|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Companies have been racing to produce technology to mass producehybrids
The world's largest automaker by sales was to announce the hybrid
system Tuesday at the Geneva International Motor Show, saying the new battery will deliver three times the power of GM's current nickel- metal-hydride batteries. more here! http://edition.cnn.com/2008/TECH/03/....ap/index.html _______________________________ .....past time....all the action http://www.getaction4ever.com |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Companies have been racing to produce technology to mass produce hybrids
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Companies have been racing to produce technology to mass producehybrids
Too bad the h2o2/aluminum semi-fuel-cell can't ever get used.
Too clean? Too powerful? Too compact? Too renewable? Too damn good for the environment? If course there's also the little ICE using h2o2 + fossil or synfuel that'll burn hot and fast at absolute minimum CO2 and zero NOx. Hummer = 100 empg (of the fossil/synfuel) GM Volt = 200 empg (of the fossil/synfuel) .. - Brad Guth wrote: The world's largest automaker by sales was to announce the hybrid system Tuesday at the Geneva International Motor Show, saying the new battery will deliver three times the power of GM's current nickel- metal-hydride batteries. more here! http://edition.cnn.com/2008/TECH/03/....ap/index.html _______________________________ ....past time....all the action http://www.getaction4ever.com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Companies have been racing to produce technology to mass producehybrids
On Mar 6, 7:52 am, wrote:
The world's largest automaker by sales was to announce the hybrid system Tuesday at the Geneva International Motor Show, saying the new battery will deliver three times the power of GM's current nickel- metal-hydride batteries. more here! http://edition.cnn.com/2008/TECH/03/....ap/index.html _______________________________ ....past time....all the actionhttp://www.getaction4ever.com Wow! mention anything of utilizing or otherwise incorporating h2o2 and all the Usenet lights go out, as well as the front, side and back doors slam shut. Too bad the h2o2/aluminum semi-fuel-cell can't ever get used. Too clean? Too powerful? Too compact? Too renewable? Too gosh damn good for the environment? If course there's also the clean little ICE that's efficiently using this good form of stored liquid energy density that's of h2o2 + fossil or synfuel that'll burn hot and fast at absolute minimum CO2 and zero NOx. Hummer = 100 empg (of the fossil/synfuel consumption) GM Volt = 200 empg (of the fossil/synfuel consumption) Or instead of doing this as hybrid, you could just as well become h2o2/ aluminum (aka fuel-cell) for being all electric. .. - Brad Guth |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Companies have been racing to produce technology to mass producehybrids
On Mar 10, 4:24 am, Sylvia Else wrote:
wrote: The world's largest automaker by sales was to announce the hybrid system Tuesday at the Geneva International Motor Show, saying the new battery will deliver three times the power of GM's current nickel- metal-hydride batteries. more here! http://edition.cnn.com/2008/TECH/03/....ap/index.html _______________________________ ....past time....all the action http://www.getaction4ever.com Is power the issue? I thought capacity was the problem. Other things being equal, three times the power just means you can flatten them three times as fast. Sylvia. Of using h2o2 plus a little fossil or synfuel is offering good and clean energy capacity, even if we're stuck with having to use a pathetic piston ICE. Decades ago I also had notions of a semi-hybrid V2V4 or even a V2V6 ICE of just good old 4 cycle pistons doing there usual inefficient mechanical thing of added friction and wasting of kinetic energy. At least this way the car, truck or SUV could spend as much as 90% of its city road time operating from just two pistons, keeping all those energy sucking appliances and HVAC up to snuff, with the other 4 or 6 pistons getting involved by way of a magnetic flywheel like coupling, but only on demand as needed. This would only double or possibly tripple the empg of a conventional ICE application, with those extreme high-millage demanding folks capable of getting as great as 4X empg within certain applications that might get a full sized Hummer or Escalade up to 50 empg, without their giving up the combined fuel sucking sprint energy with all pistons engaged. .. - Brad Guth |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Companies have been racing to produce technology to mass producehybrids
On Mar 6, 7:52 am, wrote:
The world's largest automaker by sales was to announce the hybrid system Tuesday at the Geneva International Motor Show, saying the new battery will deliver three times the power of GM's current nickel- metal-hydride batteries. more here! http://edition.cnn.com/2008/TECH/03/....ap/index.html _______________________________ ....past time....all the actionhttp://www.getaction4ever.com Good empg isn't hardly rocket science. Why have 8 or even 6 of those 4-cycle pistons going and going if 2 is more than sufficient? KIS (keep it simple) and you'll get a whole lot better empg: As of decades ago, I had notions of a semi-hybrid V2V4, or even a V2V6 ICE of just good old 4 cycle pistons doing their usual inefficient mechanical thing of added friction and wasting of thermal and kinetic energy while burning up plain old gasoline and atmosphere. At least this way the car, truck or SUV w/o a spendy hybrid battery and its complex electric drive system could spend as much as 90% of its city road and light duty freeway time operating from just two pistons, thereby keeping all those energy sucking appliances and HVAC up to snuff, with those other 4 or 6 pistons getting involved by way of a magnetic flywheel coupling so that all cylinders are delivering torque, but only on demand as needed. In some instances this would only double or possibly triple the empg of a conventional ICE application that's already efficient at 30 empg, with those of the larger equipment and of extreme high-mileage demanding folks capable of getting as great as 4X empg, especially within certain applications that should not have problems getting a full sized Hummer or Escalade up to 50 empg, and that's without their giving up the combined fuel sucking sprint energy with all pistons engaged, or otherwise having to incorporate any spendy and complex hybrid battery technology. Of course, as of way back then and especially nowadays, folks in charge or supposedly within the mainstream know were entirely negative and as naysay and/or remaining as topic/author obstructive as they could get, making it next to impossible to even share or otherwise convey this notion without our having to offer a fleet of custom prototypes that they would get to use for free, if not having to pay them to drive might not even be sufficient because every effort of their nayism mindset would be intent upon trying to damage or destroy the entire fleet. I've always noticed this deeply embedded undertow because all of these special/naysay folks that are supposedly so all- knowing are not ever the ones complaining in the least bit about the cost of fuel, of any other energy cost or of the unavoidable secondary inflation imposed upon most everything else we need in order to sustain our quality of life. It's as though these mainstream or bust naysayers are always employed or retired with full benefits as more than flush with ample cost of living built into their income status, along with getting those bonus dollars for giving others a bad time by way of stalking and then suppressing or simply banishing any possible efficiency improvements to their polluted mainstream status quo that's getting way too energy spendy and polluting by the day for all the rest of us. Of what's not exactly KIS, but otherwise perfectly doable: Using h2o2 plus a little fossil or synfuel is still offering us an alternative of good and clean energy density, as well as sufficient fuel capacity for accomplishing a fair amount of usable range per dual tank full, and that's even a win-win if we're stuck with having to use a pathetic piston ICE. The hybrid version of this would also include the h2o2/aluminum semi-fuel-cell for its electrical energy instead of a conventional battery, roughly doubling upon the fossil or synfuel empg, as well as contributing zero NOx and absolute minimal CO2 because of using the liquid density of h2o2 instead of atmosphere. Unfortunately, this is obviously a complex alternative that only a true scientist or serious inventor of future technology would appreciate. .. - Brad Guth |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Companies have been racing to produce technology to mass producehybrids
On Mar 6, 7:52 am, wrote:
The world's largest automaker by sales was to announce the hybrid system Tuesday at the Geneva International Motor Show, saying the new battery will deliver three times the power of GM's current nickel- metal-hydride batteries. more here! http://edition.cnn.com/2008/TECH/03/....ap/index.html _______________________________ ....past time....all the action http://www.getaction4ever.com If that new and improved battery doesn't take as much birth-to-grave energy as it can safely store on behalf of delivering thousands of cycles, as such that's a good thing. However, most often such spendy battery technology doesn't add up once the all-inclusive life cycle of that battery is taken fully into account, not that all such battery usage is entirely a bad thing if having been created and reprocessed from primarily green/renewable energy to start with. Perhaps if God, yourself or even our lovable Tom Hanks were put in charge, such as in order to retool this pathetic nation that's going as fast as it can into the nearest space-toilet in spite of what we think we know, and if it's intended for the better we first need to fix the fundamental heart and soul of what got us into this horrific mess in the first place, and if need be by way of retroactively kicking butts until those NASA/Apollo cows come home, or their fat lady sings. First off, the likes of our Willie.Moo should perhaps stop trying to make it look as though everything lord Mook has to say is always 100% correct, and of everything anyone else has to share is in one way or another 100% incorrect or unrelated, especially if such relates to revising history that's too often as is anything but truthful. Such all-knowing but oddly pretend-atheist types are too smart not to have the intellectual ability as to properly interpret the technological intent or worded jest of whatever others are having to share. Much like his skewed topic of "space travel or war" is clearly about the options we have had, and of why we've so often elected the path of war instead of pursuing science (including renewable energy) and viable off-world explorations that could have directly benefited the greater good of humanity (not of just improving the status of those rich and powerful) and helping to salvage our badly failing environment at the same time. Space Travel or War / by William Mook http://groups.google.com/group/sci.s...403d684bc20d3b Without a doubt, war it is, because that's exactly what we're doing, and it's only getting ever so spendy and worse off unless we few honest good-guys can derail the ongoing GW Bush and Dick Cheney fiasco, as otherwise we're going to go out of our bully way in order to nail anyone having more than their fair share of energy, be it fossil or nuclear. As you Willie.Moo stipulated before, of secret societies and special interest groups or cults (especially of the faith-based kind) have been pulling our strings and twisting the truth and/or excluding evidence for quite some time. Internet Archive: John F. Kennedy Speech, April 27, 1961 YouTube - JFK Secret Society Speech http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qs-x0-ffP0Q I don't recall any JFK specific mention of our private Federal Reserve as our global banking cartel being cult like, although the highly exclusive history about our Federal Reserve (not an actual part of any government agency), is anything but all that public according to the book "SECRETS OF THE TEMPLE" by William Greider. According to what little we do know, our Federal Reserve is essentially a private banking cartel that's in charge of whatever gets affordably funded and what doesn't of government or private multi-mega ventures, so there's not much wonder as to why it's going to be war and not of any focus upon renewable energy, fusion or even thorium, much less advancements in space travel and explorations instead of war, because there's so darn little skimming profits or compounded fees and subsequent tax revenues to behold of renewable energy, and it's not that much better off if we start using thorium as our nuclear fuel in order to easily create a vast surplus of clean grid energy. .. - Brad Guth |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Companies have been racing to produce technology to mass producehybrids | suchi | Space Station | 0 | March 6th 08 04:28 PM |
HORSE RACING | [email protected] | Amateur Astronomy | 4 | October 15th 06 02:51 AM |
Rocket Racing League | [email protected] | Policy | 56 | October 25th 05 02:58 AM |
Causation - A problem with negative mass. Negastive mass implies imaginary mass | brian a m stuckless | Astronomy Misc | 0 | October 1st 05 08:36 PM |
Technology of Tomorrow: Space Exploration Technology Spin-Offs | [email protected] | News | 0 | August 18th 05 04:36 AM |