|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#111
|
|||
|
|||
Lame attempts at propulsion. Go to Mars? Will it take 1000 years?
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 10:37:57 AM UTC-6, wrote:
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 11:38:43 AM UTC-4, Uncarollo2 wrote: P.S. I had coffee coming out of my nose when I read his "Conservative radio hosts are more popular, more intelligent, more informed, generally more eloquent,..." You left out the part about the conservatives having the truth on their side. Well, that part wasn't so funny; it was only to be expected, because your viewpoint is conservative. I'm aware of liberal TV hosts, like Oprah Winfrey, Ellen DeGeneres, and Rosie O'Donnell but I don't know of any liberal radio hosts, although I'm sure there are some on NPR. John Savard |
#112
|
|||
|
|||
Lame attempts at propulsion. Go to Mars? Will it take 1000 years?
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 8:06:55 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote:
On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 04:42:31 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Conservative radio hosts are more popular, more intelligent, more informed, generally more eloquent, and have the truth on their side, whereas liberal hosts quickly get tiresome and silly given all the stuff they like to make up. I see you're out on release again. Every time they let you out of rehab, the IQ of these discussions drops a few more points. Just because he makes a political statement you find wildly inaccurate doesn't mean you should give him ammunition by making exaggerated personal accusations that you know perfectly well are false. I can understand why you feel he doesn't deserve civility, but this sort of thing really does (have the potential to) make you look bad. The parenthetical was added since I have to admit you're not in too much danger; he may not realize it, but he makes himself look bad well enough to make his complaints in this area fall on generally deaf ears. John Savard |
#113
|
|||
|
|||
Lame attempts at propulsion. Go to Mars? Will it take 1000 years?
On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 at 9:41:45 AM UTC-5, Chris.B wrote:
On Tuesday, 13 October 2015 21:28:11 UTC+2, Uncarollo2 wrote: Yip yip yip - here comes the little pesky doggie again, trying to catch the car. Does the Volt come with a free doggie prod to fend off irritating mutts? ;ø] They may be missing a sales trick here. Why yes indeed! There is a taser attached, gets its juice from the 280 volt battery. Works like a champ, even keeps pesky little dogs from ****ing on the car. |
#114
|
|||
|
|||
Lame attempts at propulsion. Go to Mars? Will it take 1000 years?
On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 at 10:54:26 AM UTC-5, Quadibloc wrote:
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 8:06:55 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote: On Tue, 13 Oct 2015 04:42:31 -0700 (PDT), wrote: Conservative radio hosts are more popular, more intelligent, more informed, generally more eloquent, and have the truth on their side, whereas liberal hosts quickly get tiresome and silly given all the stuff they like to make up. I see you're out on release again. Every time they let you out of rehab, the IQ of these discussions drops a few more points. Just because he makes a political statement you find wildly inaccurate doesn't mean you should give him ammunition by making exaggerated personal accusations that you know perfectly well are false. I can understand why you feel he doesn't deserve civility, but this sort of thing really does (have the potential to) make you look bad. The parenthetical was added since I have to admit you're not in too much danger; he may not realize it, but he makes himself look bad well enough to make his complaints in this area fall on generally deaf ears. John Savard Aw shucks, you mean I can't make pesky dog jokes either? |
#115
|
|||
|
|||
Lame attempts at propulsion. Go to Mars? Will it take 1000 years?
On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 at 11:54:26 AM UTC-4, Quadibloc wrote:
On Tuesday, October 13, 2015 at 8:06:55 AM UTC-6, Chris L Peterson wrote: I see you're out on release again. Every time they let you out of rehab, the IQ of these discussions drops a few more points. Just because he makes a political statement you find wildly inaccurate doesn't mean you should give him ammunition by making exaggerated personal accusations that you know perfectly well are false. peterson is well aware that much of what he says is false and misleading, and if not those two, then ambiguous and/or half-truths. I can understand why you feel he doesn't deserve civility, Tell us why you feel that way. Show your work. |
#116
|
|||
|
|||
Lame attempts at propulsion. Go to Mars? Will it take 1000 years?
On Wednesday, October 14, 2015 at 1:20:00 PM UTC-4, Uncarollo2 wrote:
Aw shucks, you mean I can't make pesky dog jokes either? Anyone as pathetic as you shouldn't joke about anything. |
#117
|
|||
|
|||
Lame attempts at propulsion. Go to Mars? Will it take 1000 years?
[Default] On Thu, 1 Oct 2015 06:03:07 -0700 (PDT),
wrote this crap: On Thursday, October 1, 2015 at 12:51:48 AM UTC-4, Paul Schlyter wrote: The major security hazard is to bring people to Mars, because it's people who make war. Hitler's army invaded Poland. The UK declared war on Germany. Who started the War? The Serbs did. They started all the wars. --- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: --- |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
THE REAL CAUSE OF WAR SINCE A 1000 YEARS | Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times | Astronomy Misc | 9 | May 30th 07 04:12 AM |
Mysterious signals from 1000 light years away | Martin Andersen | SETI | 6 | September 9th 04 09:41 PM |
Mysterious signals from 1000 light years away | Vanilla Gorilla (Monkey Boy) | Misc | 7 | September 5th 04 03:47 AM |
Mysterious signals from 1000 light years away | Steve Willner | Astronomy Misc | 1 | September 3rd 04 09:43 PM |
1000 years from now | Gareth Slee | History | 6 | December 28th 03 03:16 PM |