|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1001
|
|||
|
|||
Michelson and Morley experiment
On Nov 17, 10:36*pm, NoEinstein wrote:
On Nov 15, 8:38*pm, PD wrote: On Nov 15, 6:38*pm, NoEinstein wrote: Dear Doug: *SR and GR got refuted by yours truly when I discovered that M-M doesn't have a CONTROL. *Einstein's cases are CLOSED! *— NoEinstein — SR and GR in no way depend on the M-M experiment. Your misstatement has been corrected before, but you are an exceedingly slow learner, as I'm sure you've been told before. PD- Dear PD: *Your formula of life: Whatever truths which are stated, Except what you state is NOT the truth. Relativity is not dependent on the M-M experiment. take the opposite position. *I've already wasted weeks of my time re- explaining things to you. *Give us both a break. *Go duck hunting and don't come home! *— NoEinstein — You are just a little wheel that keeps going in circles, PD. *...Or a 78 rpm record stuck in the groove. *NE Likewise, your repetition of something that is factually incorrect is a profound waste of your time. Why do you so heavily invest in wasting your time? PD |
#1002
|
|||
|
|||
Michelson and Morley experiment
On 18 Nov, 15:19, PD wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:36*pm, NoEinstein wrote: On Nov 15, 8:38*pm, PD wrote: On Nov 15, 6:38*pm, NoEinstein wrote: Dear Doug: *SR and GR got refuted by yours truly when I discovered that M-M doesn't have a CONTROL. *Einstein's cases are CLOSED! *— NoEinstein — SR and GR in no way depend on the M-M experiment. Your misstatement has been corrected before, but you are an exceedingly slow learner, as I'm sure you've been told before. PD- Dear PD: *Your formula of life: Whatever truths which are stated, Except what you state is NOT the truth. Relativity is not dependent on the M-M experiment. take the opposite position. *I've already wasted weeks of my time re- explaining things to you. *Give us both a break. *Go duck hunting and don't come home! *— NoEinstein — You are just a little wheel that keeps going in circles, PD. *...Or a 78 rpm record stuck in the groove. *NE Likewise, your repetition of something that is factually incorrect is a profound waste of your time. Why do you so heavily invest in wasting your time? PD Inglish: Newton cheating in calculating the orbits of planetary motion. Coulomb took the leadership of the magnetic poles wrong. Faraday poorly defined the electromagnetic force by taking the magnetic poles of Coulomb wrong. Maxwell elaborates his equations of electromagnetism bad for taking the wrong strength of Faraday. Michelson average real and imaginary as if they could be averaged. Einstein said that the RG and RE are compatible when they are not at all. We carry more than 300 years wasting our time. Greetings. Español: Newton hace trampas en el cálculo de las órbitas de movimiento planetario. Coulomb toma la dirección de los polos magnéticos equivocada. Faraday define mal la fuerza electromagnética por tomar los polos magnéticos equivocados de Coulomb. Maxwell elabora mal sus ecuaciones del electromagnetismo por tomar la equivocada fuerza de Faraday. Michelson promedia valores reales e imaginarios como si pudieran promediarse. Einstein dice que la RE y la RG son compatibles cuando no lo son en absoluto. Llevamos más de 300 años perdiendo el tiempo. Saludos. |
#1003
|
|||
|
|||
Michelson and Morley experiment
On Nov 19, 1:18*pm, Xaustein wrote:
On 18 Nov, 15:19, PD wrote: On Nov 17, 10:36*pm, NoEinstein wrote: On Nov 15, 8:38*pm, PD wrote: On Nov 15, 6:38*pm, NoEinstein wrote: Dear Doug: *SR and GR got refuted by yours truly when I discovered that M-M doesn't have a CONTROL. *Einstein's cases are CLOSED! *— NoEinstein — SR and GR in no way depend on the M-M experiment. Your misstatement has been corrected before, but you are an exceedingly slow learner, as I'm sure you've been told before. PD- Dear PD: *Your formula of life: Whatever truths which are stated, Except what you state is NOT the truth. Relativity is not dependent on the M-M experiment. take the opposite position. *I've already wasted weeks of my time re- explaining things to you. *Give us both a break. *Go duck hunting and don't come home! *— NoEinstein — You are just a little wheel that keeps going in circles, PD. *...Or a 78 rpm record stuck in the groove. *NE Likewise, your repetition of something that is factually incorrect is a profound waste of your time. Why do you so heavily invest in wasting your time? PD Inglish: Newton cheating in calculating the orbits of planetary motion. Coulomb took the leadership of the magnetic poles wrong. Faraday poorly defined the electromagnetic force by taking the magnetic poles of Coulomb wrong. Maxwell elaborates his equations of electromagnetism bad for taking the wrong strength of Faraday. Michelson average real and imaginary as if they could be averaged. Einstein said that the RG and RE are compatible when they are not at all. We carry more than 300 years wasting our time. Absolutely, your parents wasted their time conceiving an idiot like you. |
#1004
|
|||
|
|||
Michelson and Morley experiment
On 19 nov, 22:42, Dono wrote:
Inglish: Newton cheating in calculating the orbits of planetary motion. Coulomb took the leadership of the magnetic poles wrong. Faraday poorly defined the electromagnetic force by taking the magnetic poles of Coulomb wrong. Maxwell elaborates his equations of electromagnetism bad for taking the wrong strength of Faraday. Michelson average real and imaginary as if they could be averaged. Einstein said that the RG and RE are compatible when they are not at all. We carry more than 300 years wasting our time. Absolutely, your parents wasted their time conceiving an idiot like you. Inglish: There is a Spanish proverb that says: "I do not want to hurt, but I can." Español: Hay un refrán español que dice: "No hiere quien quiere, sino quien puede". Saludos. |
#1005
|
|||
|
|||
Michelson and Morley experiment
On Nov 20, 5:49 am, Xaustein wrote:
On 19 nov, 22:42, Dono wrote: Inglish: Newton cheating in calculating the orbits of planetary motion. Coulomb took the leadership of the magnetic poles wrong. Faraday poorly defined the electromagnetic force by taking the magnetic poles of Coulomb wrong. Maxwell elaborates his equations of electromagnetism bad for taking the wrong strength of Faraday. Michelson average real and imaginary as if they could be averaged. Einstein said that the RG and RE are compatible when they are not at all. We carry more than 300 years wasting our time. Absolutely, your parents wasted their time conceiving an idiot like you. Inglish: There is a Spanish proverb that says: "I do not want to hurt, but I can." Yes, Gabriel Xaus, your butt hurts. From so much kicking :-) |
#1006
|
|||
|
|||
Michelson and Morley experiment
On Nov 18, 12:55*am, Dono wrote:
On Oct 12, 3:03 pm, NoEinstein wrote: Dear Eric: Only those willing to write an algebra equation for science would be qualified to evaluate my algebra. *Until you, or anyone else have shown such objectivity, I will keep my Copyrighted article that contains the mathematical invalidation of M-M, and the disproof of Einstein's theories of relativity, to myself. *—— NoEinstein —— Replicating NoEinstein’s Invalidation of M-Mhttp://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/t/ac6fcd9b4e8112ed?hl=en Hey, knucklehead, Ken ****o beat you to your "invention". He "invented" the same exact imbecility as you are peddling. :-} ~~ - - - — NeEinstein — PS: If so, then 'Ken' is head-snd- shoulders above 'don't know Dono'! |
#1007
|
|||
|
|||
Michelson and Morley experiment
On Nov 18, 12:58*am, Dono wrote:
On Oct 14, 11:35 am, Xaustein wrote: Suppose an interferometer with a single arm (1881), is reached the Similar conclusions and I find it easier to understand: Impose the condition that the arm can only be oriented according to two situations (a) and (b), all others are discarded: (a) the arm is oriented along the same lines as the speed "v" to which the Earth moves with respect to the ether. T_1 = L_o * (1 / (c ^ 2 - v ^ 2)) = (L_o / c) * (1 / (1 - (v / c) ^ 2)) (L_o / c) * (1 + (v / c) ^ 2) "L_o" is the length of the interferometer that light travels in opposite directions. "c" is the speed of light in the event that "v" is zero. (b) the arm is oriented along the perpendicular to the speed "v" to which the Earth moves with respect to the ether. T_2 = L_o * [sqrt] (1 / (c ^ 2 - v ^ 2)) = (L_o / c) * [sqrt] (1 / (1 - (v / c) ^ 2)) (L_o / c) * (1 + 1 / 2 * (v / c) ^ 2) So far we all agree, the time it takes to travel the arm of the interferometer in the case t_1 is greater than the time slow in the case t_2 in value commensurate with "(1 / 2) * (v / c) ^ 2". Bzzt, wrong, wacko. The experiment has shown that t_1=t_2. The theoretical reason is very simple, do you know why? rest of your lengthy imbecilities snipped- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Dear Xaustein: The best thing is not to engage in replies with the likes of Dono, PD, and Doug. Scientific objectivity they lack. — NoEinstein — |
#1008
|
|||
|
|||
Michelson and Morley experiment
On Nov 18, 1:00*am, Dono wrote:
On Oct 18, 3:14 am, Xaustein wrote: It simply produces a NO constant interference pattern si matter how it is orientated. Hicks (1902), Esclangon (1927), Miller (1925,1933), Marinov (1975, 1984), Munera (1998), Cahill (2004), ... ...all crackpots, a little more sophisticated than you Talk science, squirt, or bug off! — Noeinstein — |
#1009
|
|||
|
|||
Michelson and Morley experiment
On Nov 18, 9:17*am, PD wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:32*pm, NoEinstein wrote: On Nov 15, 8:36*pm, PD wrote: On Nov 15, 6:26*pm, NoEinstein wrote: On Nov 14, 9:00*am, PD wrote: Then exercise your vote to choose different stewards of your tax dollars. Your tax dollars are going to get spent, and there's a certain chunk of it (not a big chunk) that your elected tax stewards feel pretty strongly should support science in this country. I'm curious, though. If you don't feel that tax dollars should be spent on supporting higher education of any kind (so you have said), why is that? Dear PD: "Results" from... education like YOU——that's why! *Ha, ha hah, HA! *— NoEinstein — My work isn't supported by tax dollars. So why is my stuff relevant to your complaint against how tax dollars are spent? PD Dear PD: *I never said anything about tax dollars on education. *I said money (parents’ money) spent of science education is wasted. *NE Well, it's fortunate I paid for my own education. Why do you think science education is worthless? Consider that the newsgroup you are posting to, and the computer you're using to post with, would not exist if science education were gone. Where do you think the money should be better spent? PD- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Dear PD: First... FIRE all of the status quo teachers who only care about their memorized lessons, and NOT about weeding out the deadwood in science texts. The latter represents 25% to 30% of the total. Get kids enthused to read about science while still in grade school. Most of what I learned in science was from reading, NOT from having a teacher explain things. In fact, I was one of those students who corrected the teachers. They called me a "challenging" student. But I exempted the exams. The main things teachers do is to assign lessons and grade papers. The "learning" part is the responsibility of the students themselves. So why send kids to take science at all? — NoEinstein — |
#1010
|
|||
|
|||
Michelson and Morley experiment
On Nov 18, 9:19*am, PD wrote:
On Nov 17, 10:36*pm, NoEinstein wrote: On Nov 15, 8:38*pm, PD wrote: On Nov 15, 6:38*pm, NoEinstein wrote: Dear Doug: *SR and GR got refuted by yours truly when I discovered that M-M doesn't have a CONTROL. *Einstein's cases are CLOSED! *— NoEinstein — SR and GR in no way depend on the M-M experiment. Your misstatement has been corrected before, but you are an exceedingly slow learner, as I'm sure you've been told before. PD- Dear PD: *Your formula of life: Whatever truths which are stated, Except what you state is NOT the truth. Relativity is not dependent on the M-M experiment. take the opposite position. *I've already wasted weeks of my time re- explaining things to you. *Give us both a break. *Go duck hunting and don't come home! *— NoEinstein — You are just a little wheel that keeps going in circles, PD. *...Or a 78 rpm record stuck in the groove. *NE Likewise, your repetition of something that is factually incorrect is a profound waste of your time. Why do you so heavily invest in wasting your time? PD- Hide quoted text - - Show quoted text - Dear PD: Mainly, I don't want the 95% of readers of these posts who never reply, to think that dunces like you, Doug, and Dono, have anything going for you at all. Your 'minor' saving grace is that you sometimes ask questions which, when answered, might edify OTHER readers. Experience has shown that YOU are beyond being edified about anything, yourself. That's why I don't want to start 'off subject' conversations with you. There should be give-and-take in conversations. But your ego will only allow you to... take. — NoEinstein — |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Michelson and Morley experiment | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 6 | September 12th 08 02:56 PM |
Michelson and Morley experiment | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 0 | September 9th 08 02:32 AM |
Who lied about the Michelson-Morley experiment? | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 10 | July 30th 08 02:26 AM |
MICHELSON-MORLEY AND SAGNAC EXPERIMENTS | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 71 | October 22nd 07 11:50 PM |
MICHELSON-MORLEY NULL RESULT AND EINSTEIN CRIMINAL CULT | Pentcho Valev | Astronomy Misc | 9 | May 30th 07 08:15 PM |