wrote:

Confidential until the story is sold.

...Read: "I'm lying, nyah!"


No, she's just protecting herself from the inevitable libel suit if she
reveals the name, since I have a hard time imagining any network president
wanting his name associated with this story at this time.



OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr