|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
"The Moon is NOT a Planet" (was - What Planet Reflects Best ??)
Hi again. You posted:
The argument Pain made about the orbit/center of gravity, seemed to make sense. What is the alternate view point of this? If two bodies were in orbit about each other so that the center of gravity of the system was *well* outside of the surface of both bodies (ie: somewhere between them), *then* such a system might be considered a "double planet" if such a criteria were developed (the Pluto-Charon comes close, since the center of mass may be outside of Pluto's surface but not far from Pluto itself). However, such a "double planet" category for bodies in the solar system has not yet been established. I would think that a "double planet" would be a pair of nearly identical objects (say, with masses within 20% of being equal to each other) in orbit around each other. In the case of the Earth-moon system, the center of mass remains well inside the Earth (4671 km from the center of the Earth, or about 1707 km below the Earth's surface), so the moon for all intents and purposes, orbits the Earth and is not a planet. Clear skies to you. -- David W. Knisely Prairie Astronomy Club: http://www.prairieastronomyclub.org Hyde Memorial Observatory: http://www.hydeobservatory.info/ ********************************************** * Attend the 10th Annual NEBRASKA STAR PARTY * * July 27-Aug. 1st, 2003, Merritt Reservoir * * http://www.NebraskaStarParty.org * ********************************************** |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
What Planet Reflects Best ??
In message , David Knisely
writes Hi there. You posted: So Albedo measurements compliment magnitude, they do not replace it? Right, they are a "guide" of the mean reflectivity of the planetary surface as a whole, which is why some people use the term "planetary albedo" rather than just "albedo". Clear skies to you. Jeff Medkeff's web page I cited mentioned the albedo of quite small areas of the moon, and of course the magnitude (in the brightness sense) of a planet depends on its size and distance as well as the albedo. I haven't yet had time to do any searching or reading, but I'd guess that you can work out the albedo of a planet from "first principles", knowing its size and distance from the sun, and hence how bright it should be. Further, I'd guess that the albedo of the Earth was first measured by looking at the brightness of Earthshine on the Moon, and later refined by measurements from spacecraft. How am I doing? :-) -- "Roads in space for rockets to travel....four-dimensional roads, curving with relativity" Mail to jsilverlight AT merseia.fsnet.co.uk is welcome. Or visit Jonathan's Space Site http://www.merseia.fsnet.co.uk |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Sedna, space probes?, colonies? what's next? | TKalbfus | Policy | 265 | July 13th 04 12:00 AM |
PDF (Planetary Distance Formula) explains DW 2004 / Quaoar and Kuiper Belt | hermesnines | Astronomy Misc | 10 | February 27th 04 02:14 AM |
Hubble Helps Confirm Oldest Known Planet | Ron Baalke | Misc | 8 | July 13th 03 08:34 PM |
Astronomers Find Jupiter-Like Planet 90 Light Years Away | Ron Baalke | Astronomy Misc | 2 | July 5th 03 04:19 AM |
Astronomers Find Jupiter-Like Planet 90 Light Years Away | Ron Baalke | Misc | 2 | July 5th 03 04:19 AM |